Object 435.exe 

Problem with Russian dushka is low ammo capacity 😢

@@destroyerarmor2846 except that there is 14.5mm KPVT, not DShK

@@daelinzip I mean in Warthunder USA .50 cals have 200 round belts while for USSR you get 50 round belt. Still does the job. The KPV on ISU 122 and object 168 still work nicely in game

Bro the DShK on russian tanks are insane, always one Shot pilot kill and heli ON THE FIRST SHOT No helis allowed except russian ones hahahahaha

Yeah we’ll give the Russians an OP cermet core .50 round but we’ll nerf the standard western .50 cals and ignore that they have much better AP and tungsten rounds. 🤡

I feel that

Nowhere close my friend lol

That is the Object 277

​@@infinitehazard5197wrong.

yeah, i love russian 8,3 and i dont like t62 so much, it have good round but its lame af

@@defenderofp.1179 true

Compared to the T-62, the Obj 435 is also faster, has faster traverse, and has better hull armor shape

Just because it has a slightly better counter part it's not worth? I don't see the logic behind that. Ig I shouldn't have grinded the panther G, even tho it's a good tank.

I think this is a T-62 prototype/version

@@zeffy._440 no, t62 is totally different. This is an obj430 protype, which after few modifications became the t64 series.

@@matevasas This is the obj 435 not 430 It doesn't have composite armour though which is why I believed it to be a T-62 prototype The gun was a testbed from what I'm reading and it was later put to use on the T-62

​@@zeffy._440no ffs its a T-64 prototype and they used the gun of the T-62

@@albertogiavani75 Yh I know

"Soviet"

Yes comrade.. you see, russia put ammo in fuel because fuel is diesel, which is very hard to burn. So when have ammo in diesel, and diesel not burn, ammo cannot either, and no explode

No it shouldn't be lowered and shit on 6.3/6.7. I have one and it an be fun. but rather keep WW2 and things like this separate for once

@@USSWISCONSIN64 this thing at 8.3 with apfsds and you face tanks in the t54 that were made in this era you’re point makes no sense

@@multimemer5317 It's 8.0 1st of all. And you're saying it would be at 7.3 WHICH would face 6.3 which is vs Tiger Ps and M26 Pershings. try agian.

@@USSWISCONSIN64 1. there is more 8.0 premium users so it would get sucked into 8.0 and 8.3 2. Dumbass the tank in the video, don’t start an argument if you got no iq

Just look up ’hehehehe woah woah woah hey hey hey’

@@MaxC__ I found it, thank you!

That's Tom scream, from Tom e Jerry

Shut up. Ffs can Russia get literally ANYTHING without people complaining? This was a good addition, a unique tank, I would have preferred the object 277 but this on of the tanks I was kinda thinking of them adding.

@@ushikiii like they don't really have enough at the moment? You stfu! Minor nations are begging for vehicles to fill up their lineups on specific BRs. Think about it, Russian main

I dont have a problem with it tey are esay distroyd once u pen

Cum issue. Your probably plagued just by the 279.

as russian main this is not even close to true, nato tanks are better, better gun depresion, better shells, and so on... you just suck

This patch is fantastic for the BTR and this, they are both very fun