Shaykh Ṣāliḥ ibn Fawzān al-Fawzān (حفظه الله ورعاه) stated: "It is imperative for any individual who is desirous of salvation for themselves, wishes for their actions to be accepted by the Most High, and to be a true Muslim, to consider and take care of matters relating to their ʿaqīdah (creed). Such individuals must understand what the correct ʿaqīdah (creed) entails, what contradicts it, what does not conform to it, and what detracts from its completeness. Then, they should act on its basis. It can only be done by learning it from the insightful scholars who have acquired it from the Salaf of this Ummah (community/nation)". And Shaykh Muḥammad Nāṣir al-Dīn al-Albanī (رحمه الله) said: "Social change within the Islāmic system is not actualized through riots, protests, and demonstrations. Rather, it can only happen through the dissemination and imparting of Islāmic knowledge and discipline".
I am from Bangladesh. May Allah keep us in the straight path and give hidayah to understand the truth as we live in a country where people are far far from the Quran and Sunnah.
00:00 Introduction 01:00 What is meant by the term Jahmi 01:52 What is Ilm al-Kalam 02:19 Who was the Creator according to the Greek philosophers 04:20 Testimony from non Muslim academics on the relationship between the Jahmiyyah and the Greek philosopers 13:50 The stance of the Salaf towards the Jahmiyyah 18:50 The rise of the Mu'tazilah 20:17 Ilm al-Kalam does not mean rational evidences 22:05 The appearance of Ibn Kullab and Abul Hasan al-Ashari 25:00 How the Ashari school of thought changed 26:48 The appearance of the Maturidis and how they differed from the early Asharis 27:47 The belief of Mutafalsifah (Islamic philosophers) such as Ibn Sina 30:00 How Ilm al-Kalam became associated with the four Imams 32:54 The enmity of the groups of Ilm al-Kalam towards the people of Sunnah 36:17 Where to find more detailed articles on the topic
بارك الله فيك Please continue to post such videos by brother Abu Iyaad, regarding the attributes of Allah عز و جل, and highlighting the misguidance of the deviant sects. We are benefiting tremendously
JazaknAllah for this video. So much knowledge and accuracy. I'm.an average muslim but have really understood what you have shown. This is so important to be aware this. For the people that know about the psychological wars that are upon the ummah. People don't understand that they trying to attack Islam from the inside . Infultration rather than invasion . You can stretch this battle a cross the board . Social media t.v. apps , entertainment and sports. Tbey claim its sports buts it a new world order religion . 2021 2022 2023 + ________ 666 ________
Salam ou aleikoum wa rahmatoulahi wa barakatoe Barak Allah oe fiekoem could you please upload it with better sound. Its not so loud. Aleikoum salam wa rahmatoulahi wa barakatoe
What gets better than this? They use kafir terminology speaking about the deen, yet Allah has made them blind to it. When truth is presented and they reject it, then surely Allah will lead astray the wrongdoers and misguiders. Thank you Shaykh, Muhammad Hijab, take notes. All needs dawah, take notes, there is levels to knowledge.
@@ExtremeShez aqidah is not taught in tabligh or in most deoband madaris, only basics taught so the general people are on fitrah, the kufr & shirk is taught and spread by the heretical barelvies
@@hikmhshm9255 there's your first problem, not tea hing aqidah. It cannot be the work of the Ambiya Alayhimus Salaam as they called to the correct aqidah first and foremost. Kufr and Shirk is in the books of Tablighis and their elders. Read the clear cut quote below. "You and me is Shirk upon Shirk” In the English translation of ‘Irshaadul Mulook[1], Zakariya Kandhalwi mentioned in his introduction, a letter of Rasheed Ahmad Gangohi to his Shaykh Imdadullah Al-Makki: "O my refuge of both worlds! You have requested information about the halat (condition) of this useless one... I have developed a natural dislike for sin and a natural inclination for obedience. This effect is due solely to that relatiotiship (nisbat) which has reached me from the spiritual effulgence of Hadhrat. To say more will be disrespectful. May Allah forgive that I be a liar, for I have written on the instruction of Hadhrat. In reality I am nothing. It is only Your Shadow - only Your existence (i.e. Allah’s existence). What am I? I am nothing. Only He is. You and me are Shirk upon Shirk." [End quote] So affirming two existences is Shirk for these people, and creation is only the ‘shadow’ of Allah... Astaghfirullah!! Also, Gangohi called Imdadullah “refuge of both worlds,” when only Allah can provide refuge to a person in both worlds, yet these people seek refuge in the creation instead of the Rabb of all that exists. And here Gangohi clearly stated he is a liar, in reference to their hiding their creed of Wahdahtul Wujood in order to preserve themselves from attack! [1] Page 20, published by Majlisul Ulama of South Africa. This letter is also quoted by Zakariya Kandhalwi in his “Fazail Sadaqat, part 2, chapter 6: Ahadith- The excellence of Tawakkul, after Hadith 10
I think all these philosophers are innovators in religion. They were influenced by the religion of the prophets But they interpreted religion the way they see fit. Lake any other innovators
I like this video, but no academic would take the paper from the Harvard Theological Review and say “this comes from Cambridge university press”. Makes it difficult to share because most people would not take the credibility of the speaker seriously.
@@iimaanabdulle467 you've missed the point of this first video regarding why they are referred to as Jahmis. Maybe watch it a few times dear brother. I know some people cannot grasp first time.
what people need to do is distinguish between modern salafi rafidi innovators and earlier athari ulema to decern the spin they are injecting in to classical texts. none of the citations quoted are from the original works of the jahmi mutazili ashari authors but third party skewed analysis of their opponents. modern prints of books quoting earlier works contains retrospective attribution of biases of writers doctrinal reflecting stereotypes .
@@somedonny8466 The video is clear cut, if you can't understand simplified knowledge then it's you who has learnt nothing. Your allegiance should be to Allah and Muhammadur Rasoolullah Sallallahu Alayhi Wassallam. Not your Molvis and Peers. The Qur'an is clear to those who want to fear Allah and attain Jannah. We are taught Qur'an and Sunnah with understanding of Salaf, encouraged to seek knowledge. But Tablighi don't learn nothing. They kept me ignorant of my Lord Subhana wa Ta'ala.
@@kylemunroe2133 It is written in the famous and relied upon Dictionary of Deobandis, “Al-Qaamoos ul-Waheed” that: “Taqleed refers to following without evidence, following behind someone with eyes closed.” [P. 1346] In another relied upon books of Hanafis, Fawaatih ar-Rahmoot, it is written (the summary of which is) that: “Taqleed is to act upon a saying of someone other than the Prophet without any evidence i.e. without looking into any of the four shara’ee proofs” [2/400] And the four shara’ee proofs are: 1) Qur’aan, 2) Hadeeth, 3) Ijmaa, and 4) Ijtihaad.
@@intekabalam7340 true Muslim Haq is Salaf Saalih 🕋🌴🌸 true followes of Rasool Lullah saw💞💖) And Khulufa u Rashideen as) AlhamduLillah🌴🌴🌴🌴🌴 Allah bless and protect all Ahlul Towheed☝️💞🕋🌴🌴🌴🌴🌴
Allah have mercy upon Imam Abu Hanifah and those Hanafi Imams who adhered to the Salafi Manhaj. May guide the false claimaints to the madhab of Abu Hanifa, or rid us of them!
The Mention of Hanafī is merely a description of what these individuals are. Also because it is known that Deobandīs are extremely bigoted (have ta'assub) towards the Fiqh of the Hanafī Madhab even if it opposes Authentic Ahadīth, yet they don't have this same type of zealous partisanship when it comes to the Aqīdah of Imām Abū Hanīfah (رحمه الله) who was a Salafī, except in the issue of Eemān in which he erred.
It's funny when these so called Salafies (the saved sect) disrespect scholars it's ok and commendable, but if someone points out mistakes of there scholars, or calls them out then they go into a frenzie.
Your all the same brother. Both groups insulting each other, this is not the way of the Salaf. What both groups are doing is having a negative impact on the Ummah. Muslims fighting and bickering between themselves. Absolutely shameful.
@@ExtremeShez wahabi is a term to identify those who follow wahabism....it's not meant as a derogatory term.....as those who claim to be salafi and followers of sunnah is misleading as other school of thought like ahlul sunnah wal jamaah claim the same....but many ISSUE of khilaf in nature is much debated in many Islamic stage in many countries......as such the truth is those who follow .....👇 Who is the founder of Wahhabism? Muhammad ibn 'Abd al-Wahhab Wahhabism began as a religious and spiritual reform movement in Najd, a remote and rather featureless area of central Arabia. Its founder, Muhammad ibn 'Abd al-Wahhab (1703-92), was born in Najd, into a region inhabited by an Arab population of predominantly tribal structure......
@@vvmustaffa2078 it is offensive term used by it's enemies, coined by British. There is no such thing as Wahhabism. Show me evidence of the people who use the teachings of Shaykh ul-Islaam Muhammad bin Abdul Wahab Rahimahullah label themselves as Wahhabi and call their dawah Wahhabism?
@@vvmustaffa2078. Who say to u he. Is wahabis they. Are sufi and Shia Who doing Taqiya. this man didnt say he is wahabi Btw In Islam u cant call others names except what they call them selves So u dont have right. To call others the name u desire wahabi etc I also. Know some sufis. Who call him wahabi i didnt accept. with they say about this man and i research in this channel about Islam Quran aqeeda the teaching of Rasool Lullah saw) And Sahaba Ra he is not agniast them he belive and follow the teaching of Rasool Lullah saw). ( TOWHEED ) And he is agniast shirk quraafaat U can write and read its better to do ur own research the truth insted saying i heard from fulaan
