Hi, Chris, and thanks for a very balanced review of this new camera model from OM System. As an owner and user of both the E-M5 Mk III and the OM-1, I think I'm in a position to make some experience based commentary on this camera. I'm just going to throw some things out there in no particular order. 1. Yes, the external body is virtually identical to the E-M5 Mk III. And I love the E-M5 Mk III body. Other people who see it, love the E-M5 Mk III body. I get comments all the time, about how compact and attractive the camera is, how compact the lenses are, and how much it captures the retro look and feel of a film SLR from 30 or 40 years ago. 2. By not spending money on upgrading the USB port or adding a joystick or changing to a larger battery, OM System have brought the camera out for $900. That's based on the current offer of the OM-5 with Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 12-45mm f/4 PRO Lens, for $1600. The lens alone sells for $700 and is a bargain in that 24-90mm (full frame equivalent) segment which is so popular. Show me another camera selling for $900 right now with the quality, features, practicality, and style of the OM-5. 3. You mentioned some other brands that would be comparable. Having owned a few of the Sony a6xxx cameras, I know that those cameras are ugly little boxes with tiny batteries and the worst ergonomics of any camera I've handled. Despite having a larger APS-C sensor, the a6xxx cameras take inferior photos and they are really unpleasant to use. 4. This camera is, really, an E-M5 Mk IV. If the company was still Olympus, very likely that's what it would be called. And if that were the case, I think the reactions to all the improvements and upgraded features, at the same list price, would be really favorable. Think about the world circumstances when the E-M5 Mk III was released. No chip shortage, no pandemic, no war in Europe, no runaway inflation, no world economic instability, etc. And yet, here we are in 2022 with this improved new model, for the same or less money. 5. I think people should stop being whining complaining haters and look at what OMDS, a new company, has accomplished in two years. A new flagship camera that is so popular that only recently has it been available in stock from retailers. Several really excellent new lenses. A new and effective marketing approach that has clearly defined a group of target buyers for OM System products. And now, a solid upgrade new camera to replace the 3 year old E-M5. Many large, well established electronics firms have done far worse in the past two years.
I am an Olympus shooter with both Em1 mk3 and EM1x real shame to see that this release of the OM5 has been a lazy incremental update with very little improvement. With the OM1 they moved away from the old eco system of Olympus and that was great but this feels a large step back in terms of moving forward opportunity missed by the new company.
I have the EM1 MK3 too, how do you think this OM5 compares to it? Should I recommend one over the other (I am loving the MK3, been easy to understand and use as a newbie to photography :) )
@@sneakyscorpia Personally if I had to recommend either the cameras i would push people towards the EM1 mk3 every time. Dual card slot alone is enough to warrant it over the OM5. I think the EM1 mk3 has better AF and all the same if not better settings the EM5 has in a metal body with better weather sealing and also it is much sturdier. OM5 is what the EM5 mk3 should have been. this new camera for me isnt worth the money if it was 200 dollars less then maybe worth it but at the current price point definitely not. If someone wants a better camera than the EM1 mk3 or EM1x then I guess OM1 is the way to go BUT for me I am very happy with what I have and wont be upgrading till OM systems up the mp count.
@@ronmurray7349 The dual card slots alone is enough for me to dismiss the OM5 in favour of the EM1 mk3. I just think personally for a supposed NEW camera and OM systems 2nd release this seems very underwhelming and lazy from their part. I myself and I am sure many others were expecting more from this release.
I'm in the market for a used camera and am looking between the E-m1 mk3, E-M1x, and the OM-5. The benefit to me of the OM-5 is the no limit video recording and the smaller battery because I have an E-PM1. I know the E-m1 mk3 and E-M1x can output raw to the atomos ninja, the OM-5 is not listed on the atomos compatibility list. At this point I'm not going to be shooting raw but it'd be convenient to not have to switch bodies to do so in the future. I'd get a used E-m1 mk3 before the OM-5 unless I need no limit recording. If I'm buying new, it'd be the OM-5 probably. E-m1 mk3 and E-m1x also are compatible with om webcam beta, which I've never used, but that's nice. Someone who doesn't want Live ND, the joystick, starry af, and is ok with the subpar microphone might go with the E-m1 mk2 and save a bit of money.
The rumours keep confusing people waiting for a mini OM1 and they are complaining for getting mini EM1.3. I really enjoyed EM5.3 so far and will enjoy OM5 as they are great cameras. I loved the designed of EM5.3 and I am happy to see the same retro look. I am will only compain about the missing USB Type C
Excellent review. I guess I vote for “legitimate niche camera” since its hard to find a lightweight weather-sealed camera with those features at that price point. Weather sealing usually comes at a premium and certainly the R10 can’t compete on that point.
I love my Olympus gear. The quality/compactness/ergonomics balancing act has been just about perfect for me. One of the bodies I own is the E-M5 II. Although my E-M1 II is clearly the superior model of the two, the E-M5 II is undoubtedly the body I use most often. For me it is just an absolute JOY to use. There is simply a kind of magic in how all of its key attributes come together. One of those attributes, to me, is build quality. My heart breaks knowing that OM Systems has decided to regulate this line of their system to the all too common world of cheap plastic camera materials. The E-M5III and now the OM-5 simply don't have the magic my E-M5 II has. I look forward to upgrading to the OM-1 at some point soon, but I'm disappointed in how the E-M5 line has in some ways 'devolved'. The solidly built little 'powerhouse' camera is no more.
I fully agree. Although I have 3 Sony APS-C cameras, the EM5 mii is the one I almost always reach for unless I have a specific reason to use a Sony. I just love the feel and ergonomics of the EM5 Mii, part of which is that it feels so solid. the extra weight also helping to keep the shot steady. Unless the image quality for stills is much better on the OM5, I suspect that if I got one I would still prefer the EM5 mii !!
The E-M5 Mk III has a magnesium frame which holds the lens mount among other things. It has a polycarbonate outer shell, which is use for motorcycle helmets. Polycarbonate is lighter, stronger, and more impact resistant than metal. For aggressive use, I would expect the E-M5 Mk III/OM-5 to withstand drops and impacts with less permanent damage than a metal body. Remember, one of the most impact resistant cameras made is the TG-6 Tough and it is also made of polycarbonate. Olympus knows a thing or two about building tough cameras.
@@gregfeeler6910 yes, I love the TG-6 and am waiting for a TG-7. It's my go to camera for local hikes. My comment about the OM5 body was not about its toughness. I am sure it is very sturdy. It's the weight of the Em5 mark ii in my hand that I like i.e. my comment was more about feel than sturdiness :-)
@@gabithemagyar Oh, I get that- I had an original E-M5, then an E-M1 Mk I, a couple of E-M1 Mk II's, and now an OM-1 (plus one of the E-M1 Mk II's and an E-P5), and I like the heft in the hand. I've also had a TG-1, TG-4, and now a TG-6. What a cool camera! However, carrying two of my big bodies with three lenses gets a bit heavy at times. The point of my reply was that Olympus reduced the weight of the E-M5 Mk III by 55 grams by using a polycarbonate shell which is likely as strong or stronger then the E-M5 Mk II's metal shell. It's not as astatically pleasing for some, though. Peace.
Micro 4/3rds is such a great format. I went from Micro 4/3rds to APS-C to Full Frame and then back down to APS-C and now Micro 4/3rds again. The size of the camera and the size of the glass is unbeatable in my opinion. The beauty of buying a system like this is you have two brands and lots of glass to choose from. I would definitely get this as a travel camera. Perfect size and good choices of smaller lenses. Too bad they did not knock it out of the park but at least they never shelved this body size.
I got it today and... OMG... I have Sony A7III, Fuji XS10 and Fuji XH1. But I gotta say... Just IBIS, it hands down beat out all their IBIS. I handheld 2.5s and get 70-80% hit rate. Longest on A7III I can handheld is 0.5s and definitely less than 1s for XS10 and XH2. Ya the sensor is smaller but it has a lot of amazing features that I really like, e.g. handheld high res, live ND and live composite. Live composite is really great for night long exposure photography. All the cons... are valid but OM system cameras do still offer good features I wish Sony and Fujifilm offer. Having more completed in camera and allows less editing is really a big plus. So while everyone else is going bigger sensor size, I am going from full frame to apsc and to m43. I still have my a7iii with me cos it's a low light beast. But I am wanting to bring it out less and less.
I switched to Sony ff and love the incredible focus system but really miss Olympus ibis and rugged build quality. I also love that Olympus incorporates computational photography into their cameras, something entirely missing from my Sony.
Honestly the em-5 iii body is now discounted everywhere and it's an awesome camera. If you're in the market for an Olympus get the 5-miii for save for the om-1.
Just got the EM5 Mark iii. Nice camera. Getting fairly deeply discounted. Much more functional in some ways than my EM10 Mark ii, though the quality feel of the EM10ii is definitely better with the magnesium alloy body.
I had the E-M10 II and it was an amazing camera. Almost got an E-M5 III, but the discounted Leica TL2 got my money. Incredible picture quality, but the thin body is uncomfortable to hold and I still want the Olympus for the other nice features. 😅
Totally agree. Save big heaps, go for an EM5 mk3. Yes I have one, together with the EM1 mk2 & EM1 mk3, the EM5 mk3 is really handy if you need a light compact camera. Does the job.
@@RyougiVector I love Olympus, but this is a different company, different management, and different name. A reason for me not to buy. Hard to explain to somebody that's an Olympus if id does not say on the camera.
@@deltatom2459 Olympus did not die. They sold the imaging division of Olympus to JIP. This very same imaging division is now called OMDS. Olympus still retains a 5% interest in OMDS.
As an OM1 owner, it would be tough to pick this up as a second body. Reverting to the old menu system, lack of usb-c, and lack of subject detection make this feel like I'm not in the new OM ecosystem. To be fair, I shoot mostly birds, so need the bigger grip. Probably wouldn't have purchased it either way.
I like it as a quick everyday camera. I like the starry night AF in these cameras as I do nightscapes and Milky Way at times. Not bad for the Priceline.
Good honest review. I was a big fan of Olympus and started with the PEN EP-1. Then after some E-PL's i went through all EM 1's. The peak of excitement was reached with the EM1 MK II. What a camera and features! It felt special and advanced. Since then I don't see any improvements. The drive has gone and OMD had the chance to push the system forward but they missed it. Well ... as I have seen no future with this brand, now I have sold my E-M1 III and all my Pro-Lenses and bought a cheap EM-10 II and use my old small lenses like the 45 1.8 or my beloved 12 mm or the great tiny 14 2.5 and I just enjoy it as in the beginning of the system. For all my advanced stuff I take out my Sony System ...
Been using my really old inexpensive pen ep1 for years . Have many photos published in books and magazines from stock photography . I'm a hack and not a real professional but those old pen cameras were amazing for such a small package IMHO. Looking to upgrade without breaking the bank and not have to buy new lenses. Now I'm really confused . Any sugestions
@@riviecc If you don’t want to change the system I would buy a used Olympus E-M1 II. You get it cheap and the camera is really really good. You also get features other brands even don’t offer. If a system change is an option a cheap but very good buy is the Fuji X-T2 with some used lenses. Most of them are not to expensive but superb and the system is still not to large and has a future because development goes further.
I’ve been an Olympus camera fan since getting my OM-10 over 30 years ago (and I still have it along with an OM-1 film camera). I still use these film cameras for the sheer joy of it with their stock 50mm lens. I also have a pair of good used medium format Bronica film cameras whose lenses I’m in love with. I bought my OM-D-EM5iii new just before they released the new OM-1. I don’t use video modes or too many other bells and whistles. When I bought the E5iii my goal was to maintain the old school film simplicity but without the cost of film you see. I have some Panasonic AF lens that it came with but my favourite lens to use with the E5iii is my Voigtlander Nokton 25mm F0.9 manual focus prime lens. My wife wanted the new OM-1 so she uses that. And I compared the two digital cameras in the field side by side. To be honest I’m glad I got the E5iii and didn't fall for the temptation to reach for the new release of the OM-1. I’m used to the E5iii's menu, the touch and feel of the controls and the shutter behaviour. I didn’t like all of the additional digital bells and whistles they put into the new OM-1 as it just seemed to add needless layers of complexity. My wife essentially uses her OM-1 as a point and shoot and that’s what works for her. She wants the high performance but with the simplicity of a point and shoot.
I’m a Olympus E-M5 Mark III vlogger. I was hoping to upgrade. Ow well. No point. My E-M5 is in the shop right now because the right channel of the external mic input stopped working. Also the thumb rest has started to peel off. Wish I could go back to Panasonic, but autofocus is important for vlogging. Guess I’ll keep waiting 😢
@@thrallingFRglory yeap, I travel alone, so I need to travel light, hence M43. Plus the weather sealing has helped me vlog in rain a few times when I absolutely had to shoot because I was only in a place for 1 day
I finally just upgraded to the Mark III even though I knew this was coming out. Basically paid $600 on eBay with 1500 shots on it. Just shot a wedding and was REALLY happy with the results! I am only a tiny bit jealous of this upgrade, but I knew I wasn't going to be able to afford it anyway. :)
When the o-m 5iii came out I was thinking they are very lazy. No it looks like they have given up completely. A micro usb port for a $1000+ camera? This package may would have worked for an e-m 10 v for $700. Really looking forward what fuji will bring with it's xt5.
OM System cameras have a lot of potential that the company ignores. And I don't really understand why. Essentially there is no other camera that's as light, as feature packed. They could really modernize their camera and improve AI which is their stronghold. They could easily make a splash in the market. Though they prefer just to survive. Maybe they're trying just to have someone in the market to have time to build something really good for the next generation. P.S. I like that they didn't change the body. I think they should be like apple. Don't change the design when you don't need. That way, they can save money and focus on real work (which they didn't). Hope they make better choices for next one.
@@ToxicGopher you may be right. I am not saying om5 design is good. I am saying that it is good to keep the design for several generations and instead, work on internals. That way, they could keep the cost down and spend the money where it matters. Look what apple is doing with iphone and no one complains that they keep the same design for 5 years. They are still very successfully selling iPhone se with a design that belongs 5 years ago at least.
@@TelmanRaoofi I agree completely. USB-C and a decent menu is least we can ask for. I have the m5ii, and I doubt I'll ever get rid of it. Just to damn good looking - especially with a 17mm F1.8 attached :)
I don't understand it neither. Panasonic released their best MFT camera for photographers: G9 in late 2017. Then they upgraded G80 to G90 in April 2019. Since then they are silent. I think it branched into two systems: small one like range finder style camera with small fixed prime lenses and big one like DSLR style camera about as big as full frame cameras (which is fine for ergonomics and display) and zoom lenses. Small ones can be justified imho. Big ones - I don't know. Expensive zoom lenses with low aperture on a big body is very versatile system, but one may possibly buy APS or FF camera with regular zooms, possibly worse stabilization for the same price as G9 with Panasonic-Leica lenses. Most pocketable camera which is basically direct upgrade of GF1+20mm/f1.7 is Fujifilm X100V. It nicely complements my G80 with 12-60mm, 45-150 zooms and olympus 45/f1.8. Of course Panasonic is way more versatile, but I rarely use it since I have Fuji. And I knew it, cause I used GF1 much more than later cameras. But Panasonic focused on high end cameras and video and then gave up and I think Olympus went the same way.
It feels kinda... sad. I thought OM1 was "the transitional" camera, and now OM Systems would sweep us with a new, from the ground up, model of OMnessness. I guess they are in more trouble than I hoped for if this is their offer to the run-up to black friday and Xmas.
I very much appreciate your objective reviews! As an additional camera for leisure this is still very good, as is the E-M5 III. The price point is somewhat high for this market.
The biggest miss from this camera is not using the new menu system from the OM-1. Using the legacy menu system from the EM-line instead of OM-line sends a mixed signal to consumers on OM technology direction with their products. Perhaps this will be corrected with a firmware update (hopefully). If OM.S reduces their product line to: OM-1, OM-5 & Pen, then the OM-5 product makes sense. The final question is will their be an OM-1x?
I have owned the E-M5 MkIII for a year now and I really like this camera. The OM System disappointed me with the premiere of the OM-5, especially when we look at the price of the new model and the very successful OM-1. For me so far, only buying the OM-1 makes sense.
If OM System is competing with itself, I guess you can persuade yourself it's a decent camera. However, the competition offers more at this price point. This should be a 800$ camera at max.
Agreed! This is an OM10 at best: a budget camera with some old hardware and an improved software. As an early adopter of the EM5mkll I was blown away about how ahead of anything it was: live time, 5stop IBIS, super compact, high Res shot, perspective correction, silent digital shutter, a decent EVF (2014), pc sync port, all things unheard of, even on the EM1. So many professional photographers bought one for REAL work (Lavikka Photography for macros for example). Look at us now... A budget plastic camera with 6 years old hardware and a new firmware, USB2 and possibly a tripod mount that still breaks apart for the same price the EMII was sold at!
In this review, you put more effort into this camera than Om Systems did. You could have simply said, "They put the inner parts of the old EM1 MKIII into the body of the old EM5 MKIII, oh and slightly improved the weather sealing." There, how long did that take? But all credit to you, you managed to produce a detailed 13.45 minute analysis. Thank you for your effort DPReview, try harder OM Systems!
I'm the niche, and I think more people are than people realize. The appeal of a small camera than can do it all is the reason people use cell phones and compact cameras. If OM systems leans into this, people will like it more. It's why I continue to use it.
Indeed, I'm starting to look for a replacement for my trusty but aging Panasonic DMC-GX1, and this seems to fit the bill. Granted, if companies are specifically aiming for customers like me only, they should probably be firing their marketing people…
The problem is that a big chunk of users who look for better IQ and control will be dedicated enough to carry a bit more bulk. The zone between performant enthusiast cameras and phones is looking deader each year, mostly left to low-end, video-focused products. And competition on the enthusiast end is *brutal* , companies can't afford to reheat three year old models. I own an E-M10, but I almost never use it anymore. It's been replaced by my Canon RP. It's a bit larger and heavier, but it's way better in low light, has much more usable AF, better displays, friendlier menus, and it's a lot more responsive. And the RP with the kit lens is cheaper than the OM-5 kit. Of course, one makes some tradeoffs, one always does, but the steady reduction in both the size of 35mm gear, and the available customer pool, means that niche products like MFT must be designed nigh-perfectly to simply not fail.
@@Ildskalli probably yes. I'm not sure how to account for that. The nifty fifties on both formats are similar in length and size. I consider the AF on the 10 Mark 4 fine. However, the Canon plays up much more to the prosumer, and the Olympus plays more to the guy who wants it easy, like a cell phone shooter. In body image stabilization ain't there in the Canon and the Sonys are still bigger, so the niche can be filled. Even for the prosumer, no camera at this price point is this small and weather sealed, so they found that niche, but who cares? OM digital solutions needs to make a Pen smaller, like a GM5, but modern, and they need to bring in the AI denoising from the OM-1 to all the cameras. The dynamic range and quality seems fine for me shooting micro 4/3rds. I jumped ship from Canon a while back after I rediscovered the fun of photography on the system. I usually go out with my E-PM1 though, a shit camera from 10 years ago with bad controls and a rubbish screen because it's small as shit.
@@funkmon I think the real problem is that it's uneconomical to market something like the OM-5 but for $700, which is the kind of price point where they'd get people like you on board. You're using an E-PM1 (had one as well, I've owned like 50% of all the cheapo Oly bodies, and most of the Panasonics at some point) so you probably won't spend $1,100 on a new camera. And those who will have a wealth of options open to them. If OMDS want to survive in this environment, they have to make close to the best possible body in each price bracket they decide to compete in. The OM-1 can be argued to do that, but the OM-5... not really.
Man I was such a big Olympus fan. The E-M5 Mark 1 got me into photography as a major hobby/side-gig. I thought OM System was going to carry on the legacy with the OM-1 being such a good start. This feels like a massive step backwards. :(
Is the weather resistance actually any different or did they just choose to rate it on this model? If they couldn't be bothered to update the USB port to USB-C I find it really hard to believe they redesigned the weather sealing.
Olympus, uhm, sorry, OM System going full Pentax here. I gave them the benefit of the doubt after they released just one body, but now after the second one the situation starts to look dire. This was kind of expected, though. But you know what? Hope never dies. The only positive thing is that they at least maintain the product lines, so you don’t have to get rid of previously purchased lenses & other accessories from the Olympus system. I will happily continue using my Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III, but I am not sure I will ever buy a product from OM System.
I was an early adopter of the Olympus MFT cameras and have still have the original OM-D E-M5, the E-M1 II, and the Pen F. I love the size and general handling of the Olympus cameras and they have some outstanding lenses but the sensor technology is ancient and I have issues with image processing when using Olympus cameras in extreme lighting conditions that I don't have in Nikon cameras. I will soon be rationalising my Olympus camera and lens line up. On my most recent vacation, I took a Nikon Z-fc and the slow 18-140mm zoom and it was perfectly fine. I just feel Olympus and OM Systems lost it quite a few years back and are just marking time on a minimal development budget. I cannot believe that OM Systems haven't implemented USB-C. That's just laziness, likewise the failure to update the menu system.
Agree. The micro USB is not a good sign and make people wonder what happens to the culture of the company. I’m still using a 7 years old PenF today I find no camera to update (and not really necessary yet)
Unfortunately there is just no competition if you want a light weight compact and water and dust proof camera at this price point. Panasonic is close but it’s aimed at videos and nothing beats that weatherproof rating
I have an EM5 Mark 3 and seeing this released initially made me excited. Now, however, I'm happy to wait until I can afford either something better or just use the money this camera costs to get a cool new lens. LiveND and starry sky autofocus would be nice additions, but I'm not going to pay $1,200 for something I can do manually and have been doing for years. New lens it is!
The EM5III is one of my favorite cameras to shoot. It’s a fun camera to use. I left Olympus/OM System products. The new products are too little, too late.
I love using the em5miii. I had been using the x100v but coming back to em5iii felt great. Ergonomics and speed is something that shouldn’t be taken lightly. I have both cameras.
May I ask what system you moved to? I've had the barebones em10 mk III for a couple of years and even I am struggling to find reasons to upgrade to the OM-5.
As a long time Olympus user going back to the film OM1, I hate seeing their cameras being dogged, although the issues ARE real. I just want to see what the new EM1 will do. It better deliver or I think Olympus is going to have some harsh realities hit them.
I guess this camera is aimed at those who want a small, compact, and capable camera but don't need the bells and whistles (and price) of the OM-1. I think the omission of the OM-1 menu system is a huge own goal though. I shot Canon for the last 14 years and because of the menu system and its high level of consistency, it takes minutes to get used to a new Canon camera. OMS should have done the same I feel.
I ordered one today for precisely the reason you give. Going high in the Himalayas, and I want a weatherproof smallish camera with good picture quality. Ticks my boxes
When Olympus decided in June 2020 to sell its camera division to a private equity company noted only for buying Sony's Vaio computer division and doing very little to make it viable, many of us Olympus users thought this was the end of the line. The new owners, Japan Industrial Partners (JIP), didn't do much to alter that impression until they released the OM-1 earlier this year. It wasn't exactly a breakthrough camera, but it built on the strengths of Olympus and added some nice new features. So, maybe there was reason for optimism among Olympus fans and evidence not to dump their gear just yet? With this weak update of the OM-D EM5 Mark III, that optimism is questionable. I suspect that the OM-1 was what Olympus engineers and designers had turned over to JIP as they sold the company, not something that JIP created on its own. This OM-5 appears at best an effort to tread water for JIP, hoping to float on whatever revenue it returns for basically zero investment in R&D. The final test will be in whatever OM System does with the next body it releases. But I'd say the likelihood of JIP producing something that keeps up with Sony, Canon, or even Fuji or Nikon is low. After all, when's the last time you heard about a really impressive new Vaio laptop?
Hmm. I'm exactly the niche user you described. I just want something lightweight to take pictures of the family around the house and on vacation. I still have my Em5 mk1 and want to upgrade but don't want to change systems and have to sell my lenses. But this doesn't bode well for the future of the company. Not sure it's worth investing anymore in the system
Lots of your replies are a little mean 😢 I would definitely buy this one compared to my E-M5 ii. It has more features and is much lighter and more weatherproof. So good on you OM systems, I’m saving my pennies. 😊
If they’re “mean” because people are pointing out that OM System re-released the same body with the same features, so be it. Not even an incremental upgrade, and they few things they added could have also been added to the EM-5 MKIII via firmware update. Only a fanboy would be excited about this release. This is a cash grab for OM System.
The biggest fault is not adding the new menu system, many people who upgraded to the OM-1 might have wanted to have a smaller lighter backup, but not when the menu systems are so different.
such a shame, I have the e-m5iii and it is the most compact best stabilised system you can get. amazing combo with the 9mm f1.7 from panasonic. I love it but it's sad to see they're not making any worthwhile advances here. I feel that this should be OM System's Flagship Camera, but instead it's languishing with old tech and dated ports. The same is true for pancake lenses that are getting old. I would like to see a revival of reengineered pancake lenses for the m43 system; the panasonic 14mm, 20mm and olympus 17mm all need love. This is what I want: high end, compact, unparallel technology. Heck, even if you go bigger. go crazy and make the impossible a reality: a 45mm f0.8 with AF. take a leaf from sony's playbook and do something truly amazing.
@@key253 I know that. Yet with that camera I feel they are competing in a market that doesn't care for those advances as much / except for the wildlife photographers - because those do appreciate the extra chunk of the OM1. Everyone else, including me, wants the smallest possible kit with the highest possible image quality.
@@stoikerty Yes you are right. It should be the flagship, because light weight is what MFT is all about. I never understood the heavy 1.2 lenses. Light weight like the Nikon 300mm f4 for instance that is 500 grams lighter and cheaper!
The micro B port is a killer for me. I'm currently a Panasonic S1 shooter, and I could not imagine not being able to charge my camera quickly off a MacBook charger. It really is such an underrated feature.
Better to stay with older Olympus cameras or get OM1. I still think that older Olympus cameras with 12/25/45/75 prime lens is more than enough for most amateur photographers for stills.
I really don't understand what the camera companies are thinking. They make a new start with the OM-system, develop a new menu system etc and then they don't include it in the OM5? If you are building a system you want a seamless user experience between your different models. People who are invested in the system might use the OM1 as their main camera and OM5 as the second body, then it makes absolutely no sense to not include the upgraded menu system and similar features. Lazy cripple hammer update. Once upon a time the EM5 ii was a ground breaking camera with many features that the older flagship did not have. The new OM5 just seems like an uninspired crippled OM1. Glad that I sold my m43 gear and moved on to other systems. The only thing I miss are the really small telephoto lenses. Fuji tend to make oversized zooms and with Sony being full frame telezooms get big.
frankly, i believe that it is not for those who wants something new, but infact someone who wanted some of the em1.3 feature in a compact EM5 body. OMDS has tried to make it as affordable as possible. if I am a new photographer who needed those EM1.3 feature, i would buy the OM5. as for now, I am still using old cameras.
I own the em5 mk3 at the moment and looked forward to the release of this model. From what I can see, the om5 is just a em1 mk3 in a em5 mk3 body. I would give serious consideration to a used 1 mk3 as an alternative.(the 1 mk3 has a longer battery life as well (approx 600shots as to the em5 mk3 300))
I was hoping for the new menu system on the OM-1, USB-C, same stacked sensor, etc. Looks like I will go with my original decision - the OM-1. Micro USB in 2022 is a joke. I could work with one SDXC card slot but the OM-5 doesn't even have the same battery as the OM-1.
The EM5iii came out in 2019. A short three years later they are coming out with an updated version that adds some new nice to have features. Will it make anyone with the relatively new EM5iii camera run out to buy one? Probably not. For those shooting the older 16mp sensors it might be a nice upgrade. Do people really want their expensive camera equipment to become quickly "dated" and part of the yearly "new phone frenzy" so many people are involved in? I see the OM1/ OM5 in the same light as the old Nikon F/ Nikkormat camera lines - professional vs. enthusiast cameras that share interchangeable lenses and have minor upgrades made every few years. Do we as photographers upgrade our image making skills every year and need the latest equipment to do so? (Olympus Fanboy since 1975😉)
Maybe the reason for this 'upgrade' is that omd couldn't get the old ibis units and processors any more and now have to use the newer ones. This would explain why they didn't really bother to improve on most of the aspects.
Really feels like the stock of old EM5 III went out and now they have to reproduce it but can’t under the olympus brand. Pretty disappointed, when you consider the om1 being a powerhouse
Yup, it looks like they had supply issues, and this was a stopgap measure so they could keep selling in the segment without significant re-tooling, or change to the firmware. It does nothing to address the EM5.3 shortcomings, like the horrific menu system. Thanks, OMDS, for making it easy to keep my money!
This might be an absolutely correct assumption. Even major players like Apple struggle to get hold of all the semiconductors they need, so a relatively tiny player like OMDS might have real issues here.
The most accurate description of the OM system situation is: "garage sale" What is left of Olympus is monetized. This is a requiem. No development means no future.
I was an Olympus user from the mid 70s when the brand really stood for something. I left them behind when I returned to photography seriously in the noughties. I watched this video because of the 'OM-5' in the title. I am disappointed that the brand is not forward thinking and starting its digital cameras from a clean slate. Instead it seems intent on trading on its past status, trying to get some mileage out of the 'OM' brand, which these new cameras aren't good enough to carry.
I've had the EM5 Mk II & III and was REALLY looking forward for some modern updates while at the same time bringing up the best features from past models, but ended up super disappointed ☹️. No USB-C, no 4K 60, same plasticy body from the mkiii and same small evf frm mkiii ( really missed the metal body and huge evf of mkii). I appreciate the internal improvements but they're not enough, it doesn't have the same sensor or menu of the om-1. All in all, i think it's not worth getting and I think I might just go on eBay and find the mark ii again. I really loved the in hand experience with that camera.
I mean it's got new text on the prism. That's something. My first mirrorless system was the OMD EM 10 iii, I totally agree that it's a low effort camera to bring for vacations or day trips. Wondering if they should have introduced ONE killer feature to distinguish the brand launch.
It's a shame. I'm a user of OMD-5 II and I'll stick with that. I really appreciate the ruggedness and mostly the portability. However, I had an opportunity to try mark III and it has some nice features but also some features have been abandoned. And this camera doesn't flash the light for that "I need it now".
Likewise I'm a niche camera photographer, and my OM5 Mk2 fulfills all my needs and won't be replaced until it no longer works, so whether a new release is better or not is not the point. It's all about the size and handling of the camera and the newest release is just as solid as the earlier models.
I really like my EM-5 MIII. It is the smallest, lightest camera that I shoot with. I thought OM-System would upgrade it more from my camera. No need to upgrade or should I say side-grade from what I have.
I think its a bargain. For almost half the money you have most of the features of the OM1: same IBIS, handheld hi-res, Pro-Capture, perspective correction (every architect should have an OM camera), Live ND. The only things missing are the AF options ( should have been more important than de handheld hi-res) and the menu system. But it is 180 grams less heavy! That's almost two fantastic 1.8 OM lenses! And 20 MP is enough. I load my batteries always on a charger, so I don't understand all the fuzz about the USB port. OK the OM1 is better, but you pay for that and you have to carry that weight. While the most important feature of the OM system are the whole bunch of light weight and affordable 1.8 lenses. Combined with the IBIS it's a fantastic combination. Handheld in any situation. My only problem with the OM5 is the swivel LCD screen. It is more stills orientated, not mainly a vlogging camera. The PL10 should be for vlogging, without an EVF. It's a pity that most of the comments follow the negative tone that Chris has set.
Great review, thanks. I don't see why anyone not already shooting MFT with an existing lens collection would go this route. Similarly, I don't see why anyone with an existing MFT body or bodies would bother buying this camera.
I am almost certainly going to get this camera because (like most people ?) I don't buy every new generation of camera and think it is foolish to do so. Nowadays cameras are so capable there is very little reason to do so. I mainly use EM5 mk1 and first gen EM1 and to be honest they are more than capable. The two features that this has that will benefit me are the better AF over the EM1 mk1 and the handheld Hi Res.
My.GF7 has broken mechanical shutter, slow shutters, old sensor,.many fewer features etc...not everyone has a high end m43 (probably most still using m43 do though). If prefer Panasonic but they refuse to update gx9 with g9 features.
I haven't bought the OM-1 yet, but I've been waiting since February to see if this OM-5 was even worth the upgrade.... nope. In fact, I haven't bought a new mft camera since the original E-M5, so it's been 10 years and I think OM-1 might have to be my new go once I buy one. Since both the OM-5 and the upcoming OM-10 are going to be gone from my considerations, I'll go ahead and buy an OM-1 from ebay for a cheaper price compared to the original release price. Thanks Chris.
Coming from a Fuji guy - yes - I find Olympus rather fascinating but then the final price tag entry for such a small crop just leaves me feeling bewildered... beyond niche, almost Leicaphile without the blood diamond money..
This camera looks more like a new production lot (for satisfying the demand for the Olympus E-M5 III) than a new camera development. The transition to a new ownership and management etc. is always difficult - therefore I assume OM Systems will need some more time to get up to speed. I am mainly a full-frame shooter but I have to confess that my two old Olympus cameras are more often used than most people would expect (considering my equipment). What I really like is the simplicity to get good results with these cameras. The Olympus JPEGs are great and for casual pictures I prefer to avoid post-processing - and I am never disappointed. Although the Olympus tech is a bit dated the general shooting experience with Olympus cameras is very pleasant. With the right strategy and further progress in the sensor technology there is clearly a future for m43 cameras and OM Systems.
Thank you for the review - I think you were honest. I love my EM5 Mk3 and there is absolutely nothing in this new camera that makes me want to upgrade. OM1 on the secondhand market is probably my next camera - at least it has ‘Olympus’ on it and I’ve already got the lenses. I can’t see this camera bringing any new users to M4/3s unfortunately… it’s a dud 😢
Seems like they put in the updates they had ready to go. I suspect the main reason for this release was to get more of the line under the OM Systems brand. Certainly not enough to upgrade from the EM5 III I bought only a year ago.
My biggest gripes are the lack of USB-C and a joystick. Wondering if it is possible for the new menu system to be a firmware update - along with improved subject detection - for both the OM-5 and my E-M1 III?
It does seem like it's time to go Fuji. So long and thanks for all the fish, micro four world. (Unless there is an updated GX85 style camera coming from Panny with the IBIS, 20 MP sensor, uncropped 10 bit 4K up to 30 FPS [10 bit 4K 60 with a minor crop] and a mic input)
Guess this explains why the E-M5 Mark III was on sale. Heh, I bought the older one and had no idea this one existed. Guess I've got something to look forward to upgrading to one day. Though I'll probably be happy with the one I've got until two more generations have come out. :P
Star AF is also in Lumix cameras, only there it's automatic and tries to focus on everything else before it looks for stars. I wish Panasonic would at least iteratively like this upgrade the G90.
Situation where you buy a company without money for research (i think om 1 was already created by Olympus), and have a lot of spare parts from the old owner.
