PADMAAVAT Climax Jauhar Scene REACTION | Deepika Padukone | Ranveer Singh | Shahid Kapoor 🔥 

👍🏽👍🏽

Queen Padmavati. pls pay respects during mentioning her.

@@bonnythelion abey haad

Khilji sawed reflection of servant/Dassi. Rajputs women never remove their veil/odhni infront of stranger males.

​@himana vattikonda Ya that place is still there. You will see it once you visit remains of Chittorgarh Fort

👍🏽👍🏽🥺

Murdering women in the name of sati or jauhaar is something to be ashamed of. Not something to be proud of..

@@priyak7384 1st of all, Sati and Jauhar are different things. 2nd, Who says we are proud of that. It was a travesty. Not an accomplishment. We only salute to the fact that they held their respect utmost. 3rd, Would've you liked it if someone would make you or your loved ones a slave. How slavery is better than death. 4th, and before you react on the 3rd...you should know that you can't study history in present context. It's like instead of a bike, you buy a horse for your first day of college. 5th, You should've read my comment. It says all. Let me dumb it down for you. My only intention was to make sure they don't think our (Even you're included) history fake just because of some debate over some event in history. My comment shows their struggle. However, I always be proud of the fact that they chose death over slavery. It's because of them, both men and women, that you and I can debate over internet... P. S. No hard feelings 🤘

​@@priyak7384 it's not murdering of women. She did it to Protect her pride and dignity

@@priyak7384 its quite easy to jude the earlier times by 21st century morality. If it was forced, then absolutely it was bad. And see, we don't practice sati now bcs we recognized its bad. But johar was only done in times of war. The men did saka, or fought till their death amd the women did johar, so both of the parties end their lives rather than live in slavery and dishonour.

👍🏽👍🏽

It's only your wishful thinking. Not reality

@@priyak7384 the fort has a johar sthal with remains of johar....and also a padmavati mahal I don't think we need more of evidence.....also our oral tradition is very strong and saving our history....do you think muslim rulers would ever document the rajput act of valour......the chittor has these stories in its heart

@@priyak7384 get lost

@@priyak7384 Problem with the people like you, Romila Thabar and other Librandus is that; even though we have so many Hero Stones spread all over the India, their history written by Bardai or Barot community; which you can trace it with the locations and could match many of these with the archaeological evidences - still you are not ready acknowledging that. Khilji dynasty has ruled India for 30 years, starting from around 1400 AD. And his evidences of destruction, massacre, forced conversions spread all over Delhi, Uttar Pradesh, Rajasthan, Haryana and Gujarat. Even the Archaeological Survey Of India is putting big Notice Boards at every historical places in India; but you don't even educate yourself by reading them.

Awww love the film!

Ss me too😔

That’s true 👍🏽

Ohhh that explains it! Cuz nobody will put a romance scene between them. Poor Sanjay took a slap for no reason.

@@sunilpia yes it was a misconception, but yes again bollywood is knows for twisting up facts and glorifying anti Hindu elements, so that's pretty much it 😁

Nope, Sanjay Leele Bansali distorted the history in Bajorio Mastani movie. Rajputs predicted he will do the same for this movie too. That's why they didn't wanted this movie by Bollywood in the first place.

Very insightful!

Correction here - your observation regarding the 'long route' and the 'short route' was spot-on. The architecture of these forts always contained 'trick routes' - the long routes - situated in the outermost perimeter. A devilishly clever strategy to ensure that anyone trying to breach them would, figuratively, take 'forever' to reach the 'inside'... A delaying tactic... While the residents of the fortress could use the 'shortest route', which only they knew, to 'escape tunnels' or in this case, the site of 'Johar kund'

Thank you so much for letting us know 😊

She was also a princess from Sri Lanka before she married to Indian King. So Sri Lankans claim her as well (as they should). Also Jauhars are a historical fact so regardless of your take on Rani Padmavati it's still a depiction true to history.

@@Priya-cm3tr No priya ji , you are completely wrong. History is a subject which is based on facts, proofs. Historical facts means-- शिलालेख , ancient scripture, coins , etc.( first history , not Romila Thapar history) From 6 century to 12 century, it's the period of Gurjar( गुर्जर) dynasty. We Gurjar and Rajpoot have some issues on History. But Historians are very clear, that period was Gurjar dynasty. I Request you, please read some great Historians, like , **k.m.munshi ji ( Glory that was Gurjar desa ) Baij nath puri ji's --- (The History of Gurjara - pratiharas ) And must read Baij nath puri's research on Gurjar dynasty in the University of Oxford. Have you any proof of Gurjar history in sri lanka . Please mention me any ancient scripture. There is big lobby of left wing Historians, who distorted our indian history. They glorified mugal History, because they are hungry for chicken beryani . Because they dislike our Indian values, culture. Thanks🙏🙏⚘️🌻🌿🍁🍇

Lol. Ma padmini .. cringing so hard.

@@priyak7384 Don't worry, she is our mother , we will manage. History demands facts, not abusive language. You know nothing about history, no problem, go to a ice-cream cafe and enjoy **Black Diamond. 🍧🍨🤗💞

they dont now shit man its about 1303 AD they should google it

Padmavati is Sri lankan

@@mrkslva4231 that's a common misconception she is from present day sirohi which was called sinholi/sinhala back then and people/european historian confused it with sinhalese people of Ceylon in reality she wasn't a Sri Lankan but a rajasthani rajput of Bhati Royal House.

@@vladtheimpaler4476 ok but don't know what's the misconception because nowhere on the internet mentions her being indian. But informational books websites( even indian ones ) mention her as being sri lankan. I'm not saying you are wrong. But the only places I've seen people saying she's indian is from RU-vid comments sections only.

Also she was the grand mother of Maharana pratap ji. Uh can read more abt this on int. The jauhar performed by padmavati ranisa was the first ever jauhar performed in the whole mewar/mewad region. I'm actually from mewad (chittod) so i know this .

We must have looked into the wrong source, no offence 🙂

Yes, why don't you visit Chittorgarh fort in Rajasthan. Have a look at Padmavati palace,,or Padmini palace. Have a look at the steps she ran down and did Johar. If you go there, you will get shivers down your spine. Please don't insult the Rajput or the history of India.

Even historians don't claim about her existance with the confidence you do . Lol. Desparate fools.

​@@priyak7384 bhai tere ko koi Kam nahin hai kya why you are commenting on every single comment that she didn't existed get a job you call other people jobless but I think you yourself is jobless ... Tere kahane se that Rani padmawati didn't existed jhooth sach nahin ho jaega because she did existed and it is a fact which can't be changed by self proclaimed archaeologist and historians like you 😂🤣 Know get lost Clown 🤡

​@@priyak7384and I don't think so he is a desperate fool but you are 🤡 who is so desperate to prove a historical characters non existence Fool 🤣😂

👍🙏🌺

In history, there was a siege of Chittaurgarh, led by Alauddin Khilji in 1303. There was a battle between Alauddin Khilji and Raja Ratnasimha. However, the motive for the siege is contested between historians. The Sufi Poet Malik Mohammed Jayasi wrote the poem "Padmaavat" where he wrote a fictional story about the lust of king Alauddin to capture Rani Padmini. But the real history chroniclers of Alauddin Khilji, namely Amir Khusrau, Ziauddin Barani, and Abdul Malik Isami do not mention Rani Padmini, and say that this siege was motivated by the expansionist nature of Alauddin Khilji (They were the court historians of Alauddin Khilji, so they would know). Anyways, Alauddin besieged the fort for 8 months, when he repeatedly attempted to scale the hill, but was repulsed back. In the end, he brought out big siege machines (probably inspired by Mongol siege engines or maybe those were all the rage at that time) and pelted the fort walls, weakening them and making is easy to enter. Either way, Alauddin entered the fort on 26 August 1303, and livid at the stubborn resistance of the king, ordered the inhabitants massacred. As per Amir Khusrau (Alauddin's official Historian), around 30,000 people were put to death. Coming to the Jauhar part, the historians at that time (Khusrau, Barani) did not chronicle the jauhar happen, nor did they chronicle what had happened to the queen. So some historians believe that jauhar may have happened there, and the queen and her entourage committed jauhar, except it was not documented by the official historians (Amir Khusrau and Ziauddin Barani). That lack of documentation (of Jauhar) would make sense if Alauddin's siege was motivated by a desire to conquer the kingdom. In that case, the historians would record the capture of the kingdom and would not bother to record the events of jauhar, as the queen was not the primary objective of the battle.

@@prabhatsourya3883 I understand what you are saying and I also know that you are really intelligent (really I am not joking) but one thing that I remember from the movie was Alauddin buring the pages of history....... I personally think that if a author is writing for a King, so he may not write against the king or about the lust that he had and in the end he didn't even got what he wanted. That's why I think we should focus on some poet who were not the court members of the King because they would have wrote about King fearlessly (that's just my opinion)

@@yugampandey4600 I wholeheartedly agree with that point. But the thing is, even the later rajput historians have dismissed the theory of Alauddin Khilji's lust for Rani Padmini. They too believe Padmaavat as a fictional piece, and the real motive for besieging Chittorgarh was an expansionist policy. But the rajput historians are unambiguous about the jauhar, and say that it indeed happened. P. S. The reason why many historians believed the siege to be an expansionist policy was that Alauddin Khilji was running multiple campaigns across the Mewar region of Rajasthan, having conquered Ranthambhore the year before. Chittaurgarh was sheltering the rebels who fled from Ranthambhore and other conquered regions. Also, Alauddin Khilji might have asked for Rani Padmini to humiliate the Rajput king, but many historians (including Rajput historians) still claim that Rani Padmini was not the actual motive for the siege.

@@prabhatsourya3883 bhai agar sachme Rani Padmini kay baare mein jaanna hain toh ooski research Sri Lanka mein bhi honi chhahiye kyuki woh wahiki thi.

​@@amitbhople1864 really she was from Sri Lanka ?

👍🏽👍🏽

💯

Thank you heaps! Glad you enjoyed 😊

True.. history is written by rulers or oppressors so it’s always from their perspective.

Yups distorians like Habib ,Guha ,thabar and Majumdar

3??!! So sad 😢

Very insightful 😊👍🏽

Every war!! That’s insane!

👍🏽👍🏽

👍🏽👍🏽

Congratulations 🥳👏🏽❤️

Thank you so much 😊😊❤️❤️

🤩🤩🤩

Interesting! Thank you for letting us know 😊

Anytime 😊

👍🏽👍🏽

Cinema chupista mama😁

Thank you 😄

👍🏽👍🏽

Interesting!

👍🏽👍🏽

That's what it is

👍🏽👍🏽

👍🏽👍🏽

This Sunday!

Okay 👍🏽

Didn’t mean to offend. We must have referred to a bad source 😊

Stfu. It's fake. Don't force others to entertain your bulshit.

Didn’t mean any offence buddy, we must have had a bad source. Checkout our analysis of other scenes too 😊

@@sunilpia of course sis, but as an Indian I would suggest you to research properly before making videos especially on history and mythology of every country but for Indian history and mythology be careful. We are way too emotional for this. BTW it's OK.

Soon 😊

Bro yuganiki okkaduu also

👍🏽👍🏽

😂😂

True, we were mistaken 👍🏽

👍🏽👍🏽

War