Not guilty doesnt equal innocent in a criminal court of law. If you raise reasonable doubt, the jury has to acquit. The burden of proof in the civil trial is much less.
The prosecutors could have shown the jury a video of o.j. committing the murders and that jury would have still found him guilty. The jury wanted to send a message to YT America.
His blood at the crime scene was proven to have been planted. For example, they found ojs blood on the back gate 2 months later out of nowhere, it was fresh blood when it should have been heavily degraded.
Please do some research and eliminate your bias if you have the ability to. I doubt it but it’s worth a try. BBC has a documentary debunking all the evidence you think there is.
This was a good, fair and unbiased interview unlike the totally biased interviews Cuomo and Geraldo did along with Dan Abrams. Thanks for letting the man speak and for listening.
A juror can vote however they like, even if they think the prosecution failed to show guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. What a joke saying that O.J. couldn't have committed these crimes.
@@22lyric go look up the timeline of when they said the murders occurred. And then look at what time his limo driver testified that he drove him to the LAX airport, then measure how much time it would’ve taken him to drive all the way to her apartment that was miles away, kill two physically fit people, clean ALL of the blood off of himself, get rid of clothing, a murder weapon, and return home as clean as a whistle, then hop in a limousine. It would have been physically impossible to do all of that in 15 minutes.
If OJ was found with blood all over him, his lawyers would argue that someone else killed Nicole and the Goldman boy and OJ went to help and Nicole threw her blood on him by accident.
Look at Carl trying to stay relevant in this OJ saga and still defending OJ. It's sickening what comes out of the woodwork when a controversial figure passes away. Where is the respect for the victims Carl? OJ ain't paying your fee anymore.
I've tried to empathize with the plight of Black/African Americans over the years, the wrongful deaths of Emmett Till in the 1950s, Medgar Evers, the Mississippi Burning case, George Floyd, and several others that were wrongfully lynched.....BUT I could never, ever wrap my head around the Black American communities support for O.J. and Johnnie Cochran in 1995 and the whole "this is payback for Rodney King in 1992"
Hey Mr. Certainty! Your statement above says O.J. was GUILTY. I guess you failed to learn how to speak or write adequately in school. (How long did you last in school? Employment problems now?) You have used a double negative, which of course means your emphatic statement actually means the opposite of what you think you have written. My guess is that you know even less about right and wrong, and much less about the law, than you know about English.
Majority black jurors of course they will not be trusted and no only verdict is what they chose not guilty but he couldn’t in a million years win the 2nd trial gotcha oj rot in hell
