Son of Pablo Picasso, Claude Picasso, talks about creating the Musee Picasso for his father's works of art. Join us on Patreon! / manufacturingintellect Donate Crypto! commerce.coinbase.com/checkou... Share this video!
Join us on Patreon! www.patreon.com/ManufacturingIntellect Donate Crypto! commerce.coinbase.com/checkout/868d67d2-1628-44a8-b8dc-8f9616d62259 Share this video!
Love Claude's generosity & authenticity of expression. Great humour and intelligence. I've not seen many interviews by Mr Rose - but this is the most animated and engaged I've seen him. Great interview! Many thanks for the phenomenal playlist linked to in the description! 👍
The more I study Picasso the more I love his work. Lately I've been studying his approach to composition, and I am just blown away at the complexity. Especially the multitudinous ways he relates the subject to the frame. I was also looking at some of his works at the museum in Antibes, and THE COLORS. My lord, the nuance he achieves with colors --- pale yellows, pale blues, warm (not hot) oranges and greens.
I am relatively sorry for Picasso's children whom he had surprisingly late. While his father Picasso (like Mozart, Goethe, Orson Welles, Suzanne Polgár, Borges or Charles Chaplin...) were educated as children to be geniuses in a subject, Picasso the father, who was older but was losing steam in his work , he could not educate and specialize them so that they would be other Genius of Painting, and let's not even talk about his mother. Thus he lived weak, delicate, until he inherited the enormous fortune of Picasso, and with his surname he made his prestige as a photographer. You have to be generous to educate to create Geniuses, and normally geniuses are not usually generous to train their children in their discipline.
Love how Claude rebutted Charie’s comments about genes. ‘My sister and I acquired knowledge more easily because we were around it.’ So much of intelligence is related to access to information, at least how we perceive intelligence.
I thought i heard charlie rose say picasso did not self portray. I believe i saw his self portrayal in his early work while studying at the academy. He was able to paint very realistically as in that period. That was always required in early training.
Reference back vs another of un- process in where repetition occurs... Actually won't offer my own. Interesting previous interview of the lover, speaking here of his mother. And asking who she thought was great artist, mentioning Lee vs Pollock. I actually studied w Krasner was the furthering of Pollock in earlier works.
He explains why I prefer 20th century painting. I grew up with a modern painter too. I also understand why the children didn’t choose painting as a profession 😂. It’s not a craft you can copy. You must be innovative and how could you compete with two famous artists?
And they're still to this day cataloguing his father's work. Let alone what his step-daughter has hidden for the past 45 years. And there's pieces that remain to be accounted for, which is Claude's job to figure what is legit or not. And Marianna is selling off a lot of work she inherited from Paulo.
impersonal...when asked about childhood memories he looks down looks like he’s so sad.... Picasso the genius painter must have been quite difficult as a father.
I hope he went after the very unfortunate pizza joint called Piecasso That stole the matador of Picasso image for their restaurant because I’m sure they didn’t pay a penny for it and we always thought it was very tacky
This interview was a let down. Claude didn't give any interesting stories about his father. It was more like a museum cureator talking about art collections. I have a feeling old Claude didn't know his father any better than I do.
Pablo refused to see him after his ex lover Françoise Gilot wrote a book about him in a negative view. So if he’s not a full worshiper of his father it kinda understandable.
I totally agree with you, he seemed more worried about selling the idea of picasso and his works rather than the nitty gritty of what life was like with picasso, it has turned into a brand and to be honest he sold out, when your pumping out work after work theres not much room for quality there, dont get me wrong the man was super talented and he went through several fazes that indeed proved he could do masterworks but in his later years he simply churned out like an atm machine, i mean for Gods sakes theres a car named after him or in collaboration with him or his estate-makes you wonder, i myself am an artist and its not easy creating works let alone quality and craftmanship, attention to detail etc, but he earnt his place in history and in his life where he could do whatever and it would sell not because they were any good but because they carried the name Picasso-and who doesnt want to be in that position financially?
@@flipzcold254 do you paint soup cans? Picasso was The obvious master at the natural progress of his life & therefore his career. If it's so hard to understand that these interviews are intended to be anything other than a script to feed to "the public" then you must not be in the same tier of intellect. Non of these superstitions of peasantry of yours are relevant to the reality of the life or werk of pablo picasso
@@flipzcold254 You obviously don't understand (or have access to) the work of Pablo Picasso. 'That whereof we cannot speak, thereof we must remain silent'. Ludwig Wittgenstein (1889-1951).
Yes you are the only one. Charlie Rose at those time was so good looking that is hard to believe he forced women at bed. I would be happy to flirt with him 😊😊❤️
@@margaritaresta6390 No, Crazybrain, YOU are the only one. His head looked like a craggy old block of cement - and his personality was equally inviting.
