@@justint7460 No, what's left of their younger forces. If the Russians are unable to kick Ukraine out of Kursk, how do you suppose the NK's will be able to do it? To be frank, if Russia and its Korean mates seem to be significantly getting the upper hand then it will be all hands on with NATO. That will end in disaster for Russia. The tricky part will be confining the conflict in its current theatre, and preventing it going nuclear. That's a separate debate.
@@WarrenCromartie2 I don't think NATO will intervene in Ukraine. They can't according to their doctrine anyway, but I think you'd see countries dropping out of the alliance at the prospect of a war with Russia.
If we had treated this war in Ukraine like we should have at the beginning, our stocks wouldn't be down 90% and the Russians wouldn't have learned how to do combined arms. The lesson of warfare is you go all in or don't go in at all. The worst possible situation is what we're doing now and did in Vietnam.
@@boink800 the global economy has never been as big as it is today, and the USA commands a large part of that growth. So it's probably not as simple as the op is making it out to be.
I’m still waiting to hear that S. Korea is prepared to do more than just “consider” sending military aid directly to Ukraine. S. Korea could turn this entire war around in Ukraine’s favor if they were to choose to do more than just sit on their butts and watch from afar as Ukraine fights their (S. Korea’s) mortal enemy, North Korea. I’m disappointed and very angry at S. Korea’s lack of action.
Well you can be mad as you want but S.Korea diddn't ask North Korea to fight Ukraine? And S.Korea did already a lot to help Ukraine and Poland by sending for example K-9 Tanks with ammo etc.
So we keep talking, and talking, and talking. And expressing "deep concern". And talking. Instead of taking decisive actions to defeat this Kremlin scourge.
Russia is a country with the largest landmass, yet still want more. Furthermore the Russian people seem okay with further conquest. The reason I won't feel sorry for them in the aftermath of what may come.
NK has now fired an intercontinental missile and its obvious that Russia has helped them with technology. So are we just going to keep talking or actually do something about it?
@@Sabrina_wotb no, the comparison is facile; NATO armies have big budgets so can afford to perform more realistic training and more often - they have fuel for their tanks/AFV's and helicopters, whereas North Korea must pretend as they have little fuel to use.
They have the troops but need weapons and ammo and the permission to use them. And cannot even get that. It infuriates me as an American living in Kyiv.
The only country outside NATO that has provided any worthwhile military aid to Ukraine is Australia, and it’s outdoing plenty of NATO countries. In that sense the Russians are correct in that most of the world isn’t interested in the war Putin started, additionally most countries are glad of cheaper energy from Russia too. So perhaps NATO needs to take a long hard look at itself about its capabilities and relevance and what the defeat of Ukraine means.
The question is can the north Koreans adapt to a technological war, do the understand what a drone actually is, can they trouble shoot equipment on the fly and set up signal jammers.
Robert, excellent! Kate is a consummate professional. Might I add, oh Kate, oh Kate! The paradigm is in its final chapter, war is only a part of that. Get a dog and pet it. Everything that has a beginning, has an end. This time, it's our turn
Surely if NK enters Ukraine as NK troops and not as mercenaries then this changes the whole aspect of the Invasion. Maybe OK if NK troops stay in Russia
I suspect the North Koreans asked Russia to allow their troops to take part just to get some battle experience. It should be a bit of a jolly for them, fighting against tired, poorly trained and demoralised Ukraine forces.
The idea that North Korean troops are any good at combined arms maneuver warfare as proposed by Robert Fox is a complete joke - the country has barely any fuel for use in large military exercises that are needed for the army to practice with. Mr Fox has some insightful analysis, but that assessment is way off.
This is a joke, there is no a single evidence(video, photographic or other evidence). However, to comment non confirmed story, whole episodes and podcasts etc.. is behind any common sense. Commentator, pointed out , that “NK troops are well trained , but poorly fed and special forces at the same time. I have never, ever heard about hungry special forces.. This interview does not make lot of sense. Like Michael Clark and other guy, Barros I believe is his name
There are so many military experts on here, & none of you even have a clue what's really going on. Who started this fracas & who is really winning? I'll tell you who, sorry, I mean what is winning, conflict is.
I am not supporting war but allies mean helping when needed so korea sending to Russia is friendly.we common people know nato is also sending intelligence in Ukraine. You people only talk about war cannot you talk of peace talk. Peace talk is best solution. We common people know nato is using Ukraine people for it's benefit not Ukraine but Ukraine people don't understand it.
Nope it was Russian imperial delusions that started the war. And NATO isn't at war so I'm not sure how you think they can lose a war they aren't even in.
@geoffmolloy4264 so, were all those Ukrainians who was taken from steets, and sent to front lines, trained to fight Russian experienced troops? 😅😅😅😅 That's why you can say hello to Russian Selidovo, Kurachovo and Pokrovsk🤓
