It shouldn't surprise me, but I had no idea that the same type of corruption was going on with Spanish versions as has been with English versions. I would not even go to a church or support any missionary who used any version based on the corrupt, impure, critical text. If I found out a missionary was doing this I would withdraw funds immediately. I'm glad Pastor Rodriguez is exposing this because it definitely should be brought to light. Missionaries to ANY language or country should be made to sign a statement that they will not use a Bible based on the critical text.
@@jwatson181 I don't know what gave you that idea but it's simply not true. Many KJV only advocates not only support missions but are themselves missionaries. Not saying every single one in the U.S. but for the most part they do.
@@jwatson181 You may be a Christian. I don't know that for sure. However, you don't understand the importance or the ramifications of this issue. It's clear you don't believe that the KJV is far superior to the modern versions and I'd be the last to try and convince you since you clearly have a closed mind on the subject. For starters, I don't tend to support anyone that I have very serious doctrinal differences with. I personally think any Christian who has an NIV should burn it immediately. The same goes for most of the other popular modern versions like the ESV. I do NOT think that everyone who uses another version is not a believer and would never say that and never have said that. You don't think this is important at all by your very clear attitude. I would not send one red cent to support any preacher or missionary, evangelist, etc, that uses the modern versions nor would I attend one of their churches. I am not saying they are lost or that they may not be doing good in some cases. They will have their supporters no matter what I think. It just won't be me. If you think it doesn't matter what version you use and you also believe necessarily it does not matter how many new versions they come out with either. One is just as good as the other right??? No, it's not right and it never will be right. The massive push to put out more and more extremely bad translations is nothing less than Satanic. It started back in the 1800's and it hasn't stopped yet. Fools don't see just how harmful this has been to Christianity in general.
I would not go to any KJV only church, because if they teach this heresy what other heresies and false teaching will there be? To withdraw funds from those preaching the gospel and winning many to Christ. Just shows how how idolatrous, blasphemous and sataniic the KJV only cult truly is. The insane worship of the KJV, more important than the gospel of Jesus Christ.
@@bobbyadkins6983 they are departing from textus receptus, on some places. It's too bad, because otherwise it could have been a good translation. This is the one that they all use down here, I even have one to go to church so it's easier not to read the verses differently. But I would never use it for my daily reading.
I guess they would also accuse the writer of Psalm 119 of worshipping God's Word. Over and over and over again the writer of that Psalm tells how much he loves God's commandments, statutes, testimonies, the law of the LORD. Next time someone accuses you of worshipping the Bible, tell them to read Psalm 119.
