'Oumuamua Finally Explained Using a Brilliant Analysis 

B

Awesome Video

I was gonna say that but you beat me to it Anton

@@raym6791 ok

Anton will you adopt me?

Even snakes

I mean there's a Kewpie doll in orbit around Cygnus X-1, for Pete's sa

DELETE DELETE CIMMENT DELETE COMMENT HIDE COMMENT

Aliens, snakes, and lizard people ​@cgKyle CIA needs to get out there and cause galactic civil wars and plant snakes as lizard people and vice versa.

chunks

Yesss

No I haven't!

LMAOooooo, Dunning Krugger effect is strong in the comment section

Which is why they teach the Theory of Evolution in schools as though it was fact.

Plato's Cave Allegory

Chocolate rainnnn

Woah! That's so cool that watch his videos

Well this is the last place I'd expect to see Tay Zonday

Tay you absolute legend you

Yo Tay whats up playa?

There’s no image of it, just hypotheses

@@TalkinKush That is not true.

@@grant1390well, the image is just a dot. Who know what the surface actually looks like

@@bb5979 Of course it is just a dot. Though it was also observed spectroscopically.

Is it just me? The object ejected invisible gases heated by the Sun which would cause it to move away from the Sun, but his image of its path at 3:30 shows it moving CLOSER to the sun than expected?

@@Pyxis10 No it wasn't "aleins" *_IT WAS ALIENS!!!_* 👽

That's real science for you, c'mon man!

yeah space trash from another society out there.

Exactly my point as well. 😂😂😂

It's obviously a piece of a world blown up in an intergalactic war far, far away.

We have a quote like this in Spanish. Very good!

That's exactly what my wife said before she divorced me

lmao that's what I thought right away

The Hutts got pissed Han's ship is still around so they froze it in Carbonite...

Just what I was thinking!

@@TheMoulie Great minds and all.

@@pkkiller_apathy4568 They do that, those pizza people.

Terence?

I’ll listen to the wind over my own judgment honestly lol

@Sean Matheney that's the one I know;-)

@@jasonpassofaro3305 this guy's a legend ^

Too late I already got tinnitus

So I wasn't crazy lol

Brilliant. Here's the new artist impression [puts up image of a something that looks even more like a spaceship - millennium falcon]. I jumped to conclusions

I'll have to delete my comment now...

And the Baltic Sea anomaly...

Oumuamua*

You said it in a much nicer way.

exactly wild theory and money squandered to research it.

But the media is also culpable, looking for anything to sensationalize, even if it means drawing wrong (though popular wishful thinking) conclusions just to attract views and make a buck...

Having been in, and out, of academia I'd say that for every self-promoting egotist there are dozens of dedicated scientists driven by the desire to understand what's around us. Taken out of context, many of the questions being asked can sound foolish, but that can be said of most things out of context. I dare say that you misunderstood the point being made in the video. ​@@paulbattenbough1002

I saw this in the 90s as a graduate student. Much of the spin you saw in the media for a particular scientific story was created in the University and then given to the News Network. We all should be more skeptical about popular science articles. Although, it's hard to see where the motive for spinning what appears to be a pure science topic, people don't realize the amount of money that is on the line. Popular Science articles kinda serve the same purpose as those advertisements for prescription drugs. Why would they show these to the general public? It's to influence the people that control the money.

Wow

Lol!!! That's Hella Funny🤣🤣🤣

We are the supreme beings in all of the galaxies that exist. Other life forms are behind us. We will be the first to invade another planet.

@@bobbywalsh7767 nope, there are many higher civilization out there in our galaxy some of them already came on earth before.

Giant raw stake.

No one uses mate like that anymore, so no, they won't say, mate, sorry.

Or Voyager will land on a planet inhabited by a medieval society. They'll melt down the gold record for its precious metal value and chuck out the rest of the probe as trash.

@@Mscape7 who hurt you, mate?

@@Mscape7 Dafuq kind of weird comment is this? What do _you_ know, lol?

Sup, mate..

So THAT explains his smile at the end of his recent videos. It all falls into place now.

Yeah I never bought that "this is a Canadian accent" business.

My first suspicion is that he called me wonderful

He may be an alien, but he’s so darn lovable!

Trying to tell us these things aren't because of aliens is just the sort of thing an alien would do.

The brightness fluctuations clearly come from its tail flapping, not rotation!

Ou-mola-mola? 🤡

@@nimblehuman Excellent!

@@Clayne151 Good point!

You should let Avi loeb know! He will be right onto that fishing for stuff out of the ocean.

No where. Time is a word humans created to dumb down one of the key fundamental parts of the here & now, to provide others with the human condition to find relevance.

@@floydthedroid5935 ok buddy, he was just saying how time as flown since 2017, it seems like maybe a year or so ago

@@conorhennell2623 ok buddy

@@conorhennell2623 repspect the droid simpleton

Oumuamua is a time stealing probe, from a distant star system, and took it all. 😅😅😅

I was hoping I wasn't the only one

It does! Completely!

Shit. Beat me to it lmao.

It reminded me of something but I couldn't put my finger on it.

Same here! Either Han got lost trying to beat his record for the Kessel run. Or someone smashed a huge ball of red play-do.

Digest with your gut, but use your brain to think.

Morals don’t matter if u kill someone to prevent deaths in ur ship, maybe u will be out to death but 2 deaths instead of many more

I mean parasite

Captain Disillusion is probably paying a lot of alimony now.

The healthiest and most successful relationships I know of started out with no passion involved. Turns out your brain is more reliable for love than your heart too.

No worries. This piece of space junk doesn't discount the reality of ET. Far from it.

It could still be a ship purposefully surrounded by nitrogen ice to protect it during the journey. Good camouflage as well. They switch on tumble mode and silent mode in the event they are spotted by intelligent beings.

Goodbye

This NEEDS to be top comment

The Big Picture - have you *NEVER* seen the state of mankind's society the world over? It was just thoroughly explained in this video why some of the most intelligent among us are complete morons. Why would aliens, who switch to tumble and silent mode when spotted by intelligent beings, switch to that when spotted by people on earth? That makes absolutely *no sense* whatsoever in any way, shape, form, fashion, fantasy, or imagination. 🤦

hahaha

I love that saying but hear it from rather close minded individuals sometimes haha.

Too late for that, I need to find my brain again.

Twas a good'un wannit!

@@crono3339 reminded me of Jack Sparrow in the 3rd one when he'd dropped his brain!!

I believe that was a quote from one of Carl Sagan's books.

Ooops--splutch!

That's why I keep my hair shoulder-length It kind of acts like a net. Well . . . More like a thicket hedge

Thats why we built the pyramids.

@@bsodcat no one knows how they built them . There are only theories no definitive proof of how they were actually built so accurately using primitive tools.

@@fordism.01 likewise... this study is a theory... backed up with solid science and logic... but a theory nonetheless. And it will remain so forever without additional observations.

And the Nazca lines.

@@fordism.01 Are you serious? Stop listening to Ancient Aliens, that shit is brain rot.

Wait! The aliens are not only visiting us, they’re serving us breakfast.

At least he didn’t say it was saucer shaped!

... Unidentified Flying Pancake-shape; Unidentified Flying Saucer-shape: same thing; both are Unidentified Flying Objects.

That the scientists pretend to have any idea what this was, is a conspiracy theory

Flying pancakes

Wikipedia (which provides references in case you'd like to follow-up) says, "On 26 October 2018, Avi Loeb [an Israeli-American theoretical physicist who works on astrophysics and cosmology and is the Frank B. Baird Jr. Professor of Science at Harvard University] and his postdoc, Shmuel Bialy, submitted a paper exploring the possibility of Oumuamua being an artificial thin solar sail accelerated by solar radiation pressure, in an effort to help explain the object's comet-like non-gravitational acceleration..." I guess you used the word "conclusion", so yes - it was not a conclusion. It was "exploring the possibility", which is a step-up from "not rule out".

Simply mentioning a possibility (regardless of how unlikely) will cause the media to announce it as a fact. They do it all the time.

"Mentioning the possibility" is all Avi Loeb ever does because his career is just fishing for citations in as many fields as possible. In this case he responded to reasonable critiques with outrageous ad hominem attacks and media campaigns. A real scientist would refine his predictions or admit it would be impossible to verify them with new measurements.

​@tomcapon4447 Did you read Avi loebs book about it!? Be honest 🤥 Because if you didn't and your only sources are news media sniping Loeb's quotes/miss-qoutes. Then your onus of authenticity is lacking. I have read it. He backs his claims with very high standing evidence and theories. In fact, he makes it so clear how unusual this "asteroid" is that you beging to understand higher governmental invested institutions might be having a part to play in why Loeb's research isn't being taken more seriously.... Don't take my word for it. Instead read his book about this topic. It is very interesting. It actually makes more sense than the dribble that this channel is talking about that parrots the same talking points of MSM.

@@tomcapon4447I immediately knew the name Anton was referring to when saying scientists ego, that’s all Avi Loeb does indeed, & unfortunately that’s why he has name recognition while real scientists don’t

Why so unusual when in USA and Canada we have a plethora of immigrants who speak fluent English with accents? It's not so unusual to me since I hear all accents from people from abroad and our regional accents of English spoken all over the continent every day. What's your accent like?

Journalists: COULD ALIENS USE ICE TECHNOLOGY INSTEAD OF METAL AND SILICON CHIPS?

Or, the other way around, at least for those who think like Hawking on the matter.

I want one!

Clearly didn't watch the video or how Anton talked about it if that's what you got from this video.

And the round ones are death stars, right? :-D

Do channeling to answer that !

No .......it is a Blamange cloud.

Lol

I swear i've seen you somewhere Firestorm.

Now, that's a mouthful, worthy of Project Blue Book!

Close, but we still have to figure out where does the basking owl or barn shark fit into all this.

@@gooberclown it's MIB.

I couldn't see anything for all the vitreous floaters in the way...

Just a mass hallucination. Move along folks.

This is not an original quote though

It’s actually a GK Chesterton quote from a century ago

Haha

: It's been available on t-shirts and bumper stickers for decades.

i watched Lex Fridman podcast with him and he said its possible not that it IS.. Media might change his real wording.

I'm not disregarding what that man did for the betterment of science, but it's pretty clear he's just chasing popularity at this point.

It's is not fair to claim that he is suggesting that this is a alien object. That is what everysingle headline i have seen, Vice for example, have claimed but this is not what Avi stated. He stated it is possible it could be. The only facts that he claimed as fact was that this item was a flat shape and not cigar shaped, that it was extremly reflective, Doesn't leave a tail and had some ability to accelerate itself. Mainstream science disagreed with all of these points, but every point accept for the acceleration was also asserted in this paper. I have seen two different schools of thought when it comes to the acceleration. Scientists such as Neil Degrasse Tyson said it was probably offgassing and Avi claimed that it could be a Solar Sail type acceleration, likely from sunlight but it can be done with a laser. The hypothesis that it could be technological in nature isn't that extreme of a idea when you consider that Avi is one of the world experts that has been working on or atleast hypothesizing Breakthrough Starshot, a program hoping to build a 5 mm thick solar sail that we could send to Alpha Centauri and have it arrive in a matter of years/decades instead of centuries/millenia using Solar Sail technology. I would not disagree with you if you stated that it may be dishonest of him to collaborate with news agencies that are going to make deffinitve/hyperbolic statements on theories, but i do not think its academically honest to pretend that he is asserting that this is qualitative, inarguable evidence of alien life. If you listened to him speak about this in long form, such as Lex Friedmans podcast with him, you may find your opinion becomes more neutral. The truth is no one knows untill we know. Whether thats a new space telescope, sending a cubesat to one of these objects to analyze it or just a increase in the total amount of these events untill we have enough evidence to prove a single theory without any faults or pitfalls

Funny stuff! 👍🏼

@@anthonylangzettel4936 Thanks mate. I AM trying my hardest. We NEED a good laugh at times like these. Please subscribe to my channel for LOTS of CRAZY!

there was an airplane called just that

Not only that, it's the ship that made the Kessel run in under twelve parsecs!

"You may not like it, but this is what peak asteroid looks like"

@@3zzzTyle Wait until LSST is in operation in a few months. More formally known as the Vera C. Rubin observatory, from a mountain top in Chile, it will scan the skies continually and find all sorts of previously-unknown faint, slow-moving objects. Suddenly we'll see lots of interstellar visitors, maybe Planet 9 (if it exists), more stuff in the Kuiper Belt and Oort Cloud, etc. Minds will be blown.

I want one!

Imo it's a beautiful object. Far from ugly

@@stinkyfungus I'm not sure if that's science but it sure sounds tasty!

​@@BavonWWCooking is chemistry.

Be more careful next time

Of course you hope it’s aliens, we all do, but what you probably meant is that you still think that it’s aliens. I can tell you that it’s not, even if it was it would be so unlikely that it would be hilariously funny. Use logical basis for your understanding else you will loose in life. It’s like chess

@@generalhypocrisy1876 life is a game we cannot win, mortality

It’s a funny game I must say, I like games but I’m also very good at them. So much to learn from so much simplicity, but it is indeed the devils game

@@generalhypocrisy1876 I'm not saying its aliens. But, you can't say for certain that its not aliens. Unless you have a really fast space ship no one knows about.

Nothing is certain in science, the word certainty is probably the most human word there is because it’s simply just a word to get a point across. I’m certain on something is the same as saying that I believe in something in my world, I hope that makes sense since we could be living in different realities according to that

Says the narrow-minded skeptic.

@@TheHighlanderprime Which is not Mr. Petrov. Your point?

So my mind is my skull. I became to open minded my brain fell out of my skull. I was wondering where that noodlely stuff fell from. Now I know, my mind.

@@TCizauskas I responded to one silly pseudo-skeptic misnomer-fallacy (brains falling out) against an open mind … That was my point.

@@whysoserious7014 Minds grow ... As brains don’t ever fall out as a result... Only close-minded control freaks use the “brains falling out” analogy.

It's the Millennium Falcon! :-)

@@minarchist1776 🤣 That’s what it looked like to me too!

@@minarchist1776 the Millenium Falcon lies at the bottom of the Baltic Sea....

@@minarchist1776 "IT'S THE MILLENNIUM FALCON!! I CLAPPED WHEN I SAW IT!!!" XD

Flying saucer, confirmed!

Good point

I find your lack of faith disturbing.

@Ratso Fatso Maybe someone pushed it from afar?

@Ratso Fatso Unless our calculations were incorrect!

Tarkin

That movie was sooooo sad! But good🧐

Always Rendevous with Rama was the first, the progenitor

I was thinking RAMA myself.

@@marcusalexander7088 How any anyone not?

Arthur C Clark, the greatest. Grew up on his work.

I would like to add also this logical question: should I believe more to Avi Loeb's study or to the Steven Desch and Alan Jackson's one which the only position they have helded in their life is a chair at the university? Compared to Avi Loeb's background seems like they could be no more than his students.

Mr Dylan Reggies signal has changed my trading experience and I now trade without having that heavy feeling in my chest about winning more.

I have great hope in Bitcoin because the renowned Bitcoin analyst and investor Dylan thinks that the cryptocurrency would reach new heights by the end of this year, and i believe so because his prediction always come to pass

i have also been trading with Dylan for almost a year now, and it has been huge profits making for me.

i used to get lots of heart attack when holding, but since i started trading with Fuller and applying his strategy to my trades, i have been making decent profits.

Trading successfully is when you got the right strategy. Trading with mark strategy has brought me great success. I have never seen a strategy as consistent as his.

tbh the only thing thats going to tell us the truth is Project Lyra

Maybe they could probably be sort of almost possibly be onto something like, Totally right... Or nearly.!! 😀

@@darrenwoolley51 I think you're probably right In fact, I know you're probably right I think

No one truly believed it was a spaceship, with the exception of one guy...

How interesting, please share the data 😁

They are going to remove “gullible” from the dictionary to please woke people as it offends them

@@xmathmanx Avi Loeb the dumbest of them all.

That's still better than "What's your answer?" "Aliens." And how did you arrive at that answer?" "Also aliens."

This is how logic works.

Right? Its trade these assumptions that you have for these assumptions we have is basically what just happened lmao

@@impact0r It doesn't make it exempt from fallacy.

@@wilsonmpesha904 Elaborate, please.

yeah, channels that showcase fresh journal papers in a fairly dry way are the best, in particular this channel and suspiciousobservers.

@@BlackMasterRoshi hard pass on Suspicious0bservers, which is a pseudoscience wank fest run by one of the least likable humans on the planet.

I dont believe it is any different, as far as I know & understand a nitogren iceberg should have also completely evaporated

Exactly. The only “scientific fact” they are going on with is that the signature of nitrogen evaporation and the acceleration that it was exhibiting based on that momentum was similar. I don’t get these scientists when it comes to proving something they want it to be they do mental gymnastics to make it so. This is not science. So now they have found a sound scientific explanation that looks good in theory while it cannot prove one darn thing. While Avi another scientist did not do that, he said let all of the possibilities be there and analyze based on actual data. He never made any firm conclusions but hypothesized that it had a signature of being extraterrestrial, not that it was. And furthermore he stated let’s get real data when a next one similar to this one arrives and send a probe to acquire the data then analyze it. This whole thing is nonsensical.

@@spaceUniverse2012 The most disgusting part is this: "finally explained". What? As if its concrete in the absence of proof. The furthest Avi went was just a hypothesis but this channel dude was so confident of his version that he thinks its final.

@@Leon-fj5dt bottom line Avi is approaching this from a true scientific perspective as opposed to others who want to see a specific desired result

@@spaceUniverse2012 I am just very disappointed at the opening statement in this channel. He avoided disputing the arguments by Avi and proceed to sarcastically attack others personally and keep the parts that supported his own hypothesis. He further said that its ok for ppl outside of the scientific communith to jump into conclusion. What does he mean that? We are incapable or irrational? He should try get a job at a commercial tech coy like Tesla/SpaceX instead of making stupid theoretical youtube videos.

Yea, I think so as well. It happened long long ago in a Galaxie far far away.

Let us keep our minds open, by all means, as long as that means keeping our sense of perspective and seeking an understanding of the forces which mould the world. But don’t keep your minds so open that your brains fall out! There are still things in this world which are true and things which are false; acts which are right and acts which are wrong, even if there are statesmen who hide their designs under the cloak of high-sounding phrases. - Walter Kotschnig November 8, 1939

​@@sleepycalico aliens or not aliens, our world, as of today, is hardly the work of those whose brains didn't fall out, by all standards. I'd question the merits of whoever reigns over science since 1939, because they sure don't want to change their habits. blind skepticism has become so rampant, it's practically dogmatic. I dare anyone seek out any kind of non-prescribed explanation of reality, as if there is a central governing body deciding on what is truth, a priori. it's both funny and tragic at the same time, how nobody seems to get that the picture is inverted, and that those words got misplaced.

I was going to say the same, but I thought I'd check the comments first!

I enjoy your response, but I don't entirely understand it. I googled Walter Kotschnig and saw that he was a Foreign Service officer who was present at the formation of the United Nations and who went on to represent the United States at conferences worldwide for more than a quarter century. So, as that is the lead info from his obituary, I'm going to guess he wasn't also a scientist. The scientist who said that (most recently) is Anton. But I think it's a perfectly sensible thing to say, no matter who is saying it, in whatever field, at any time in our history. The state of our world today actually *might* be partly attributable to people whose brains didn't fall out. lol But I take your point. Thanks for your wonderful response, wonderful person.

@@milanstevic8424 Oh, on further thought, I think I know where this went weird. I was just quoting the original usage of the expression.

In a galaxy far far away

@@jarvissystems4334 Yes.

@@jarvissystems4334 Baltic Sea Anomaly ;)

In a galaxy right here.....

Damn you beat me to it .

Yes.. Thank you. I don't have to comment now. D'oh.! 😖

at most 20, at most. I left the "scientific community", which is a propagandistic term for the outside. Yet, leaving just made me to understand that the area science still provides intellectual peak experience. Ergo I mixed, stayed scientific without the need to meet the ego-trippers

@@monnoo8221 You would enjoy Avi Loeb's book. Highly recommend, based on your comment, if only for the parts unrelated to the controversial chunk of rock.

The worst thing is that these folks are the ones who get all the attention, drive all the grant dollars, and push science in the wrong direction.

This is the reason I don’t blindly believe the government and other dimwits that tell us to “trust the experts and scientist”. It’s an annoying situation, for being sceptical towards what is being portrayed as the “truth” or scientific consensus in some matters, portrays you as a science denier. When in reality it has nothing to do with denying science, but rather that the conclusions presented isn’t convincing enough and in a lot of cases comes of as biased, or in many cases, they’ve decided on the outcome first, then looked for ways to make it happen.

It is true that one builds a reputation in science, good or bad. One case in particular that comes to mind is a historical article that was in the American Journal of physics some decades ago. I was doing research for my honours thesis, and for a break and some light reading looked at an article showing a picture of Sir Isaac Newton’s original paper on gravitation. I noticed that the formula was copied down wrong. Along come some of my peers eager to leave. I pointed the error out, and was met by skepticism. I allowed myself to be dragged off to lunch, promising myself that I would check it out later. Being busy with my studies, I never got back to it. A few years later, on student did point it out and cemented his reputation in the community. Apart from the lesson to “if you see something, say something,” it must be noted that those reviewing Newton’s paper didn’t take the time to follow through with the calculations. I point out that the equation was wrong, not the theory. Having had a tendency to do derivations myself, rather than just accepting them (the schrodinger equation, for example), I failed to follow through when it was most important for me to do so.

Excellent point!

maybe but they will definitely not stop labeling weird things as such based on their dogmatic views

So having a small time window to observe the object justifies saying it could be aliens? I don't believe so.

Couldn't agree more! The rabid and dogmatic effort to explain anything exotic away is going to keep us in the dark ages for a long time to come. Very sad.

@@rjim1 Uhhhh

Loeb I believe right?

Thanks for this great comment, I have no idea what it was but I find this reluctance to even slightly consider it to be an alien object interesting, especially when we humans have sent out the 2 voyager probes ourselves. I really enjoy Anton’s videos but he could have done this without taking shots at Prof. Loeb.

That's what makes me mad. For all they know it still could be an alien spacecraft and they don't know for sure and just like Avi Loeb said no one wants to imagine it could have been something special indeed. They still don't know what it is 🤷

It was a monolith (2001: A Space Odyssey) and we were supposed to have developed enough to go up and touch it, triggering the next stage in our evolution!

We?

@@erikbakker1531 humanity .

@@erikbakker1531 couldnt launch a probe in time because we lack the speed or tech .

😂

😂

“A guess”, IOW….

exactly

finally probably definitely maybe ... possibly .

I agree. These are the people who suggest that ET intelligence should be everywhere given the amount of time and the vastness of space. But, if someone suggests an interstellar object with very unusual properties (accelerating as it leaves the solar system without a comet tail) might be extraterrestrial, these same people say “No. It’s never aliens!”

The probability isn't zero, but hyping one of the least likely explanations that would be one of the biggest moments in human history (proof of alien life) is just as bad.

Since no alien has ever been captured, and no contact has been confirmed, aliens, outside of science fiction, do not exist in science. Only speculation that there might be some, or have been. Leaving something completely fictional out of your reasoning shouldn't be considered unscientific, imo :)

@Jonah Parsons Nice false-equivalence. Another civilization and a mythical human being are too very different things. But go ahead, act like you're clever.

@Jonah Parsons I knew someone was going to say that. The difference is ET intelligence is a scientific possibility (See SETI for more info)..

Dropping said soap was also a missed opportunity to point out the darker possibility of what first contact could entail.

John Michael Godier is that you? I hear his voice when i read this​@seanparker4461

It was probably definitely not aliens for sure!

Agreed, its one or the other.

@@Aaron-oe8xw In most ways i agree with you guys but on the other hand, Finally know and possibly are not entirely exclusive. When A person is trying to learn something (look at code breaking) trying one thought over another is how to determine if that thought might be valid or is not valid. Basically it is part of the learning process.

but they can so the english language suks LOL

Anton seemed kinda pissed off in this video, he "probably" wanted to put an end to the alien theory as much as possible. Methinks he doth protest too much.

Indeed. This is a very very unscientific thing to say. An ice chunck chipped off a Pluto like impact??? And Anton know for sure this is it? Come on. First of all: great that the community finale catches on that Pluto collided with charon causing sputnik planitium impact zone and the red dot on charon and its equatorial crumble zone. But to suggest Oumumua is pure ICE??? Come on aton use your brain. Pure ICE is Never observed, and would never survive the extreme structural stress around the sun, just look at interstellar comet borisov desintegrate on aless tressfull trajectory. Moreover , spitzer st would have notice nitrogin evaporating. In all: a crappy chunck of science Anton!

@WonderDrugEchinacea Yes. And the straw clutching has been intense. I have read the paper. We have never seen free frozen nitrogen in space. Free frozen nitrogen, if it could exist, would be very short lived. The trajectory of Oumoamua and it's speed tell us it's ancient. I cannot believe this hypothesis.

An what ever it was it very very weird and like nothing we have seen before or since. An there not enough data to confirm any solution to the problems.

@@RWin-fp5jn spitzer is our best source of data for this object and yet it detected nothing which match any comet or asteroid, which is extremely strange .

@WonderDrugEchinacea People are making assumption to try an fit a tiny slither of data An they desperately looking for a natural solution to that slither data, so far all of their solutions however doesn't make much sense.

Lol

😹😹😹

Obviously

It mist Anton

It's very important to think squarely inside the box, else the old maxim that science advances one funeral at a time will no longer be valid.

That is a Richard Dawkins quote.

@@k98killer 😂 well done

I never thought this was an alien spaceship. But I do applaud scientists for having an open mind. Because scientists normally don't. And I think that's way more important than worrying what morons think.

Where’s the soap? It does, doesn’t it ! LOL. Classic two Nuns in the shower sketch.

When God drops the soap.

Plot twist: it's Cthulhu's poop

it's the god damn millenium falcon

It reminds me of the candybar on caddyshack.

exactly. i can't stand all this haughty cosmological conjecture masquerading as certainty. it's not science by any stretch of the imagination, simply more untestable conjecture based hypothesis

Exactly!

I thought radar data was obtained about Oumuamua.

@@mitseraffej5812 If you can find any meaningful radar observations, please let me know. The only radar comment I found via google is that "Canadian meteor radar " observed no signal.

@@therealanyaku I was most likely mistaken. I thought that I heard something about it.

He's a flat-Oumuamua-er.

I'm getting there! thanks though

even your question is fake as you do not really want to know!

He will, people will find him eventually

becuzz''' all da Haterz r democrats'''''' ;|) LoL''''''''''''''''

The thing is, many explanations were being thrown around apart from the alien craft. Loeb wasn’t saying it was aliens, but he was annoyed to put it mildly that many academics mocked the idea of it being synthetic in origin while openly promoting ideas of it being made of materials that have never been observed or created. Their ideas were/are just as implausible as the craft but discredited the idea without presenting a counter argument to it. His argument is very fair

Another point that Avi makes is that the hypothesis the object is alien space junk or whatever is objectively more plausible than other ideas that have somehow gained a lot of traction. E.g. think about string theory with many extra dimensions that we cannot see, or multiverses.

Avi is just trying to sell books by making himself look like a poor brilliant martyr. The guys a charlatan.

@@rrson648 “Guy’s a charlatan” by being Harvard’s Head of Astronomy? He’s making a critique of the current status of academia, not only this, but the privatization of scientific data funded by taxpayers, amongst other things, which many other important people have pointed out as well. He’s sharing his viewpoint like anyone is allowed. He a respected figure. What now, every scientist that sells books is a charlatan as well? Go back to your couch and eat your rubbish, greaseball

I also read Avi Loeb’s book ( EXTRATERRESTRIAL) and the above two / three posts are pretty close to my personal interpretation of Loeb’s position. I don’t remember Loeb saying it must be aliens, only that it was possible that it could be. I think the main thrust of Loeb’s book, and his interviews that I heard, is that for scientists to proclaim that it absolutely is not a fabricated item is incorrect. Keeping an open mind about that possibility, until new data (if ever) becomes available, is reasonable. Selectively crucifying Loeb for mentioning this possibility, when other “crazy”, unprovable (currently) ideas seem to be acceptable scientific dogma (string theory, multiverse, etc...) seems to be unfair. Loeb laid out a couple of solid reasons why it might be an artificial object. My “gut” tells me that the object was probably natural in nature. My critically thinking brain allows for the possibility of other possibilities. This new analysis of the old (original) data is yet another possible explanation of what Oumuamua might have been. Kudos to these scientists who keep working the problem. Kudos also to Loeb for pushing back against the ossified section of the scientific community that says “it ain’t never aliens ever, end of topic, and stop bring it up”. G’night wonderful people and peace ✌️.

Ah, the comment I was looking for.

Kind of an ugly letter.

Unicorns are a goat mutation.

Never heard that one. I like it👍🏼

Unfortunately for them snowball earth is no more.

Heigh-ho, heigh-ho, it's off to Earth we go!

Excuse me... they prefer to be called "little people" these days.

@@bobinthewest8559 Sorry I was not pc. One of the little fellows is probably looking for Black Snow (a guy).

@@hendrikbarboritsch7003... 🤣🤣🤣

soooo true.

Sure. That´s science´s way of saying " we know as much about it as we probably ever will, because we can´t collect more data now, we can only re-analyse the data we have so far."

You can't expect anything more intelligent from Anton.

@@will2see don't say that. He is cool and smart guy, the new science video every day it is tons of work

@@РоманЯковів-э3ч He does make a lot of assumptions and present them as facts tho.. I unsubbed ages ago

Yeah he has become a clickbait guy, becomming a fake news soldier