The cop with sun glasses retaliated because you ask for his name and he wouldn't give it to you verbally. As soon as you questioned him about it, his ego kicked in. He's a real tyrant...
The final security guard kept saying "Sir", but then swore at you and called you an idiot. He said he had been polite throughout 😂😂. They really do scrape the barrel to find these minimum wage clowns.
@@bendoon7010 the security guards decided to come and hassle a member of the public acting lawfully on public land. They decided to call the police to report someone acting lawfully. The police decided to attend. None of this would have happened if a member of the public, acting lawfully, had been left to go about his business.
@@bendoon7010 What are you talking about? Even during the lockdown, the public is allowed to go outside. AB is literally outside on a public road, so it is completely legal. When you go out to exercise or to walk your dog, you can use your phone to video anytime. The cops did not have a reason to believe that he was breaking any Covid regulations.
@@bendoon7010 They wouldn't be dealing with this 'fuckwit' as you call him if the thicko security hadn't wasted the time of the police by calling them. If they are just 'doing their job' then maybe they ought to undergo the necessary training that enables them to do their jobs within the boundaries of the law and to realise that they basically have no powers whatsoever. If you don't like this guy then stop watching his videos. You seem to be the clown here.
Ask these arrogant pigs, is that what you say to the, Magistrate, Judge and Jury when asked for their name, collar number and station / division they work at:
Those bellends have no authority to detain you whatsoever, had they of done so it would have been assault. Personally I'd have let them and then use force to defend myself.
@@Adam-uu5bw for the vast majority of the time there was just one of them supposedly guarding him, each one of them looked a complete buffoon, I would have simply walked away easily.
The Offended Bucket if somebody came at me with the attitude that security guard had I would have told him to fuck of what I wouldn’t do is come on RU-vid and talk like I’m Chuck Norris I don’t bend over for anybody it’s ok this is you’re safe space you can continue to act hard on here just don’t take that energy in to the real world or somebody will smash you’re phone and slap you
@@bendoon7010 covid rules didn't apply. There was "key workers" only rules. If you could not work from home then it was "essential" to leave. I'm a tree surgeon. I could not work from home therefore it was essential for me to leave home to work. Dumbass misinterpretation of lockdown rules. AB clearly stated he was working, he can't do his work from home ,ergo, his leaving was essential
Fuck lockdown rules pathetic mate AB you are a legend mate educating us on how to defend ourselves as this authoritarian situation is only going to get worse you are doing a very very valuable service to the people and you should be very very proud of yourself you are a real hero 100
The bold Security guard can't detain is wrong on every account, he has no authority to detain a person and his use of the act's that he thinks he has, he should not hold a SIA licence.
Anyone in the UK can detain someone they suspect has, is, or about to, commit a crime, including this bold Security guard. I believe, the way I read it, a civilian who detains another civilian, is actually making a citizen’s arrest. They may use reasonable force to keep the “suspect” there until police arrive. The detaining/arresting person, or people, are responsible for any unlawful detainment. AB should have prosecuted them for unlawful detainment/arrest. I don’t understand why these auditors don’t sue every time. The only way to make changes with unlawful detainment/arrest is to make the offending parties PAY with their own money. Both of these police are tyrants. Their attitudes when they arrived was BS, & I can see why people would want to TARGET these police, who display such shitty attitudes while knowingly being filmed. You can imagine how they would have treated AB if he was not recording. I would never target a cop, but if my best friend targeted a cop, I might buy him a Rib Eye steak dinner for his troubles.
Actual they have less because they are employed and employees have duties and obligations so they are BOUND to an employer. Public are not bound to that employer. This also apples to the police officers as they are employees of the public.
@British Grumpy Cat Technically anyone can detain someone under a citizens arrest however to do so having had SIA training when not appropriate is stupid because it will end up in court with a big payout. These thugs do everything they can to avoid getting to that point.
You handled that situation superbly AB the last security guard was Sir this and Sir that then swore at you and said you're being detained an absolute joker. Maybe he's auditioning to be the most politest James Bond villain but in reality he's a sociopath. Excellent videoing 😃
“Sunglasses may be worn by staff but should be removed when talking to members of the public.” That police officer needs to go back to his station and re-read the rules.
He is that fucking arrogant, with his power trip he feels he is above the law ! And that rules, legislation, and natural law do not pertain to him. Rouge Wild Hog, even lower than a Pig with the classic weight of a 106gram pig brain
Wow what a nasty security guard with the blade head, I thought he was being genuine at first but once you started questioning him what a change there was, there no need for the language coming out of his mouth, it's a good job you had the camera rolling or I'm sure hes the type to have assaulted you. Hats off to you for keeping your cool throughout. Judging by how quickly the police 'de escalated' it (I use that term loosely) at the end shows they probably agreed with you. The constable with the sunglasses may need some refresher training though on how to approach and speak to people,its quite simple really. I just cannot understand why they feel the need to talk to people like shit
Are you able to update us about any of these lawsuits? I'd love to know the status or outcome for this one as it is undoubtedly a slam dunk! Any details you are willing to share would be greatly appreciated!
It's a scam - these "auditors" want to earn money from advertising revenue so they're all indignant and holier-than-thou during confrontations to maximise their views. They're have no intention of following up because it's irrelevant to their video income
I wish you’d mentioned to the police about the security causing you harassment, alarm & distress (their actions and swearing) and asked them what they were going to do about you being illegally detained (security may not have touched you but they kept blocking you from leaving).
uktokers while being held illegally against ones will, under fear of harm, still having panic attacks due to how many more physio security personal are out there willing to hurt and harm innocent people doing lawful activities ! Nice lawsuit !
Because he was in the wrong. Only essential workers should be out and he's not one, it was a battle he couldn't win so he just dodged the question, whined like a baby, and went back with his tail between his legs.
Yeah as a security officer I can back this up. We have NO powers to detain ANYONE. Like ALL citizens we can do a citizen’s arrest if a serious crime was in progress, but with any citizens arrest you would have to justify your actions in court.
One: tat was an illegal detention, and that needs following up, and Two: When the policeman identifies by say 'you can see it' - the response should be "Is that how you would identify yourself to a judge in court?"
He needs to soeak it he has no idea 9f a persons eyesight. A person may be videoing so they can watch it later in better form an assumption of sight is by far an unbalanced assumption.
Security have no authority what so ever outside the boundarys of their site, Those clowns work for a private Company who have a contract with the home office, their not employed by the home office
So, a civilian, private security SIA accredited personal, can impersonate a police officer, well only a police officer can hold you under police authority, claim to work hand in hand with the home office, kidnap you and forcibly, illegally detain you, while every breath of it is caught on video, then when the real (haha) police turn up, do nothing about the security breaching and braking countless actual laws, then to try and enforce a legislation, not law, legislation that is unlawful, we know this because the courts are throwing the out thick and fast, I hope you take this further AB, that footage is priceless mate.
Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984, Section 24A. This clearly indicates it was not unlawful, he shouldn't have drove 100 miles from where he lives to try film inside a confidential area.
@@asal4823 As he wasn't inside a confidential area, and if, just if a "confidential" is "hidden" behind a see through fence, then it is not confidential, and after reading all, that's ALL the laws, regulations and guidelines, a key worker can work anywhere they normally work, and if that's 100's of miles away, so be it, do long distance truck drivers drive to the end of their road and have to stop? The police can detain you, private security, on public land cannot, unless they put you under citizens arrest, because once they've past the boundary of the premises they are contracted too, private land, that's all they are, citizens!
@@fedupdriver5157 The Official Secrets Acts 1911-1989 provide the main legal protection in the UK against espionage and the unauthorised disclosure of information. Section 1 of the Official Secrets Act 1911 (as amended by the 1920 and 1939 Official Secrets Acts) sets out offences related to spying, sabotage and related crimes. Read the sign in the first video.
@@asal4823 The sign is for inside that property, if its public land, its public, you are spouting a lot of rubbish, I know all about the official secrets act, I had to sign it when I was in the armed forces, there is not a lot you can tell me about that Asal, in fact there's not a lot you can tell me about anything that's factual, twisted and made up, well the stage is yours.
Our police used to be loved and then they turned into an underfunded paramilitary group of thugs intended to raise revenue and go after low hanging fruit.
Oh dear. SIA badge holders getting it very wrong again. He seems to think sec 24a gives him the power to detain for anything he wants, for any reason. He's obviously been told something about sec 24a, but never bothered to actually read it or understand it.
Sec 24a is only about Arresting for an INDICTABLE offence. That is, carrying a sentence (in Crown Court) in excess of 12 months. There wasn't even a summary offence. Mr. SlapHead security should lose his badge.
The cop with the attitude has no professionalism towards you at all, he also needs some people skills, i totally agree with your comment about the sunglasses, this is not the USA
@Apeck Ak its easy really england don't need blacked out lenses California's different that's a desert Florida...etc you make stupid people look clever apeck
3 года назад
You the best AB I've seen loads of others doing this your ones Hilarious you very well Educated clever man massive Respect keep it going 👍
Great series of videos here. Further proof that you are one of, if not THE best UK auditors, and also, that independent journalists are key workers - showing the complete lack of respect shown by the pigs.
The SIA was brought in to stop criminals and wronguns from working in the security industry. I worked in security for almost 20 years and had to apply for one in 2005. When the recession kicked in in 2010 a lot of the security guards lost their jobs as all building work in the country stopped and the sites couldn't afford the extortionate rates security companies were charging them. In the end a mass influx of foreigners suddenly stepped into our jobs at £3 an hour with no licenses. When I saw the way the industry was going I never renewed my licence and have never gone back to the job that I loved doing. Now a large percentage of these foreign guards have no criminal checks and hardly speak english and treat the public like shit, the government allowed this to happen the moment the SIA was brought in.
Cop:"My name tag is right there." Me: "Looks like it says Uracunt to me. Hello, Uracunt." And make sure you refer to him by name every time he talks to you.
Hi AB, I did look up section 24 and it's been added to with a myriad of new coronavirus rules, so lots of study needed before challenging constables, but keep up the good work, I admire your efforts.
So how does spending your time provoking and annoying people working during a national pandemic make sense? There are restrictions as to why you need to go out, but there aren't restrictions on wearing masks due to shortages and ineffectiveness of most masks.
@@asal4823 Idiot. Your use of the term " national pandemic " exposes you as a moron. A pandemic (from Greek πᾶν, pan, 'all' and δῆμος, demos, 'people') is an epidemic of disease that has spread across a large region, for instance multiple continents or worldwide, affecting a substantial number of people. Therefore, a national pandemic simply does not exist. If you struggle to grasp this simple concept all other utterances from you should be dismissed as the rantings of a halfwit.
I swear, at one point, I thought that guard was going to call for Captain Mainwaring😭😂 "Don't come the fucking shit with me"... He should have said Sonny-Jim at the end of that 🤣
I'd of let him jump me I'd of 100% walked off, and not retaliated at all and then when police arrived, make a complaint of assault and false imprisonment.
@@stevegarden9940 Lack of crime shown. Under Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984, Section 24A, he had probable cause to detain, especially during a time like this.
24A Arrest without warrant: other persons (1)A person other than a constable may arrest without a warrant- (a)anyone who is in the act of committing an indictable offence; (b)anyone whom he has reasonable grounds for suspecting to be committing an indictable offence. (2)Where an indictable offence has been committed, a person other than a constable may arrest without a warrant- (a)anyone who is guilty of the offence; (b)anyone whom he has reasonable grounds for suspecting to be guilty of it. (3)But the power of summary arrest conferred by subsection (1) or (2) is exercisable only if- (a)the person making the arrest has reasonable grounds for believing that for any of the reasons mentioned in subsection (4) it is necessary to arrest the person in question; and (b)it appears to the person making the arrest that it is not reasonably practicable for a constable to make it instead. (4)The reasons are to prevent the person in question- (a)causing physical injury to himself or any other person; (b)suffering physical injury; (c)causing loss of or damage to property; or (d)making off before a constable can assume responsibility for him. NO Indictable offences occurring here
The police are never on the side of Joe public even though they've sworn an oath to serve and protect us . The one talking to you was just keeping you calm as part of his training.
ab you are super fine and handle everything just perfectly.you handle stress like its a breeze in the park.respect from me.great videos and shame on the people who challenge you.i salute you sir.regards steven.
Another great video. I wish more members of the public knew their rights. Obviously the security men need more training that if they do not lose their jobs. And the 2nd policeman doesn't seem to be too clever either.
Brilliant AB on a public highway and the words came out of his mouth and some how out of the gift of magic he can detain you . I would have gone for the citizens arrest and thought oh shit weeks may be mouths in court and all the paper work he would have to do explaining why he thought he had the power of a police officer for no crime 😂 . Brilliant just Brilliant keep it up mate 👍 .
Nah... you didn't assert your rights in this part either. To the bully in the high vis jacket, you should have called his bluff and walked away. he has no authority to put his hands on you and was laboring under the misapprehension that he had some power bestowed on him by The Great and powerful Oxfordshire Council. The first copper was sound, the second one was a nob and you failed to stand up to him, when he asked why you were there. As a 'journalist' you would be considered a key worker and you flunked it sorry.
Members of the public are under no obligation to speak to a security operative if they choose not to. Do security guards have any right to touch, hold or grab a member of the public when not detaining them? SIA licence holders are awarded no powers or rights over and above any other member of the public
Well that was good. I’m suspicious of the security guys.... I’ve watched a lot of your videos and it’s becoming more and more apparent to me that all the guys look and talk like the illegals that are coming over in their droves, guided in by our boats from across the channel and sanctioned by Pritti Patel.... Makes me seriously concerned for the people of the uk...
Totally agree mate, I think the UK is lost I really do, so sad, I was born in 1953, I’ve had the best time to live here, it was a wonderful place to grow up. I was a teenager before I ever saw anything other than white. Even the coppers were generally respected. I am lost for words. Am leaving in the summer, never to return.
What I said about his sunglasses wasn’t made up , Ohh and I am a key worker by the way recruit.college.police.uk/Officer/Documents/Appearance_Standards_GuidanceDocument.docx
Officers talking about Covid enforcement while not wearing any of the PPE. Wish you would've had more energy to fight because those security tyrants believe they won.
Calling a police Constable "Officer" is the verbal eqivalent of licking his boots. "Officer" relates to Admiralty Law, which in turn relates to corporations and the control and collection of revenue. A "Constable" is supposed to protect us from criminal activity under Common Law and Law of the Land, therefore the gradual transition to the title of "Officer" without most people noticing is slowly eroding people's rights and what you end up with is a police force working and protecting corporations instead of people." (Credit to PJ for his original comment posted elsewhere). Think about it. Even the bloke who calls round to read the gas meter is an "Officer" these days. And so are the BBC licensing goons ("Enforcement Officer", for Godsake). It is a corporate psychological manipulation to subjugate us. But there is no obligation to tug one's forelock and dance to their tune like performing monkeys. It is not compulsory to embrace one's own enslavement.
You should do a silent audit. It would be amazing to see what they will do. I think Danny shine from social experiments does meditation in front of the police and they can't do shit but just watch
Good job officers for dealing with that annoying individual. It’s ok for him to ask the details of those security staff but he’s not willing to supply his details..
I have said this time and time again. Those security guards owned you from the start . I’m 5.6. And not a hard man . But I would have walked and when they put hands on me I would have defended myself. And no doubt been taken to the ground . Then in hospital I would be counting the pennies when I sued everyone of them . You don’t have to be a hard man to know and excercise your rights .
Section 24a Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984: A person other than a constable may arrest without a warrant- (a) anyone who is in the act of committing an indictable offence; (b) anyone whom he has reasonable grounds for suspecting to be committing an indictable offence. (2) Where an indictable offence has been committed, a person other than a constable may arrest without a warrant- (a) anyone who is guilty of the offence; (b) anyone whom he has reasonable grounds for suspecting to be guilty of it. (3) But the power of summary arrest conferred by subsection (1) or (2) is exercisable only if- (a) the person making the arrest has reasonable grounds for believing that for any of the reasons mentioned in subsection (4) it is necessary to arrest the person in question; and (b) it appears to the person making the arrest that it is not reasonably practicable for a constable to make it instead. (4) The reasons are to prevent the person in question- (a) causing physical injury to himself or any other person; (b) suffering physical injury; (c) causing loss of or damage to property; or (d) making off before a constable can assume responsibility for him. Clearly you were not in the act of committing an indictable offence because you were acting within the law pertaining to taking photographs from a public place I would sue.
The cop refuses to give you their information you have to make a public information act request to get. But I bet you that if you were to give your name to the cops they would have given your name to the security officers. And what is it so hard for cops to give their details?
It makes no sense anyway. Why not just give him the info there and then if the police will disclose it through the freedom of information act (which means anyone can obtain it). I have a feeling he won’t even be able to get the info he requires via FOI.
Imagine the first pair in German SS uniforms lmfao, and then to have Ricky Hatton and Clark Kent in uniform show up, i would not be able to stop laughing, im glad for you that your able to keep a straight face AB , keep watching the watchers!
