Тёмный

Nuclear Fusion on Earth: ITER vs Sun 

Net Zero Tech
Подписаться 2,7 тыс.
Просмотров 620
50% 1

Is nuclear fusion at ITER and other reactors different to fusion in the core of the sun? “Harnessing the power of the sun.” Headlines like these might be misleading. In this video, you’ll learn why. Enjoy!
ru-vid.com?su...
0:00 - Intro
0:34 - Latest Nuclear Fusion Breakthrough
1:13 - Nuclear Fusion Basics
1:34 - Proton-Proton Fusion in the Core of the Sun
02:37 - Deuterium-Tritium Fusion on Earth used at ITER and other Fusion Reactors
03:42 - Burning Plasma at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
04:32 - Lithium Breeder Blanket
05:33 - Tritium: Low-Energy β-emitter
06:12 - Overcoming Electrostatic Repulsion
06:41 - Plasma: Magnetic and Inertial Confinement
07:26 - Cross Section: Probability Fusion Reaction
09:24 - We cannot wait for Nuclear Fusion
Details - SPOILER ALERT !!!
The type of reactions that lead to nuclear fusion that occurs inside of the sun is different to what is used in the International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor (ITER) and other fusion devices on earth. It is the proton-proton fusion. This process begins with protons, which are a lone hydrogen nuclei and through a series of steps, these protons fuse together and are turned into helium. In the Sun, deuterium-producing events are rare. Diprotons are the much more common result of proton-proton reactions within the star, and diprotons almost immediately decay back into two protons. Since the conversion of hydrogen to helium is slow, the complete conversion of the hydrogen initially in the core of the Sun is calculated to take more than ten billion years.
Proton-proton fusion reactions work great in the sun, but there are a few good reasons why we don’t use them on earth. In fusion devices, deuterium-tritium fusion (sometimes abbreviated D+T) is used. In this reaction, a deuterium nucleus fuses with a tritium nucleus. The result is a helium nucleus, a free neutron, and 17.6 MeV of energy.
Lithium produces tritium when exposed to energetic neutrons. So, in fusion reactors, a lithium 'breeding blanket' is placed on the walls of the reactor to produce tritium.
Besides the fact that we don’t have the mass for gravitational confinement on earth, the cross section explains the very practical reason for why we don’t use the first step of the proton-proton fusion on earth. The “cross section”, σ, is a measure of the reaction probability as a function of the kinetic energy of the reactant nuclei. So, a higher cross section is crucial for the technical and economic viability of fusion power on earth.
I think it is an enormously complex technological challenge to create economically viable fusion power on earth. But certainly one worth pursuing.
#nuclearfusion #ITER #deuterium #tritium #proton #lithium #nuclearpower #nuclearenergy #nuclear #fusion
🔔 Your subscription to the channel goes a long way:
www.youtube.com/@NetZeroTech?...
✅ See you on Patreon:
/ netzerotech
📧 Reach out to Katha:
kathasepoint@gmail.com
☕️ Buy Katha a coffee:
paypal.me/kathasepoint
Thank you for watching! 🙏 Let me know your thoughts in the comments! 💭

Наука

Опубликовано:

 

7 авг 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 28   
@cat-Ifreet
@cat-Ifreet 2 года назад
Katha, I am an engineer working at ITER in France. I was also actively involved with the people designing the very same lithium breeder you talked about in this video. As an insider in the field I watched tons of videos on Fusion for the public, but still, I did like your video! Keep it up 💪
@NetZeroTech
@NetZeroTech 2 года назад
Amro, Thank you very much. I really appreciate it. 😀 Most of all thank you for doing the real work of pushing fusion power forward. I visited ITER in 2010. There was not much to see, but they were already giving guided tours around plain fields. 😄
@mhoskin37
@mhoskin37 9 месяцев назад
Your videos convey you have put in a considerable amount of time and effort to make this content. I am taking my first steps toward solar and geothermal for our home. I do not believe this is a smart financial decision, rather than a responsible position for living our lives. Here is hoping for a more sustainable existence. Thanks again for helping us keep thinking!
@NetZeroTech
@NetZeroTech 9 месяцев назад
Hi Michael, Thank you for leaving a comment. Great to see you moving towards solar and geothermal! Let me know if any questions come up I may be able to help with. Warm regards, Katha
@jjeherrera
@jjeherrera 2 года назад
I think this is a well explained and honest video. Congratulations!
@NetZeroTech
@NetZeroTech 2 года назад
Thank you so much! I really appreciate it. 😀
@ronniemanuel6287
@ronniemanuel6287 2 года назад
Thank you for another informative and enjoyable video
@NetZeroTech
@NetZeroTech 2 года назад
Hi Ronnie! My pleasure. 😀 Thanks for returning!
@solexxx8588
@solexxx8588 2 года назад
Thanks for saying that we have to act on climate change now with the existing technology. We can't wait for a fusion reactor to become technically viable. I'm not anti-nuclear for baseload power production but there is better safer fission technology already possible with reactors like molten salt based breeders. We have to continue to build out solar, wind , hydroelectric and tidal energy to quickly stop adding fossil fuel carbon to the atmosphere and then some day we may have sustainable fusion.
@NetZeroTech
@NetZeroTech 2 года назад
I completely agree. Thank you for sharing! 🙏
@sean_vikoren
@sean_vikoren 2 года назад
Have you looked at the deuterium-deuterium reaction mediated by a titanium or rubidium lattice?
@NetZeroTech
@NetZeroTech 2 года назад
Hi Sean, not in detail. Would you recommend that? Thank you for watching and looking into this.
@johnh6245
@johnh6245 2 года назад
If you want to look at the economics of fusion energy why not compare its complexity with that of a fission reactor? The latter has a very simple and controllable energy source, no vacuum system, no breeder, no neutron multiplier, no superconductors, no superconductor shielding, and easy removal of components (i.e. fuel assemblies), just to name a few. One could add the difficulties of tritium breeding and handling given the ultra fast diffusivity of tritium and the absence of good permeation barriers.
@NetZeroTech
@NetZeroTech 2 года назад
Great idea. Fission has made impressive progress over the past decade. Generation IV reactors avoid long-lived radioactive waste. However, this still means half-lives of up to 200,000 years. To put this in perspective, the human species evolved 300,000 years ago. Thanks for watching!
@johnh6245
@johnh6245 2 года назад
You say a great idea, but an up to date assessment of the expected cost of fusion energy is probably not high on the community’s wish list. However, the European Fusion Development Agency published an assessment in 2005 giving the estimated cost of 0.14 Euros per kilowatt-hour, some three times the cost of energy from fission at that time. The capital cost was well hidden in the report but one could deduce that it was a factor of five or six times that of fission.
@NetZeroTech
@NetZeroTech 2 года назад
@@johnh6245 I think we can agree that comparing current let alone future economic viability of technologies is difficult given the unknowns. What we do know is that we urgently have to invest in climate-neutral technology and divest from fossils. Long term this is equals the overall economic choice. 😊
@jjeherrera
@jjeherrera 2 года назад
@@johnh6245 The truth is there can be no honest estimate of nuclear fusion electricity, because there are still too many uncertainties, but you are right that it wouldn't compete with fission. I think the possible advantage of fusion would be the reduction of long lifetime nuclear waste. Still, breeder reactors in Gen IV generation might also be able to solve that problem. Maybe LFTR reactors? They have always sound to me as a good alternative to fusion.
@lohithadewa2570
@lohithadewa2570 2 года назад
Thank you for informative video. Just one question. What do you think about fusion using Helium-3. I believe Helion's planned reactor uses He-3 which results in a proton which they plan to use directory to generate electricity and by-pass the traditional thermo-mechanical steam turbine route.
@NetZeroTech
@NetZeroTech 2 года назад
Thank you. I appreciate it. Interesting question. 😊 That’s what I read, too. I wish I knew more about it. Thank you for watching and sharing the info about Helion Energy. 😀
@oussamalasfer4860
@oussamalasfer4860 2 года назад
iter is step closer to better future hopefully there ll be no fusion energy haters like fission XD
@NetZeroTech
@NetZeroTech 2 года назад
Yes, the progress has been amazing. 😀 The timeframes of technology still require patience. 😊
@MattNolanCustom
@MattNolanCustom 2 года назад
Hi Katha. Nice video, but you've been plagiarised here - ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-NcEYJq0Jwpg.html - you might want to file a youtube copyright notice against that channel
@NetZeroTech
@NetZeroTech 2 года назад
Thank you. Imitation is the greatest form of flattery. 😃
@MattNolanCustom
@MattNolanCustom 2 года назад
@@NetZeroTech sure, but this is not imitation, it is theft. Your countless hours of effort taken for nothing so that somebody else's channel can get views, generate ad revenue, whatever. Even if you personally do not care, allowing this practice to continue unabated can affect people who do care. It happened again today - ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-GpY7MJ8-TSE.html - you really should file copyright claims against both of these videos directly with youtube
@NetZeroTech
@NetZeroTech 2 года назад
@@MattNolanCustom Thank you very much for bringing this to my attention. I’ll look at it later today. I switched jobs and moved between continents in Q2. It‘s been a busy year. Slowly catching up. 😊 Hope you are well!
@NetZeroTech
@NetZeroTech 2 года назад
Hi Matt, I filed the copyright infringement today. It took me a while, as I prioritised other matters. I don't think it's a big deal, since the infringing channel didn't make any money off of the video and not very many people watched it. Thank you very much for letting me know. I appreciate it. It makes me wonder how many infringements, I'm missing. How are you? Katharina
@MattNolanCustom
@MattNolanCustom 2 года назад
@@NetZeroTech I'm glad you followed it up. I'm very well thank you.
Далее
Laser fusion
1:10
Просмотров 213 тыс.
Все сезоны бравл пассов…!!!😨
00:59
ТЫ С ДРУГОМ В ДЕТСТВЕ😂#shorts
01:00
The moment we stopped understanding AI [AlexNet]
17:38
Просмотров 863 тыс.
Why heat pumps are taking over
17:14
Просмотров 423
How the Heart of ITER will Electrify Plasma
2:52
Просмотров 24 тыс.
Why your insulation sucks...
8:24
Просмотров 1,3 тыс.
Boeing's Starliner *CANNOT* return home without crew
9:56
Why Don't We Send Nuclear Waste To The Sun?
2:46
Просмотров 2,8 млн
How Kepler Actually Discovered his Laws
16:40
Просмотров 176 тыс.
Geothermal at Home - What you might not know
11:26
Просмотров 2,5 тыс.