Paul Pierce vs Carmelo Anthony Full Highlights 2006.12.15 - The TRUTH With 39 Pts, Melo With 42 Pts! 

Pierce was the better all around player, yes. But that doesnt mean you have to disparage another player. Carmelo is an all time great, period. We dont need an adendum like, "All time great scorer." Carmelo Anthony was a great player period. We could make comparisons all day. For example, Gary Payton is the better all around player compared to Allen Iverson. Iverson was just a household name. Lets not do that.

@@mkadozaPrecisely he also downplay those aspects of Melo game that he says pierce is better in. They always have to over compare. This was great duel between two great players

@@FireAngelChris Carmelo was a better midrange scorer, better rebounder, especially offensively, a better finisher at the basket, and a better ball handler. We can appreciate every player for their skills.

@@mkadoza Agreed

Anthony is an overrated scorer

@@Coldskin1 agreed

@@Coldskin1 top 10 all time in points ever scored in nba history and he’s overrated?? Okay

@@Coldskin1how in the world a top 9 scorer all-time be labeled overrated?

​@@Coldskin1Wrong That Is Irrelevant

No one forgets that

Naw melo never made it to finals and he had good teams

@@Cash3600 not as good as this Celtics

@@officialexe9587 idk bro he had a very solid team with nuggets and super team knicks that flopped ans they were young, paul pierce made it count when it matters lol

@@officialexe9587 that's Carmelo's fault , cause kg Allen pierce were ogs by then , agreed they had a squad , but what happened when they tried to mold the knicks around melo with young talent ? He flopped , I think Pierce was a leader . Don't get me wrong I like melo , that Celtics team was one of a kind

@deez8686he’s not a casual, Jayson Tatum is no where near prime Melo