Guyyo why do let us recall your retrospective clandestine plan of assassinating hchalu. The oromo communities across the globe will never leave aside and keep on provoking us
I love you as part of our Oromo brotherhood, but I must strongly disagree with your assumption that every group in a country needs a militant force to protect itself from the government. This notion is laughably naive and reflects a primitive, poorly informed mindset. In advanced nations like America, with over 50,000 ethnic groups, there is no need for each group to have its own army. Instead, elected representatives from all groups contribute to a unified government. The government comprises people from the entire nation, allowing each group to join the national and local armies, as well as local governments that establish law enforcement and public institutions. These entities work together with the federal government to create a cohesive nation, rather than descending into inter-group violence and servitude. Your perspective is stuck in a bygone era, where might equaled right and every tribe felt the need to protect its territory through force. This approach is not only antiquated but also counterproductive. Modern civilization has evolved beyond such tribalism, recognizing that collective governance and integration of diverse groups into a single national fabric is the path to progress. The very notion that each group should have its own militant force reveals a gross misunderstanding of how successful nations operate today. Take the United States as an example. With over 50,000 distinct ethnic groups, there is no anarchy or inter-group warfare driven by each group's need to defend itself from the government. Instead, the system of representative democracy ensures that all voices are heard and all groups have a stake in the nation's governance. People from every ethnic background are elected to public office, from local councils to the federal government, where they contribute to creating policies that reflect the diverse interests of the populace. This inclusivity fosters a sense of belonging and shared responsibility, which is essential for national unity. Moreover, the integration of various groups into the national and local armies strengthens the social fabric. Military service becomes a unifying experience, fostering loyalty to the nation rather than to individual ethnic groups. The same principle applies to local governments and public institutions like law enforcement and schools, which work in tandem with the federal government. These entities collectively maintain order and provide services, ensuring that no group feels marginalized or compelled to resort to violence for self-protection. A multicultural democratic civil society thrives on the participation and representation of its diverse populace. By encouraging all groups to participate in governance and public service, nations like the United States and many European countries demonstrate that diversity can be a strength rather than a source of division. This principle is fundamental to the functioning of a successful, modern state. It ensures that all citizens, regardless of ethnic background, feel invested in the nation's success and stability. Contrast this with the situation in Africa, where many nations are still grappling with the basics of statehood and governance. It’s unfortunate but true that Africa is still in the early stages of civilization compared to the West. Intellectual and institutional development is decades behind that of America and Europe. This lag manifests in various ways, from the prevalence of tribal conflicts to the struggle for democratic governance. It is somewhat inspiring to see Africans striving for democracy, freedom, and justice. However, the path they are on is fraught with challenges that more advanced societies have long since overcome. What Africa needs is guidance and support to navigate these hurdles, not the creation of further divisions. The tendency of some in the West to stoke these divisions for their own amusement or political gain is deplorable. It smacks of a colonial mindset, where the suffering of others is seen as a distant spectacle rather than a humanitarian crisis. Instead of creating divisive dramas for our amusement, we should guide Africans towards peace and security. Teaching people to coexist is crucial because they are the ones suffering and dying. Meanwhile, you, living comfortably in the West, are merely playing games at their expense. It is a cruel irony that those who have the most to lose are being manipulated by those who have nothing to gain but the satisfaction of seeing chaos unfold. The Western world, particularly those in comfortable and privileged positions, has a moral obligation to promote stability and unity in Africa. This means offering support in the form of education, infrastructure development, and fair political engagement rather than sowing discord. Africans are fully capable of achieving the same levels of peace and prosperity seen in the West, but they need the right tools and guidance, not condescension and exploitation. Your armchair theorizing from a safe, cushy existence in the West does nothing to help the situation. It is easy to pontificate about the need for militant protection from a government when you have never experienced the brutal reality of such conflicts. Instead, focus on constructive engagement-advocate for policies that support democratic institutions, education, and economic development in Africa. Real progress will come not from division and conflict but from unity and cooperation. Your simplistic, outdated views do nothing but perpetuate the very problems you claim to want to solve.
