Here we compared three tanks in War Thunder. They are M4A3 (76) W Sherman, Panther A and Т-34-85. Play to War Thunder! - warthunder.ru/ru/registration?...
Panther A: Better armor than M4A3 Better gun than M4A3 Better speed than M4A3 Smoke grenades M4A3: .50 Cal... Gayjin: Yep, seems like the two tanks are equal, they should all go in 5.7.
Exactly, at least with T-34/85 you have speed and trolly Stalinium armor but M4A3(76) being slow and having non-existent armor equal to the superior Panther A? *Once again gaijin spoiling the wehraboos*
What's the point of showing 3 timers that run simultaneously instead of showing actual tank speeds and testing acceleration? Other then getting out of spawn and reaching a spot in your first spawn on a large flat map, top end speed doesn't matter
Personally, I think the Sherman series of tank was the best as it was practically and did well in almost every single theater of the war, with even seeing use today by some countries. Has better crew survivability in the later models with spring hatches, and is still pretty fast with all things considering. The T-34 variants really didn’t have the easily escape level hatches, and the T-34’s weren’t built to last beyond an expected timeframe (as in the vehicle would stop working after a few months as they predicted vehicles would’ve been shot and killed by that time). And the Panther, the obvious quality over quantity issue and other things involving fuel consumption and the many impractical and non-mass produced upgrades that it saw
@@peridot675 panther isn't really better quality though but more like revolutionary design, it was get push so hard and have so many flaws with little of testing. Sherman build from reality, it design to be a general purpose tank, and do best what it design to do, and can transport it anywhere. T-34 is actually have very good performance and perform much better than sherman in terms of speed and armor effectiveness, Every country have their own idea when it comes to build thing's.
@@Zelectrocutica I do agree with the last statement, as potential history would say. I mean, Italy did build those small tankettes as they would climb steep hills for example. I still find it an interesting discussion to see what tank could overall in a sense, be the best.
Goddamn, so the M4A3 (76) rly is so damn slow. I thought it was just me feeling that Panther and T-34 felt more agile no matter what terrain.. So what makes the M4A3 (76) stays at 5.7 other than the *vertical stabilizer* which is something that the M4A1 (76) has at 5.0? Its non-existent armor and suspension does not justify it to have the 0.7 BR difference than it supposed to Panther A clearly won in terms of firepower and armor, T-34/85 is somewhere in between because if Papa Stalin bless you then you will be granted the invincible Stalinium armor in certain cases (laughs at the impenetrable bouncy driver hatch). And the only downside from Panther A is its reverse speed but only typical dumb wehraboos rush with a tank that has incredible scope, other than that it's an undertiered 5.7 tank that should be facing Jumbo and Pershing at 6.0-6.3 instead of the inferior Shermans.. If Gaijin wasnt being so German/Russian bias, here's how they should put these tanks: >all 76 Shermans (except Jumbo) at 5.0 because it's basically a better Panzer IV made by the Americans. The M4A3(76) can stay at 5.7 IF they fixed its HVSS suspension accuracy bcs its too goddamn slow for a medium tank especially from US. Otherwise, with its current statistics, it should've been 5.3 instead of 5.7 >T-34/85s can stay where they are because they are just THAT good in 5.3-5.7 >Panther A should've sit at 6.0 with the G version. Both got their own playstyles that the wehraboos can choose, A got speed and G got extra armor plating on its turret mantlet. These guys should be facing something on their own size, the 76 Jumbo, so that the German winrate can increase by forcing its players to learn how to not aim like some goddamn stormtroopers
True, I have similar views about Shermans with 76mm as a Germany player at this BR (about 200 battles in Tiger H1 and 60 in Panther D) and honestly they are very easy to kill, slow and their gun is underperforming
Also speed helps you get to a better position first like a camping spot or a flank. Speed can also help you out maneuver the turret rotation of and enemy in a close combat situation so
Then why are the M18, EBR, R3, Ru251, and Radkampfwagen claimed to be broken and cancer? The undertiered Panther A should be rebalanced by moving it to 6.0 so it can face 76 Jumbo and Pershing more often, as it should be..
Exactly, at least with T-34/85 you have speed and trolly Stalinium armor but M4A3(76) being slow and having non-existent armor equal to the superior Panther A? *gaijoob be spoiling the wehraboos* At least move the damn Panther A to 6.0 so it can face 76 Jumbo and Pershing more often, as it should be
Other race ... for what? powerful engine ? You run a race but there are no hillsides or potholes. You can surpass battlefield obstacles and compete for "off-road" performance.
Panther win it can pen the other every where but itself is for them unpenetrable in the most Spots and the t-34 and m4 have not the guns to pen the main plate also the panther have a faster turret
СОЮЗ НЕРУШИМЫЙ РЕСПУБЛИК СВОБОДНЫХ. СПЛОТИЛА НАВЕКИ ВЕЛИКАЯ РУСЬ. ДА ЗДРАВСТВУЕТ СОЗДАННЫЙ ВОЛЕЙ НАРОДОВ - ВЕЛИКИЙ, МОГУЧИЙ СОВЕТСКИЙ СОЮЗ !!!!!!!!!!!!
If you take the extra armor off the panthers turret it will be much fast that useless weight is 450 kg if I’m right... anyway panther wins 1 place Sherman and T-34-85 lose
