@@MyahUnleashed i understand the reasoning, i’m just mad at diana for even writing it into existence! they deserved to spend the rest of their lives together, no interruptions.
Just watch her eyes and then the face brimming with emotion. She is so good. She almost doesn’t have to say a word. Never heard of her before this show and she constantly hits it out of the park. Her and him together with no one else around. That’s why people watch this show. One of the best moments in awhile.
This scene was so sweet. Getting a little misty eyed watching it again. So heartbreaking to know that despite how epic their love is, Jamie and Claire never got to raise a child together. And the fact that Jamie was offering to do that despite how much is already on both their plates is SWOON-WORTHY. Caitriona and Sam's acting in this was everything. Love them together. Chemistry is off the charts. One of the best couples in TV history for sure!
Jamie is the best men, truly a king of all men. But somehow, he suffered the most throughout the whole show. One would expect he would turn dark? Nope. Jamie only becomes more perfect. Even after all this pain and suffering, he is still.. the best.
@@jennareeves3659 .. . I know and he makes all the sacrifices . Thats what pisses me off and why i have the theory that i do but not gonna put it out there. It would probably really piss people off.
Jamie is such a good man. So enlightened and generous. For a man in the late 1700’s to desire a mixed race child like Fanny’s baby is mind bending beautiful. He is so attuned to Claire’s desires too. This series has it all !
It's so sad they weren't able to share that. Jamie is a father/father figure to so many (Bree, Fergus, Marsali, Joan, William and Faith) but he never once got to hold a baby in his arms knowing they were his. He couldn't be part of their milestones or just say they were his own. That is heartbreaking for me. Claire didn't get to raise a family with Jamie but Bree always knew she was her mother and she got to spend 20 years as "Mama". She even got to hold Faith. Jamie must feel so much pain all the time. I mean, he didn't even know the baby's sex for 20 years. That's horrible.
I feel like William is a different circumstance. Sure he had a relationship with William but never as a real father. William was his secret - something that people will never know not even William himself. It’s sad that, in a way, he lost all three children: one to death, one to a different time, and one to lies
@@newjerseylion4804 Frank is her dad, Jamie is her father. But it kind of proves my point anyway, Jamie is her biological father but he's not her dad, and that's tragic. He met her when she was 20-22 and missed every single milestone.
@@bobvancevancerefrigeration844 we still have more seasons to watch maybe his son makes an appearance later on. But so true about Jamie not able to raise a child of his own, he deserved that and more.
They got a little of raising a child together, they spent at least a year raising Fergus together. But even that was cut short and Fergus was older when they found him and it wasn’t in ideal circumstances.
Poor Jamie just wanted to be a Daddy. From the time he was told to expect Faith, he wanted babies. He only married Leary (I'll go for the English spelling here, thank you.) for the children she had and the more she might have. I understand. I've sat and just watched my newborns for hours. They're a wonder to be sure. Most men don't have that yearning. They accept and love the children they get, but they don't dream for them before they exist.
“I regret that we were never parents together” I find this a weird statement because they kinda are parents to Bree. Regardless of how old you are you never stop being a parent. The line should’ve been: “I regret that we never raised a child together”.
@@dawnchristensen7492 Um yeah I know. Lol. I watch the show and read the books. Maybe just parents understand this. You even use the correct word "raise" not "parent". Thing is, you're STILL a parent when the child is an adult. That's the difference. :)
@@jcr-studios I think the active word isn't "parents" but "were". It's supported by the fact that Claire says regret isn't enough of a reason. She's pointing out that, emotionally speaking, Jamie's desire is to change their past - something that's impossible. If my husband said that we should go out on a series of high-school style dates, and then revealed that he wanted more chances for us to be together, he's not saying we aren't now. He's saying he regrets that we weren't then; I'd be inclined to agree, but I'd also point out that things still turned out nicely for us. His expression of that doesn't neglect our relationship now. If anything, it speaks of someone who's had a taste and wants more than what's allotted to him. Jamie and Claire only have so much good time (something she highlights by mentioning their obituaries) but Jamie wants to capture lost shared time - the infancy stage, childhood, adolescence - in addition to already being parents to Bree. He's not emotionally binning his child. _Anyone_ ought to know the difference between parenting a literal child and parenting an adult. They are certainly not the same. Part of the reason so many parents get empty nest syndrome is _because of that difference_ .
When people think of being parents together, they mean sharing all of the child's milestones and literally raising the child together. Jaime and Claire as a unit have only been with Bree for a few years and she was already grown when Jaime met her. Yes, he is her father, but for a lot of people, they would not count that as having been parents together.
Bree is a whole adult when she meets jamie it’s not the same thing. Jamie didn’t get to see Bree walk crawl teach her words those are major milestones. Not the same thing
Meu Deus...como a Claire está sofrendo nessa floresta. ,enfrenta tudo. ....ela e muito corajosa... Admiro muito a Claire..e o Jamie.. Casal perfeito um para o outro.. Merecem ser felizes. Nossa eles sofrem muito.. Amo esse casal.....
she definetly would have been safer raised by a woman who never saw black people as slaves or less than white people and befriended one in her time. i mean the 18 century was a hard time for a girl...and if you add that she is mixed... i would not trust anyone raised in that century with that baby
There would have been a significant complication in doing so. Jamie would then be the guardian of the child and take over the management of the property and trading post she inherited. That could make it look as if he had motives for dispatching Mr. Beardsley. By leaving the management of the property to the Browns and the woman who lost her own child and wants this one, Jamie dodges such accusations as well as having to attend to a property so close to the Browns on a regular basis.
I keep thinking that somehow she was born in his time idk y i think that but for what ever reason i feel like she was sent through the stones to her time by some means idk exactly but i think originally she was born then?? Maybe?? Idk y i feel that way but i do lol
