She's a Jodi worshipper. The unedited video of Jodi after her conviction said a lot too. They're both liars. Jennifer encouraged Jodi to attack the Alexander family. Jennifer told Jodi she was going to get life without parole anyway, she had nothing to lose.
@@roxannemoser she done her job tbf. At least nurmi kept asking the judge to be let off the case! No1 wants wants to be bad at their job. Why was rob kardashians name famous? For getting OJ off
@@meltedmarshdaddy Her job? Her job was to give Arias a competent defense, which she failed at. It is not to lie on television. She isn't a politician.
@@Ocrilat She cant go against her own client and defense on national tv. That would be failing. She didnt fail either it was an open and shut case and she was only a public state attorney. She saved Arias from getting death and thats the best any attorney would do.
@@martinam7806 This is beyond Jodi's rights . Its about the lawyer getting more clients. I understand maintaining the lie during trial of course, but to do so AFTER conviction is not necessary. Especially as it was a lie designed specifically to destroy a dead man's repution.
Ms. Wilmott please tell me, if someone gets shot in the head and stabbed about 30 times and then his throat gets slit from ear to ear do you still think that is self defense???
Of course, but she had to have amnesia. If she didn't, then the police would have the gun, which would prove it was her grandfather's, and thus prove premeditation...and prove story #3 was a lie like #1 and #2.
What's funny is that she seems to have used the gun simply because she brought it...and using it caused the problems that ended with her behind bars. Imagine if she didn't use it.
@@KHH595 Yes, but it would have been tougher to convince based on a photo of a foot. The gun being 'stolen' from her grandfather, and Travis being killed with the same kind of gun pointed to her immediately. The gunshot screwed up her self-defense claim too. No gun would have made it more difficult (not impossible) to prove guilt...and only one 'not guilty' or 'not proved' would be a hung jury.
I’m pretty sure she as an attorney has to uphold what was said in court. She also can’t say what was talked about even if Jodi told her about lies. Not morally but legally has to do this
Really wish journalists were better prepared. The question SHOULD have been: "After hearing that Travis' sisters BIGGEST fear, was that Travis was conscious for the throat slitting, and for Jodi to say YES he absolutely WAS conscious, HOW is that NOT vindictive Ms Wilmott? How, does that NOT destroy the character you have been trying to portray JA as throughout this trial - with that one, frighteningly vicious statement"??
I could never be a lawyer, having to defend a murder's innocence would be a terrible job. Especially when you and everyone around you knows the person is guilty.
Well, these defense attorneys choose their jobs and many are very highly paid, or are serving as public defenders in order to later get onto private firms later, so it’s hard to feel sympathy for what they go through.
@@AnangelfromaboveIm a lawyer, its not inmoral, its called democracy. Otherwise, if someone cant have a defense, the state would become a dictatorship. What we do is just say what the defendant wants to say. We are just a microphone, because defendant cant speak for himself... but we dont like defendants, we dont think they are right, we hate what they do, but we are tools of the democracy system. BUT, as a lawyer, what a WOULD NEVER EVER EVER EVER EVER DO, is calling pedophile a man without evidence. That was a very dirty thing to do, and I could never do that... that certanly is inmoral.
we can't believe a single thing this woman says. Jodi said she was now aware that Travis WAS alert when she took the knife to his throat! She SAID it because the family made a statement that they hoped that Travis wasn't aware of it by then. She said it just to take another pot shot to that poor family. It was EVIL!
Miss Robin Martz YUPPERS....she said it to HURT everyone. However, it only PROVES that she feels NO REMORSE! If someone had done this to jodi's brother, and I am just PRETENDING that jodi actually has a heart & can FEEL LOVE for anyone other than herself, she would say & feel the same as the Alexanders feel about what jodi did! That said, jodi feels NOTHING for NO ONE other than herself. Travis once told her, (paraphrasing), "You only cry for jodi!" And that's STILL true.
The Alexander family were reliving their brother's death over and over again. Jodi could have shut her mouth and not told the family that he was conscious when she slit his throat. They did not need to know that and she knew how much that would hurt them so that was her last shot at that family ..Cause them as much grief as possible. I don't know how they could control themselves from attacking her when she said that. She is one evil woman.
+Lorraine Walsh Well said! Is exactly WHY Jodi Arias made that claim. I seriously doubt that TA was conscious or aware of his final moment of having his throat slit, nearly decapitating him. J Arias is clearly guided by satan himself as what she did takes being demonic possession I'm positive of her being demon possessed as she dabbled in spiritualism years prior to meeting TA. I'm thinking it began when she was 14...the "fruits" of this is pathological lying, stealing, sneaking, disobeying authorities, doing what one wishes and has zero tolerance to being told what to do or under control of your parents. Remember one of her BF, Bobby, who hunted vampires and they both dabbled in the Wicca faith AND also "The Secret" is also a form of spiritualism. You cannot dabble in any of this...even just a little bit is dangerous and JA allowed/invited satan full control over her life and look where its gotten her. Its like being pregnant. you cannot me just a little bit PG...you either are or you aren't. The same goes to God as there are NO gray areas. You're either serving God or you're serving Satan. This is powerful stuff going on here only most people aren't aware of it...what I'm writing here is all biblical and I'm happy to prove/back up with scripture as to what I'm writing. Jodi Arias will NEVER take an ounce of responsibility to any wrongs she's done and she will continue to finger point and blame others for what she's done. Jodi Arias believes her own lies and fantasies she makes up, as if its all true, she tells a very convincing story and there are gullible people who believe everything she says. Jennifer Willmott isn't a stupid person, in fact she's quite brilliant and smart. But she's got something wrong with her thinking AND also she doesn't have any conscious and helped JA make the claims that she did along with her other lawyer, Nurmi whose entire career has been defending the worst of the worst...Child rapist, Pedophiles, Child molesters and seriously evil men who destroy peoples lives. it was Nurmi who introduced the idea to JA to make these claims of TA being a pedophile for the sole purpose of making it easier to destroy this poor victim...and get people to believe TA deserved to be slaughtered like he was. Take a look at how many people believe the lies about TA being a pedophile and post/comment that he deserved to be murdered so he will never harm another child. But that is nothing but big fat lies that Nurmi helped JA come up with. It worked on Jurors...and #17 on 2nd trial fell into their trap! plus the fact she had a personal vendetta against Juan Martinez for his putting one of her ex husbands in prison...she claims she forgot who he was...yeah right!...How does ANYONE forget the prosecutor who put your husband in prison, spend weeks watching him, listening to him during your husbands trial?...if thats the case and she really did forget, then this woman shouldn't be left walking around, let alone making such serious decisions as a juror!
Their case was always lost from the get go. And to be honest how her mom seen bruises sounds bogus. Then all of her defense except NURMI acts like they’re Jodi freaks.
@@matthewp9156 We are not talking about Jodi. We are talking about her attorneys and the beauty of our judicial system in this country to have a fair trial. We don't just hang people because the court of public opinion. Do you realize how many people would be wrongfully convicted???! ( and yes, they are now too but we also have attorneys and laws to exonerate those people). I'm saying, with what little her attorneys had, they did the best they could to defend her. Sure, she's guilty, but she has every right & so do you to be defended if you are ever in a situation need be.Not sure why you hate that? That's a blessing and our constitutional right!
Jennifer Willmott was low level attorney who saw Jodi as her golden ticket. Laurence "Kirk" Nurmi - the other Arias attorney has already stated publicly that Jodi was creepest client he ever had and that Jodi thought he was her boyfriend. Only Jennifer Willmott hangs in there for Jodi because its her only option away from her biggest fear which is obscurity.
Or maybe you don't understand how the legal system works and you don't know the obligations of a defense lawyer and that they're stuck with clients that they might not even want to represent and how they are not allowed to say anything bad about their clients. She even says at the end that she has no choice.
@@Andi-81 that's not what I mean. But the way the law is written, the attorney is obligated to take the client's word on face value. The justice system wouldn't work if this was not written in law. The war would be one sided. I don't think Wilmot believed Jodie, but she's obliged to take her word. Jodie ended up where she belongs. While I think Travis was a duplicitous person, he in no way deserved this terrible ending.
Only bad lawyers lie, .At least, that's how it is in the UK. Barristers are taught very strong ethics, it's drummed into you over and over, and you NEVER lie to the court. Your first responsibility is to the court, not your client, so you never lie for your client. It's pretty straightforward.
This woman is as manipulative as Jodi. She is trying to portray herself as naive. She knows perfectly well that Jodi is a cold blooded killer. I will give her the benefit of the doubt and say she is stupid enough to believe Jodi.
This attorney is insane herself. All the evidence points to the fact that this woman is capable of having “some sort”of friendship with Arias because they are both sociopaths. They both have the same demeanor and the same voice quality. So strange.
I don't know why people are so ignorant hating this lawyer. Many of us have worked for companies we don't like however it's our job to do it. No matter which lawyer represented Jodi (everyone would have hated that lawyer as well)
I agree that it was definitely her job and she was stuck with her but I think most are more upset that not only did she go along with and push the phedo acts..her whole demeanor throughout this trial was just childish..and some think how can she bat for someone who has done this..even though her job is to defend she went low with it..I think that may be why some aren't as equally repulsed by Nurmi..because he defended her but he didn't keep making excuses and going way beyond..he did what he had to and was gone...but I also see Where you come from on it! Its hard to keep some morals and be likeable I would bet if you have defend something as vile as Jodi while acting like you believe her near impossible stories..and it indeed was her job so I get it on both sides.
If this were MY lawyer, and I saw all the fluff and stuff on her desk, meaning the crap hanging from the desklamp and the lotions and potions and little precious boxes and CRAP....I would leave. This person is stunted emotionally at around 14-15.
Lol! I was thinking that but I saw the part 2 video and it looks more like a storage/office room so I wonder if it’s her paralegals/assistants desk. Maybe attorneys are different but I have a lawyer in my family and he never touches those file boxes unless he has too so he doesn’t have those in his office at all. Normally his paralegals mess with all those 😂 but if it is her office then legally blonde needs to chill 😂
@@agent_ninety9 actually what I meant was that she is undefendable. Indefensible means that it is "weak and it cannot be protected" . And she doesn't need protection. Others need protection from her.
Welcome to Jodi-world, where nothing is your fault and you are the greatest person on the planet. Don't you see? He attacked her with deadly intent so she ran away but remembered the last time she ran left and Travis choked her unconscious so she instead ran right and picked up a gun she thought was unloaded, just to point it at him to make him stop, but he tackled her and the gun accidentally went off and she didn't know he got shot and he was still coming at her to kill her and then she blacked out and was not aware of her actions even though she slaughtered him with deadly intent and cleaned the crime scene afterwards and deleted compromising photos and left unseen only to come back to reality somewhere in the desert near the state border where she knew something had happened but couldn't accept it and then magically find her phone charger but didn't call 911 even though she had his blood on her so she instead called his voice mail and pretended to never have been there and then went to Salt Lake City to have a heavy make out session with Ryan Burns just to feel normal and safe again and he was absolutely not an alibi for her and then she found out that her license plate was missing on one side and upside down on the other beacause of those rowdy skateboarders a few days back and then she went to dinner with knife wounds on her left finger that was from smashing a glas at Margheritaville, no wait, another restuarant and it wasn't a glas, it was a metal edge, no wait, Travis had kicked her finger six months ago, no wait, she cut her finger on glas in Travis' house before the murder and it was her right finger, everyone else is wrong, and then she went home and couldn't accept his death so she pretended he was alive in her diary and then someone told her he was dead so she acted surprised because of the fog or something and then she sent flowers to his grandmother because of ethics and then went to his memorial service because they had a pact and visited his house with other people and then went bikini shopping and flew home and gave her phone number to a guy on the plane and then she was arrested while packing her car with condoms, knife and gun because she was going on a camping trip with guys and you know how guys can be and then she was interrogated and denied everything, and then she was interrogated and blamed ninjas that threatened her family and then she told the truth about Travis' abuse and pedophilia and then she was wrongfully convicted because the prosecutor was not nice to her. Questions?
Now SHE conducts herself as a true professional! She doesn't write scandalous post-trial books about her client. She didn't tell the jury that "she doesn't even like her client", like Nermie did. How he got away with those two things, I will never understand.
She seems like a nice lady. I think two things she said were interesting: 1) She’s not her friend and she says, more than once, that she had no choice but to be in this situation (which is true). 2) She basically admitted (in a roundabout attorney way) that she didn’t believe her story but had to defend her because that’s her job. When she says that she didn’t really concern herself so much in what was true but what evidence she could use in trial in order to support a defensive theory. It's a clever way of saying: "I had to do whatever I had to do in order to give her a fair trial. But I don't believe this b*&!& and I'm not her friend, either." LOL. So, I think it’s easy to want to call Willmott “scum” and “trash”, etc. But, it’s just factual that she was court-appointed and doing her job. And you can't help but notice the big smile when she says, "I'm finished." It's almost like you can hear her say YAY.
It was the same way with Kurt Nurmi. He was court appointed. Jodi Arias completely wrecked his life! She sued him because he wrote a book. Crazy chick! He had said he didn't want to use to travis is a "child molester" defense, but she insisted that he do what she said!
That’s not what I’m hearing. I hear comments like “the evidence points at her (the murderer) being the victim”, and Travis could be my client. Which is beyond crazy for her to say and kind of a dumbass to still defend this so obviously guilty murderer 🙄
I know people like Wilmott, my mother is exactly like her, they are dangerous celf-centered individuals without moral compass. There is no worldview but their own, noone is right except them and noone is even close to their level, meanwhile they are barely average people. That is why she will never understand the case objectively, her worldview is what is to her profit, what Arias told her. It does not matter if these people were forced into this, they tried to pull off some nasty things to keep this monster out of jail, they asked for a retrial, they blamed the procecutor for unlawful behavior, they made someone draw lines into a magnified picture of an eye and blamed everyone for not seeing what they see etc.
5:47 Bingo! Great job on the interview. Willmott is now locked into a statement that directly contradicts the killer's mother. Jennifer Willmott is Jodi Arias with better parenting.
Crawling in doggie doors, showing up where she's not wanted, knowing all of the financial institutions and outs of someone else's life who you dated for five months, and monitoring his social media like a detective isn't out of the ordinary At All. *note extreme sarcasm* Travis was stalked and harassed then murdered in cold blood. His weakness was having sex and Jodi knew she could manipulate him that way. She planned all of this and thankfully she was arrested because she'd already rented another car where she had stashed knives in boxes and had a gun she'd just purchased taped under the hood! Who was next..?
I don't understand why she's still lying for, I mean, defending the murderer after she doesn't have to anymore, since the trial is over. At least, the other lawyer, Nurmi has some integrity.
Excellent interview..... Jodi Arias is an unrepentant, spiteful woman. Her last comments that Travis Alexander was alive & aware when his throat was cut proves it. Declaring this newly recalled "info" before being carted away to prison was one final way to strike at his family and devastate them even more. Horrible woman.
@@oldskertonion morally I don't agree as all the evidence points to her committing the crime and the defense scenarios being laughable. Surely you can see that
This is why lawyers are considered to be the lowest form of life. ALL the evidence points to a defenseless victim being brutally murdered after being stalked for 2 years. His friends feared for his life.
Cuomo premeditated directing covid-19 patients into nursing homes leading to the death of innocent elderly people by the hundreds. He's serving no time in prison. Jodi killed one guy who cheated on her and set himself up in a love triangle. She is serving a sentence of life without parole. 🤔 Something here doesn't look like equal justice under the law.
3:51 "Why didn't you have her family testify when they said they saw bruises" Willmott: "Who said that?" Was SHE EVEN THERE???!!! Sandy Arias specifically stated in open court → she saw the bruises! WOW, Willmott finally speaks publically & proves the majority have been right about her all along. She's nuts!
Stabby also said her SISTER saw them, but anyone who saw them was "being prevented" from testifying. UGH. We already knew, but now we have PROOF POSTIVE that JODI LIED ABOUT THE BRUISES.
8:18 "I'd speak about it but I really can't go into the things we talk about" then 10 seconds later & for the duration of the video she goes into the things they talk about! Also since she doesn't believe Jodi's a stalker, Willmott clearly sees nothing wrong with slashing tires, sneaking in doggie doors, stealing passwords, or spying on someone! ⊙.☉
***** jodi's NOT a stalker? If someone slashed HER tires 2x, walked into her friend's house where you were inside with them, broke into your house while you weren't there, slept in your Christmas tree after slipping into your house UNINVITED, and following you to the restroom waiting outside for you to come out, appear at various places you are at when YOU did NOT invite them to be there.....Wilmott does NOT consider THAT stalking? Let's see how she feels when someone actually DOES that to her. She BELIEVES jodi's NUMEROUS LIES? How STUPID is she? I know TEENAGERS that can see right through jodi's lies! Good Lord.....she's missing some MAJOR brain cells!
***** a typo.....I should have used HER instead of YOUR because if someone did all this to wilmott, she would DEFINITELY consider it stalking! she claimed her life was threatened, but I don't think there was ever any proof that it was.
2 scenarios:She knows the truth that her client is a narcissist brutal killer who planned the murder and saying those things ( like - there is no evidence that she stacked him which is a lie) bc she acts as a defense attorney or she is infatuated with JA who managed to manipulate her
It's granted to every american in our constitution to have a right to a defense. We are a country that upholds the belief that it is better for 1,000 to "get away with it" than for one person to be wrongfully committed. We need both sides to fight vehemently in the hope that justice will always win. Obviously, we we are flawed but a defense attorney is a right that we should uphold for every citizen. In the end, Jodi was sentenced to life in prison and this attorney can wash her hands from her job to protect the innocent who are only found guilty in a court of law.
A comparison between Jennifer 'Dumc Huntte' Willmott & Juan 'El Diablo Mein Fuhrer' Martinez Unregistered Registered Legal Fanny Recording Time Limit 10 minutes (per file) Unlimited (Over 24 hours recording) Criminal X O Game Recording (avi, mp4) O O Screen Recording (avi, mp4) O O Plays Minecraft O O Webcam/HDMI Recording (avi, mp4) O O Image Capture (bmp, png, jpg) O O Game FPS overlay and control O O If the product is registered, the watermark (www.JenniferWillmott.com) will not be shown on the recorded videos and the recording time will be unlimited. Once you purchase the program, there is a lifetime guarantee on the license as long as you follow the license policy.
Yeah people deserve a defense no matter who they are, and defense attorneys are doing absolutely nothing wrong by defending people of all walks of life. Without these attorneys there would be nobody to defend innocent people when they get charged with things unjustly, and nobody to protect people who may be guilty from getting a sentence that is unjust.
Jodi's mother said (lied), "I saw the bruises" during her interview with the press on the steps of the courthouse, as she was leaving, immediately after the sentencing phase was concluded. Of course, it was a lie because she was never anywhere near Jodi during the time of the alleged incidents of abuse. Sandy Arias was in Yreka. Jodi Arias was in Mesa. Sandy did not even see Jodi, nevermind see any bruises on Jodi's body.. It is surprising that the reporter came to this interview without knowing about Sandy's statement or where and when she made it. She should have been better prepared. As it was, the reporter allowed Wilmott to evade confronting that deception. Nothing of much value in this interview! Wilmott's statement that Jodi wanted "to tell the truth as she saw if" is unadulterated piffle." Jodi "'told the truth"' as she wanted US to see it." Well, we didn't see it her way--and only a person walking around without an attendant could possibly believe it." Where does that place Wilmott?
Her mom went there to help move April before travis died. JA claimed travis had tried to choke her and bruises were on her neck at that time. I don't believe it but that was when her mom was there and jodi made her mom leave. Right before that, Matt had called the mom, worried that jodi had might kill herself. Listen to parents` first interview with Flores for that info.
Thanks for clarifying that for me. I should have paid closer attention to the time of that visit. Don't know where I got the impression it was before Xmas 2007. Like you, I still don't believe Mom saw anything of the sort she claimed. It's not as though Jodi was taking her Mom into her confidence.
She did go home that X-mas. It might have been that x-mas or around new years where Matt was calling all concerned that she'd hurt herself. her father or mother were saying it in their police interview. I don't know if you would have caught it easily in testimony. I caught it by listening to the parents interrogation and piecing that up with what the blond girl that testifying on day one or two was saying. Maybe also when Jodi was testifying about the uhaul truck. I had to watch the trial at least 3 times to get facts. Especially when she was arguing with JM about that picture and the masterbating that never happened.
I'm going to watch it again and see if I can follow that thread throughout the interviews and testimony. Was the blonde girl you referred to Lisa Andrews, Travis's girlfriend during some of the approximately 22 months, (Sept. 2006 to June 4, 2008), Travis and Jodi knew each other? I was actually in Court for a few days of the trial but not for any of the days when Arias testified. I was there for Lisa Andrews. Anyways, I still don't understand why the reporter who interviewed Wilmott was not aware of what Sandy Arias said about the alleged abuse in her interview on the steps of the Courthouse after sentencing. It would have been good to see Wilmott's reaction if that had been put to her. Cheers and thanks.
No problem. I am sure that was an experience to be in the court room. I have a legal crush on Juan Martinez. I guess it was Lisa Andrews. It's been so long and I looked at SO many different things. I just looked at my google document notes and realized that I was getting information even out of journal entry photos. I'm gonna find it for you myself because I might be wrong about it being Lisa's testimony.
"she had been in very situations with different attourneys" I believe she was so annoying that noone could bare her.
8 лет назад
Unlike many people, I felt no anger towards Jennifer Willmott because I had realized that she was just doing her job. -But having said that, there's NO WAY that I'd hire somebody like her as my Lawyer, because if I was charged with DUI, having Jennifer defend me would probably get me Jodi's needle.....
Willmott tried to discredit Dr. Janeen DeMarte the minute she got on the stand. Dr. DeMarte wasn’t having any of it. Didn’t take Willmot’s bait and acted very professional. She at times even got Willmott tongue twisted 😂 it was DeMarte who was able to discredit this horrible woman. I hate to even say this about Willmott since she lost her 15yr old son to a tragic skateboard accident. But after seeing her again go on and on again on the recent Discovery+ doc. It just annoys me how she refuses to believe Jodi is a monster. Then she wonders why she gets her “so called” death threats. She said in the documentary one person grabbed her and “kind of spun her around” to tell her, I hope Jodi rots in prison or hell. Who kind of spins you around. She was probably tapped on the shoulder, maybe accidentally with all those people outside. Willmott, like Jodi, tried to dramatize her encounter that probably never happened 😂😂😂
Jennifer Wilmot is the one who told Jodi to “go ahead and say it (about Travis being conscious when she slit his throat) you know she’s going to sentence you to life without parole today, what do you have to lose!” But she sure wants to back pedal about that now. That was one of the most cruel aspects of this trial. And Ms Wilmot, it was your very unprofessional actions and mean girl attitude you shared with Jodi during the whole trial that has people turned off toward you. You and Jodi both looked heartless and immature during the trial. It was shocking to see a “professional” act in such a way!
People are so emotional. This was the day after the sentence. She's still Arias' lawyer. She simply cannot throw her under the bus to make you feel better. It's her job.
I think she is a fine attorney, she did her job rather well and now she as a any good attorney probably shouldn't black mouth her client, whoever the client would be. But as a person I think she would like to forget about Jodi as soon as possible. I am pretty sure she is fed up with that psychopath. She is just not going to say that in public, because that would not be appealing to any other potential client.
OMG she most definitely was stalking him. Did this attorney sleep through this trial? The evidence proved she was a liar, a killer, a stalker and thats why she is serving life
Juan Martinez said he was already dead when he was shot because there was no bleeding from the wound meaning the heart was not pumping at the time of the shooting so how can she say she shot him first?
It's quite contradictory what Wilmott speaks about with regard to Jodi's memory issues ... how the memories "came back" to her over a period of time through reliving and retelling things during the trial. The problem with that is the fact that Samuels testified that these things Jodi couldn't remember about the killing were never encoded and so they were never made INTO memories in the first place. That was how he explained her Fog and why she couldn't recall specific things. That she would never be able to because the memories were never made. Remember the whole hippocampus testimony? What Wilmott is saying in the beginning flies in the face of Samuels "expert" testimony entirely. What it boils down to is that the more the defense people talk, the clearer it becomes that none of them -- not just Jodi Arias -- can keep their lies straight.
Scarey how someone can believe their own lies, part of me wonders if she never met Travis would she kill some one else. Why was Travis her fatal attraction ,
She probably doesn't even realize she just crapped all over the entire defense's strategy and claims during the guilt phase of the trial. What a maroon.
Sonja Momberger YOUR ANSWER IS YES SHE WOULD HAVE EVENTUALLY but Ive met a killer or 2 in my life, Its the spirit inside that has becomed spoiled to a point of thier only belife is to live savagely & normalcy empathy & compasion are all a myth & belife that they were never shown these things weather true or not Why should they feel thiers for others. TO ADD : if you really listen to her interigation carefully Travis wanted what was right to do right he was a sinner he knew that, But he was not gonna break that commandment even in defence of his own life. She said it so when she described male & female nijas. "he said thats not why were here, just go get help"
I like Jennifer. She defended Jodi because that’s her job. She’s a defense lawyer. Someone’s got to do it. As citizens of the U.S., we have the right to a fair trial and due process. It’s probably not easy to defend people who do terrible things, but for those who are wrongly accused, these defense attorneys are vital in getting justice. She messed up sometimes, but overall I think she did well. Plus, she was up against Juan Martinez, which I’m sure was not easy!
Absolutely it’s our justice system that everyone deserves a good defense and Arias was entitled to one certainly- my problem with Willmott is that she betrayed her hypocratic oath as an attorney to be ethical and moral in her defense of a client…. Letting Arias testify that Travis was a pedophile, that he masturbated to pictures of little boys and liked her to dress like a young school girl is wrong…. But more importantly I absolutely believe that Willmott acted unethically by taking details of another case where a woman was on trial for killing her husband in self defense and Dr. Lenore Walker testified on behalf of this woman by describing Battered Women’s Syndrome… and Willmott asked Dr Walker to testify for Arias but she declined stating she didn’t believe Arias was a DV victim… which led Willmott to take many facts and aspects of this other lady’s case and gave them to Arias to use in this case…,
Juan Martinez created such a circus, he as disbarred for unprofessional conduct. He's no hero. He could have secured a conviction without turning a U.S. courtroom into a circus pavilion.He had contact with a dismissed juror, for god's sake. J
An unenviable task. I don't know this person-maybe I would dislike them in real life for personal reasons, maybe not-but she is doing her job and I respect that. But justice was served and the truth was exposed and I am grateful and happy at this.
