What model of Dodge do you plan to tune? 🔧 Building a fast car? Get $400 OFF the all-inclusive VIP package deal: hpcdmy.co/dodgeann 🏎 Get 50% off your first EFI tuning course. Enrol instantly: hpcdmy.co/annefi TIME STAMPS: 0:00 - Artificial Neural Network | ANN 0:27 - HP Tuners ANN Trainer 0:39 - What Is An Artificial Neural Network? 1:33 - Why Not Just Use VE? (Volumetric Efficiency) 2:25 - Fudging The Numbers = Band-Aid 2:42 - More Fudging = Also Band-Aid 3:25 - Not The Only Options! 4:20 - VE Neural Network Trainer 5:40 - 25 x VE Tables VCM Editor 🤯 6:04 - 5.7L HEMI V8 Cam Setup 7:00 - VCM Scanner Logs Vs Editor Tables 8:00 - Just A Demonstration | Making Changes 9:00 - VE Table Visualization 9:12 - Using ANN Trainer 10:27 - Tuning Change Results 11:20 - Graph Data Comparisons | Narrowband Sensor Data 12:05 - Power Enrichment | Wideband Sensor Data 12:56 - Full Dodge Tuning Example Using HP Tuners
That’s why when you take your time and do a tune correct. And set all the scalings and compensations correct. It will run like stock or way better, but use the stock parameters rescaled for the new power level. Tuning this way can yield great benefits.
Thank you HPA for getting into Gen3 Hemi tuning. I purchased the module INSTANTLY as soon as I saw it available. While I've not gotten into it yet because my buddy's 6.4L Apache is still coming together - I fully trust y'all to lay out it there in a credible way. There is very little credible intel out there on tuning these PCMs. Anyone decent at it is fully unwilling to share details. I was dreading having to muddle my way through it solo. Keep up the good work.
I once started developing my own nn to use as a plant model to than tune my pid boost control, didn't end all that well as my dataset wasn't big enough so the network got very biased and was having big errors in verification datasets, but seeing it's used in the industry as a defacto control strategy it gives me a confidence boost to retry it 😊
I’m a HVAC controls engineer I’ve been thinking about ways to automate PID controls for ages, but because the process happens incredibly slowly vs say a PLC PID tune it’s hard to implement and I still do it by feel
My main question is why? VE tables of 5, 10 etc has not been nothing new in many European ecu's for the last 10 years, maybe more. Why the added complexity? Is easier for the oem to tune? And i thought Bosch was the king of overcomplicating things. If someone can shed a light on this.
very easy. For the factory it is reducing complexity. The OEMs are absolutely not interested in supporting us. The view of the development: Instead of calibrating 25x maps (in which around 40% of data is not used while driving normally) by hand on a very expensive test bench, with a more expensive stuff spending thousands of hours (different temperature, humility, dust etc.) they use a very stupid and dump ANN, run this engine for 1month with the self-calibration ANN to have basic data and the rest of calibration is done by the customer himself during his driving. Very genius solution! --> and yes I hate it!
You should if it what telling you was worth a vip membership hook me up with one. And buld a manachice cource with litature along with you tunner couece and get couages have your people train people on training teachers that can have teaching your cources at multi colleges and meep doing youtube videos and get your colldge coudrse and teaching teachers inperson clases andvsince they knowageable on manachenics already you jusft expande the knowage to the whole car and diesel inderesty and if this possable new money source was worth a vip membershil and you end up making it super rich i happy for you all i want the membership give kf it makes you that amount mjnus expencives i only want it if i helped you and kt made you the amount that it membedship costed
