I believe that you have a patent because you are willing to do something about your ideas. Posting this video is a very generous and good thing to do. Thank you Evan Levy !
I work at a power plant. We have one forced draft fan that has a sacrificial bull gear that keeps wearing out. When it wears out, that boiler cannot operate until the forced draft fan gets a new gear. I can see how your magnetic gear could absolutely fix this problem. Great idea! I hope to see this tech available soon, and I hope you make tons of money with it!
i almost hav the same idea like this... but the difference is the convex magnet.. for me this is really helpful to many people... if i hav enuf funds i will try to make my own version of generator in a large scale...this man is really a genius...we hav to protect this man..
I admire you for getting the patent, and then sharing this wonderful idea with the world. I hope that many others are able to join in and further this project. 🙏🏼
I would discribe the magnetic amplification at the corners as magnetic paddles that push the magnetic paddles on the next array. In a way, very much like gear teath, but without the direct contact issues of friction and the ability to be effective through a barrier. This is genius. I can also see how bearing wear and load doubling can be shared and reduced by adding outside arrays, such as a row of arrays extending out in the direction of the load, for example in a winch.
To get tighter coupling i instinctively think “bigger” structures. But there may be more benefit from using many small units in parallel. Genius creation. Thank you for sharing.
Loved your demos. Brilliant thinking. I woke up about 3:50 AM today and came across your video. It inspired some of my thinking this morning over a ☕️. I am a creative thinker, and I am mediately saw many of the applications that might be possible with your invention. Congratulations, Evan‼️ Best wishes for many future implementations of your patent and for financially profiting from it too.
Did study elecronics eng can shut out the brilliance of this and where it can be applied. Thank you for the good work. Well done. Now think of magnetic lavitations can be improved with such a technic.
I think you made a great executive toy there. The problem is the slippage, if you have experience with the forces that are required to turn certain mechanical devices you will see this. I think it's a great solution for the drive with no mechanical connection, probably for the medical industry or any low torque applications.
You could solve the torque problem the same way you do with typical gears, with a ratio. You go from small/closer to larger/wider spaced magnet arrays. If you were to use electromagnets depending on the current input the force to cause slippage could potentially be greater than that needed to strip metal gears. Have you ever tried to open a door secured with magnetic locks? This system may be useful in kinetic wave generators in the ocean as they can be sealed and protected from salt corrosion. There are very real possibilities myriad applications of this concept. And, I think it's really cool.
@@usrine I thought the same thing ratio it up also on something like a wind generator or hydro pump slippage could be useful in over torque to prevent failure
I completely understand your idea. Absolutely amazing idea. I am a fabricator myself. I am going to look at this and see what applicable situations I can make a physical prototype with very nice work.
🧲 He did not invent this. It’s old school technology that’s been around for decades in the public domain. His custom magnets have absolutely nothing to do with why this works the way it does. Any shape of magnets even mixing shapes together will do the job. There are countless applications already in existence that use magnetic coupling.
@@FreeMagneticEnergy2 I'm not professing any knowledge here, but I have a question - if it's in the public domain, why was he given a patent? There would have to be something novel for it to be issued.
@@shennalim111 Many patents are given by the US patent office that are questioned later and often rejected due to public domain knowledge. The US Patent Office examiners are not perfect, especially when new complex ideas and explanations are given. I "own" (assigned to my employers) a number of patents that would probably fall into this situation.
Your not the first person to think about magbetic coupling, but you did someting with your idea and made a working midel. Well done and congratulations.
When I get this old I hope my hair is that effin cool! Very cool video and congrats on getting a patent for that considering the patent office is corrupt as hell.
Evan that's a brilliant design with huge potential over a wide range of products, it does away with parts that wear out and add weight and of course friction. Good luck and I hope to see this system implemented into some working prototype which I could think of many. Very cool.
Air bearings would help with the friction.... Although the amount of friction is now negligible thanks to you removing the belt and chain the main drag of the friction model.... Most people don't realize that the power with the magnet lies in the edge not the center ....that was a great demonstration thank you
Interesting, very interesting approach for magnetic coupling. I can see this having many applications, some of which the technology has not even been invented for yet.
I have designed and built VAWT wind turbines for over 50 years and came up with a similar-enough design using flat magnets, but abandoned it due to "cogging" which was so violent, it shook things apart. My current design cogs as well, but in only one 3° segment in a 360° array in single-phase a.c. and direct current, three segments in 3-phase. All these designs "hum" in varying amounts, depending on wind speed.
I was thinking of a staggered array, stacked, to form a 360° coverage, to possibly eliminate cogging, but if say, 5 rows are stacked, have the center stack with higher density neodymium magnets, or larger sections, with fewer elements to form the enclosure. Nobody wants to have one pole jump/cog to the next, continuously, but flow easily from pole to pole, with the same strength field to generate a steady current and or rotation. Just my .02¢
@ERNEST PATRIOT I have tried placing "dummy" magnets along the arc pathway to offset cogging. It helps, but it also increased start-up resistance, requiring greater wind speeds.
Very interesting project. Nice to see intellectual curiosity expressed in creativity and action. Kudos! Will be interested to see future videos and development. If I understand your magnet design and array correctly, you are achieving an improved coupling between each rotor to maintain a positive connection eliminating or limiting slippage with ability to maintain at greater force of torque. By so doing you could create a virtual gearbox without contact and transfer energy through various surfaces eliminating penetration, seals, and exposure to caustic liquids or unstable games for instance.
As many viewers have noted magnetic coupling is not new and is in use in a variety of applications. The other recurring question regards torque and slippage…. And i want to assure you that this system optimized will have equal torque of a conventional induction motor with several other advantages that i will demonstrate in future videos. Different things govern torque in a motor… field windings, current, gauge of wire but all these variables interact between stator and armature in the air gap between field shading.. so ultimately a motor does work through coupling and changing polarity in field windings. brushless motor are a relatively new development and they have many advantages in that they eliminate brushes and commutators and replace with an electronic control unit that switches polarity in field windings… because the radius of centrifugal force is moved out from shaft it produces more angular momentum… i will add the following…. It was kind of an accident of intellectual curiosity that i ended up with a specialty magnet shape and found engineers at Stanford Magnets who would redesign sintering molds to achieve the convex shape i thought would work best in my coupled rotor system…. Also it took some top notch former machinists from Lockheed Aerospace to help figure out how to design holders for magnets to rotate closely at really high speed without flying apart.. I posted video to share some of my thinking and a curious observation about what is going on differently than any other magnetically coupled system… i plan to address all questions regarding slippage and torque and how this idea can overcome these and other obstacles to create a new type of electromagnetic system. One expects magnets to act in certain ways but in my setups you can observe something empirically different occurring. What is unique and strange about my design is that the coupling action occurs at the edges where magnets are thickest… these nodes act as virtual cogs in a magnetic gear… the north/south attraction or north/north repulsion of a field does not occur as it would in the equal thickness face polarization. The gap angle also seems to affect the field interactions.. so why is this? And is it useful? My design needs optimizing but my suspicion is yes and i can both explain and demonstrate why that is..in a future video.. But ultimately this type of R&D is expensive…. I was initially posting as documentation and to maybe find funding for next stage development. i never expected this many people watching and responding… please subscribe and i will post more videos as prototypes develop…e
@@evanlevy8947 try overunitying it like Troy Reed did. Seems like it could achive frictionlessness and gain enough energy to stay in loop if you use coils and get 100% efficiency in circuit.
@@evanlevy8947uh..brushless motors aren't new, we just now have the ability to control them more easily/better due to electronics advancements. And your comment about the force being moved outward seems to imply you think all brushless motors are outgunned, which is not the case.
@@forbiddenera I think if you watch the entire video he concedes that brushless motors exist as well as magnetic coupling. The patent presumably has more to do with the shape of his magnets and the arrangement thereof; not that he claims to have discovered/invented new principles of physics.
There is one great application here is for transferring power from an inboard motor to propeller in the water. Currently inboard motor boats have a drive shaft going through the hull. This would allow the inboard motor to turn the gears inside the boat which then turns the magnetic gears outside of the boat to turn the propellers in the water.
🧲 Simply Google it as others are way ahead of you on this. He did not invent this. And his specialized magnets has absolutely nothing to do with why it works the way it does. He has fooled the patent office and or himself as well. Another helpful gentleman in this thread last information as well about what you are talking about as a means to get around water leaks.
There would be too much slippage and wasted energy. The magnets work when turned slowly. If you were to accelerate the rotation using a drill (or boat motor) the other magnets wouldn’t accelerate at the same rate. This wasted energy would be transferred in the form of heat, a lot of it…..
Maybe would be in a good use for torque converters where slippage is needed but again at one point need to be locked o don’t know just a thought , I see where every one coming from but I’m sure would be a use for it some how some where
Very nicely done. Simple and yours. 👍 I have a great application for solar powered well pump systems which are extremely common now. I believe this could increase viability, simplify and reduce friction on many motors and pumps. Solar is quite sensitive at output and needs all the help it can get for efficiency. Awesome 👌
Interesting. I have seen magnetically coupled pump drives that use magnets on one side developing eddy currents on the other side. This allowed for slight misalignment between the driving and driven shafts. Your system has a more 1:1 ratio, less slip. One application I can imagine is using these components as a soft engagement clutch. Imagine moving the central rotor along its axis of rotation to engage or disengage power transmission. This type of clutch may be useful in explosionproof applications (assuming unintended voltage generation is controlled for). Another potential industrial application would be driving an array of stirring impellers submerged in a light liquid. This could be for anything from a chemical reaction tank to an on-grain whiskey still. It just struck me that the driving rotor in your array could be replaced with a rotor wound like a DC motor [EDIT-to clarify, this 'rotor' would be stationary, powered as a BLDC motor], allowing the whole array to be turned on or off. I will bookmark this video. There is food for thought here. I'll let you know if I come up with any reasonable applications.
Good afternoon Evan! I am a supporter of magnetism and even at a distance from our culture it was quite satisfying to see your commitment to developing magnetic rotors, keep it up, hugs! 🇧🇷👏🏻
Excellent presentation, It reminded me with an old coupled spinning magnets toy that when you spin one the kinetic energy moved back and forth between the two- in chaotic manner. The con for this system is that magnetic fields drops versus 1/r^2. Hence it will work at small separation. Using belt is good when space is an issue. Another system is magnetic breaking in cars. Best wishes
I like your magneto-geometric array, there are companies that print magnets in a variety of ways now, I think you are on to something. Perhaps you could even begin to make shapes/arrays that would induce magnetic fields such as yours does at the corners, in three dimensions that would result in a magnetic field shape in a fourth dimension. Say a magnetic field Klein bottle, or a one dimensional mobius strip. I am not at all versed in what it is I'm trying to say here, and probably far out of my league, but the shapes of the fields generated by the interplay of a magnet array seems very unique to me.
Evan, predictable physical result from adding more is that the force needed to turn one grows in paraller with the number of cores. If we attach motors on them, then the force needed to to turn one would equal the force needed to turn all the motors. If not, then this would mean energy multiplier
An important benefit of the design is the elimination of a belt or shaft or differential between the "prime mover" (the one magnet being driven by an external power source of some kind) and the "driven" magnet-rotors. The elimination of a matter-based (ie. atoms) physical connection of the prime mover to the driven magnet-rotors has value that varies depending on the application. But you eliminate the need for shaft seals, shafts being machined, wearing out of shaft seals, lubrication of shaft seals, etc. One thing you implicitly point out is the feedback between the 'driven' rotors and the 'driver' (prime mover) rotor. "How can there be feedback from the 'driven' rotors to the 'driving' prime mover rotor?" some might ask. Magnet torque is how. Let's say one of the 'driven' rotors has a small plastic fan blade attached to it - when the driver (prime mover) rotor is powered up, its magnetic field is coupled 'invisibly' to the adjacent 'driven' rotor and the 'driven' rotor's attached fan spins around. It's a house fan. The only resistances that the prime mover 'driven' rotor must overcome are these: 1) physical resistance of the bearings of the driver, and the driven, rotors 2) the inertial drag on the initially-stationary driver and driven rotors (the inertia that Newton's Law reminds us 'things not in motion stay not in motion' and so on) - it takes a force, in this case magnetic torque, to overcome the inertia of the initially non-moving rotors 3) the air resistance experienced by the fan blade when it is rotating So, not too much resistance in (1), (2) and (3) here. That resistance is borne by the driver rotor's power supply - as those combined resistances increase or decrease, the 'load' on the power supply connected to the 'driver' rotor handles the load. Now replace the fan blade and its air resistance with a turbine blade whose job is to mix peanut butter and molasses at a candy factory. Item (3) has now skyrocketed. The amount of magnetic torque required is now immense. Does this couple back to the energy source providing power to the prime mover rotor? Yes indeed. The physical torque created by the magnetic field of the prime mover may no longer be sufficient to mix molasses and peanut butter. "Slip" might occur, where the prime mover 'driver' rotor's magnetic field is no longer sufficient to spin the 'driven' rotors, and no molasses and peanut butter get mixed. In a traditional electric motor, this is overcome by design (the reduction in rotation speed caused by the friction of mixing molasses and peanut butter reduces back EMF in the electric motor windings, which allows current to increase in the motor windings, which increases the magnetic field and the motor spins faster via that 'built-in' feedback). In the case of a magnetic-driven system, you'd need to increase the magnetic field of the 'driver' rotor by increasing its size to fit the task (mixing molasses and peanut butter).
I think there's too much of an assumption that there's less "friction" compared to say the belts and pulleys on an engine as he described. There's an almost completely negligible amount of friction involved in belts in a car engine for example. They travel in tandem with the pulleys, not in opposition to the pulleys. Think about that.....Even when a car engine is revved to tens of thousands of RPMs, they don't get hot, don't melt, and even though they rotate at much higher RPMs than the tires do, I've had countless vehicles I've owned that have gone through multiple sets of tires and still haven't had to replace the belts. The other obvious fact is that with rotary Magnet-to-Magnet alternating polarity arrays like these, (you can see it best in the linear array he showed) there is always a "Cogging" effect, like you see, feel and hear in the video exactly the same way you do in old farm wind mill cogs. The magnets don't like to be in between facing each other. It's like trying to drive your car down the road with square wheels, it's a rough ride. The cogging resistance would cause more energy loss than if he'd made it with belts. So if he'd rearranged the magnets to eliminate the cogging effect, and also used floating magnet bearings to really eliminate friction, then maybe he might have something....
I would look for an alternative to the bearing .. some kind of magnetic pivot point using the resistance between matching magnetic polarity to house these moving components. this would technically eliminate the friction. Add this into a perpetual motion concept and this could be substantial.. very inspirational! Keep up the good work !
I'm 50 years old right now. Back when I was in the 11th grade I had an idea of using bar magnets resting in a pin. Several bar magnets in a square should spin like yours. Unfortunately due to nay sayers i.e the instructors said it would never work. This was before advancements in magnets. I had other ideas as well when I was in electronics classes but I never went anywhere with them because of all the negative comments from my instructor. Thank you for designing this showing that it does work.
I don't think efficiency will be an advantage but wear and tear plus having the flexibility of it with it essentially being a connection free gearing system is pretty cool!
@@FiatPandaSelecta True. His sketch of a windmill could also just use a regular generator coupled through a clutch at the bottom, but his design still has merit.
@@SodiumInteresting depends on what your building or trying to accomplish. Seems there's always a trade off no matter what you use though. I wouldn't beat yourself up over going bearingless unless what your trying to accomplish really shows a need for it. Bearings have been running hard for years on end and usually don't take much to swap them out. If your going through good Japanese bearings then something else is the problem.
This could be used for a low pressure/ hi pressure react vessel to mix materials in it without requiring a mechanical seal. Eg. Walnut shell filters, oil removal filters, after filters and softeners.
I have a fifty=year-old mag-coupled hot water pump in my solar water heater, bronze bodied, stainless coupler plate, magnetic driven section. Never been apart since built. I like the idea of a mag-coupled planetary transmission for electric bicycles, with magnet-locked sun and planet gears.
@@AsifKhan-pk1km the way he was trying to achieve propulsion, and breaking in the video with the bicycle is a completely different configuration of the use of the magnetic poles. Also, the force that was created on the bicycle in terms of torque is pretty substantial for the amount of surface area. He was trying to use it in and size of magnets.
@@brucewayne9300 you are right, it was so. I know of a military tank runnng on electromagnet. The more the weight the more the current required. Simple formula. Anyways, in the effort to see your pic i saw your list of lov songs. Good catchy lyrics, like she should not kiss me like that.where were you when the world.👍 i am in my late 50s, i liked Nat king cole, jim reeves, max bygraves etc. They sang beautful love songs.
This is a great use of magnetic energy and also a wonderful illustration of sharing and furthering an idea . You never know what variations of this might come about . Very good on you .
I guess the important question is how much mass do you need for the system require to transmit given amount of torque (say 50 Nm)? This would allow having some kind of estimate if this coupling is usable for e.g. wind turbines where a single turbine can output 5 MW or more, the the amount of torque needed is very high.
Yes. I don't thing magnetic fields could resist anything much more than moderate shear forces. Metal gears are much more reliable under these forces. Unless, of course, superconducting magnets are used, which is, I suppose a possibility. The windmill looks interesting but it would probably need a 200 or 300 foot shaft to drive the magnets at the base. That would be difficult and expensive to achieve using current engineering methods. Something new would need to be invented for that...
@@tasmedic Wind turbine already just like an electric motor also, do all their work through magnetic fields (of course the magnetic fields are mostly created by electric current), so the field strength is not an issue. I think the issue for wind turbine is that what would be the advantage? Electric generator / motor, unlike internal combustion engine, can be already so easily split in as many pieces as you want even on the same shaft. What is the advantage in hopping the movement sideways to a different shaft and adding extra magnetic parts, when the generator / motor itself uses these very same principles?
But I think the idea still has many applications elsewhere, and why not even in wind turbines, I don't claim to be an expert on the wind turbine subject.
Since you are attempting to shape the field, perhaps you might try an asymmetric meshing pattern, something along the lines of a chain and sprocket. That might relieve your cogging issue which seems to me would produce heat and rob you of transmission power. What do you think?
Very interesting..I'm sure this can be used in various applications including aerospace...just wondering how much heat if any would be generated when applied with a load on the system.
I'd really like to speak with you. I have a design for a fan blade that is usable even in icy conditions where the ice will flow straight off of the blade not causing any damage not doing any damage to the system and I needed an idea to advance what I know and I thought of back in 1989. Your design combined with my information would be phenomenal and would pretty much put the oil industry out of business.
Great idea. I believe that this design would be quite useful in an oil or natural gas refinery. The shaft seal is the weakest point on the centrifugal pumps used to move the highly flammable products. This system eliminates the need for shaft seals all together. The pump would be built in to the production plumbing. It would eliminate the friction that comes with the bearings needed with a shaft. Replacing the pump sections during normal maintenance would require much less time and expense.
You have created a frictionless magnetic transmission unit or coupler that can have diverse applications, specially in the auto industry(no gears, no messy ATF necessary) The magical & even misterious power of magnets has been barely exploited up to now, wonderful Best wishes
Not really true but appreciate and welcome all skepticism. There are several things worth noting that apply in this case… halbach arrays which utilize field shaping and magnetic gears are at the fore front of r&d in the motor sector.. i don’t know your background but assume GE’s head of innovation, the professor who invented regenerative braking and a few stanford and ga tech ME’s who have seen prototype first hand and encouraged further development beyond what i show in video may know somethings… if you know more i am ready to listen.. and as far as the patent .. my nephew worked for patent office and helped file patent .. it was reviewed by a retired professor with a phd in electromagnetism and motor design. Also in the patent process it was held up for 8 months for national security review.. as having military applications.. if you have more knowledge and want to contribute please send resume and work experience as my company looks to build an r&d team
Just by chance, you came up. You have mystified me with you patented magnetic system. My mind is spinning for all of the applications of use. Will be watching and possibly contacting you. Appreciate your simple presentation. Thank you, I will be watching regularly. Simply mystified for the aray of possibilities.
Wearless transmission is a very good application for coupling magnetic fields. It has very good potencial for being Implemented in many ways. Reliable, no maintennance required, looks very promising to me.
Suggest you replace the bearings with a Maglev system to reduce friction further. Something like that could potentially generate current in extremely low wind and significantly increase efficiency. Question. Do you feel polarity resistance/torque as you turn it by hand going from N to S, such as you get with a stepper motor for example?
Have you been able to measure efficiency due to field interference (and maybe shaft friction) losses as you add more "elements" to the array? Is it very much difference to an equivalent mass single shaft generator? If you were to have each individual armature/magnetic stator combo in a self contained modular hot-pluggable setup you could scale up and down generation capability easily as well as have plug and play replacement and maybe better fault tolerance than a single shaft generator (kind of like having parity bits in RAID 5/6 storage etc).
Really fascinating thank you for sharing this. Is this basically like an energy pulley system, like could it act like a multiplier between the input and the output?
This is how my motors and rotors act when we put them on the manufacturing plates, lol! Was always a curiosity to spin one motor or rotor and have them all spin in lock step.
I am surprised that you were issued a patent for this. I suspect that this patent is indefensible as this system of magnetic coupling has been very commonly used for many years. the most common usage is for a motor driving a centrifugal fluid pump i.e. a swimming pool pump where it is desirable not to have a physical rotating shaft seal that might wear out and leak. Magnetic coupling is usually more expensive than a shaft and seal so it is used mostly where isolation of contaminants is important. The appliance that most comes to mind is the chemistry lab stirrer /hotplate. I am certain you have seen those Teflon coated stirring bars in the bottoms of beakers many times. That is exactly this device.
I know this well.. i have two patents in fact…there are other patents related to magnetic coupling… a lot in fact.. look up my patent and see what differentiates it… shaft couplings have a different architecture… look carefully at my magnets… the shape.. the design. My cousin is a patent lawyer and worked for patent office before going into private practice.. the uSPTO uses outside reviewers and mine happened to be a PHD researcher who recognized that the field shaping in my system was unique.. i know the you tube internet drags up all kinds of comments and skeptics and i am happy to engage and basically discredit comments like this that are dismissive and have no basis in fact. Could you send me your resume? Tell me your specific expertise on patents… or do you have more specific knowledge in electromagnetism? Also are you familiar with halbach arrays in motor systems? I can go on about the experts who i did reach out to.. and their reaction to the physical prototype… i searched them out and engaged with them.. gained insight… you are shocked that something that you deem not novel and provide examples that have nothing to do with my patent… or without any kind of research at all … really Mike what is your point?
@@evanlevy8947 I worked for 35 years as a research scientist / engineer at Bell Telephone labs and have several patents from that time. worked with several patent attorneys.. and in evaluating devices & ideas for patentability. One thing I heard repeatedly from the lawyers was that a patent is only worth anything if it is defensible and broad. The most important part of any patent is the claims. Yes I am familiar with Halbach arrays, etc. I will read your patent when I have time.
@@lukacs1130 you far surpass my expertise… so i have some questions.. when you say a patent is defensible and broad… what exactly does that mean… is that embodiments? I include different numbers of magnets, types and shapes, different applications… etc.. also as an expert with knowledge what are advantages to halbach arrays? Are they not alignments of stacked magnets that emphasize fields in a direction? If so and i say this with the utmost respect wouldn’t those advantages make sense in a rotating system. The patent reviewer recognized this as unique… also when the patent was under review it was put on hold for 8 months for national security reasons… my cousin who worked at USPTO for ten years never had this happen before nor his colleagues… so to me it was not just vetted by an expert outside USPTO but also reviewed by pentagon experts… so there seems to be something novel and patentable…. Whether it can be enforced whatever that means in the free range of communication really matters little to me at this point… because i have no money to even defend it… i guess a serious patent troll could maybe buy me out and look to sue every new device that uses shaped magnets in magnetically coupled system then it might prove defensible… but really i am driven more by curiosity than market place… i am not 100% certain of what the advantages are but based on a lot of empirical evidence and discussions with experts far beyond my knowledge… there may be ways to use this in many applications…. I will post some more video and i want you especially to watch because i think you will be surprised at how this works… i have spun this at 20,000 rpm and if you can imagine seeing dozens of powerful magnets spinning in locked procession at close proximity you can perhaps understand that it works differently than anything on planet… i want to use ECU’s in this system and if you can recommend an EE who can adapt them to what i see as next stage if prototype that would be helpful… i am hoping to raise the funds to hire consultants to help solve some things for commercial development… i made some expensive avoidable mistakes… and the arrays you see can be optimized… also i searched magnet suppliers around the world who can make this convex shape… i found some engineers at Stanford Magnets who figured how to make them without retooling molds fir sintering… i was really limited to two sizes and shapes… not ideal but it helped me get to a proof of concept prototype.. i also want you to see that the torque transfer of my small arrays is sufficient to drive generators… which is another comment from the web trolls… and if my hunch is correct the way this can develop is that a design can be realized that has as much torque as a physical connection…. Imagine that possibility… high torque transfer with no contact… angular momentum added to a shaft at really high speed… this is not about spinning a magnet in a beaker or magnetic coupled drive shaft… what could you envision if what i say actually holds true… i won’t share but there are somethings that could be achieved in the field or rotating machines
@@evanlevy8947 As soon as I understood and was able to form mental images of how the architecture and directional polarity of the toroidal nodes magnets, it became clear how under-used magnets are. After reading all the replies here, it doesn't seem most understand the toroidal shape the pole nodes form and how geometry and direction of polarity of magnets can affect the locality and strength of convergence and divergence points in the toroid. Which is perhaps why the govt wanted to take a good look at what you discovered and see if you've passed them up. Your work is unique, you explain in a clear way how the nodes can be better harnessed. Electric cars have been around for over 100yrs, so has my Grandpa's machine shop. He makes screws... so sad. I used to work at a custom golf cart shop, the owner had the same vision as Grandpa. So many motors, and magnets all destined to do the same thing over and over. I think there exists a portable machine right now than can form any shaped rare-earth magnet in minutes and another do-hickey than can polarize it any which way including inside out, even faster. I retired on my 45th bday over a decade ago, depressing to watch technology not whizz by. You have solid grasp on the potential of your discovery. It aint the tech, as too many wanna be Tony Takedowns had great glee pointing out, magnets in a circle ain't new, missing the the substance of your presentation: you discovered the architecture makes a difference and with that a new level of uses for magnets is waiting to be explored.
@@evanlevy8947 so technicly could such system as yours give higher output of wind turbines? It looks like it does from possibility of coupling where one can provide enough energy on each other one. Could you try overunity experiment? I mean it would cross thermodynamics i know but could you try putting battery device on the central system so it can make other couples work as turbines who could generate enough electricity to reach overunity by setting wires out of their coils? If you do try it please make a video with amps and volts messurements since a lot youtubers dont mind making real messurements but only amps or only volts.
I love this! Congrats on the patent. I remember having a similar idea in the early 80's when I was first exposed to nanotech as a kid. I was naively thinking about the "problem" of lubricating machinery at the scale of individual molecules when the mental image of a gear train with opposing magnetic poles at their interfaces popped into my head. This is obviously not that, but it's extremely satisfying to see that the idea was sound in principal by way of your demo. I hope that it makes it out into the real world and thanks for sharing.
In a similar line of thought, this would allow submarines to transfer power from inside the hull to outside the hull not only water tight, but also under pressure, and silently.
That idea is old as, it is called a magnetic clutch, your car airconditioner uses one, except its decoupled via a solenoid pulling it away to disengage it.
very cool, I've def seen similar before. I'm just wondering how you might measure the working torque of the system and to what degree is it scalable ?🤔 thank you for posting 🙏
Put an armature in each of the spinning magnet tubes. rig one of the armitures to a motor capable of maintaining the spin on one of the tubes. tap the energy from the other tubes... use more than one tube to power the motor if necessary. Make a magnetic bearing system utilizing the repulsion of polarity of magnets to remove friction from the system.
There is nothing original here. Magnetic coupling has been around for decades. Countless videos on RU-vid as well using the same magnetic coupling on other inventions. The patent office totally screwed up.
@@FreeMagneticEnergy2 this mans creative work and design has most likely derived from the basic magnetic couplings available, this is how unique improvements are achived today. Your witnessing a well thought out advanced coupling with a very uneqe magnetic design pattern (force field) that allows the coupling to hold more torque and maintain precision (synchronisation) on much greater speeds. if i am mistaken please let me know.
Great idea, but since all 5 magnetic barrels have the same repulsive polarity, and all 4 periphrical barells have the same rotation to another, but opposite to the centered barell, (opposite rotation ensures the correct power transmission) then you ought to separate them 4 from each other with a non-conducter partition wall to avoid loss of energy, since (even fixed from a further distance to another than to the center) their synchronized rotation can lead to a "minimal repulsive" loss of energy. Would also be great if you add magnetic levitating suspensions axes to all 4 ball-bearings to avoid friction, where the ball-bearing comes in contact only when the centrifugal forces become too strong. I see a very practical use of your invention in electrical bicycles, where I can boost the performance by just adding more e-engines upon need. Your first prototype can have 4 mini 1Kw electrical motors on the main centered transmission axis connected to the drive wheel. A 4K powered e-bike ! Congratulation to your patent!
🧲 turns out he did not invent this. This is old-school technology from the 1960s. And his specialized magnets has absolutely nothing to do with why this works. But you did make some good points that I never thought about.
I found this video while researching a idea I've been having. I love the idea. Could this be used to improve on Magnetohydrodynamic drives? I appreciate your work.
I was 11 yo when i made pretty similar mechanism. Unfortunately it was 42 years ago and I didn't have neodymium magnets just a weak speaker's magnets. Good luck Sir and lots of health.
I've had this idea myself a while ago now. Basically frictionless spinning shafts or gears instead of ball bearings or roller bearings. 😉👍👍 Should increase efficiency by a TON!!🎉 Plus, there are no bearings to ever have to bother to replace!👍🥳
I really like the pump idea. Pumps are always breaking down because the seals fail or water corrodes the bearings. No shaft is brilliant! Go pick up an inexpensive Harbor Freight sprinkler pump, retrofit it with this technology/method as a demonstration.
I haven't read all the comments, so someone might have already asked this question, but I am curious to know how this will function at high speed. First; if you start the spin at an initial high speed, is there a lag, and second; what happens after a prolonged high speed spin? Does heat build up, and if so how much. The other question I have, is have you tried rotating groups of magnets set up with different diameters, such as an example of a gearless auto transmission. I imagine, as the diamerter of the magnet configurations gets larger, you will lose some of the sweet spots strength where the magnets are thickest. The larger the diameter, the smaller the ratio between the thin and thick parts. A small magnetic toothless gear turning a larger magnetic toothless gear would be very interesting to see. If you need further funding for future experiments, perhaps a GoFundMe fund raiser would work. I would surely add some funds to see your work develope further.
I made a self contained orb (ball) much like a micro earth, of strategic agronomically placed magnetic concave plates. I call it the eternal battery. Free energy forever. Never stops spinning. Has quarts bearings.
a couple of months ago, i saw some guy with 3d printed wheels with neodymium magnets. Think it was called magnetic gears or so, it behaving the same as yours, preventing the gears get damaged when to much torque was applied, it looked quite powerful and the guy toke measurements. But nice job.
Yes heard there were very cool custom types of magnets being made now .. love how your magnets are designed and paired. Clearly going to be useful seems frictionless
It’s not frictionless. Other comments address this but it’s easily visible in the linear array. Just like dropping a magnet through a copper tube, as the field polarity switches and moves through metal in the assembly or case it will build eddy currents that can/will induce current which will drain through heat(waste).
🧲 his custom magnets, have absolutely nothing to do with why this works because we can use any magnet of any shape and this will still work the way it’s seen in the video.
Great video! This is another important step forward in our understanding of magnets and magnetism. There is much-more to be learned about magnetism and there are many more fascinating surprises to be revealed about magnets going forward. Thanks for sharing your genius discovery and patent info!
I slightly remember when I was young I'd found solution for that issue too for the magnetics too, but then the authorities said the weed is bad for the youngsters health, so I stopped potting meaning the solutions of the magnetic world didn't never got realized! Now when seeing such a similar effort released, my dejavues keeps coming back!😅
