NOUVELLE THEOLOGIE, DE LUBAC & RADICAL ORTHODOXY BY SIMON OLIVER 

At around 9 minutes he says something like ‘radical orthodoxy sees a demise in what’s known as the metaphysics of participation’. Is that just a slip of the tongue because I thought radical orthodoxy was very much in favour of the metaphysics of participation? Any clarification would be much appreciated, thanks!

Small wonder why the VATICAN and RC clergy are in such confusion.

The book, Heavenly Participation: The Weaving of a Sacramental Tapestry, by Hans Boersma comes to mind when I listen to this.

That's because Boerma's book is based on the Nouvelle Theologie. Boersma has a much more in depth on these theologians called Nouvelle Theologie and Sacramental Ontology.

In sum, pantheism.

I had no idea about this before reading you are gods by DBH, watching this beforehand would have helped

Sacramentality /symbol goes , I think, a bit beyond what is indicated here. The symbol IS what it signifies and participates in that reality. The created order might signify the creator but is not the creator or a sort of pantheism.

3:03

And just like communists, the vatican 2 Nouvelle Theologie proponents say, the theory is perfect but the implimentation was not.

Amazonian Synod much?

Hahahaha... The so-called "resourcement" was just a facade for heresy. They used apriorism, real manualism to justify their heresies...

The Neoplatonist tradition I think is far more sound than any kind of Thomism, I love St. Thomas as a SAINT but his philosophy was rather based on I hate to say it, the empirical logic of Aristotle that is rather well...rationalistic and not Mystical or based on any good arguments for Catholicism. Mind you I'm no Eastern Orthodox because there certainly are as many Christian Platonists in the West as there are in the East. Suffice to say in my view the Thomist tradition led to subjectivist Errors in the Catholic Faith, and maybe even Protestantism.

Fantastic explanation. Thank God for the emergence of a theology which is actually nothing more than a return to the proper perspective. Neo-scholastic theology, even if harmless, did an a great job of sucking the wonder and majesty out of revelation and the mystery of the incarnation and God's eternal union with man.