F. Lee Bailey's interrogation of Mark Fuhrman was incredible, he forced the arrogance right out of Mark Fuhrman. Now Fuhrman can't remember his memory was fine under direct examination by Ms Clark. Now a cop with a GED education is trying to match wits with one of best lawyer's in America. Mark Fuhrman was such a liar that Ms Clark and Dummy Darden couldn't see he was a problem until the interrogation was taking place and now he's falling apart, instead of listening to the questions being asked he's trying to ask F.Lee Bailey questions, but it ain't working. As F. Lee Bailey would say answer the question. Mark Fuhrman is the poster child for racist, lying and corrupt law enforcement officers. The look on Ms Clark's face is like wtf do we have here! While Darden is sleeping at least it looks like that. 🤣 It's over for this witness truthfulness is not what Mark Fuhrman would come across as credible or truthful. How many times is he going to say I don't understand the question!
Totally agree..cross examination is extremely difficult and he is the only attorney in this case who showed any particular talent for it. Btw I think that OJ is guilty and that Fuhrman did not plant the glove.
we all know furhman had the gloves to set up OJ who wears gloves on a hot summer day? he was nicole special cop he been to her condo many times and of course he bragged to other police officers about her boob job she got and even said he slept with her before.
Don't worry, Marcia. The film tape is saved. We're watching it almost 30 years later and it's still so unbelievable how badly you did your job here. Big yikes!
The jury wasn't ALL black. Two white jurors also voted not guilty, although that was not their initial vote during deliberations (insofar as they deliberated at all). Also, the prosecution never sought the death penalty, so he would have been looking at would be life without parole if convicted. 8 African-American 2 Hispanic 1 half Caucasian / half Native American 1 Caucasian
I don't know that F. Lee Bailey was a brilliant legal mind. He was just good at courtroom theatrics, as were the other defense attorneys. There is a difference. They also had a sympathetic jury.
Marcia Clark was the Public attorney that was hired and working for Los Angeles. The public defender’s were not hired by Mark Furman or any individual on the People vs OJ Simpson. If you are a public defender you do the job as best you can after the grand jury decides a case can and will go forward. Clark had no choice but to do the best she could with the evidence and facts of the case and what evidence the Judge allowed in or not. God bless, Be well ✌️
@@HalfB But Ms Clark, "she ended up defending the actions of the LA police officers involved in this case. As the States lead prosecutor she knew who she was defending and it wasn't Nicole Brown and especially Ronald Goldman, who was barely mentioned in a double homicide. Had she spent more time breaking down OJ Simpson's defense rather then breaking down States witnesses and defending the actions of the police maybe the outcome could have been different, but when your leading detectives are lying constantly about their roles in this case: it became obvious why they were taking very little notes. In Mark Fuhrman's own words he has stop taking notes once off the case, "that was another lie, because he remains on the case playing detective at OJ's resident. It's the little things that got the attention of those jurors and people who watched the trial. When law enforcement officers start lying; experts like the dream team will pick you apart. Ms Clark and her team got "OUT LAWED" literally by the defense, because of the sloppy police work and forensic team that was unbelievable. Lucky for OJ Simpson that he had the money to defend himself and challenge the planted evidence or he'd be serving life in prison. Falsifying evidence to convict a guilty man, and the prosecution's case went right out the window. A police officer pleading the 5th amendment in a double homicide and he's the star witness for the prosecution! Did you even watch this case or your just one of those people who believed OJ Simpson got away with murder????
Seth Thomas not hard to out a racist. Lol. His cross examination of the shoe print expert was LAUGHABLE. It was so ridiculous, even OJ was angry with him.
He is certainly more aggressive than any of the others I have seen on this case. At times Detective Fuhrman is somewhat vague with his answers or it is hard to get at his meaning so sometimes it is fair to request specificity, but sometimes Bailey seems to be almost taking on the witness. If it were me, I’d probably be nervous the whole time. He’s not letting up on him at all… I get the impression he is doing whatever he can to get him to splatter, being both direct and laser-sharp in his approach. About 75% of the way through this vid, I can tell he is trying to undermine the credibility of Detective Fuhrman and having to answer honestly without volunteering information, Fuhrman is not choking but he is getting picked away at piece by piece. You want the narrative of the witness to win out since it seems like he has information that is the backbone of the case, a solution could be proffered, so that is probably why Bailey is pulling out the side block very slowly. I wonder how much this testimony stayed with the jury and affected their decision making. As a detective I don’t know what to make of Fuhrman. He made some missteps in his approach on June 13th and that is clear, but I don’t think he planted evidence which is what Bailey seems to be getting at. But I don’t know: it is hard to be objective when you know the result. But this is really interesting.
@@MalloryNewcomb mark furhman is being careful what he says. he lied so much he has to be careful with his words. he knows he was there at bundy that night remember he took the 5th
All professionals played their part but the credit goes to the statue of wisdom F Lee Bailey who dug out the grave for prosecution by conducting his marvelous crosss Examination tto Mark Furhman.
Aaron Thatisall it’s not hard to cross examine a disgusting racist, is it? You already have the upper hand, you just have to dig their grave and watch while they fall into it. Easy.
Actually if Fuhrman had just come clean on the racial issue he would have been fine. Prior to the tapes coming out, the opinion in legal circles was that Bailey didn't lay a glove on him (no pun intended).
Sherry Lewis was the only brains the prosecution had and fed Marcia all the real legal stuff but no matter bc the lawyers for mr Simpson were damn near perfect
Seth Thomas BS! Cochran was smarter than Bailey by a mile. Dershowitz is an appellate lawyer, not a trial lawyer. He never cross examined anyone in this case.
yep it only cost OJ $50k a week lmao. but it was money wasted because the jury stated they acquitted for rodney king so OJ could have hired a rookie and saved some money.
Excellent decoy by F.Lee Bailey's abilities to distract Ms Clark instead of concentrating on questioning Mark Fuhrman, she's, been distracted from questioning Mark Fuhrman to wondering what those books are and then gets mad when F.Lee Bailey explains that these books are way over Mark Fuhrman's head. Implying that these books are way over her head as well. Now it's personal Ms Clark is against the wall, and being outlawed by every defense lawyer that she has to go up against.by having to defend the cops now her integrity is at stake, she put it all on the line to defend the LA Police Department, that was an embarrassment to law enforcement officers all around the country. The lying and arrogance of the police officers involved in this case is just outrageous.........
@@Ken-iu2zp yes it's obvious that Ms Clark's problem is that she's so busy trying to second guess the defense attorneys that, she's looking at everything on the defense team's table, so they put a few books as decoys, forensic, and criminal investigations books: "The whole time She's trying to make her case she's worried about what evidence is going to come from those books and then she feels insulted because F. Lee Bailey's comment about Fuhrman's intelligence is beneath these books, but she can borrow them now she's mad, because her intelligence has been insulted as well, without, F. Lee Bailey being sarcastic. This was brilliant ; (Dante Alighieri an Italian writer and philosopher). The art of confusion, this was classic F. Lee Bailey. This was the biggest moment of the entire trial, because now Ms Clark and Darden's whole line of questioning was to defend the police integrity instead of defending the integrity of Nicole Brown Simpson and Ronald Goldman. This moment would bring an avalanche of doubt as to the integrity and trustworthiness of the detectives. Ms Clark knew those tapes were out there, she just never counted on the defense attorneys finding them and then realizing that Mark Fuhrman is a liar and there's a possibility that he could have planted evidence, but it's to late to turn back now. Listen to her closing arguments and what she said about Mark Fuhrman was more damaging then the glove debacle with Darden asking OJ Simpson to try on those gloves. Ms Clark's calling Mark Fuhrman a racist was the end of that case. As for the books look at the defense team's reaction when Ms Clark mentioned those books to Judge Ito. They immediately huddled up even OJ was in this one. Now F. Lee Bailey is braking down Mark Fuhrman's arrogant attitude, he ain't smirking anymore, he knows what's coming from this interrogation From F. Lee Bailey this isn't a cross examination and the prosecution never picked up on it. From this point on things changed dramatically for the prosecution team. They were forced to defend the police now. This case had so much riding on it that it was called, (THE TRIAL OF THE CENTURY), bigger then the Manson trial, bigger than the Ted Bundy trial, John Wayne Gacy's trial and Jeffrey Dahmer's trial all these trial made OJ Simpson case look like a crime of passion, but it had precede the worst possible crimes in American history, yet OJ Simpson was top draw out of all those cases. And American's were upset because it was about race from the very start, OJ Simpson was going to be labeled as the worst possible human being in America and he was only accused of killing two people; "Inspite of the behavior of the detectives involved in this case...... If OJ Simpson was guilty, it was the police planting evidence and the incompetence of the prosecution team to handle a case of this magnitude against the best lawyer's money could buy in America.
The reason they punished racist mark fur man is because he was threatening to suit the dream team for slandering his name so they had to change his mind.
@@jacksonk.fozzbodie213 did they highlight the proven racist comments by the detective that supposedly found the ONLY physical evidence tying Simpson to the crime scene, or play the race card? If you actually watch this trial, listen to the motions, view the evidence, you will see what has been joked about and gaslit by the talking heads, is in fact racist of those that believe OJ is guilty. Ask yourself why do you feel he is guilty...is it because of what you’ve heard or what you watched materialize during the trial?
@@Martin_Vail_Esq. Fuhrman using the word to so e screen writer is. ot proof of anything. I believe OJ did it because of motive, opportunityy,and becuase his blood was EVERYWHERE. Fuhrman picked up the glove after the blood was already collected.
@@jacksonk.fozzbodie213 The criminal case and the civil case are mutually independent in U.S. In criminal case, it is civilian v.s. public. In this case, as long as there is 1% chance telling it is reasonable that OJ did not do it, he cannot be guilty. As we know, there is enough evidence (missing blood sample found at the gate, the penetrating blood on socks, etc.) to show the detective and the LAPD can plant or manufacture evidences. In civil case, it is civilian v.s. civilian. In this case, the preponderance of evidence is enough to make OJ lose the trial. And he did, he needed to pay the victims' families $30m. I don't believe it is about race card. It is just the media's game for getting attention. Not everybody wants to devote time and effort into the whole trial.
The late, great F. Lee Bailey. Not only did he whittle down Fuhrman from a tree to a tooth pick but Fuhrman is the only one in the O.J. Simpson trial that was convicted of a crime. Marcia Clark sells Fuhrman as the "great white hope." The detective that will take down OJ Simpson. After Bailey tore Fuhrman a new one, Marcia Clark Says" we don't like filthy detectives that call a black guy a "N'.
Marcia arguing about Fuhrman is funny when she had to eat all of those words and tell the jury he was the worst human on the planet. When he went racial on the judges wife the case was over.
@dick hole enterprises you do realize that the gloves were ojs,another prove is that many police officers were at the scene.which makes it impossible that he planted The gloves,plus how did he plant the gloves in the first place if no one found out about the bodies until 12:00?there’s no evidence of mark fuhrman planting the gloves.
@dick hole enterprises omg watch Vincent Bugliosi vs O. J. Simpson 100% guilty he will answer every single question about him being framed and show why it would be impossible 14 officers were at scene b4 Furhman and every single one not all of whom were white said there was only one glove let me repeat only one glove so there never was a second glove for furhman to pick up and plant that man who's life was destroyed brutally murdered 2 people I think he got off EASY prosecution was worst in history... Furhman months before trial found evidence to exonerate black man Erik Harris charged with the murder of a white man and brought to DA getting man freed... Sounds like somebody who'd frame oj Simpson who has powerful connections c'mon vanadder never had one complaint in 30 or 40 years Furhman only 4 in 20 years not a lot
@dick hole enterprises as was said the gloves found at crime scenes and shoes that made bloody footprints leading away from bodies were both proven to belong to O. J. Simpson pictures of him wearing the gloves and shoes were found reciept for the gloves abd both shoes and gloves bought at bloomingdales where oj was a regular only 300 pairs of each were sold in country... Cmom so ridiculous not funny the mans fresh blood was found at the crime scene alongside bloody footprints that we know were his the blood had no edta in it defense didn't even refute that proving couldn't have come from the blood in vial... What about all that evidence which is only 1% off all evidence against the man whose life you say was dragged through mud c'mon he got off easy
Marcia was an idiot that's why sge should've never told Furhman to lie about saying the word then you show the jury how he had exonerated a black man erik Harris charged with white mans murder months before you dont go after ur own witness treat and like he is worse than the man sitting across from you who has brutally murderered 2 people for using the n word there was no evidence that he planted anything only that he used that word ten years b4.. That makes him worse than a double murderer? C'mon Marcia ur an idiot
@@gradyjohn2183 There is proof of him pleading the 5th on and on and on....boy please go sit DOWN. Oj got off and that's that....the defense did their job but thanks to Mark not doing his
I think bailey is jewish. after blacks he was the race fuhrman hated the most. fuhrman was the worst witness ever. marcia should have known he is not up to the job
@@maryanng6841 sorry, I was under the impression he was. anyway, that does not change the fact that the DAs were not competent enough to take on the pros of the defense
As would most people being badgered and slandered [in court, where it's "legal" and the witness has no recourse] the way the Prosecution allowed Fuhrman to be with decidedly few objections, even though there were numerous instances of leading, stating "facts" not in evidence, badgering and commenting beyond the scope in the form of argument for the jury rather than legitimate questioning. Clark allowing all of this without objection [she did this to a lesser degree with practically all of her witnesses, particularly police witnesses] and blowing Fuhrman off when he took her to task for it is ultimately why he plead the fifth and, essentially, torpedoed the Prosecution's case. She also did practically nothing to stem the tide of Defense BS regarding "racist" comments from years and decades earlier that were entirely irrelevant to the issues in the case. There were far too many instances of people who knew absolutely nothing about the actual facts of the case involving themselves in it so they could get their faces on television, and Kathleen Bell and the softcore porn writer Laura McKinney were two of the best examples of it.
This came back to bite Marsha on the butt. The wheels are starting to fall off and her insisting that the tape be kept so Bailey can look bad is in hindsight hysterical.
Yea she seemed to take stuff way too personal I noticed in that exchange too and she’s always assuming things will be true or untrue and saying that to judge ito like that matters
Well, I now comprehend why OJ was acquitted. Tampering with evidence multiple LAPD officers at the crime scene trampling on the blood from the victims bodies.
The prosecution, namely Marcia Clark, was stuck with Mark Fuhrman. There was no escape. They couldn't take Mark Fuhrman off the case because "No Furhman = No Glove Found, No glove...".
@@JesusOnlyWay-d8eplease explain how it’s practically possible for Fuhrman to have planted the glove. Do you know how many officers saw the crime scene before Fuhrman even arrived?
@@JesusOnlyWay-d8e you do realize that two beat cops saw the left hand glove at the scene at bundy two hours before fuhrman arrived on the scene, right? and you do realize that kato heard OJ banging around behind his wall at 10:45 pm did mark fuhrman time travel and plant the glove there too? get serious
“I want this tape saved forever because in the end it’s gonna be very funny.” -The woman who should have looked before she leapt. “These people all know each other and they cooked up all of this.” -The same woman who said it was ridiculous to assume Mark Furhman planted evidence and belittled such assumptions as “conspiracy theories”
u r living in a bubble of innocence. there's so many cops that have planted and set innocent people up. you know how many cop serial killers there have been?@@iPro3million
Scheck's closing was passionate and thorough. You can see the confidence and knowledge as he argued point by point, devastating the prosecution's case.
Another hilarious quote: Fuhrman - "The voltage box, I opened that, I looked in that area for any type of physical evidence, I saw none, so I returned to the front of the house." Bailey - "Why were you looking in a voltage box at that point?" Fuhrman - "I didn't know sir, I was just looking at any area that could have housed something or somebody." Bailey - "And a voltage box, you thought there might be somebody in it?" Fuhrman - "It was very large voltage box, I didn't know what was behind it." Bailey - "Is that why you opened it?" Fuhrman - "Yes". Bailey - "O.K.. Nobody there?"
This case will forever be an example in jurisprudence in Law Schools around the world in the art of criminal defense and what not to do as a prosecutor. Law enforcement officers are not lawyers and they should never pretend to be. The prosecution team allowed their expert witnesses in law enforcement to display such ignorance, should have never happened. Just answer the question asked. As for the prosecution team they became personal and lost perspective of the case in seeking justice for Nicole Brown Simpson and Ronald Goldman, instead of ones ego.
Clarence Darrow and F. Lee Bailey. Two of the giants of the20th century. Oh my! Just as soon as the defense put him on the dream team, the prosecution had no prayer.
Jim McKillen You think so maybe true, but in F. Lee Bailey on words he Bailey felted like if he was the lead attorney as Roberto Shapio was Johnnie Cochran would've been his first pick of choice of the attorneys on O.J. Simpson defense team
The State of California should have found THE best Lawyer they could find. Write him/her a check for $1 million and let them lead the Prosecution. I think the State of CA thought they had a slam dunk case and so didn't take Simpson's Defense team seriously. They should have!!
"I have spoken with him on the phone Personally, Marine to Marine, I haven't the slightest doubt, that he'll march up to that Witness stand and tell the world what Fuhrman called him on no provocation whatsoever."
The passive aggressive line of questions by Bailey are masterful. Very entertaining. Hate em or love em, dude is good! And yes I know he was disbarred years later and likes to drink.
Lori Massacci this wasn’t about race. He got off on class. He got off because he could afford 5 lawyers and a shitload of experts. This wasn’t a typical trial by no stretch of terms. You or I could never afford his representation. And as far as being disbarred by two states... yeah that’s a big deal. That’s not a process that’s “run of the mill”
When Marcia gets up and talks about how preposterous the claims are, remember in the closing arguments she called Fuhrman "The worst kind of person" because they had basically completely proven these allegations against Fuhrman.
I still believe the police should have looked at Glen Rogers (serial killer) who worked for Nicole around the time of the murders. The police disregarded him completely because they were only focusing on OJ. From his murderous history (Glen Rogers) was known to use knives to cut his victims necks. I'm not saying that he was the killer I just would have liked for the police to look at him more seriously.
Yeah maybe..but how did he get oj blood in bronco and on his socks and get in his house and put all 3 of there blood there. It's the blood evidence that alwsys sealed it for me.
@@celticsalltheway every single piece of evidence pointed towards OJ. I can’t name another suspect because there is absolutely no reason to suspect anyone else
hang on.. I have a question? i was only 14 when the trial was on tv. If the killer wore gloves were they suggesting they were worn during one victim attack but taken off for the second or both because if o.j. had cuts on the back of his hand surely they would have looked to see if there were cut/holes in the gloves on the area where the cuts were located on o.j.s hand? or am i missing something here.
It’s simple. He didn’t do it Everyone who seen him before the trip to Chicago testified that they did not see any cuts on his finger. Including the limo driver Allen Park. Consider this he helped move his luggage into the limousine and out of the limousine wouldn’t he be squirting blood¿There is no way to clean up from that messy job and patch or self up from a very deep cut completely stop bleeding in that short amount of time.Not to mention the lack of blood in the bronco they have a shoe print on Bundy but not in the bronco.........
@@sherilynnpontillo7936 yeah exactly.. where was the DNA inside the glove.. even if there was no blood. Leather makes you sweat big time and during an exhausted attack as severe as this surely the killer would have sweat profusely from the adrenaline and what about skin cells.. why can't they re-test the glove found for DNA.. then we'd know (well some are suggesting he was not alone but thats asinine because if o.j. was the killer it would have been too personal and he didn't know ron would be there theres no need for 2 killers all that to take on nicole i highly doubt that. The prosecution contends that during the attack the glove was pulled off so thats just crazy luck that the glove that was pulled off and found at the scene the same hand he had cuts on or was it a different hand? There was so much blood and if there had been 2 killers there would have been more shoe prints.
Letting him know and almost like saying "I'm not laughing at your joke. We're not on the same team. And stop trying to lighten things. You know your ass is cooked meat now as I am catching you in your lies".
@@angeladavis1198 Amazing how the defence, when asking lange about the car ron borrowed and parked a distance away around the corner, weren't allowed to go into that line of questioning. The jurors did begin to hear about the borrowed car being left there, but it was stricken from the record/to be disregarded etc.
Now, let's see... planted evidence? Lying, racist police? Sloppy labs? Junk science?Biased judge? Sneaky, dishonest prosecutors? The FBI choosing sides? That about cover it? Oh yeah, that "all black " jury that saw through all the c**p, and delivered the only verdict possible? I suppose those three WHITE jurors lost their caucasian club cards by standing up for the law, and demanding justice, huh?
@@daffyduckfan4478 you have got to be joking right... Please tell me you are... There were 14 officers at the crime scene b4 Furhman got there every single one not all of whom were white said there was only one glove therfore there was never a 2nd glove for furhman to pick up let me repeat there was never a second glove for Furhman to pick up so idk how u explain that
@@daffyduckfan4478 months b4 the trial Mark Furhman found evidence to exonerate a black man (Erik Harris) charged with the murder of a white man and brought it to the D. A. getting the man freed... Only had 4 complaints ever in over 20 years vanadder never had a complaint in 30 or 40 years was a week away from retiring their going risk their lives and pension to plant evidence.. I doubt it if you plant evidence in a murder case you can receive the death penalty so they would have been risking their lives c'mon entire thing is ridiculous the only reason you don't know all this is the prosecution was worst in American history by any metric
At 1:29 into this video Furman says "Once I was committed there was no turning back." My take is once he decided to plant the glove there was no turning back.
F. Lee Bailey was one of the most powerful, most intimidating attorney's to step foot into a courtroom. Still alive, at 88 yrs old. I bet he's still as intimidating as he was while active as a defense attorney.
@@Bullitt419 Ok I'll try and be more polite: He's a fat, drink driving, drug-money hiding dead ex-lawyer with a double-chin that will most likely not fit inside most coffins 🤣🤣
No....she didn't have a good case outside of planted evidence....why ppl want to make it everything else is beyond me...Clark and darden were more than capable of convicting...they had the weight of the entire us government to assist
i think she was inept that's obvious, but it's moot, the man didn't do it, the media conditioned, bombarded, through repetition that he did it, psychologically that works, 90 percent of people will spout he's guilty yet couldn't explain why, and they sat through this trial and they don't seem to understand that you had cops planting shit and the fact 2 knives were used, whatever happened that night was linked to ron goldmans lifestyle and dealings and Nicole's, and Ron might of been the primary target, and possibly Nicole was collateral damage, I don't think Ron Goldman was at the wrong place at the wrong time, he was the target, him and or Nicole, the media led you to believe that Nicole was the primary, listen to Pat Mckenna on Porkins Policy, he explains perfectly the case
@@jacksonthawbred4608 bro..you make very well rounded, intelligent points & I also agree 100% with your philosophy regarding the media bias & people forming false opinions about a case..but come on bro.. you and I both know that this isn't the case for that.. we know he's the killer & to argue otherwise is being intellectually dishonest..he was acquitted because he had brilliant lawyers that clearly showed reasonable doubt..
I lived in LA and was a public defender in the 90s, and sat in the courtroom several days. This was right after the Rodney King riots. No way was a black jury going to convict a black hero, as soon as I saw the jury makeup, I knew he would walk. He could have represented himself with that same jury and walked, be could have said he did t with that same jury he was walking no matter what. .any of those same jury members now have said they knew he was guilty of killing two white people one of them Jewish, plenty of racism on al! Sides of the equation.
the cop who found the body did not use gloves. he used a blanket from house to cover nicolle. the forensic team did not use gloves when taking samples. fuhrman walked through the crime scene. these are rookie mistakes and showed how sloppy cops are or were in general
"If Ms. Clarke has come to admire the books, I would be more than happy to loan them to the prosecution." LOL! I can't deny. Baily is smooth.........and also SLIMY!
If Simpsons defence thought fuhrman “planted” evidence,then why didn’t they have his clothes from that night taken and analysed,the reason they didn’t is they already knew the answer that the results would come back clear,the only “planting” done is this case was a manufactured racism theme by the defence team
Yep. Fuhrman flew to Chicago and got OJ's blood, came back and slung it all around the Bundy residence despite it already having been photographed and samples collected before OJ got back to LA and dozens of people saw him do this and did not say a word. Fact, Mark Fuhrman for over a year conspired to get disability through psychological trauma, and was told by other former officer, including black, that claiming he wants to hurt minorities and has anger and rage would help get him disability quick.
This was another hotpoint in this case Ms Clark's defense of Mark Fuhrman was huge to her own credibility as well. This was her downfall as a prosecutor in California Would Mark Fuhrman plant evidence? No one really knows, but it's obvious by his own admission that he would do such a thing. Ms Clark has just lost it her constant commitment for not being able to stand up to the defense attorneys has become prevalent now that she's loosing the case. Its become personal now with Ms Clark and not seeking justice.
they did not know simpson was going to kill 2 people like he did and he is the one that left all the evidence, no had to frame him, up until this trial simpson acted like he was something special, he was an athlete so what and acted like he was white as to what his house looked like inside that defense changed it up so jury did not see his white life.
Bailey’s strategy: Talk in circles till the witness is so confused and unsure of their own existence and then present that as evidence of some form of impropriety or dishonesty. Im so dizzy just listening to this man, I’m glad I wasn’t the one on the stand. They would have had to hold me in contempt because I would have said something lol.
@@hus390 My boy? Lol. Mmkay. Either way, not disputing Fuhrmans impropriety or whatever. Just disputing Baileys status as a “lion” in the courtroom. There’s no way even he knew what he was talking about half the time. Just pulling crap out of thin air and, as I said, talking in circles.
Oh, it wasn't in a circle, it was pretty straightforward had Furhman took a second to think before answering. For example, the whole point of this segment is to say that Furhman unusually designated himself as the primary investigator of this case the moment he received the notification of the patrol officer and then he did some unusual investigating behavior. He just laid tiny dots of that theory which Furhman accidentally confirms without knowing. That doesn't mean he planted evidence, but that's for later.
