Pershing Tanks: Slow & Powerful 

This thing is above the br of Panthers and t34-85s and often gets dragged up further

That's player-performance based balancing for you!

And moved it up in br too lol

And it's mobility is no better (Even worse in my opinion) than the M26

There should also be a certain skin for the M26 for the Korean War era. Something with the white stars as well as more serial/unit markings on the fenders as well as on the turret and hull.

I heavily agree there should be more Ww2 historical tanks/ airplanes (premiums or skins)

Allow us to earn it instead of purchasing it

The t33 round right

Someone definitely doesn't know how to am, as well as been misinformed

@@mono9702 No, the T33 APC was explicitly designed to and proved capable of punching through the Upper Glacis of the Panther at a range of 1km. Gaijin has refused to make this the case since the tank has been introduced years ago. In game T33 Shot performs worse than the shell it was explicitly designed to replace in US service. That earlier shell, M82 Shot, still being capable of punching through at 300m. However, in the game unless you are firing APCR you cannot punch through the Panther's Upper Glacis at all and even then you can only do so at very short range. This is the clearest cut case of bad shell modeling in the entire game and has been proven definitively wrong yet they refuse to fix it even when given official US Department of Defense documents on the testing of the 90mm gun. They either do not care or simply don't want to give the 90mm it's historical performance.

​@@ThatGuyOrbyyeah I have found the 90mm to be a bit lacklustre at 6.7 regarding penetrative capabilities.

Since the decompression its better than anything at its BR but the tiger II

@@scifiordieits better than the tiger 2, as the tiger cant even do anything to it.

@@quan-uo5ws only if the KT player can't aim at its visible MG port bulge, a problem that seems to keep occured since Jumbo in 5.3..

@@quan-uo5ws it has a lot of holes in its armour, besides that, the gun is much better on the king tiger

Unfortunately it doesn't have a line up anymore at 6.3.

Can it survive an is6

​@@ArsenyPronow neither doe the m26 from the US tech tree

@@wrpg9955 the Italian one has now, at 6.7 XD

@@ArsenyPro all m26 were brought up to 6.7 so some how e5 with better armor is the same as the m26 with worse armor

tbf we have the M41, M56 and M50

​@@sasin2715There you are right. However, when I use, for example, the M41, I can't do almost anything to them. Not even with HEAT-FS, they withstand a lot of heat

It is 2 days ago I use it 10 rounds full up-tier every time then switch to the jumbo 76 instant full down tier yet equip both first match 140sp second match full down tier only when you equip the jumbo can you get a down tier

@@stick_person857 only if the jumbo was any good above 5.3

the T34 has that amazingly massive engine too that makes it way quicker then an almost 66 ton tank should ever be. It's like the super pershing except more armor and bigger gun combined with a much more powerful engine

Well the T29/T30/T34 Heavies don't actually use the Pershing Chassis. The designers rather just used it as a starting baseline. The hull was significantly lengthened and widened to better suit the massive and quite thick cast turret meant to house the 105mm/150mm/120mm guns respectively. They also drastically increased the thickness and slope of the armor which while the slope is represented the increased thickness is not. The US Army listed the "Basis Thickness", the term at the time for effective thickness, of the Upper Glacis at 228.6mm but in game the thickest you're looking at is 160-180mm depending on whether or not they hit the track links on the front of the hull. To get such a thickness at the angle listed the plate would need to be 127.5mm thick.

dont worry, if you go down in BR youll still get uptiered against tiger 2s

I noticed a lot of the IS tanks have the same weakness. Shoot at the lower plate that houses the transmission and it should die. This may not work on the later variants.

It’s annoying it was good at 6.3

Rumoured USMC tree coming, reason they shifted M1A1 HC to the Patton line, M103A2 would be so sick to see

wt players trying not to complain and cry in the comments of every video of the official channel

@@Lorenzo-kn9nf Brain dead apes thinking I'm complaining when I'm only offering good changes to the game.

American players try not to cry about perfectly adequate and balanced vehicles challenge (literally impossible)

@@wallachia4797 You're actually brain dead if you think the T32, the T32E1 are M103 balanced and in correct BRs lmao XD. The T32E1 being in 7.7 is an actual joke in the community XD.

Same With British Tanks

i just had 20 rounds with the t32 and i had no problems, it rarely gets uptiered anymore, max youll see t54s

​@@eaaglee_wat guarantees everyone has the same luk as u? I always get uptiers, and according to info obtained by some research of how sp determines ur br in the Batle, I don't get a full downtier (in all matches), since 2022

@@eaaglee_ It's not a horrible tank, but it gets outclassed by a lot of things around it, and 7.0/7.3 area is just filled with is6 spam. I don't really need to explain why the is6 matters.

@@eaaglee_ The 7.7 version of the tank. The BR is 7.7. That means you can get up to 8.7 tanks. And some of those tanks get darts.

It should, M82 could go through the ufp at like 150 meters. T33 should shred panthers with pen of 210mms

@@apersondoingthings5689not in war thunder tho

A tank to counter the Panther.. in 6.3 lmao While the Panthers roam free in 5.7

@@apersondoingthings5689 Exactly yet Gaijin doesn't make that into reality ingame cus of the Wehraboos LMFAO

@@apersondoingthings5689 i fired both at point blank range. the UFP is blessed by the snail. heck sometimes i can't go through the "weak spots" on the turret.

lmao what

Maybe irl. In WT it's just uptier meat

We must be playing a different war thunder

Too bad they moved it to 6.7 and ruined it

DO IT!!!!

JUST LIKE BRITISH CONQUEROR WAS SPECIFICALLY DESIGNED TO COUNTER RUSSIAN VEHICLES.. BUT GAYJIN SAID NO RUSSIAN BIAS MORE IMPORTANT 🥶🥶🥶🥶🥶

Get good then😂

better than the community bitching bout making the tree year/era of service cause you would face way worse maus be fighting at 6.7 is7 was before the t10 and in the same year the is4 was made be glad they keep enough sense not to listen to this community

@@JETBLACKCORD true but still i hate the is3 and is6 point n click adventure tanks

on 7.0

The T20 is at 6.0 is it not?

@Dynasty0612 last I saw it was 6.3, might be at 6.0 again though so idk, regardless 5.7 would still be better, stabilizer or not the 76mm can only do so much against king tigers (nothing frontally)

​@@Samtheman1251Same with the 76 Jumbo?

@suzanarubi9254 the 76 jumbo used to be fine at 6.3 since most the Coldwar era tanks were squishy, but now that theyere gone its not nearly as viable, the 76 can only go so far and the armor isn't as good as it used to be, 6.0 would be a good move foe it

It really is a breath of fresh air ain’t it lol. Sure it doesn’t pen very well but it’s always so funny to watch players panic when their shots just bounce of it lol.

@@steakinbacon8593 i put the sad eyes decal on the hull 😂😂

@@steakinbacon8593 its the tank that makes germany players learn how to aim for weak spots

Bro just said 100mm of armor is worst than that of a tank that can be .50cal'd

@@mono9702 Yes cause i prefer tanks with less armour or more mobility rather than a mix between both. All tanks at that br can pen it.

@@Lore_Thunder Valid opinion. I thought you meant armor wise with your wording. My fault

3:25

germany players when they realize that you have to aim for weak spots

seriously though, just check the protection analysis ingame. that's literally the only reason i got through 5.7 while getting uptiered to 6.7

aim for just above the track for better chance. the side armor is just russian bias