Pauper League - UB Sneaky Terror | I’M HUNGRY!! LET’S SNACK!!! 

Let’s GO

Snap bolt! Snap bolt!

@@CloudBorne totally

@@celeste5724 yeah, that deck is really impressive now. In paupergeddon when that affinity player gained 7 with reckoners bargain the madness player grinded right through it!

@@wiloj yeah, maybe there is some hybrid jund tokens glee shell 🤔

@@anoobindisguise4337 yeah, might be good. I’d have to test it. I was worried that it leaves you down a card but maybe discarding and returning snackers makes up for it

@@MrFereshteyeh yeah, with all the cantrips, hard casting Lorien is totally doable in this build

@@SnapBolt I agree. I like playing less lands, and your list seems solid.

@@diogovieiradasilva yup, I remember seeing that list, and I mention potentially playing the modern age like him a few times. Perhaps his list is better

@@SnapBolt UB terror is my favorite deck, I'm testing what I can to see if the deck performs well again.

@@user-fq2jv3ds7h certainly cast a lot of boarding partys! That deck was sweet

@@spark1128 it was a really cool deck!

@@thesuperfan99 Hype!

@@somanytears definitely felt like that for me too because they did. Lots of nicely timed answers into multiple boarding parties

@@theyoganath3073 yup, thought about that later. You’re totally right - great card

I think you guys need to read marauder again ;)

@@galacticpresident3502 they meant can’t sac a token

@@SnapBolt Ok, that makes more sense. Sorry! Thanks for the league, that Jund deck in R1 performed surprisingly strong.

@@galacticpresident3502 yeah! We got junded out there. Removal into thorn wrecked us

@@hexennacht. don’t think that’s the best way to go. I could see cutting all the scours/mental notes and playing a more controlling build but I don’t really like cutting them for careful study modern age. If anything, cutting consider for the modern age and being more like the list from the pauper creator tournament sounds better.

@@vegetin01 🙂🙂

@@flosiporosi7827 it would be radical yes, and pretty clunky

@@arcobrunner1979 thanks arco

@@alexpinca2163 perhaps stronger, but the instant can be really nice with spell pierce / counterspell. Maybe that was more important when I had 4 spell pierce

@@sebastianw.1735 yeah, but munitions seems like it can be a good value card too, especially if you have a bunch of wellsprings

@@andreashk2tm sicK

@@benlittle5543 snack time

@@Usernameneverseen interesting take, I would personally like to be able to set up infinite loops to make magic online more closely mirror paper play but that’s probably not happening anytime soon. For now, I play magic online given the time constraints and try and build my decks accordingly

@@todeshorst1697 sicK

@@daybreak817 that’s what I do! (At least what I strive to do)

@@baple not sure what you’re talking about. Are you talking about me sarcastically? Or pauperganda? Since he has crazy intros and doesn’t usually play leagues

@@SnapBolt They're definitely talking about Pauperganda, but he's stated a bunch of times he doesn't do leagues for his channel anymore because there was too much stream sniping going on. It DOES mean the matches are slightly less competitive and/or indicative of the meta, since more people are brewing in the open matches. But he's clearly an important part of the pauper community, and it's nice to have a variety of content.

@@BubbleOBill hype 😎