Тёмный

One of the most beautiful calculus results you'll see! Solved using the Laplace transform 

Maths 505
Подписаться 59 тыс.
Просмотров 26 тыс.
50% 1

If you like the channel, consider buying me a coffee as a sign of support:
www.buymeacoff...
In this video, we've solved a fascinating integral quite elegantly using the Laplace transform. And the result looks so awesome it's almost too good to be true.
Be sure to like and subscribe for more maths content.

Опубликовано:

 

1 окт 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 51   
@zunaidparker
@zunaidparker Год назад
Beautiful interplay of the two techniques! This result was marvelous.
@maths_505
@maths_505 Год назад
Indeed So far I haven't seen an integral that gives a similar result
@Gamberizzati
@Gamberizzati Год назад
nice. however there is an elementary solution in one line using the residue theorem applied to the function Re(e^(iz)/(z^2+1)).
@maths_505
@maths_505 Год назад
Yes indeed but I just love using real methods wherever possible
@zlatanbrekke6538
@zlatanbrekke6538 8 месяцев назад
The residue Theorem is so powerful in this case. I only had to look at the integral and calculate it in my head, I didn’t have to write a single line down. I could SEE what the answer would be. Such a beautiful, powerful tool.
@adityabharadwaj4114
@adityabharadwaj4114 Год назад
Very nice method! Really liked it. Thank you🙏🙏
@damrgee8279
@damrgee8279 Год назад
Can somebody tell me how all of this is used in the real world
@noedeverchere2833
@noedeverchere2833 Год назад
In engineering
@renesperb
@renesperb Год назад
Another aprroach is to use Fourier -transforms:Consider the integral of Exp[i x y]/(1+x^2) ,which corresponds to √(2*π) * Fourier transform of 1/(x^2+1). The FT of 1/(x^2+1) is √(π/2)*Exp[- | y |]. For y=1 you get π/e . To see that the Fourier transform of 1/(x^2+1) is given by the term written before , one can just use the inverse FT of Exp[- | y |] which is easy to calculate.
@techanalyst23
@techanalyst23 Год назад
Absolutely gorgeous one ❤️‍🔥
@MilkoAtchev
@MilkoAtchev Год назад
Wow! Great result and techniques for solving! Thank you👍
@NotreDameCollege-ju6fl
@NotreDameCollege-ju6fl Месяц назад
which software you use to write like these?
@aymaneoulahyane6803
@aymaneoulahyane6803 7 месяцев назад
❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤
@jasonlin5884
@jasonlin5884 Год назад
But what if replace the cos(x) with sin(x) ? It surely converge (seems converge to 0.64...). , but I can't work out. I get it equal to infnity*0
@blblblblblbl7505
@blblblblblbl7505 2 месяца назад
It gives 0 because the function is odd
@jasonlin5884
@jasonlin5884 2 месяца назад
@@blblblblblbl7505 sorry !i forgot to rewrite the integrated boundary from 0 to plus infinity . It is converged. Converge to 0.6xxxxx
@renesperb
@renesperb Год назад
The technique used is by no means simple. I would assume that someone who is able to do that also knows residue theory .Use that you may take the real part of Exp[ i x] and use that 1/(x^2+1)= 1/2 i (1/(x-i)-1/(x+ i) ,which leads to π * i *(-i *Exp[-1] = π/e
@maths_505
@maths_505 Год назад
Indeed but I just love using real techniques whenever possible
@juliogarcia1152
@juliogarcia1152 11 месяцев назад
Are U kidding us?
@roderictaylor
@roderictaylor 22 дня назад
Very nice.
@thomasblackwell9507
@thomasblackwell9507 Год назад
Beautiful! This is a combination of the Feynman Technique and the Laplace Transform right?
@maths_505
@maths_505 Год назад
Not exactly The feynman technique is based on differentiating a parameter The laplace transform is more of an integration w.r.t a parameter along with the introduction of an exponential term involving that parameter
@thomasblackwell9507
@thomasblackwell9507 Год назад
@@maths_505 --Thank you, sir.
@holyshit922
@holyshit922 Год назад
@@maths_505 is special case of integration with respect to a parameter
@abouzarmansouri
@abouzarmansouri Год назад
Why should I use such a long method? There are much shorter methods
Год назад
❤❤❤❤❤❤ Beautiful interplay of techniques!!
@wagsman9999
@wagsman9999 Год назад
wow... very nice, stunning result
@epsilia3611
@epsilia3611 Год назад
Let's say I integrate from -infty to +infty the function x, wrt x. Can I use the fact that x is an odd function in order to say that the I definite integral is zero? The same way here, how do we know the parity on an indefinite integral applies ? Because the function you're integrating is bounded maybe? In that case why is it a valid argument?
@maths_505
@maths_505 Год назад
You can integrate x from -a to +a and you'll get zero. Taking the limit to infinity of something that's zero is zero so yes the argument is valid in this case Nd yes part of the reason why the parity applies is that the function we're integrating is bounded. However that's part of the bigger picture where we need boundedness to actually get a solution that's valid.
@epsilia3611
@epsilia3611 Год назад
No need to delete my response really, it's okay if you don't have the response to my question...
@maths_505
@maths_505 Год назад
I haven't deleted it I responded an hour ago
@epsilia3611
@epsilia3611 Год назад
@@maths_505 I was talking about the 3 other comments that were deleted in a row ...
@maths_505
@maths_505 Год назад
Deleted? I haven't deleted anything Perhaps they're being held in review Let me check
@helker999
@helker999 Год назад
such an underrrated math channel
@kartikeyasaxena3465
@kartikeyasaxena3465 Год назад
Love from India 👍
@social6332
@social6332 Год назад
beautiful solution.
@gianlucastrong3496
@gianlucastrong3496 Год назад
Thank you very much!
@hanspetermarro4188
@hanspetermarro4188 Год назад
Nice video along a touristic route of mathematical techniques. Contour integration in the complex plane makes this a one-liner.
@mohammadmohammad-qi2os
@mohammadmohammad-qi2os Год назад
awesome
@kennethwilliams4169
@kennethwilliams4169 Год назад
Nice!
@bmrm2004
@bmrm2004 Год назад
Beaufiful result. Can also be accomplished using complex analysis.
@maalikserebryakov
@maalikserebryakov Год назад
Yep that was my first reaction
@shakaibsafvi97
@shakaibsafvi97 Год назад
Hi You skipped too many core concept steps :(
@giack6235
@giack6235 Год назад
I'm not very sure on 0:30 passage: function is even ok, but doubling the integral and behalfing the integration domain in case of integrand even function works only when extremes of integration are finite. If extremes are not finite we don't know how each extreme approaches its infinity (+inf and -inf respectively) and so we don't necessarily have a symmetric integration area. I think the passage is true only in the principal value of the integral sense.
@umairbutt1355
@umairbutt1355 10 месяцев назад
I've always found this result mind-boggling. I mean who asked for that e? 😂Made even more strange by the introduction of cosx into the integrand of all things! Results like this seem to be hints to a higher-order generationalization of e and trigonometric functions via complex analysis.
Далее
THE MOST BEAUTIFUL RESULT IN ALL OF CALCULUS!!!
10:00
Ко мне подкатил бармен
00:58
Просмотров 204 тыс.
Лучше одной, чем с такими
00:54
Просмотров 438 тыс.
Students these days are not able to solve this one
17:02
The overpowered Laplace technique for summing series.
19:21
When a mathematician gets bored
10:18
Просмотров 45 тыс.