Paul Is Not Dead - George Harrison and 'Faul' 

I don’t blame him

I got that impression too

and Macca, RIP

And without John.

The world we live in.

sotoy lu jembuy

@@bocahbledek7239 jangan malu maluin indo plis

@@dilucragnvindr6397 bct ah

The irony of the public... anything for a story...

Ik denk dat iedereen met een beetje realiteitszin dat ook wel zal beamen. Maar aangezien logica in sommige gevallen teveel gevraagd is, heb ik het originele interview erachter geplakt zodat iedereen kan zien hoe het verknipt is.

@@MaccaLives Keurig gedaan.

@Patrick Goudriaan In another video George greets the replacement as William.

Who??

Members of the crazy PID (Paul is dead) cult. They HATE Paul McCartney, ("Faul" to them), and WISH he were dead! Why?! Why do they hate Paul and wish he were dead? One must ask. Because they believe that Paul or "Faul" as they refer to Paul, replaced "the real Paul" (they believe died in 1966), and that he did such a good job of being "Paul" that he fooled everybody except themselves, and they resent being considered "the idiots" by everybody who don't buy into the PID nonsense. The PID cult hates Paul McCartney for BEING a success, for LIVING his life, doing what he does, and for NOT BEING DEAD, as they wish he were, so they can prove a fabrication that he wasn't himself. They are looking forward to the day, soon they hope, when Paul dies. The "truth" as they believe it will "finally" come out. They see the day that Paul McCartney dies as a day of celebration and vindication for their morbid beliefs. They are a sick cult and they are trying to recruit others by confusing people with BS tactics and BS statistics and BS forensics. They are creepy and sinister, when they're not just being ridiculous.

How about you shut your stupid face with your ridiculous bullshit??

How about you MAKE ME? (you stupid PID believing, asshole!)

Water Falls yeah the PID theory is dumb af. The only PID I believe is "Paul Isn't Dead"

umm, not okay to ask george harrison if his record may bomb.. Asking him if he and ringo work well,,,lol george is not smiling.

@@nunyanunya6398 Harrison was no wilting flower, he could handle that. He doesn’t like the press obviously but he bears this well.

@@CharlieTWilbury i agree 100% of course george could *handle* the interviewer. still, i've never really seen him so cranky. Maybe something that happened that day or question. Or maybe GH was sick of people and the bullsht

Ray Martin and he is an absalute pro

Georgeous!

That’s so true! If Paul actually was dead, John would’ve said! This is a man who said The Beatles were more impactful than Jesus!

John Lennon gave zero fucks man, he had no chill. This fact ALONE allows me to know that the whole fake Paul thing is bs.

Would John (or George) let a "new" imposter drive them crazy rehearsing Ob-La-Di, Ob-La-Da??

Lennon did tell us, that's why he's not here anymore. [Verse 1: John Lennon] I read the news today, oh boy About a lucky man who made the grade And though the news was rather sad Well I just had to laugh I saw the photograph He blew his mind out in a car He didn't notice that the lights had changed A crowd of people stood and stared They'd seen his face before But nobody was really sure if he was from the House of Lords I saw a film today, oh, boy The English Army had just won the war A crowd of people turned away But I just had to look Having read the book ☞ I'd love to turn you on ☜ [alarm clock rings] [Verse 2: Paul McCartney] Woke up, fell out of bed Dragged a comb across my head Found my way downstairs and drank a cup And looking up I noticed I was late Found my coat and grabbed my hat Made the bus in seconds flat Found my way upstairs and had a smoke And somebody spoke and I went into a dream [Verse 3: John Lennon] I read the news today, oh boy 4,000 holes in Blackburn, Lancashire And though the holes were rather small They had to count them all Now they know how many holes it takes to fill the Albert Hall ☛ I'd love to turn you on ☚

Money talks, and it also keeps people quiet. Paul is dead, for the others...its all about the money.

That's so nice Pat, you sound like a real Sweetie (so rare in women these days). Don't suppose you are any relation to Mick Abrams -- Jethro Tull's first guitarist?

That's very sweet. Yes, he was so handsome. I follow Dhani's career now. Hes talented, and the spitting image of his father.

I always thought George was the most handsome beatle.He looks great here ❤

@Robert Blackemore >> " _Some day the phrase "Paul is dead" will be true.....etc._ "

Robert Blakemore hes not dead XXXXDDDDDD

Bad vibes

@@irplane "George said Yoko gave off evil vibes.I should have beat the F-cking Sh*t out of him,him and his F-cking Hare Krishna" John Lennon.

Another great comment. I know from personal experience that quitting smoking for GOOD is a tall order if it's been a lifetime habit. I smoked a pack a day. numerous articles say George was a "heavy smoker" but don't specify to a gnats a** what "heavy" means. 2 packs a day? 3? anyway, I finally gave up firewater AND ciggies for good. at least I HOPE it's for good. Let's hope that the 2 LIVING Beatles have dodged all the bullets they created in their youth, and that they both eat watercress and take Flintstones vitamins every day. I want them both in my life when I REALLY get old. am 63 soon to be 64 now. those 2 need to live until they are at least 100. longer if possible!

And the most intelligent

yes& yes

Very droll! I did laugh out loud!

Paul number 1062 is walking around today

What's scary is that there are people out there making similar comments completely unironically.

463 has always been my favorite. Something about his hair.

You stupid... and yet, I love you so!!! LOL!!! 🤣🤣🤣🤣

No doubt

😆

And I have a bridge I want to sell you in Brooklyn.

Source or lying

Me encanta como los PIA solo se rien cuando les hablan de los estudios forenses hechos en Italia , porque en el fondo saben que no tienen argumentos.

Some conspiracies are the creations of fools. The 1st and 3rd you mention absolutely go along with this, and I know nothing about the 2nd one. The 4th??? People tend to think of all conspiracy theories as being as ridiculous as the Paul Is Dead one, and this is the false illusion that these people have created, which means other more rational and intelligent conspiracy ideas may well be unfairly tarred with the same brush. You just have to do your own research and/or use your own reasoning. The idea that man never landed on the moon is certainly NOT a ridiculous one at all, unless you wish to believe everything you read in the papers and see on the news as being factual, when powerful people who have a powerful agenda can so easily manipulate public perception for their own needs. It annoys me greatly when I get classed in this fold by PID believers and told to "WAKE UP". It should be obvious to anyone who's able to think logically, and see with their own 2 eyes, that McCartney is and always has been one and the same.

hauntboy if nasa never landed on the moon, then nasa can’t go to outer space and therefore the earth is flat, you do YOUR research

@@GBSaSu To the simple-minded it might seem to be as simple as that to fathom out, but clearly it isn't, which is why a lot of level headed and rational people are of the opinion that the landings were staged. I don't see any rational people putting forward a good argument as to why Paul McCartney was replaced. This is because there are none because he wasn't and they are irrational. So I think it's YOU who needs to do YOUR research, not me, and I don't have the time to educate you. I would, however, suggest watching the videos done by Richard D Hall on the subject, and, in particular, the statement analysis he had done by Peter Hyatt of the interviews given by Armstrong, Aldrin and Collins when they 'returned' from 'the Moon'. Obviously Hall had his suspicions before approaching Hyatt. Hyatt confirmed these suspicions and he also confirmed mine. I take it you're able to locate Parts 2 & 3 on your own. It doesn't require a lot of skill. ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-wfTapJhp_Qw.html

@@GBSaSu So what rational reason do you have for believing that Apollo really landed on the Moon, other than that's what you were told? And, furthermore, how do you explain Hyatt's findings accompanied by his surprise and disillusionment as a patriotic American? Surely you don't think he was paid to lie, do you? Now that would make you a conspiracy theorist!!!!!!!

hauntboy operation fishbowl and I don’t

When We Was Fab, what a cool song !! So is "I'm looking Thru You" clams and all.

@The SNES Man Joan WAS quizzical!

And the "walrus was paul" is complete gibberish...when john lennon heard teachers were having students analyze lyrics of paul and john he made alot of gibberish lyrics so people would try and make sense of complete gibberish as they did....john never said "I buried paul"....he said "cranberry sauce" and as for the difference in eye color paul has hazelnut eyes which appear more green or brown in different lighting and change with age...around middle age 25-40....and his ears just didnt change...yes he lost a decent bit of wait when he was partying alot in 67-68 and his cheeks got longer but that's it..

Fred labour has admitted multiple times to making up william shears (billy shears) as a hoax for publicity www.parlia.com/a/billy-shears Aswell as photos of him side by side after 1966 and before being identical even up to freckles m.imgur.com/gallery/4XmqTd6 On top of all that...heres audio recordings from original recordings 1966 and before compared to recent live performances being almost identical www.audioforensicexpert.com/sir-paul-mccartney-is-not-dead/amp/ What more do you need?....john did not say "I buried paul" he says "cranberry sauce"...as for the album covers there are multiple takes of each album cover with different beatles even in the portions paul is in...its funny how a theory with so little evidence...built on speculation...and no proof that your double even exists...looney bin you belong sir

Amen👍

''Why would he insist on calling him "Faul" in this 1 interview, but happily call him Paul in EVERY other interview he ever did? There's 3 possible reasons. '' A fourth possibility might be that George used the name FAUL sarcastically in response to the ridiculous PID claims. A fifth possibility is that he was upset at Paul at that moment and thought Paul was acting like a phony, and so used the pseudonym. I agree with you that Paul is..............wait for it..........Paul.

Video was doctored... that's the reason "Faul" is in there.

Did you even watch the video?

@@nath9233 Clearly he didn't. George called him by his real name, Paul.

💯💯💯🙏

i like billy.he wrote songs like helter skelter,hey jude and let it be.after that he started wings.not bad for an imposter.

But he supposedly died on September 11, 1966. Or November 9. Or not at all because the whole theory is absolutely ludicrous.

Truth sayer.

RIP Paul

Esos premios se entregaron el 6 de septiembre de 1966 , no el 13.

@@seguidordeduolingo proof?

He was as fake as his wig- nice vibe on the radio!

Yeah, George was a truly magnificent human being.

@@Bright_Light_Love serial cheater and womanizer - what a spiritual and wonderful human being 😊

@@jonasrmb01 You don't get it. It's not how you start, it's how you finish. Look at Gandhi or Malcom X. Discover how they both grew beyond and rose above their racist attitudes in their younger years. MLK was a regular patron of prostitutes. Does that negate everything he did in the civil rights movement? Time to grow up, my friend.

Snagged Ringo's wife. Real gentleman.

Lol. You don't get it ! It's the main interview (2nd bit) that was edited ....... ! The first bit shows you what George did actually say. !

@ Graham -Thank you...You saved me from wading thru ~20 mins of yet another sycophant interview. As expected Faul devotees, like Flat Earthers are just another bunch of paranoid deluded conspiracy nut-jobs, fed garbage by scammers...& happy to consume it, without smelling or tasting that excremental nonsense.

@@MrWoodsy2k Oh right. Of course. Now why didn't I think of that? Dratted Occam and his stupid razor. You do know that the FBI killed JFK don't you? And that the moon landings were faked? And the Bush administration brought down the Twin Towers? Damn, all these unbelievers! Must get back to my home in the Bermuda Triangle and get some R&R.

@@MrWoodsy2k You are trolling. It's obvious that the second version is the first and unedited version. Peddle your crap elsewhere.

@@MrWoodsy2k what a nonsense look at the quality of the first and second clip also the first one sounds really edited and the second one does not and george just saying the word faul in this talk show doesn't make any sense either way get a life

Copyright claim 😔

@@MaccaLives Oh, guess you got unlucky with that. I posted a video last year using a Lennon song with my own footage. I did get a claim but they allowed me to continue to use it.

Especially in the context of trying to convince us that they are closer than ever. Paraphrase: "I love Paul, but he's a horrible person." Okay, George.

It does sound like Faul though.

@@therestorationofdrwho1865 Sounds like Faul only in the doctored, edited version.

And the "walrus was paul" is complete gibberish...when john lennon heard teachers were having students analyze lyrics of paul and john he made alot of gibberish lyrics so people would try and make sense of complete gibberish as they did....john never said "I buried paul"....he said "cranberry sauce" and as for the difference in eye color paul has hazelnut eyes which appear more green or brown in different lighting and change with age...around middle age 25-40....and his ears just didnt change...yes he lost a decent bit of wait when he was partying alot in 67-68 and his cheeks got longer but that's it..

Fred labour has admitted multiple times to making up william shears (billy shears) as a hoax for publicity www.parlia.com/a/billy-shears Aswell as photos of him side by side after 1966 and before being identical even up to freckles m.imgur.com/gallery/4XmqTd6 On top of all that...heres audio recordings from original recordings 1966 and before compared to recent live performances being almost identical www.audioforensicexpert.com/sir-paul-mccartney-is-not-dead/amp/ What more do you need?....john did not say "I buried paul" he says "cranberry sauce"...as for the album covers there are multiple takes of each album cover with different beatles even in the portions paul is in...its funny how a theory with so little evidence...built on speculation...and no proof that your double even exists...looney bin you belong sir

I’m not sure many are profiting off it, though I have no clue whether Tina Foster (a massive player in this) and her ilk are receiving donations or not. Obviously, Thomas Uharriet is making a lot of money with his Memoirs of Billy Shears and Billy’s Back books, which he still claims are funded by Sir Paul despite the fact that a 5-minute Google search demonstrates that this claim is rubbish. Either way, people are purposely perpetuating this utter shite about Paul being dead/replaced and it’s doing my head in.

The pyramid mate, the Pyramid. more to it than PID.

Exactly.

More people believe it now more than ever and know it's true because never before were so many clues able to be put together to see the whole story. The more you know about it the more you begin to realize Paul McCartney hasn't been with us since Nov. '66. Billy Shepherd is a hell of a musician. But he's not Paul McCartney.

@@3Ddude101 Billy Shepherd is the pen name of Peter Langley Jones who wrote many articles for The Beatles Monthly. As for "Billy Shepherd, musician", you need to come up with some biographical facts: what is his date of birth and where was he born? Who were his parents? Where was he brought up? What school(s) did he attend? Where is his Wikipedia page? That's the very minimum you need to provide. As for "More people believe it now more than ever", that's the nature of conspiracy theories in the age of the internet. Few people other than a few cranks believed it before 2000-ish.

@@3Ddude101 On the contrary, the more we research, the more convinced that PIDers are lunatics. First of all, if Billy Shepherd took Paul's place, who is playing Paul now, since Billy died in Los Angeles in 1988. [Obit: Bill Shepherd (Born: 13 June 1927 in Merstham, Surrey, UK. - Died: 1988 in Los Angeles, USA.) was a British orchestra leader, arranger, and music director, most known for his arrangements for the Bee Gees. He's had several groups throughout the years: Bill Shepherd & The Ranch Hands, Bill Shepherd and His Border Brass, Billy Pepper & The Pepperpots, The Bill Shepherd Flock, The Bill Shepherd Orchestra, The Bill Shepherd Orchestra And Chorus, The Bill Shepherd Singers. ] (Macca Lives research) This man didn't have anything to do with the Beatles, other than covering some of their songs in the early sixties. A few years ago, his son has come forward to say his father was not involved in the whole PID phenomenon, and to express his disdain for those who are perpetuating the myth.

​​@@jeannadysart5243Hey, fascinating facts about Shepherd's son. Could you send the source?

​@@3Ddude101you're absolutely right. All of it makes sense once you know ✌️❤️

I’m afraid I cannot comment on the first three examples, as I have never seen them. Without context, I can only make assumptions. If I had to, I would say the ‘William’ thing could very well be an in-joke, akin to Paul and John greeting each other in 1974 with the names ‘Sir Jasper’ and ‘Valiant Paul’, which were their characters in the 1963 Christmas Variety Show. I can explain where Macca comes from. It’s a common nickname in the UK for anyone whose name begins with Mac. It’s done with many names, and seems to be especially predominant in the North. In the early days, George was often called Hazza, which is short for Harry/Harris/Harrison. A man named Barry would be called Bazza. Jeremy would be Jezza. Et cetera. Paul was known as Macca from very early on, and he can be heard being addressed as such in various studio outtakes before and after 1966.

Ok, very cool. Those videos are on RU-vid, except the one where George, George Martin & The Conductor. I believe it may have been pulled for some reason. The 1976 Geraldo Rivera interview is probably the one most likely to start PID comments, since Paul himself says, going by my real name, also Paul McCartney. I have yet to talk to anyone who knows what he was referring to. That's why I thought maybe his name was William Macca but continued to go by his stage name... The hunt continues... Thanks for answering, Dan in America...

Daniel Jenn happy hunting because that's what you'll be doing until the day you die

+beatle brian. Nah, I use to think maybe he was replaced but more & more I am coming back from that rabbit hole. I do know after listening to John Lennon & Paul McCartney that after the famous We're more popular than Jesus comment by John, someone or some people did play with the whole PID thing because they noticed that sales started to boost. That's what I'll go with lol...

Well, the one where they hug sounds like one I've seen where George is addressing Neil Aspinall, who enters the room after Paul, but is off camera at first. He says Hello Neil, then hugs Paul. People have tried to say that he's saying Will or Bill here. But it is Neil. I have never heard or seen anything from John or George which would suggest to me that PID is real. The only person making suspicious comments that make you go Hmm is Paul himself. I just watched an interview with Jay Leno from 2002 where Jay said something about Paul always being the same guy and Paul makes the most curious face in response. Like, why? He took an innocent comment and just gave it a PID connotation by moving his eyes furtively. He says the oddest things. Once he said that being Paul McCartney is difficult to live up to , but he felt that the advantages outweighed the disadvantages. He could just be talking philosophically about the burden of his status, but it comes off really weird the way he phrased it and is ambiguous enough for PIDers to call it a confession. Ringo sometimes makes some oblique comments that make you wonder what he means as well. But nothing overt or damning. Nope, in PID, Paul is his own worst enemy, which makes you wonder what he gets out of toying with it.

Do you know what the song is, and could you tell me where I could find it? 😄

That is known as a I-IV-VII (1-5-7) in any key, with country pacing and lead. Likely found in the RU-vid library.

Verbal agreements were broken long before then. And those were much worse betrayals since the Beatles were still together at that time. I’m taking about Allen Klein, of course. Each Beatle had veto power before that time, but John, George, and Ringo didn’t mind changing that in order to force Paul into a management deal he (rightly) didn’t support. Where was George’s outrage then? Bottom line, Paul had a better financial manager, who got him a better deal. And why not? He didn’t owe the other three anything anymore. All prior agreements had ceased to be valid once they signed the paperwork to disband. Paul never wanted out. He would’ve been happy to stay a Beatle, but he also wasn’t going to lie to the world for however long it would take John to announce he’d broken up his band. Don’t forget that Paul was unwillingly lining Klein’s pockets each day the façade continued. After what the others had allowed Spector to do to Paul’s songs, and the way they tried to sabotage the release of McCartney, he was done. Anyone would’ve been fed up by then. But sure, Paul was the hypocrite. Not George, who suddenly decided the original agreement of 1-2 songs per record wasn’t good enough for him anymore, or who was happy to rob Paul of his veto rights. Not Ringo, who stood idly by, and enabled John and George when he knew Paul was being treated unfairly. And not John, who screwed over his best mate in so many ways, I can’t even decide where to start.

Macca Lives I agree with you on many points. After Klein was appointed it was mainly Macca keeping the band together and driving the direction. Paul has always had better legal advice and rarely loses in court. George has had managers fleece him many times and had to sue them. Once the band splits Paul can negotiate what he likes on future records. Going back on verbal agreement may not have legal implications but does have moral ones. At a time when they were getting on better I just wish he'd thought about his relationships rather than the finances. Alternatively tell the others what he was planning and explain it to them. As for George only getting one or two records I don't think that should have been written in any contract. A band should be a democracy. All members should be free to come with songs and then the band along with producer decides which are the best for the album. By dominating George you can't expect him to care as much or expect him to be keen on working together or reuniting. When they did Anthology George probably only did it after insisting on Jeff Lynne. Paul is constantly talking about his time as a Beatle and his relationship with John. George was always less keen to talk about the past. They were great friends and went through so much together. I just feel it's a shame to let money come between them.

Paul DID think about his relationships as well as his finances. For all the good it did him. His band brothers just walked all over him and foolishly followed drug addled John, who listened to his own handpicked crook, Allen Klein, who flattered John's ego as John openly disrespected Paul, his wife Linda and his in-laws, the Eastmans, whom Lennon described as "middle class, establishment pigs. Real nice. Paul had to think of his family and himself, first for a change. Let the ingrates fend for themselves. John, George, and Ringo eventually sued Klein and he counter sued them right back.

annnd, of all of them, JWL had the most middle class upbringing.

+Gary Box. Thanks Gary, I've wondered about that money issue. I knew it wasn't about the publishing but what I didn't know was the re-negotiations on the Beatles music... Seems I heard that Kurt Cobain asked for reimbursement on the original 3-way split they agreed on. You're right though, the money usually messes everything up.... As for Cobain, that's probably one of the reason's so many people dislike his wife, because most felt she was behind that 3-way split thing....

That exposure was the whole point of the video, Sherlock.

What amazes and appalls me, is that the whole PID crowd HATES Paul for being alive and being so successful at being himself. They don't care about his talents, or that he makes people happy with his music or that he doesn't hurt anybody. They can't wait for him to die, so that "the truth", as they believe it, can "finally" come out. They are ghouls trying to recruit more gullibles into their cult.

Well, he has become rich and successful by participating in the planned corruption of morals and standards in western society for the sake of creating chaos to offer a solution that would not have been accepted in the first place, so there you go.

Well he's done what he had set out to do. Become a successful musician. Fortune and fame are twin perks, and crosses to bear, and have to be managed correctly and studiously, or one can easily trainwreck off the rails as many have. He and his family haven't, which is to be commended. As for people (fans) who worship celebrities as their gods, it's their prerogative, if they are foolish enough to do so. Moral standards begin within ourselves, bestowed by parents, family, and the outer community. Hopefully we (the world at large) do a good job, a better job, of instilling moral values into our children starting from the cradle and reinforced by the community at large.

"Moral standards begin within ourselves, bestowed by parents, family, and the outer community." When the female population is "liberated" so that it no longer receives its moral standards from moral people, but the world system instead, then they sink to whatever low becomes popular and accepted by that system. The same goes for all others who are of the born follower nature of most of humanity who, just like the vast majority of members of other mammal species, adhere to whatever their particular herd has had propagated among its members by the usurpers of the leadership roles. Those who have controlled mankind since the Neolithic agricultural revolution at least are well aware of the uniformity while they use it to propagate a belief in individuality of identity so that the human cattle would never suspect what is occurring though it is obvious to those of mind who have developed the correct perspective. The Beatles supported many "progressive" causes which, contrary to their portrayal to the public, came from "the top" as manufactured ploys introduced for the sake of accomplishing ulterior motives rather than being "grassroots movements". These were intended to destroy the fabric of western civilization to enslave all of us, and they are well on their way to doing so. Here's a United States National Security Council document confirming that "Women's Liberation" is one such ploy, with the stated purpose of government having been to reduce population. drive.google.com/open?id=0B3iO3keGWrXMbFdfR2FCS1E3dVU Then there's the fact that Al Gore fairly recently mentioned this particular matter of increasing women's influence and independence as a means to reduce population, and a woman in the audience cheered, showing how well the indoctrination has taken hold. In fact, that's the very reason most people are not alarmed by such things as I have stated here in general; they are followers who have progressively adopted more and more of the agenda from schools, TV, movies, etc. as normal. Hopefully the solution applied to ridding the Israelite population of those whose institutionalization by the Egyptian totalitarian state (which is very much the same as the ideology at work here) was such that it couldn't be broken won't be necessary in this case. vidmax.com/video/160546-SCARY-THOUGHT-Al-Gore-wants-the-United-States-Government-to-Stabilize-Global-Population-Growth-

Oh god. Another misogynist philosopher, hating on and blaming women for having "The Nerve" to want control over their own minds, bodies, and lives.

If you saw film showing many people calling Paul 2 in private surroundings Billy at first may shock you.

Can you elaborate on this using your own words? The floor's all yours....

memoirs of billy shear , I suggest you read it

@@earthraindove2870 Waste of time.

@@user-te3jc3sl7r have you read it ?

And Kevin, that is indeed what they claim.

Or he wanted out of the band and the limelight. Maybe John Lennon did the same thing 14 years later.

That's (John, cut off), Ringo, Paul, and George during the recording of Beatles For Sale (1964). Somebody edited Paul's face to make him look weird. This is the original image: tinyurl.com/y8xn7qtu. Granted, the lighting makes him look a bit odd, but if you enter 'Beatles for Sale recording' in Google Images, you get loads of photos from that day, in which Paul looks perfectly normal.

Macca Lives Thank you very much for the answer !!

With roy and Bob dylan

And Tom Petty!

It's not so much believing it, it's more fun to dig for clues which might have been coincidence at first but later on they were putting them there like a treasure hunt.

its easier to fool someone than to convince them they have been fooled.

George never says "Faul." That was the point of the video. Listen to the entire interview and you'll see how the snippet was manipulated and edited to make it sound like he said Faul. PIDiots are desperate to prove something; they make up evidence. But why?

BRUTAL JOSE SILVA *Accent*

Spot on

Yeah, the most delusional of them all (PIDs)

There's a couple more, but Mike Williams is extremely articulate.

yeah. he knows it's much more than just PID.@@mfb3042

Thank you.

*Macca Lives:* You're very welcome. Changing tac slightly, and I can't confirm this with a link, simply because (contrary to what conspiracy theorists also believe), not every piece of research ever done is on the internet yet! But North Manchester Uni (in the UK) carried out some fascinating blind clinical research around 2002-2003 which involved over 2,600 participants from the UK and the USA. And it indicated unequivocally that 89-92% of conspiracy theorists, also suffered with confirmed medical diagnoses of paranoia, clinical depression, or manic depression - the latter having since be re-branded as _"bipolar"_ of course. Dunno about you my friend but I find that incredibly telling! Cheers anyway, and thanks again for making the time and effort to upload this vid. Of course I doubt it will cure them of their mental health problems... sadly!

Itzdat Managgen What a dutiful, gull8ble, perfectly programmed little robot you are. Congrats.The Beast System has done a great job on you!!

@@DrAnne-mc8er Well put! The facts are telling, also, if you try to reason with the PID people, they simply Blow Up instead of a reasoned explication. No disrespect to people who are suffering from these awful mental health problems.

"And it indicated unequivocally that 89-92% of conspiracy theorists, also suffered with confirmed medical diagnoses of paranoia, clinical depression, or manic depression - the latter having since be re-branded as "bipolar" of course." - Can you supply a link to this? You seem to be putting every single conspiracy that's ever been mentioned in the same bracket as the brainless 'Paul is DEAD' one? I agree that quite a number actually are; for example PID, flat earth. However, not all conspiracy theories are as dumb as PID, but the repercussions mean that other more articulately reasoned conspiracy theories may well be unfairly tarred with the same brush because of ridiculous things like PID. You have to do your own research and/or use your own reasoning. The idea that man never landed on the moon is certainly NOT a ridiculous one at all, unless you wish to believe everything you read in the papers and see on the news as being factual, when powerful people who have a powerful agenda can so easily manipulate public perception for their own needs. It annoys me greatly when I get classed in this fold by PID believers and told to "WAKE UP". It should be obvious to anyone who's able to think logically, and see with their own 2 eyes, that McCartney is and always has been one and the same.

The real interview that’s included after the edited one, you mean? It’s right here in the video you commented on without watching ☺️

Drummers = annoying.

And I'll wait for evidence of any of those things happening. Go on. You made those claims. The burden of proof is on you, so prove it.