No Endorsement: Uncommitted Mvmt. Won't Back Harris, Trump or Third Party as U.S. Arms Israel 

VERY WELL SAID!!

Honestly, what part is the lie about the 1200 dead and 250 hostages? Hamas doesn't even deny that.

Trump is pro Israel and ban om middle eastern from coming to America. If you have family coming to America you have to choose wisely and Indian are the 3rd largest illegal immigrants in America. Alot come through Canada

No it wont. Even if we stop giving them arms they will find a way to inflict harm. Lets not be naive please

soooooo what the world saw on alllllll platforms about oct 7th was a lie? do explain.

While spewing empty words

@@marymendez5879 I can't help but wonder if ""uncommitted" here isn't a STEALTH-DEMOCRAT operation. The undemocratic party has pulled a NUMBER of dirty tricks on the Green Party, and if Trump is a threat to us, BOTH PARTIES are a threat to us*, the people of Palestine, and people all around the world. * See Obama's NDAA/INDEFINITE DETENTION WITHOUT TRIAL! And "democrats' support for Cop Cities, where our cops are trained by ISRAEL' s cops! "We seek no wider war."- Lyndon Johnson. Lying and war and betraying workers are longstanding traditions with the "democratic" party. The Ruling Class owns BOTH of these parties, and uses them to keep us from having a REAL DEMOCRACY, that would INCLUDE at least one party of the working class MAJORITY, rather than DECEIVE and REPRESS on behalf of the "1%" ! With their betrayals of the environment, (Willow Project, Nordstream bombing, Gulf drilling permits...) and behind the scenes plotting to "carve up" Russia with their proxy war in Ukraine, now spilling into Russia!- ALL HUMANITY IS THREATENED with nuclear war! Watch "Mouseland", and understand we need OUR OWN PARTY, that is not CONTROLLED by ISRAELI MONEY along with "our" 1% !

You should be careful with your accusations of lying. It's one thing to lie, it's another to not tell all the truth.

@@johnwattdotca when that's done with intent, it's called a lie by omission

Who, Kamala?

Because if they don't then Isreal's feelings get hurt🙄 apparently they need a reminder that their genocide is valid I guess

@@locustproachin6052 keep talking apparently its working

Because Jews have money.

everytime they try that, they fail. And you get mad at Israel for being superior soldiers than the Palestinians. It’s silly.

@@60andover-timetotrain-join89 yup

She's the same as biden with a better memory. She will tow the line given to her. She will be a teleprompter president

You do know what a stump speech is, right? In today’s media, every word uttered especially by a presidential candidate is hyper-analyzed, and sticking to a script avoids that. Having to constantly fight such small fires diverts effort from the campaign.

Not Democracy Now! but we have US media that repeats a loop until we are all programmed to believe the lies these politicians spew. This is a strategy that politicians use. Repeat, repeat, repeat lies.

So she's supposed to say, I won't support the blue and white flag? She'll lose for sure. Better for her to get into office and then organize to press her to do the right thing. How naive of this woman to think otherwise.

Someone needs to call her out....frannkly I blame the journalists in the US today as much as I do the government.

How Dare she repeat the DEBUNKED LIE about rapes on October 7th??!!!!

Yeah she really has nothing to offer on the subject, just a vague stock line from the press briefing room. It's intolerable when so many are suffering in Gaza due to our weapons and paid with our taxes. It's sickening to me.

on what issue does she "sound" intelligent? The Significance of Time? What can be unburdened by what has been. Unburdened by Biden, Cheney, and public view. You are voting with Dick Cheney.

It literally pains me to hear Harris simply talk about ANYTHING.

I can feel you. She says "Okay lets unpack this" and then just talks about same crap, when the question was simple "where is Israel's line between aggression and defence".

Jill Stein is a Russian troll. No sane person would waste their vote on her

Because they believe in this flawed strategy that they can pressure the Democrats. I'm Muslim and I'm fed up with the "uncommitted" movement. Voting Stein or third party is NOT for Trump. It's a loud and clear message to Democrats that they don't deserve our votes. She talks about the broken system, but doesn't apparently believe in the long term strategy of investing in third party movements.

The first thing she says is that a third party candidate for president is not viable base on our electoral system. The second is that they want the Harris campaign to change its policy of blinders-on for what Israel is doing. The third is that Trump is a threat to Palestinian Americans and those who believe in democracy, the Bill of Rights and peaceful protest. So it may come down to a Hillary 2016 or Trump 2020 situation where voters of the respective parties left their presidential candidate's box empty. But there is still time for Harris to change.

This is the exact point. Yet, if you listen to those that in 2020 opposed Yang & Williamson and now will claim opposition to a 3rd party. They think "uncommitted " is viable and voting for the green party is a waste of their vote. If one can't see this is playing into getting the other war supporter elected, we all need reducation and stronger glasses. If you claim anti-war, stop the killing now or for future populations, the decision is about courage and different action. ✌️

I agree.I look at it this way.If you don't vote you lose the right to speak out against the results.

eh, honestly he prob will win the election.

I am not sure you can call the 1200 innocent victums...check into the facts. and who has a music fest next to the largest outdoor genocide camp...Innocent, come on...listen to the interviews from those living in Israel. One can not take and select the facts of choice, but must look into the entire picture, the entire history.

We are not blind or deaf to USA lies.

Let's not forget that this conflict did not start on October 7. It's been 75 years of ILLEGAL occupation, dispossession, killings, oppression, and censorship of Palestinians by Israel with full complicity and support of the good ol' USA. The vast majority of countries in the world support a real two-state solution. Just like with the apartheid in South Afrida, the US as a country is on the wrong side of history.

ZIONIST RU-vid deleting comments again

🇮🇱🇮🇱🇮🇱🇮🇱🇮🇱🇮🇱🇮🇱🇮🇱🇮🇱💥💥💥💥🇮🇱🇮🇱🇮🇱🇮🇱

Isaël commet des crimes de guerre chaque jour. Vous avez parfaitement raison, Monsieur. Usa sont complices en livrant des avions et des bombes équivalentes en nombre et explosivité aux deux 1ères bombes atomiques. Usa sont complices en interceptant et s'opposant à toutes les résolutions des Nations Unies à l'encontre d'israël. Le congrès américain a applaudi le criminel de guerre nitin Yahoo pour continuer son génocide. Les deux candidats à la présidence font la compétition à qui soutiendra le plus leur allié privilégié au lieu de se proposer de servir le peuple américain. C'est donc le système politique américain qui est sionisé jusqu'à la moelle. Les usa ne savent pas concevoir la paix dans le monde mais excellent à envenimer les relations internationales

No they don’t.

@@60andover-timetotrain-join89 Wrong

"There is no such thing as Palestine in history, absolutely not." -- Arab Princeton Professor, Philip Hitti, before the Anglo-American Committee of Inquiry in Jerusalem in 1946. In 1937, Secretary of the Arab Higher Committee to the British Peel Commission, Awni Abd al-Hadi stated: “There is no such country as Palestine. ‘Palestine’ is a term the Zionists invented.” "We [Palestinians] were never an independent state in history, we were part of an Arab state and an Islamic state.” -- Palestinian Hamas Foreign Minister Mahmoud Zahhar (quoted in The Economist, February 2, 2008) "Never forget this one point: There is no such thing as a Palestinian people, there is no Palestinian entity, there is only Syria. You are an integral part of the Syrian people, Palestine is an integral part of Syria." Syrian President Hafez al-Assad [Addressing the Chairman of the Palestine Liberation Organization Yasser Arafat during a meeting with leaders of the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) in 1976] Zahir Muhsein was a Palestinian leader of the pro-Syria As-Sa'iqa Ba'athist faction of the Palestine Liberation Organization between 1971 and 1979. In an interview with Trouw Magazine, 31. March 1977 he stated....."The Palestinian people do not exist. The creation of a Palestinian state is only a means for continuing our struggle against the state of Israel for our Arab unity. In reality today there is no difference between Jordanians, Palestinians, Syrians and Lebanese. Yes, the existence of a separate Palestinian identity exists only for tactical reasons. The establishment of a Palestinian state is a new tool to continue the fight against Israel and for Arab unity..........

its weird. She's playing on Israeli voters (the second largest group of zionists are in the US), and her AIPAC handlers (literally) - she s also focused on pulling in Republican votes.

@@FlanovaMeta Trump thanks you. Just wait to see what he does.

Yup 100x over

@@IsThisALongUserName HA! Evry1 that do not believe a 3rd party can win will most definitely get the surprise of their life when they see Jill steins count jumping higher and higher

@@miriamschiro8585stein will simply act as a spoiler for Trump.

😂😂 But you still voting for Kamala, right?

Keep speaking the truth!

People have had knee-jerk support for Israel for so long, that they can't see that the Netanyahu regime and war on Gaza is closer to Putin's regime and his invasion of Ukraine than to American values and international law.

I would add the American military experts who say exploding devices is smart, clever…like it is a game. This country is in decline.

Yeah, and this is what the US has been it's entire history.

I hate to be not picking but Israel killed a number of those people themselves. All tragic.

and its more like between 200,000-400,000 deaths, with many hundreds of thousands literally on the brink of death. How this gets rationalized I'll never understand.

Question to understand american votes: does uncommitted is the same as a "white" vote here in europe, meaning you're not voting for anyone?

@@ladyaf4716yes

SAME! LET'S GROW THE GREEN PARTY! NO TO GENOCIDE! 🍀🌻

Mehdi Hasan has been a huge disappointment.

Jill also has my vote!!

And yet Democracy Now still refuses to interview Jill Stein of the Green Party, who is the only anti-genocide candidate for American President. That's extremely disappointing, I heard that DN had sold out but I didn't believe it until now. I will never donate again, clearly the DNC is more important than Palestinian lives.

We have to get rid of the electoral college first.

Not just that but all the offices. If we had that we could be a four-party system, two left, two right. Any party gets off-track then there's an alternative for like-minded people.

@@sandal_thong8631 Let's not let the political right organize at all. There's no good reason for the pursuit of their goals to be legal in a civilized country

If you're not endorsing Harris you're effectively telling your electorate not to vote at all. THAT is truly a wasted vote. This is an unserious person

@BernieTime1 Better wake up. Both major parties are the same disease. Until we take our voice back, we are living in the illusion of Democracy. Democrats are not less evil. They just hide their fascism better. I was a Dem for 50 years. I woke up... finally. It's a tough reality to face! $$$ rules!

Yes and this arabic woman Lexis lied. She said to vote for none of the above and DO NOT VOTE FOR JILL BECAUSE IT HELPS TRUMP. LIAR. INSANE. She's using the Palestinians for political and financial gain. Shame on her. Unreal

You have to hold DNC puppets like Lexis accountable

Exactly! I was also a former lifelong diehard Democrat until this administration or actually until after October 7. It’s frustrating to know there’s a viable option with the green party and people like you said are too scared to do what’s right. It’s infuriating. But I’m voting Jill Stein this November. So glad to see other people are just as brave as I ✊🏾.

Jill Stein is not going to win. Thats a fact. Please use your vote effectively and stop trying to put this issue on the Democrats, is not. We might be able to sway Kamala easier when she is in power than Trump. That just makes more sense right now.

@@tsmilingatu If you're in one of the swing states and Trump wins, then I hope that works out for you.

That’s how im feeling. But the fact is SIGNIFICANT whereas green is on the ballot or write-in for all states except Georgia and Nevada (still fighting those I guess ). It’s not a small chance.

surrendering will get you peace...

Wake up. Nobody is getting a pony, your 3rd party stuff is just as good as Trump propaganda because anyone who votes for 3rd party votes for Trump. And if you think Harris will be hard on Palestine, you should read up on how Trump feels about them.

@@yawningpheonix I'm awake. I see that we survived 4 years of Trump and can survive 4 more. And I also see that the Biden admin has been enacting 2025 all over the country with cop cities. And I also see that there's an anti-interventionist wing in the GOP that is not existent in today's DNC. Why bow down to two evils when you can organize against both and vote in peace?

Jill Stein belongs in this context.

Trump thanks you. Just wait to see what he does.

She will never stop sending arms.

@@IsThisALongUserName What will he do? He can't send more arms then what the Democrats have been sending. He will support Israel to annex the West Bank and Gaza, but this is essentially what the Democrats are doing because they keep parroting the "two state solution" when they know that Israel will not allow that to happen. As far as support for Israel is concerned there is not much difference between the Democrats and the Republicans: Both are beholden to AIPAC!

She's not once advocated for a ceasefire - lie number 3 and the interview has just begun! She advocated for Netanyahu's version of a ceasefire.

The only way to defend that savagery is to repeat lies

@@ladyaf4716The rapes occurred. Your nonsense is dismissed.

@@ladyaf4716 If you repeat a lie long enough it becomes Israel.

@@60andover-timetotrain-join89send us the links

There have been no real witnesses or forensic evidence of rape. Their has been evidence of torture and rape in Israel jails. She is a war criminal and complicit.

And you think Trump would abandon Netanyahu? Are you high?

​​​@@Yahyia-cv3sxboth suck, both will supply weapons, 11+ months of genocide is currently happening under democrat Biden-Harris admin. Why vote for her or trump. She talks about ceasefire but says nothing to pressure it, just talk. They're both virtually the same on palestine.

take your med

​@@Yahyia-cv3sx Where did he say that?

@@oligarchies Is this evidence enough of Trump's views? He gave the Presidential Medal of Freedom to Sheldon Adelson's widow, who has stated about pro-Palestinian protesters: "Those ghastly gatherings of radical Muslim and Black Lives Matter activists, ultra-progressives and career agitators were nothing short of street parties. These people are not our critics. They are our enemies, the ideological enablers in the West of those who would go to any length to eradicate us from the Middle East. And, as such, they should be dead to us". She reportedly will contribute $90 million to a SuperPAC supporting Trump, and she "pledged more than $100 million to Trump’s campaign in exchange for US recognition of Israeli sovereignty over Palestinian territory West Bank, where there would be no Palestinian Authority or peace accord." (for references look up miriam adelson in wiki)

She is parroting the lies she has been conditioned to repeat over and over.

How many stein bots can there be

Agreed!

because votes for Jill Stein (she is good) will let Trump in - simples - your electoral system is flawed

@@JC-eu8rg Thousands, apparently.

​@@peterbreingan3181wrong, peeps wouldnt vote for Kamala Nazi if Stein wasnt an option numbnuts

But you will be complicit in 25 million immigrants being placed in concentration camps? Your moral righteousness is misplaced

A vote for Jill Stein _is_ complicity.

@@ITALJUTE THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR THIS!! Why cant they see that? They think they're morally superior or something.

Voting for Stein is voting for Trump. Good luck

@@mrdenson3101 Nope. I don’t “owe” anyone my vote. Earn it. “Not Trump” is not good enough. Tell you what. If the Democrats stop supporting, paying for what’s happening in occupied Palestine, despite all their other betrayals, I’ll vote for them. Have I raised the bar too high? All you gotta do is stop killing innocent people. Nothing else. Otherwise, with either Party, you support something that should be morally unacceptable to a normal human being. Look at it another way. How would you explain to a Palestinian person that your “logical”, “pragmatic” vote is, in all likelihood, going to kill them or someone they love? How would you explain that? Explain that, because your rights were in danger; they had to die. Explain Harris’ assertion that we will maintain and ensure that America’s military remains the most “lethal” in the world while supplying ever more lethal weapons to another country, while in a conflict with a nuclear near peer? Supporting two separate conflicts while some politicians are cheerleading for a conflict with China? No wonder we live in a country where we cannot even prevent our own children from being murdered in their own classroom, never mind children halfway around the world. LOTE voting brought us to this point. Time to demand better. There’s a butcher’s bill to be paid because of LOTE voters cowardice. Jill Stein 2024.

A vote for Stein is a vote for trump. Okay then.

@@norankpost2 100% WE DO NOT REWARD GENOCIDE. Vote Jill Stein please. A vote for Trump is a vote for Trump. A vote or Jill is a vote for Jill. A vote for neocon Harris is a vote for neocon Harris, PERIOD. If JILL loses, it's because her platform sucks CUZ LACK OF DONER MONEY, news media COVERAGE(a fried to leave the doubly)and there connection to establishment ,AIPAC SERPESES HER because she'd close there open tap on Israel.

​@@norankpost2A vote for Stein is a vote for Stein. A vote for Dem or Rep is a vote for genocide.

If they wanted our votes they would earn them and not try to motivate people out of fear

Because they're actually blue no matter who Democrats pretending to care. They are putting up a front to try and change Harris' mind (they won't) but in reality they're going to fall in line and vote for her. If they move toward Dr. Stein then they might join a movement that would replace the DNC with the Green Party and that terrifies them more than ending the genocide.

@conniefoss9382 You must feel important.

@@voidfire8824 Well, this worked wonders for Hillary in 2016 right? Specially when the sentiment of OP reflects the sentiment of over 700K uncommited voters, Biden only won in 2020 by 44K votes in swing states, do your math.

@@voidfire8824 Because belittleling voters worked wongers for Hillary in 2016 right? Specially when OP sentiment reflects that of over 700K uncommited voters.

If you think things would or will be better under a DT's administration you are dreaming In technicolor.

If she has lost your vote, then Trump has gained it.

Maybe she should do more than just pop up every 4 years hoping to jump to the top… she’s not even close to qualified, but Harris is.

@@zebontheweb Thank you for asserting that the two-party system should remain unquestioned within American discourse.

Let's GROW the Green Party! 🍀🌻A big Green vote share will send a strong message against genocide

@@zebontheweb nobody is qualified to be the president of the united states. It's not a job that any one person would have in an actual democracy

You do know Jill Stein is a Russian puppet, right?

So what you're saying is you'd vote for Trump if Stein were not running?

​@cms1381 I wouldn't vote for Trump if Stein was not running. If there was no 3rd or Green Party then I would write in "Uncommitted" or "Curious George and the Man with the Yellow Hat" or whatever.

Okay then. Glad that you are welcoming another Muslim ban Amy. One more trump presidency will bring an end to democracy and the end of Jill stein and the Green Party . I support the Palestinian cause but will never aid another trump presidency. Netanyahu is Israel’s Trump.

In other words a vote for trump. Okay then

​@@cms1381Wow, what a braindead reply.

We can put Harambe as the protest vote. You can write whatever you want. Idk what to put.

Write/call and request it!!! We all need to speak up waaaaaay more.

Kamala won't listen to anyone because of her ego. She knows all about the lines crossed and crimes committed and doesn't care.

They have. Harris is iron clad pro Israel and still repeating debunked lies about Palestinians - what makes you think she would actually change? She won't. She won't even meet with them....she didn't allow even ONE to speak at the DNC - a slap in the face - thats when I turned against her. She doesn't even believe in democratic process.

She sucks. I've listened to every policy. She is a republican - her campaign, and its working to a degree - is to pull in disenchanted republicans - however I know a few previously uncommitted, or green party, are choosing to vote for him for one simple reason. They want the right to protest - even though that is in many ways getting removed under a democratic government, the fear is trump will literally pummel free speech and make it impossible. Interesting reason.

what gets me is no journalists are calling it out. To me thats criminal journalism - and they need to hear from us. They get tons of feedback from israelis, zero from people against the genocide, the lies....fact - we need to become activists and start calling out joiurnalists on this and so much more.

try watching footage of the genocide, it will change you.

The third parties are useless.

As opposed to the other two? 🫢

​@@TomT-bo1yrFair, they're also useless😂

Kick out the deep state Zionist run Government and you will find peace around the world 🌎🌍! Period! But that isn't possible because they run everything! Including RU-vid

The green party are a bunch of people who talk loud and say nothing and do less.

It has never been a true democracy. However, a vote for anybody other than Harris is a vote for Trump.

Ignorant take. Voting 3rd party serves no purpose. Especially a 3rd party that has zero local, state or congressional presence (like the Green Party and its Russian backing). That has nothing to do with the problem. Billionaires being able to create super pacs and support candidates is the problem. Groups like AIPAC, NRA, etc being able to dictate policy to the politicians they own is the problem. Politicians being able to own stock is the problem (20 billion goes to Israel, politicians buy stock in military industries, Israel buys weapons, stocks go up, politicians get richer) is the problem. This isn’t Europe.

Thank you and yes.

Yeah and if DN platformed the other parties there would be more support. Amy and Co just want DNC adoration and monied support from shitlibs😮

Holy Shit, you literally sound like liberals. You recognize that, do you?

💯✌️

They will lose and trump will give us another Muslim ban.

because we don't want Trump/Vance.

With full respect for your vote, and Jill Stein....because many simply know she won't win, and do their idea of the lesser of two evils. Its a bummer. I hope someday we can create a system where Jill Stein part of debates, om every states voting, a major presenter at the DNC, etc....some of the uncommitted vote is a vote against the DNC

STEIN IS A GRFTER AND HAS ZERO CHANCE OF WINNING

"There is no such thing as Palestine in history, absolutely not." -- Arab Princeton Professor, Philip Hitti, before the Anglo-American Committee of Inquiry in Jerusalem in 1946. In 1937, Secretary of the Arab Higher Committee to the British Peel Commission, Awni Abd al-Hadi stated: “There is no such country as Palestine. ‘Palestine’ is a term the Zionists invented.” "We [Palestinians] were never an independent state in history, we were part of an Arab state and an Islamic state.” -- Palestinian Hamas Foreign Minister Mahmoud Zahhar (quoted in The Economist, February 2, 2008) "Never forget this one point: There is no such thing as a Palestinian people, there is no Palestinian entity, there is only Syria. You are an integral part of the Syrian people, Palestine is an integral part of Syria." Syrian President Hafez al-Assad [Addressing the Chairman of the Palestine Liberation Organization Yasser Arafat during a meeting with leaders of the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) in 1976] Zahir Muhsein was a Palestinian leader of the pro-Syria As-Sa'iqa Ba'athist faction of the Palestine Liberation Organization between 1971 and 1979. In an interview with Trouw Magazine, 31. March 1977 he stated....."The Palestinian people do not exist. The creation of a Palestinian state is only a means for continuing our struggle against the state of Israel for our Arab unity. In reality today there is no difference between Jordanians, Palestinians, Syrians and Lebanese. Yes, the existence of a separate Palestinian identity exists only for tactical reasons. The establishment of a Palestinian state is a new tool to continue the fight against Israel and for Arab unity...................................

100% WE DO NOT REWARD GENOCIDE. Vote Jill Stein please. A vote for Trump is a vote for Trump. A vote or Jill is a vote for Jill. A vote for neocon Harris is a vote for neocon Harris, PERIOD. If JILL loses, it's because her platform sucks CUZ LACK OF DONER MONEY, news media COVERAGE(a fried to leave the doubly)and there connection to establishment ,AIPAC SERPESES HER because she'd close there open tap on Israel.

Not voting sends a message, it says we refuse to play the game.

@@kina8786 100% WE DO NOT REWARD GENOCIDE. Vote Jill Stein please. A vote for Trump is a vote for Trump. A vote or Jill is a vote for Jill. A vote for neocon Harris is a vote for neocon Harris, PERIOD. If JILL loses, it's because her platform sucks CUZ LACK OF DONER MONEY, news media COVERAGE(a fried to leave the doubly)and there connection to establishment ,AIPAC SERPESES HER because she'd close there open tap on Israel.

​@@kina8786 how does people voting third party not send that same message?

@@mtstash It was response to OP’s “If you don’t vote for anyone, then you’re not sending a message,” not a claim that that voting 3rd party doesn’t.”

Totally disagree. It's pure "my way or the high way" from that movement. And they couldn't even produce a candidate. They are an extreme minority in the party and a disgrace.

I agree. Minuscule chance of winning does not mean it's not a viable choice. Having a platform indistinguishable from Republicans on support for Israel is a losing strategy for Dems, and they should be defeated for taking that stance. If they want to know how to get their voters back, they need only look at the policies on the spoiler platform Supposedly democracy is at stake and we only have one valid choice to prevent it. That doesn't sound like a choice at all. It's a protection racket.

It isn’t. Green Party should build from bottom up. Stop focusing on the presidency. Unless of course you want a Muslim ban.

Trump thanks you. Just wait to see what he does.

If you actually care about the outcome (which is the whole point), then 3rd parties are not viable for a national election, not in the system as it is currently. Even when they win the majority of the vote, the Dems still often don't win the presidency, or control of either the House/Senate, or even control of state house/senate. A 3rd party might have a chance in a local/state election, if the state isn't gerrymandered that is. Elections are a game, and we play by the rules as they currently are, or we are not doing what we can to prevent what we see as the worst outcome. That is the choice before us.

you must be nuts. harris banned even one Palestinian to speak at the DNC. She refused to even meet after promising a meeting. She doesn't support Palestinians, listen to her when she talks, and stop wishing.

Chomsky ran with Epstein, then dismissed calls to explain his relationship with him. Not sure why everyone still venerates him.

If you don't vote Democrat then you might as well be voting Republican in the Republicans are going to be way worse Trump will give Netanyahu carte blanche you can do whatever he wants and Trump will tell you to stick your head up your butt

Chomsky refused to explain his relationship with 3pstein. He does not deserve the veneration he gets.

@@innocentnemesis3519 You’re not correct. He said exactly what it was. Look it up

@@innocentnemesis3519 Then stop spreading the duopoly’s misinformation for them

🍀🌻🍀

100%

Spread the word on as many posts as you can! We have to let people know that we have an option, besides those two corrupt parties!!

💯💪💪

Ditto

Better than a war criminal and a convicted felon.

Note that the Uncommitted Movement is still affiliated with the DNC. Their 'compromise' is to try to sell voters on not voting at all.

She won't win 😢😢😢

I truly respect and admire Jill Stein. That said, a vote for Jill Stein in the upcoming general election is nothing more than virtue signaling. Why? Because there is zero chance of her winning and every vote for her is really a vote for Trump. I despise the Biden/Harris/Walz stance on Palestine, but Trump would be far worse. If Harris wins, the fight for Palestinian liberation can continue. If Trump wins it's game over for democracy. Period.

@@Emma.E.Emerson I know- it’s a protest vote. It’s a disaster whoever wins so might as well protest.

More and more people are finding out and helping to change the tide. Also, there will be a debate between all 3rd party candidates that will get the word out. Hosted by free and equal in October.

Let's say the Uncommitted Movement is 100% successful. That means nobody votes for Harris but everybody who does vote votes for Trump. How is that a win for anybody?

I would not be surprised if Trump rounds up Arabs, Persians, any Moslems. Go ahead and vote for Jill Stein. That would hand the Presidency to Trump. Good luck with that.

No. If you vote for harris its for domestic. Both are pro genocide. I don't get how some can't hear her statements are quite direct where he alliance is.

A vote shouldn't weigh on your moral conscience. I'm morally against the death penalty, but if none of the candidates are against the death penalty, then what should I do, vote 3rd party? If that means that the election is won by a gung-ho supporter of the death penalty from the GOP over a Dem candidate that would be more judicious in applying the death penalty? If you knowingly voted 3rd party, when you know the stances of the Dem/GOP party candidates, then by the same logic, shouldn't that vote weigh on your conscience? Even if it weighed on my conscience, I'd still have to vote for the Dem in that situation because at the end of the day I just want fewer people will die. That is why I vote Harris despite my view that the US should stop offensive arms sales to Israel.

Cute little Muslim ban while hundreds of thousands of whole families have been whipped from existence and millions more are starving because of kamala.. and what did we get from kamala full support of this madness. Kamala has 45 days, ban the export of weapons and implement UN resolutions which is the extremely bare minimum to end this madness. She has 45 days . Clock is ticking otherwise she is sleep walking us into WW3

You mean like the 9 years of free media DJT got?

BS. She is campaigning....Biden is in full dementia - someone else is running the show. Don't be deluded this admin pays any attention to civics or laws - we are the biggest law breakers in the world. Literally.

Alternate reality and Arab fantasies

What a bunch of self-serving nonsense you've written. Here let me simplify it for you. If you throw a punch at somebody you should expect to punch to come back at you. That's it. Hamas had plans for attack but no plans to defend their people. Hezbollah have plans for attack but no plans to defend their people. Here's the bottom line nobody cares about the Palestinians. Not the Gulf Nations, not the Islamic Nations and frankly I don't see any other nations coming to the rescue here. When their own brothers and sisters in Islam will not come to help the Palestinians what does that say? Most Americans can't stand Israel and yet we help them because well we're allies(for now) who's coming to help the Palestinians? Truth hurts.

​@@hcmd886agreed.🙄

Christendom was always an empirial religion, born under the auspices of constantine, the subjects were converted at the edge of the sword and rendered into slaves for his majesty, often referring to him as their lord. In Islam such slavery is unthinkable. The only lordship is that of the creator, no station into which man was brought into the lands of Islam was to any degree as bad as the repugnant chattel slavery brought by the primitive tribalism inherent in their texts, for example, The word עוֹלֵל, ʿôlēl which means 'Babe, infant, little one, a suckling' occurs 21 King James Bible Verses Of these verses: “Happy shall he be, that taketh and dasheth thy little ones against the stones.” -Psalm 137:9 “Now go and smite Amalek, and utterly destroy all that they have, and spare them not; but slay both man and woman, infant and suckling, ox and sheep, camel and ass.”-1 Samuel 15:3 “Samaria shall become desolate; for she hath rebelled against her God: they shall fall by the sword: their infants shall be dashed in pieces, and their women with child shall be ripped up.”-Hosea 13:16 The other verses are not much different. Infact it is always in association with violence. Indeed these verses are the reason why in the Crusades the sense of pious rejoicing at massacre does not appear to be the product of later theologizing; it is also found, in the account of the eye-witness Raymond of Aguilers: “in the Temple and porch of Solomon, men rode in blood up to their knees and bridle reins. Indeed, it was a just and splendid judgment of God that this place should be filled with the blood of the unbelievers, since it had suffered so long from their blasphemies.” In fact, Raymond continues, “This day, I say, will be famous in all future ages, for it turned our labours and sorrows into joy and exultation; this day, I say, marks the justification of all Christianity, the humiliation of paganism, and the renewal of our faith.” Another account by a chronicler and eyewitness-priest, Albert of Aachen, describes the killing of fleeing women, and depicts crusaders as:: “seizing [infants who were still suckling] by the soles of their feet from their mothers’ laps or their cradles…and dashing them against the walls or lintels of the doors and breaking their necks […] they were sparing absolutely no gentile of any age or kind.”The incoherence inherent in a stranger to Abraham calling the children of Abraham gentiles notwithstanding, this account evokes the very same Psalm 137:9 imprecation against Babylon, in Latin, “beatus qui tenebit et adlidet parvulos tuos ad petram.” Albert describes a massacre occurring, in cold blood, on the second day following the conquest, painting a scene that is as horrific as it is realistic and detailed: "Girls, women, matrons, tormented by fear of imminent death and horror-struck by the violent murder wrapped themselves around the Christians’ bodies in the hope to save their lives, even as the Christians were raving and venting their rage in murder of both sexes. Some threw themselves at their feet, begging them with pitiable weeping and wailing for their lives and safety. When children five or three years old saw the cruel fate of their mothers and fathers, of one accord they stepped up the weeping and pitiable clamour. But they were making these signals for pity and mercy in vain. For the Christians gave over their whole hearts to murder, so that not a suckling little male-child or female, not even an infant of one year would escape the hand of the murderer". Evoking several of these verses in practice: - (Num 31:17-18) Now therefore kill every male among the little ones, and kill every woman that hath known man by lying with him. But all the women children, that have not known a man by lying with him, keep alive for yourselves. - (Deut 7:2, 9:3, Num 21) thou shalt smite them, and utterly destroy them; thou shalt make no covenant with them, nor shew mercy unto them... - (Ezek 9:6) Slay utterly old [and] young both maids and little children and women: but come not near any man upon whom [is] mark begin at my sanctuary. This is the polar opposite in the Quran in Surah Al-Tanwir, literally "The Englightenining" Surah, Aya 8-9, we have the death of a newborn is mentioned amongst the penultimate signs of the end of times, emphasizing the gravity of such an action. That child, now resurrected, is asked for what wrong doing was she murdered. This is to emphasize that she had done nothing wrong, for she had done nothing wrong and this is the day of retribution where those who omitted the evil are to be punished. This is the polar opposite in the Qur'an, Surah Al-Baqara Aya 190, which exhorts to fight unbelievers and not be "Aggressors", in the commentary of what it means to be aggressors, this was stated Al-Hasan Al-Basri stated that transgression (indicated by the Ayah): "includes mutilating the dead, theft (from the captured goods), killing women, children and old people who do not participate in warfare, killing priests and residents of houses of worship, burning down trees and killing animals without real benefit." This is also the opinion of Ibn `Abbas, `Umar bin `Abdul-`Aziz, Muqatil bin Hayyan and others. Muslim recorded in his Sahih that Buraydah narrated that Allah's Messenger said: "Fight for the sake of Allah and fight those who disbelieve in Allah. Fight, but do not steal, commit treachery, mutilate, or kill a child, or those who reside in houses of worship." It is reported in the Two Sahihs that Ibn `Umar said, "The Prophet forbade killing women and children." بابتداء القتال أو بقتال من نهيتم عن قتاله من النساء والشيوخ والصبيان والذين بينكم وبينهم عهد أو بالمثلة أو بالمفاجأة من غير دعوة "To kill those whom you were forbidden to from women, elderly, children and those whom betwixt you is a treaty or custom or by surprise or without cause" -Tafsir Al-Zamakshari of the meaning of Aggressors in the Aya More hadith from Musannaf Ibn Abi Shaybah: حَدَّثَنَا حُمَيْدُ بْنُ عَبْدِ الرَّحْمَنِ، عَنْ شَيْخٍ، مِنْ أَهْلِ الْمَدِينَةِ مَوْلَى لِبَنِي عَبْدِ الْأَشْهَلِ، عَنْ دَاوُدَ، عَنْ عِكْرِمَةَ، عَنِ ابْنِ عَبَّاسٍ أَنَّ النَّبِيَّ صَلَّى اللهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ كَانَ إِذَا بَعَثَ جُيُوشَهُ قَالَ: «§لَا تَقْتُلُوا أَصْحَابَ الصَّوَامِعِ» "Do not kill the dwellers of monasteries" حَدَّثَنَا ابْنُ فُضَيْلٍ، عَنْ جُوَيْبِرٍ، عَنِ الضَّحَّاكِ قَالَ: كَانَ «§يُنْهَى عَنْ قَتْلِ الْمَرْأَةِ، وَالشَّيْخِ الْكَبِيرِ» سَعْدٍ قَالَ: «§نَهَى رَسُولُ اللَّهِ صَلَّى اللهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ عَنْ قَتْلِ النِّسَاءِ وَالذُّرِّيَّةِ، وَالشَّيْخِ الْكَبِيرِ الَّذِي لَا حَرَاكَ بِهِ» "The prophet forbids the killing of women, children, and the elderly" This is the polar opposite in the Qur'an, Surah Al-Anfal Ayah 61 in which even oath breaking deniers/unbelievers are allowed to sue for peace states if the unbelievers they ask for peace, give it to them. Stephen Langton, the writer of the Magna Carta (12th century, contemporary with the crusades for a reason) studied in the university of Paris which archives show had plenty of Arabic treatises in its procession, there can be no question about it being inspired by the "Sharia". both the renessiance and the european enlightenment were directly preceded by massive translation movements form Arabic (see the Republic of Letters by Alexander Bevilacqua, The House of Wisdom: How the Arabs Transformed Western Civilization By: Jonathan Lyons. The modifiable testament testament commands indiscriminate killing, genocide, plunder, mutilation, enslavement, or torture of enemies, including women, on the other hand.Surah Al-Baqara Aya 190 limits war to those who fight against Muslims, prohibits transgression, and implies respect for human dignity and life Indeed it is what precedes the famous "sword verse", always cited out of context. God did bring down the Qur’an, Mohamed is his Messenger.

Surah Al-Imran Aya 49, of the Quran states that jesus was sent to the israelites, although written over 1,300 years ago in the 19th century (same century bible was only transtalted into Arabic in as well) they came to the same conclusion, He never used or heard the words Christian or Christianity or any equivalent of either. Paul had neither met nor seen Jesus, his relation to the twelve apostles was one of decided independence and even of opposition. He acknowledged no subordination to them. He addressed no doctrinal epistle to them or their churches, and received none from them. He made no reports to them. He did not correspond with them regularly. They never invited him to preach to their congregations and he never invited them to address his converts. He declared that he did not owe his conversion, his baptism, or his doctrine to the twelve, and that he never spent any long time in Jerusalem or in Judea as a Christian missionary. He claimed to be an apostle by a secret divine commission, but the twelve never admitted the validity of his claim. They never gave him the title of apostle; they never said anything indicative of willingness to admit him into their councils. Vacancies occurred in their number, but they never chose him to a vacant place, rather we have statements of Peter with regards to Paul which show nothing but animosity: "And if our Jesus appeared to you also and became known in a vision and met you as angry with an enemy [recall: Paul had his vision while still persecuting the Christians: Acts 9], yet he has spoken only through visions and dreams or through external revelations. But can anyone be made competent to teach through a vision? And if your opinion is that that is possible, why then did our teacher spend a whole year with us who were awake? How can we believe you even if he has appeared to you?… But if you were visited by him for the space of an hour and were instructed by him and thereby have become an apostle, then proclaim his words, expound what he has taught, be a friend to his apostles and do not contend with me, who am his confidant; for you have in hostility withstood me, who am a firm rock, the foundation stone of the Church" -Homily 17 Section XIX On the pauline credo currently called trinitanity Peter said "For some from among the Gentiles have rejected my lawful preaching and have preferred a lawless and absurd doctrine to the man who is my enemy. And indeed some have attempted, while I am still alive, to distort my words by interpretations of many sorts, as if I taught the dissolution of the law… But that may God forbid ! For to do such a thing means to act contrary to the Law of God which was made to Moses and was confirmed by our Lord in its everlasting continuance. For he said, “The heaven and the earth will pass away, but not one jot or one tittle shall pass away from the Law.” -Letter of Peter to James, 2.3-5 Soon after Jesus had selected his twelve apostles, according to Luke, he " gave them power and authority over all devils and to cure diseases. And he sent them to preach the kingdom of God, and to heal the sick. And he said unto them: 'Take nothing for your journey, neither staves nor scrip, neither bread, neither money; neither have two coats apiece. And whatsoever house ye enter, there abide and thence depart. And whosoever will not receive you, when ye go out of that city shake off the very dust from your feet for a testimony against them." This is the entire charge of Jesus to his apostles when he sent them out to convert the world, as reported by Luke, who claims to give the address or a portion of it, and that presumably the most important portion, word for word. The language here attributed to Jesus conveys no idea that he had any purpose of founding a new church. Neither here nor anywhere else, in the language attributed to him in the New Testament, does he explain the phrase " the kingdom of God " to mean a new ecclesiastical organization. In several passages he does use it to signify the celestial dominion after the destruction of the world; and this is therefore presumably its meaning everywhere. The gospel of Matthew is much further than that of Luke in its report of the charge of Jesus to his apostles: "These twelve Jesus sent forth and commanded them, saying: 'Go not into the way of the Gentiles, and into any city of the Samaritans enter ye not; but go rather to the lost sheep of the house of Israel.", "Think not that I am come to send peace on earth; I am come not to send peace, but a sword. For I am come to set a man at variance against his father, and the daughter against her mother... He that receiveth a prophet in the name of a prophet, shall receive a prophet's reward; and he that receiveth a righteous man shall receive a righteous man's reward." This charge, as reported by Matthew omitted nearly all the main ideas that would have been appropriate in an address instructing the twelve to preach the foundation of Christianity. It does not say whether Jesus wished to reform or to supersede Judaism; whether his principal purpose was ecclesiastical, moral, political, or sanitary. The remarks about healing the sick and casting out devils is the most explicit of all the instructions. Certainly no reader can learn from that charge that Jesus intended to establish a new religion; and much less can he learn any feature of the faith or discipline of a projected new church. And this address is that portion of the New Testament where such information should be given most clearly. He made no doctrinal definition and no ecclesiastical organization. He did not use the key words of the original doctrines necessary to Christianity or a new church, nor the keywords of ideas afterwards associated with Christianity, such as Incarnation, Trinity, Immaculate Conception, and Transubstantiation. The subjects to which the most space or most prominence is given in the sayings attributed, in the gospels, to Jesus, are, First, the Mosaic law; Second, judgment day; Third, faith; Fourth, the sins of the Pharisees; Fifth, ascetic morality; and Sixth, his divine commission. Triune nonsense is straight out of the Roman Pantheon. Hercules, anyone? Cerberus? The trinity of Zeus, Athena Apollo, literally called the Triune. Greek goddess Hecate was portrayed in triplicate, a three-in-one. This was all done to make the creed more digestible, followed by mental gymnastics attempting to reconcile the onsensical with elaborate theories. Why doesn't a square peg fit into a round hole? Answer by saying it's a mystery instead of geometries not lining up. No such thing as the bible, the new testament is a concoction of several books that were deemed canonical, books written in Greek that were given the hellenized names of Apotsles who neither wrote, nor spoke greek to give it an illusion of antiquity, much like the calendar we have today, which was established in the year 535 CE by Dionysus Exegesis so too was the original message altered to that of the pauline credo, a digestible religion to the yet to be converted greeks who had no desire to follow the mosaic laws. There never was such another epidemic of ecclesiastical forgery. The church was flooded with books attributed falsely to apostolic times and authors. The names of many of these books, and the texts of some, are preserved. Distinguished saints and learned fathers of the faith openly commended the invention and acceptance of false- hoods designed to aid the conversion of the world to what they believed to be truth. None of the disciples spoke of trinity, ate pork or proclaimed it is allowable to do so, yet the miracle begotten paul, whom peter called him enemy, introduced his new creed according to his whims It proclaimed the abrogation of the Mosaic ceremonial law. It announced itself as a new and independent religion; calling its adherents Christians, and their doctrine Christianity. Rationality was only born with Islam, those who cannot count have nothing to say, at the end of the day 1+1+1 will never equal 1 God did bring down the Qur’an, Mohamed is his Messenger.

The lesser of two evils doesn't apply to genocide.

and neither does voting for the status quo. Democrats wont move and proven they wont listen to the people and yet you think voting for them achieves something? Wrong. These aren't protest votes. These are morally aligned votes. Which you argue the same for Harris, then you have shit character

@@traviscutler9912 Yes, it does. If Germany had voted in Mr. Half-as-murderous-as-Hitler-yet-otherwise-equivalent-to-Hitler, there'd at least be millions of jews that didn't have to die.