Comparison of car acceleration: Peugeot 407 Coupe 2.7HDI V6 BiTurbo 204km 440Nm 2007r and Peugeot 407 Coupe 3.0HDI V6 BiTurbo 240km 450Nm 2011r Test 0-100km/h, 0-150km/h
Own both engines. 2.7 on a 607 and a 3.0 in 407 coupe. The 2.7 is faster than in this clip. No sport is engaged. He puts it in sport only at the end. The 3.0 is a bit faster, but not that big of a difference. Reliability wise....never had any issue with them. The gearbox is a bit of a dog, but still , coul be worse. I don't know for what reason ,the 2.7 has a better sound than the 3.0. Sounds more "muscular" as to say.
I'm very interested to know your opinion about the car's reliability and some important points to be aware of. I have a Peugeot 407 SW 2.7 V6 HDi Biturbo and have encountered many problems with this engine. It's a very nice car with good acceleration and everything, but it has many problems.
@@iiNe0 agreed. It has some famous problems as the engine is not simply from Peugeot. It’s the same in land rover and jaguar and ford. The point is that i have not faced major problems except the long crank time in summer! The glow plugs don’t activate like other cars in summer! And in winter it starts so easily for me! Anyway if you buy a bmw then you see that your car is still much better in terms of maintenance
@@Czevak 9 months later xd.. the 2.7 is just bad in any way you can think. It may be pleasant to drive if everything is fine with him, but that won't be for very long.
En effet, Dommage qu'il n'y ait que des chevaux en plus, et pas de couple (seulement 10nm de plus avec le 3.0 parce que la boite AM6 n'accepte que 450nm max).
@@LGAA775 actuellement la voiture sa Fait 2 ans avec reprog presque 40000 kilomètres avec il me semble que la boite n'est pas la même que sur le 2.7 ou renforcé mais je suis sur que elle est bcp plus fiables
I have cold start problems in summer. How can i know what it is? The diagnosis says injector 3 is clogged or too wide. After it warms up it works like butter
@@alfamonk Engines are differently tuned. The 2.7 is revving fast and higher where its got power. The 3.0 is revving slow, with feel of torque, at high rpms its pretty much the same feeling. The big+ is consumption around 7,4L over my last 8000kms vs 8,4 on 2.7L. But if i should choose between 2.7 and 3.0 i will simply take car in better overall condition and good service.
Thankyou for video! I can't find a 3.0 hdi in U.K :/ il buy a 2.7 remap ecu and gearbox ecu there are company's here that program both. Delete egr. swirl flaps? And dpf. Maybe 248 bhp 395ft/lband change the oil regularly haha
@@alfamonk No collaboration. PSA gave excellent 2.0 and 2.2 hdi to ford, and ford revenged with 2.7 and 3.0 tdv6 engine. Those engines were completely designed in ford dagenham centre. But they have very bad crankshaft desing and thin bearings. All of them will die one day due to broken crankshaft or spinned bearings.
Un dep arreté pour voir les perfs max d'un vehicule se font avec les options disponibles : en l'occurence les 2 motorisations en bva sont dontées d'un mode sport... Cela aurait ete plus realiste. Cdt.
Silniki wbrew temu co piszą w internetach jest bezproblemowy, pod warunkiem jeżeli rzetelnie wymieniamy olej co 10tyś km. Jeżeli chodzi o skrzynie to tu już jest gorzej, ponieważ według producenta w tej skrzyni nie wymienia się oleju co skutkuje ślizganiem się biegów i szarpaniem w późniejszym czasie. Przez to ciężko znaleźć egzemplarz na rynku wtórnym gdzie ktoś dbał o skrzynie.
@@Future-Project Dokładnie jeśli ktoś wymieniał co jakiś czas olej w skrzyni, to jest bezawaryjna, natomiast jeśli ktoś doprowadził olej do konsystencji smaru/ i wyglądu błota, a skrzynia ma już sporo najechane, to wymiana skutkuje uszkodzeniem skrzyni. Dodam tylko, jak dbasz tak masz.
C UN VEAU LE 2.7L PAS DE COUPLE !!! RIEN DE MIEUX QU UN 6 CYLINDRES MINIMUM OU UN V8 COMME J'AI DEPUIS LE DEBUT DES ANNEES 2000 ET QUELQUE SOIT LE VEHICULE DE PREFERENCE ALLEMAND BIENSURE !!!
