Woo! I came 27th for my own composition! What fun! But hey, when I sacrifice everything for performance in RST, I improve my ranking by *1 place*! And by another 3 places in 9Kx2. Let's just not talk about what happens after that... Oh well at least I can still time travel!
Susu’s computer: I can’t take it! Susu:screw it im going to finish this no matter what Also susu: I regret this but I’m still going to play as long as you don’t d- Susu’s computer : *dies* Susu: die...
I'm genuinely impressed with the effort you put on to the mega comparison! I would have wanted to join back but my current pc didn't meet the requirements... maybe next time
So this is what you've been doing... it's been a while! Now that's really insane, really looks like months worth of work! Some screens even look like they're lagging!
Honestly, this benchmark in a nutshell literally proves that Ryzen is far ahead of Intel by steps you wouldn't imagine taking. This is a very well-made and accurate type of benchmark that made me change my mind about how Ryzen is way better than Intel now. What a table-flip it is!
@@dot2810 yep. I see very little reason to go with amd this generation. At least until their x3d zen 4 series comes out. That could become a new gaming king, however, still be more expensive than intel
@@theresa.y5221 Not quite, Theresa, they have to submit the footage to MusiMasta and visualize how much time the lag lasts for each crash of a MIDI song.
We need a 2024 revamp of this. You can include more MIDIs such as: Ouranos More versions of SFTDP (28.2 and 44.7) Pjanoo Quadrianexium TQP Nerfed HRK's Lag Tester 3, 4 and 5
If you're doing this on PFA, it will lag so much due to an unusual amout of notes played per second. no matter how smooth you're driver is or the note magnification, it still lags but in a short time. In other MIDI Visualizations like MIDITrail, Zenith, and UMP, the FPS almost drops down to ~10FPS. And the best thing with UMP, it can visualize the FPS with the Lagometer and the Ping. You should recreate this with any MIDI Visualizations other than PFA, MusiMasta.
Okay. Here are multiple comments, in a single comment. 1. Early access gang where you at 2. 30 fps gang where you at 3. I didn't expect to be included in the credits. Thanks, anyways! 4. It is the first time that I wasn't last in the comparison. For the first time! Well, it's using my school computer, but still, it is my run. 5. I didn't know you planned to add text to all the runs. 6. So you are saying that you put two (or three? or four?) runs under different names? Huh. 7. Is it possible to add timestamps for each MIDIs and around 5 seconds before each crashes? Put it on the description and the comments for each PC and mobile users. 8. You got color variations on each graph. Interesting. 9. Where's the thumbnail? 10. Overall, I think this comparison is quite good. It is a good standard for current PCs and I hope the future could watch this video and look back at time (and say "I am better than the fastest one!!111"). Congratulations, and kudos to you! Addendum: 11. You also roll the hues at the comparison part itself. Not my taste but interesting.
Okay. Here are multiple responses, in a single response. 3. Np! :3 5. That's because I won't add the specs to the description. There was barely enough space to do so for the Ouranos comparison, which had 94 runs. This comparison has 205 runs, so they won't fit no matter how hard I try xd 6. Mostly just 2 per MIDI. I did have to add another 2 of mine for the Tartarus MIDI since people were more afraid of running that one lul 7. Working on that rn 9. I am still working on it. That's what happens when you time travel into the past. 10. Thanks! :3 Addendum: 11. The color changing FX is just a test. Next time around, I'll look at people's responses here when deciding whether to use it.
i'm still surprised carlos' i5 suffered alot at 5.1 ghz (reaching that speed was making the cpu itself quite unstable) and got beaten by a ryzen7 @ 4.42 ghz now i admit ryzens are clearly better
