PAUL HEYMAN'S SHOCKING CONSPIRACY THEORY ON BROCK LESNAR CONQUERING THE UNDERTAKER'S STREAK 

Dude, he just brought back Kayfabe!

Well, he kinda is Jewish, he has it in his blood LOL

Jarrod Schrunk ur pro pic is good

They have the same talking style. Quote when Paul Heyman said, "Do I have your attention now?"

I would like to think that Paul Heyman had to be a mentor to Punk

+TheyCallMeFilep he was. he helped punk in ECW. check punk's documentary

duhh

LOL don't insult Heyman by comparing him to that crybaby. Listen to Heyman, he can sell "ice to the eskimos", his presence, his voice, the man can read a phonebook and he could still hold our attention. On the other side all the crybaby Punk did was crying and complaining "boo hoo Triple H doesn't like me blah blah blah I want to be in the WrestleMania main event blah blah blah fuck this I'm going home blah blah blah". Comparing Punk to Heyman is like comparing that crying comedian who made the video "Leave Britney Alone" to Al Pacino

we don't need anymore

+Joe Schmo you might want to call them 'Inuit' and not 'eskimo' which is considered an insult to many.

+Maxwaehrens fuck off eskimo

Maxwaehrens Yeah, but...what are they gonna do?

+Maxwaehrens oh look an oversensitive PC society crybaby

Take a look at what happened with ECW

Great creative,shitty buissnessman

Or the President of America

I think he has had a big say with the Bloodline. Which has been great for 2 years!

See I heard live at the area that night there was a .1 milla second that it flashed 22-0

yeah that apparently happened

There's tons of live footage on RU-vid from inside the building, it didn't flash 22-0 at all. That's just some kid's imagination. It's been confirmed by several people (Bryan Alvarez, Dave Melzer, Wade Keller, etc.) that they decided an hour before match time that Taker was losing, and only a very small handful of people were told including those in the production truck, so they could make the 21-1 graphic. The refs are not told who's winning ever, unless they NEED to know, because Vince wants them to call it like a shoot. But even still, somehow the finish leaked as people who bet on WWE got word and within the final minutes of betting, Lesnar's odds overtook Taker by a very wide margin.

I imagine it could be changed in an instant since the tech isn't too primitive when it happened.

@@IAmNeomic The refs ALWAYS know what's going to happen. They don't have ear pieces for nothing.

"Brock Lesnar does, what Brock Lesnar wants to do" - Heyman

Pretty much.

Looking like neither he nor Jones had any idea, may well be an unlisted component of an otherwise apparently above board supplement.

+ssn708 you are a resident of lala+fools land if you believe Lesnar didn't or don't take steroids

+ssn708 pro bodybuilders are not that big as Lesnar is and they are juiced to the gills.

ya then what happened the 2nd time? moron

Brock was conquered by Brock Lesnar, that was a rookie mistake and he got overzealous. Until he gave him a leg, he was beating the ever loving shit out of him.

Its Sasha Mitchell? Not Ben Affleck

I just had Deja Vu with your comment

Not one one of , he is the best talker in the history of sports entertainment.

The undertakers real name is mark Calloway (could have spelt last name wrong)

+DirkAustin You do know it's scripted right?

hahahahah that would be savage. Like, he is screwing him, and also mocks him. hahahah lol, "thanks mark, booooooooom"

abhishek, Paul is saying "what if Brock went OFF SCRIPT and purposely gave Taker the concussion, knocked him out then delivered another F5 before getting the 3 count." Who could stop them on LIVE TV? And they cant just fire him straight afterwards because Brock got so much attention, the beast who beat the streak. Its a good theory that Paul came up with.

+Silent Gamer2015 The ref has an earpiece and communicates with backstage, he could be "accidently" knocked out

He could sell a sober woman to Bill Cosby.

The man just single handedly brought back Kayfabe!

BlackFaithProduction (bill cosby voice) '' You got to put the pill in the pudding pop and patiently wait 8 minutes''... (lol, @ rape joke)..

+THEJIGGADREWSHOW xD

***** I brought back a classic memory from your childhood..You should be thanking me.. You're welcome..~!!!

hahaha init Paul heyman is just trying to make some buzz I dout it's true

+J.A Styles regardless you gotta admit heyman knows how to get peoples attention

spot on. plus Lesnar doesnt care about anything but his paycheck. hes proved it many times, especially when he put over eddie. he has no love for wrestling or mma, they just make him rich. He's even said it in interviews and promos, he doesnt give a damn about what fans think, he couldnt care less whether he goes over or not.

If Brock beats the streak, Vince has to capitalize on that regardless of unprofessional-ism. Brock Lesnar went back to the UFC by beating Vince in an arm wrestling contest and called him "old man" and said "we can do this the easy way or the hard way". We have no idea how Vince trusts wrestlers or his criteria for establishing trust. You dont even know the man personally to assume how he thinks of anything. He would lose money from getting rid of Lesnar as he was a UFC world champ, wwe champion in his younger years and just defeated the streak at Wrestlemania 30. Losing all of that means losing money, whether you like it or not.

2Good2BeTrue45 Just read any of Chris Jerichos' books and you will find out what kind of man Vince is, Chris doesn't cover anything up anything either! But form his books, you learn that Vince HAS to trust his wrestlers before putting them in situations such as pushes and title matches, which only makes sense as Vince has been burned by some of his talent before (Lex Luger, Kevin Nash, Scott Hall, Hulk Hogan ect.). Plus, if he couldn't trust Lesnar to NOT injure a superstar during a match then that would lose Vince money. Also, he would NOT have LOST money by firing Lesnar after Mania 30 (providing what Heyman said was true, which it most likely isn't) because of the reasons I have already stated, Vince would certainly LOSE money from having Brock go out and injure other wrestlers, by either losing merch sales from them not being there, house show sales from them not being on the card, and potentially lawsuits from the wrestlers who could sue WWE for putting them in a situation where they KNEW Lesnar could try to injure them intentionally. Plus his trust with one of his most beloved wrestlers would be forever broken, and there is plenty of material out there to tell you that Vince would do ANYTHING to maintain trust and friendship with Taker. LOSING money would be Vince keeping Brock on AFTER he beat Taker and NOT capitalising, if you get rid of Brock after Mania that isn't LOSING money as you no longer have the potential to GAIN any money at that point and Vince and co couldn't have known how much money Brock could have brought them and neither would anyone else.

Fuck Kenny

You love it.

You love it.

Who's Kenny?

Cal Gozmit Your mother.

Was just going to say that lol

Not necessarily, like he said, not even the sound guys or the referee knew who was going to win. Same for the guys who made the graphics, so they probably made one for each scenario if it's true that they didn't know.

I remember hearing about a fan that during the show where they are setting up the titantron for the next person that was gonna come out a fan saw a blink second of 22-0. I'm not sure if it was true tho

It flashed 22-0 for .1 milla second live at the arena

They make both made a 22-0 one too

thanks! i had no clue when it started

FINN FINN FINN

Not me, because the show will still suck. A change of roster won't change the quality of the show. The stage sets will stay the same and the shows will be produced the same.

June Amarillo it's more than just a roster change tho. different champions on both shows. different pay per views for both shows. etc.

+JOSH What does multiple PPV's mean? That just means more terrible content. And I don't consider a show a PPV unless it has a different stage set from Raw and SD.

because not even the graphics guy knows the results. Just like how the media for every football match have one paper saying England wins and another saying Ireland wins, they had 22 - 0 and 21 -1 ready.

+Silent Gamer2015 ya but Undertaker is supposed to win, so why would he have that ready

+Vikram Prashar but they didn't know who was supposed to win. that's why they would have both

+Vikram Prashar they had 22-0 ready first it flashed .1 milla second then it went to 21-1

it seriously did flash 22-0

his whole point was that it gave him so much attention that they couldn't punish him. Brock is a huge moneymaker. that would be shooting themselves in the foot. but you're right. it was planned

+Cory Goodman a slow methodical punishment over the past 2 years where he puts over young talent constantly, then gets unceremoniously banished would be what a smart business man would do in this situation, but Vinces pride would have gotten the better of him.

But he's also a money hungry bastard so...

he fired CM punk at the top of his game. hes fired stone cold steve austin when hes at his hottest. vince mcmahon is a millionare whoes ego prevents him from being a bilionare. he wouldnt think twice about fire lesner and worse if that were true

Both Punk and Stone Cold left. He only fired them after they where out of the door cause he likes to have the last word Vince "...You're leaving, well you can't leave because YOU'RE FIRED" HHH "Vince, why are you shouting at a closed door"

Dreaming here, but imagine they turn Roman heel, shut him up like he did best when he was in the shield, make him a Paul Heyman guy, teach the dog some new tricks and moves, and there you have it. It's a simple recipe for success, it's just WWE don't want to focus anymore on the product, rather just on sales and profit. And people, being gullible, would continuously eat the shit that WWE spews, which makes them even happier. And I agree, P.H. is one of the best on the mic.

+m8cool wow I like that idea, could work well, they should hire u

+andrew brown pfft the only way they'd hire me is if I find a wrestler that people want to like, but book him wrong and shove him down their throats, while he sells more merch than anyone else. Because WWE are all about that $$$.

Taker wanted to lose correct, but Vince would have never allowed it, I think they both collaborated against Vince's wishes, knowing they'd be the only two to get away with it. Undertaker might of been suspended for a year because of it.

+Petaaaa i feel like Undertaker let Brock beat him even though the finish was for Taker to win which explains why everyone was shocked but doesn't make sense if the ref new the ending.

Undertaker is all about old school wrestling. Hell he even has a move dedicated to old school wrestling. In old school wrestling, all streaks must be ended by an opponent.

That's not.... /facepalm

no u didnt

oh fuck

+Wings Geckos no thanks ur content sucks

I conquered your mom 😂😂

obviously he appreciates it. that's why he's great at it.

micahman3000 except he doesn't an he isn't. He's admitted he doesn't care. And how does 50 suplexes and an F5 make him great? Lol

micahman3000 plus he couldn't even sell a Spear. He is shit, hes just big so WWE likes him. And he doesnt care enough to get better.

Hahahahahaha!!!!! Bork!!!!!!

They might have always had that graphic ready at all of undertakers previous wrestlemania matches in case something happened to Taker

I'll buy that. The truth is that you never really know 100% what is going to happen in a match until it is over. People get hurt and you don't want it to look like you didn't expect it. On the other hand, if someone did that to Vince I'm pretty sure he would wait until there was a chance to throw him under the bus, like say when he failed a drug test, and he would use it to bury him.

Lmao he's got the meat sweats.

Have you ever been on a stage like this? I have and the lights aren't just bright they are fucking hot and Heyman sits under them for about 90 minutes before he tells the story. Of course he will sweat.

Right? I legit kept watching it over and over and over again

What u mean

The fella in the flannel tee shirt he's getting rape by a ghost and doesn't even know it.

lol

They probably make a graphic for each, just in case plans change

You really think a team of professionals working on WWE's production team wouldn't have a contingency plan?!!

Aww, you people are so gullible.

I don't think it'd take long. all they need to type is "21-1" on the same purple cloudy background they'd been using all night. I think there was a lightning graphic on it.

+jacob howe Pretty much what sports organizations do with their finals. They have championship shirts and hats for both teams. The winners get their shirts and hats and the other teams get donated to people in third world countries.

***** NAH

WWE is exclusively watched by white virgins, like going to comic con or trying to find your favourite porn stars real name and address

you have no more reason to believe shawn michaels than paul heyman. i'm not saying i believe heyman, i couldn't care less who's saying the truth. you are simply believing what you want to. in the end, none of this means a goddamn thing, anyway. it doesn't change anything.

If HBK came out to celebrate with Bryan the whole moment would've been ruined.

what type of question is that? It's like asking why would they want to make money. Undertaker returning to take on Brock was huge.

My point was that IF Brock did the unthinkable of forcibly pinning Taker and ruining his mania streak then WWE wouldn't be willing to work with him again after that let alone Taker working matches with him again. Taker is apparently still pissed off at McMahon because Vince ASKED Taker to lose to Shane at 32 so I seriously doubt he'd ever work with someone who ruined his streak. Come on, man!

DJItchyBoo you got to also ask more questions then that. Like maybe they agreed to end it in the ring. I doubt WWE would end the streak willingly, I think there is some truth as well as lies in what Heymen was saying.