Тёмный

Obergefell v. Hodges - Landmark Cases - Episode # 2 

Think LegalEase
Подписаться 6 тыс.
Просмотров 26 тыс.
50% 1

Опубликовано:

 

26 окт 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 17   
@Zulfiqarlaw
@Zulfiqarlaw 8 лет назад
Thanks for the time and efforts you put in for making the issue look so simple to us.
@ThinkLegalEase
@ThinkLegalEase 8 лет назад
Thank you for your comment. I do my best to make law simple and understandable.
@shaunavillarreal25
@shaunavillarreal25 7 лет назад
Super helpful and explained in a clear way! Thank you for the time you took to put it together!
@hyojinlee
@hyojinlee 3 года назад
Thank you so much for this video👍
@jessicah4306
@jessicah4306 8 лет назад
this was great! thankyou!
@ThinkLegalEase
@ThinkLegalEase 8 лет назад
Thank you +Kate Jess. I am so glad you enjoyed the video.
@geoguy001
@geoguy001 Год назад
So Prior top this decision...how did this work with the full faith and credit clause?...a state that did not recognize same sex marriage would argue that an out of state same sex marriage is not valid in their state........and states that allowed it expected other states to accept it because of reciprocity...?
@jennyelusseau363
@jennyelusseau363 5 лет назад
Make so much sense. Now I can write my paper on same-sex marriage!
@davidbauler3159
@davidbauler3159 7 лет назад
It was quite odd. It seems to be a pretty clear case of sex discrimination by the government. It generally, wasn't talked about in that way, but it seems to be obvious to me.
@chantelly7146
@chantelly7146 2 года назад
What was with the unnecessary personal opinion you slipped in there about "children will suffer from the stigma of knowing their families are lesser than other families just because their parents are same-sex, which is a very valid point"? You should be keeping personal opinion out of describing court cases if you are trying to be used as an educational source. And the Loving v. Virginia case struck down miscegenation laws prohibiting interracial marriage, not just marriage between those of "opposite races" Do better.
@bradenevans514
@bradenevans514 8 лет назад
Writing WRONG over the court clerks face is pretty petty. She has rights under the first amendment, which was well before the 14th. Just saying.
@breakthespell98
@breakthespell98 6 лет назад
yeah quick question... how does your homophobic opinion matter or add anything to the facts about a case? thank you.
@Archey6
@Archey6 6 лет назад
at what point did he make any "homophobic" comment
Далее
Freedom of Speech - Landmark Cases - Episode # 3
6:58
POLS 3321: Obergefell v. Hodges (2015)
12:06
ИСТОРИЯ ПРО ШТАНЫ #shorts
00:32
Просмотров 155 тыс.
Does the Bible Support Same-Sex Marriage?
40:58
Просмотров 185 тыс.
D.C. v. Heller  - Landmark Cases - Episode # 7
7:09
Просмотров 32 тыс.
Supreme Court Shenanigans !!!
12:02
Просмотров 10 млн
Stanford Rathbun Lecture 2017  - Ruth Bader Ginsburg
1:27:16
Overview of the American Legal System
39:18
Просмотров 281 тыс.