You all prolly dont care at all but does anyone know of a tool to get back into an instagram account..? I was dumb lost my password. I would love any tricks you can offer me.
@Mathew Frank Thanks so much for your reply. I got to the site through google and I'm trying it out now. I see it takes quite some time so I will get back to you later with my results.
I’m interested in the discussion of the seasons at about 1:20 - I notice that he says “winter, summer or monsoon”. Living in Canada, this stood out, since I’m used to the seasons being listed as “winter, spring, summer, or fall”. What part of the world does this video reflect? Is it common to refer to the seasons using those THREE names?
In the peninsular regions it's a common thing to hear Monsoon as a distinct season which has played a major role in shaping some of the civilizations that we see today in those places where monsoon comes. For instance, I'm from india and it's the norm of seasons being called Summer, Monsoon and Winters while we do actually also include the spring and autumn seasons totalling our tally to 5. The monsoon is seen as transition from hot summers to colder winters as they come after summers end generally in the months of June-July and retreat by August-September, after which we have a brief season of autumn until November when winter begins in the Indian subcontinent. (There's actually a lot of geography and meteorology involved with Monsoons and they have life changing effects on the people inhabiting the places as it directly affects crop production and water availability in all the regions and much more.)
What are you talking about? The cicle of weather was the same for millions of years? Seriously? Anybody that has really read and studied about the ages of the earth and climate knows this is completely false. Weather has changed dramatically many times long before humans were even here, climate change has been real during the entire life of the planet and never needed humans to create a shift in climate.
Satkar Syangtan That was the year that I discovered the “Chemtrails” “Geoengineering”....It puts us in a greenhouse and causes the warming...metals to the brain that works with 5g radiation and kills the weak/ elderly.I don’t think our elderly can take the human microwave ....my option and I respect yours .....we both do not really know ... but THEY do
Superb ..you made the topic so easy so knowledge able and upto the mark that every other difficult topic should be explained on similar lines ..thankyou sir
What you say about ch1na and India and other developing countries is not true. In 2030 they will be asked to make assessments and don't even have to do that. Nothing in the agreement says they have to change
Hi guys! i know many people will ignore this comment, but for those who didn't, hear me out :) if u love the environment, please use Ecosia as your search engine. For every 45 searches u make, a tree will be planted somewhere. if you think this is fake, u can always look at their channel in youtube. Also stay safe guys
Igor Resch I had to google what that country was. I couldn’t believe I didn’t know a country that was big enough to emit 5% of ghg. Then I realised it was Russia.
Its a group of people who mean well but have no real power and go away with good ideas that are never going to be actually implemented leading to their own extinction.
Maybe you didnt heared him correctly he was refereing 200 years ago . All changes before 200 years were natural. This is also a fact that the revolving of earth is also slowing with passing time so there are some other challeneges 2 .
@@muhummadsaud3722 The little ice age is also a fact. The point is that if ice ages and warm periods happen, you cannot refer to the last 200 years as the last two hundred years include the little ice age, therefore there is no "same weather".
They better perform well, Earth is the only spaceship we have; and we don't want any future extraterrestrial visitors to find a dustball of bones do we?
Don't worry, they'll agree on something soon enough. They just need a smarter agreement, which the US can manage due to many financial hardships it's facing.
It is so sad! I just wish there was more knowledge, education, and media coverage on the subject! So people in our communities could take matters into their own hands instead of waiting on government officials to set boundaries or limitations. We need to take responsibility for our own carbon footprints as individuals in our communities! If that means walking to the grocery store more often or carpooling or if you can afford it solar energy and electric cars. Individuals can make a difference, but there needs to be an Awakening and the knowledge instead of just focusing on Facebook and Instagram!!!!
India has 30% of all the poor on the planet and less than 50% of those poor actually go to school and as we know the poor multiply 10 times more than the educated and wealthy India’s projected social growth and or Network is running approximately $2 billion negative each and every year on top of the 200 billion it is currently spending.
India’s fertility rate is 2.2. Many states India already have fertility rate well below the replacement level (2.0). Even though many Indians are poor, they’re are getting more and more aware of the pros of having a small family. So instead of worrying about India, focus on your country.
Yes, study has show that 16% of RU-vid about climate change is fake or deliberately misleading. This is not one of them. Learn from genuine sources like NASA climate or read IPCC report that signed world best climatologist or go to Wikipedia it's much more safe that RU-vid. On RU-vid everybody can make video about anything they want and for what any reason and purpose they want without consequences. Freedom of speech is most misused privilege on RU-vid. This in not democracy! Nice hat!
Kloko Loko IPCC is not a trusted source. I’ve done my research on those scientist whom the IPCC claim are in “consensus” when they are not. Their are thousands of scientist who signed an open letter stating the IPCC is not taking into account the scientific reviewers comments into consideration. It is a politically driven report not scientifically driven report. Also NASA has conflicting data from year to year and I’ve seen too many inconsistencies in their data to trust them. This is a governmentally controlled propaganda ... do more research into it before blindly accepting it. Also read scientific reports by said scientist against the one hypothesis that everyone is duped into believing .. there’s a lot to unpack
@@sapettee I have watched more than 5000 videos (about 10 per day) about climate change on RU-vid so no more research is needed just telling you that RU-vid is very unreliable source about climate change. " do more research into it before blindly accepting it. Also read scientific reports by said scientist against the one hypothesis that everyone is duped into believing .. there’s a lot to unpack" What specific one?
Kloko Loko the hypothesis that humans are driving climate change. According to many other diverse scientist, climate change is a complex matter and it’s more driven by sun cycles, cosmic rays, etc.. things that the IPCC report doesn’t go into detail or include. Why waste your time watching you tube videos on this topic if they aren’t reliable? My point is simply that the IPCC report is not reliable either ..
@@sapettee You are right thing is very complex and problem with RU-vid is that anybody can make video about anything they want for what any purpose they want without consequences. That's why is unreliable. I know all that theories from both sides but I have one for you to just to think. You know that in artificial greenhouse like plastic or glass plant greenhouse is warmer than outside or you know when you go inside your car on sun it's much warmer than outside. Something tells you that inside is stronger green house effect. Same is with more CO2 in air . CO2 lets light to pass from Sun to Earth but when light hits the ground it transform it self in heat and warm surface of the Earth. Now warm earth radiate heat back to space (but now it's not light but invisible heat radiation that you can only feel when you stand close to warm object, like furnace) that radiation is suppressed and absorbed by greenhouse gases like water vapor, CO2, CH4 (methane) NO2 etc. You have bunch of gases and major is water vapor you see it here what percentage what gas contribute to warming en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greenhouse_gas#Impacts_on_the_overall_greenhouse_effect So energy from Sun can pass but heat radiation is suppressed by GHG and more you have them in atmosphere stronger greenhouse effect will be and less heat is lost to space. You can see here if you are interested www.ces.fau.edu/nasa/module-2/how-greenhouse-effect-works.php Without water and CO2 (two main GHGases ) average year temp. on Earth would be 0F or -18°C like on moon. Lets back to that plant greenhouse . Once when person understand why is warmer inside and what specific difference is what is causing to be warmer in comparison to Earth atmosphere than that person can say that it know basics of greenhouse effect. Also if some individual learn something new in misleading way (for example on RU-vid) it's much harder for that person to accept real genuine explanation because our brain is wired that way to resist that to happen. First information have priority. Thing is that everybody today is some kind expert in climate change what is unrealistic. Also no one is questioning are we made of atoms and all around us is made of atoms, we just trust science and scientists. What is problem with climate change and why is politicized is because all our energy infrastructure was build on fossil fuels. Our heating in winter, our electricity generation, our transportation. And to change this to renewable, big infrastructural change must happen but not all people from fossil fuel business want that. Fact is that no mater what climate change or not we will transform our society in renewable sources not because we want to but because we have no choice. FF are finite source of energy and we can't function without energy. And with this much people on Earth those reserves will become only just more expensive and more costly and harder to dig up and environmentally unfriendly (fracking, water pollution etc) Also people do not get that fossil fuel price is going up every year. You can see on this graph of oil price history last 150 years that oil price was pretty stable from 1900-1970 year, about $16 per barrel and today is 3 time higher (inflation is included , red line in that graph) en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Price_of_oil#/media/File:Crude_oil_prices_since_1861.png
