Correction: At 9:20, it should be 26,664 instead of 26.664. For the updated tutorial: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-peVzELlTGE4.html Paano mag-interpret ng correlation results: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-MR9M2zN0HFU.html
Sir ung Sig. (2-tailed) = .107 sa SPSS. Accept the null hypothesis kasi ang reason is mas mataas sya kesa sa 0.05 or 5% di ba? tapos .612 ung pearson correlation so moderate positive relationship. if variable x is going up then variable y is going up din po. tama po ba yang interpretation sa data mo sir?
You're a great teacher Sir! You were able to deduce a highly complex topic into simplified steps in a language we can understand using examples and contexts we can relate with. A million thanks to you Sir!!! I wish to learn more lessons in stat from you.
SANA GANITO DIN TEACHER KO NUNG COLLEGE AKO. MATH MAJOR KAMI PERO NEVER KAMI NATURUAN NG GANITO HUHUH. NAG AADJUST AKO LAGI KASI MATH MAJOR ARE EXPECTED TO PERFORM STAT LALO NA SA ISANG LUGAR NA WALNG STATISTICIAN. A MILLION THANKS TO YOU SIR
Maraming nagtatanong kung saan galing ang data sa X and Y. Given po yan for the sample problem. If nagreresearch po kayo ngayon, ang assumption nakapag data gathering na po kayo before conducting correlation analysis. Bale ung data from data gathering po ang gagamitin.
Good day sir! thank you so much for making things clear you're such a lifesaver! ilang araw na akong nabobother kung ano gagamitin kong operation sa study ko T^T and then this video showed up.
Thank you po sir 😭😭 since pandemic di namin mareach out mga teacher for help sa correlation. Sobrang thank you po for this vid. Worth to subscribe po ang channel mo. Thank you po. God bless ❤️
Salamat po. Malaking tulong po ito sa akin. However, for correction lang po, hindi po bumababa ang demand kapag tumataas ang supply or vice versa. Usually po, presyo po ang nagdidikta ng demand at supply. (ex. kapag tumaas ang presyo ng blayblade o ng iba pang elastic goods , bumababa ang demand nito.)
Gusto ko lang i-clarify yung sa 11:05. Mas malaki yung table r kaysa sa r. meaning mayroong significant correlation between self-confidence and exam scores. Tama ba yung pagkakaintindi ko? Naguguluhan ako eh.
Hello Sir! Kapag ganito po ang statement "is there a significant difference between the internet platform and academic performance" pearson po ba ang gagamitin or t-test? Bale po gumamit kami ng checklist questionnaires and likert scale questions.
Yung result ay mas malaki pa rin yung table r kesa sa r, therefore reject the null dapat. There is a positive correlation sa pagitan ng self confidence at exam score.
In this case, computed r (.61) is less than the critical value (.71). The decision is do not reject. Pero kung mas malaki ang computed r sa critical value (tabular value), ang tamang decision is reject Ho. Therefore, there is a positive correlation between self confidence and exam scores.
sir, it is a huge help for me, especially that I am going to take my comprehensive exam. If it will not be too much for you, would you please make a tutorial video with how to solve and interpretation for wilcoxon signed rank test, kruskal-wallis one way ANOVA, Mann Whitney U test, student's t statistics, t-test for two correlated sample, t-test for two independent samples and F test. It will be so much appreciated. thank you sir. :)
Good day po, thank you po dahil po marami po akong natutunan, ask ko lang po is bagay po ba sya sa likert scale like agree strongly agree etc. para maging formula ko po?. bale po gusto lang po namin malaman yung small and big companies po. at pangalawang tanong kopo san po ninyo nakuha yung table nung basis kung amy correlation or wala po. salamat po.
Hello sir ask ko lang po if pwede po gamitin yung pearson for finding if theres a relationship ng extreme effects of family induced pressure and academic performance?
May i ask what would be your recommended correlation method for continuous Y and discrete ordinal x po? e.g. Y = QA Score 90% X = 0 Fail, 1 Minor Markdown, 2 Meeting Expectation? thank you in advance!
sir, may I ask a question? sa hypothesis po ba dun kami magbbase sa mga literature na nakuha namin which is yung rrl??? or mali lang pagkakarinig at pagkakaintindi ko sa sinabi mo sa 5:10
Question po. Halimbawa pu ung research question ku "Is there a significant relationship between the frequency of using social media and mental health issues?" paano pong gagawing numerical ung frequency? May mga sample scale po ba ung frequency? Di ko po macorrelate yung data kasi ung frequency pu nila ay by words not numerical.
Hi sir, pwede po mag tanong kung pano ilalapat ang pearson r if gumamit kami ng descriptor na 1- never, 2- seldom, 3- sometimes and 4- always tapos ang result po is percentage?
Good day po. This video is a great help. May I ask if we can use Pearson r if we want to correlate the demographic profile and level of awareness of certain thing. We use five point likert scale Po. Thanks .
ano pong pwedeng gawin para makakuha ng data? gaya nung sa table niyo sa 5:32, pano niyo po yung kinuha huhu. ang variables ko naman po ay perspective at attitude and behaviors.
hello po paano naman po kapag i cocorrelate is time or hour po Like po saamin Level of self-esteem and Time usage of social media Example Level Of Self-esteem = 15 Time usage of social media= 1hr- 3hr?
good eve, sir pano po gawin yung pearson r, ang variables po ay mobile phone usage and academic performance. Based sa results namin is yung Academic performance was regarding sa grades nila for the first sem and by grades (75-79,80-84,85-89,90-94 and 95and above) ang pilian then ang question naman namin about usage is answered by never rarely often always. by strands po yan thank you po
Sir I have a question, may nakita akong link sa google after makuha Value ng r, nag solve pa sya ng t-test para malaman ang significant relation, bakit sa inyo diritso reject sa null hypothesis??
Hi Sir... I have a question po. Correct me if I am wrong tama ba naiisip ko na dapat reject the Ha kase yun po ay "There is a correlation between self-confidence and exam scores at ang Ho naman po ninyo is "There is a correlation" tama po ba sir na ang dapat na i reject ay Ha?
Hello sir..pwd q b gamitin ito to find correlation between fatigue and risk of injury? if so, pano po kaya e lahat po ng RCTs e descriptive? pano q I apply ang pearson dto
sir ask lang po. Magkaiba po Kasi Ang formula na ginamit ko sa nadiscussed nyo po. same value parin po ba Ang makukuha kung sakaling magstay ako sa formula ko at gamitin ko po yong sayo. r= (Nsumxy-sumxsmy)÷√[Nsumx2-(sumx)2][Nsumx2-(sumy)2