Some related discussions you guys might find interesting; ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-dfIZyc7B_7I.htmlsi=HVDv5_Hf82NNwk6u ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-yDa2SZ6MaOE.htmlsi=LvBorECF8J_HkGeN ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-iqAvgHJa7Yw.htmlsi=QDzUR25msM7PL6OD ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-pq-L3VCSnwU.htmlsi=HG5YLyxb0pXwCgO2 ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-dLW48yM72nI.htmlsi=zHY-gJLMWFfNxVQG ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-ztruZVkMoek.htmlsi=rlBrc_AMPqw6mO9j
Really interesting genuine dialogos, gentlemen Some resonant themes that might (not) be on your radar Deep Continuity Hypothesis - Thompson Philosophical Silk Road - Vervaeke Ruliad/Observerse - Wolfram/Weinstein Full Discrete Geometry - Maudlin
I’ve never heard anyone say “to the degree it’s possible” more and Saint Maximos until this episode. Thank yall both for giving so freely. Incredible conversation
incredible convo, lads 🙏 🙏 that phenomenon that alex voiced at the end where in a truly productive and generative conversation it can feel like a "third element" appears that is both between and beyond the participants is SUPER resonant for me. this sounds very much like what Vervaeke calls "dialogos", where the conversation "takes on a life of its own"... Gotta be one of my favourite activities haha incredibly excited to go listen to the next part of this 💕
❤❤❤ 45 min in reflects just this conversation I had with my friend today. We were talking about my use of Tarot to help me anticipate positive or negative outcomes that have not taken place yet. We are both Catholic and have no interest in the occult per se, but I'm also autistic and a big part of avoiding meltdowns is visualizing future possibilities and transitions. Tarot has helped me in this regard. I think it ties in with this field of possibilities mentioned here, and we were specifically referencing morphic fields and the fact that time may well be an illusion, or at least not what we think it to be... SUCH a good conversation here, Kehlan. Thank you.
This was excellent. Thank you. I suppose Vervaeke would have called this "die-logos." I am pondering why this was such a successful conversation. I think that the wrestling with time is one of the significant "headlines" for the challenge our age is facing. I think that homeostasis (and I like the homeodynamistic variation of that motif), is a key area for focus. Have either of you read Matthieu Pageau's _The Language of Creation; Cosmic Symbolism in Genesis_. In there he deals with time from the ancient phenomenological standpoint and it's very rich fodder for the conversation you have begun here...
wow, i sat down with this man at the pari center in italy and we talked about gebser and the aperspectival world and also his work on synesthesia for a while. love to see him on your channel❤
You have some of the best content on this platform. I just happened to come across Alex Gomez-Marin a few weeks ago while searching for information relating to Dr. Jacobo Grinberg, and now here he is on your channel. Look forward to listening in when time permits... Love to you ❤️🔥 and keep up the great work!
I"m just getting into this (8 minutes in) and loving what's going on! Am feeling some synchronicity too, with a book I just finished, and want to recommend to anyone who's interested in the conjectures within physics that's being referred to in the video. so, if you want, check out When We Cease to Understand the World, by Benjamin Labatut. I just got it at the library. it's many things, it's classed as fiction, it kind of feels in some ways like a formscapes video but in writing, and it dramatizes the battles in the early 20th century between Einstein and his team on one side, and people like Heisenberg on the other. Well worth the read, and short.
I would like to hear you and Ken at Theoria Apophasis have a conversation. He has an interesting take on a lot of the subjects in your wheelhouse. Good luck and thank ya
Not finished with the video yet, but ugh so many cool ideas. I'm intrigued by the idea of elliptical orbits as resting states, and I'm wondering if that can be expanded to include repeating patterns in general. Repetitive actions can induce meditative states (drumming, chanting, pacing) and once you repeat an action enough times it becomes habitual and you no longer have to actively think about it. People also get more "set in their ways" as they age, as they experience less novelty and get stuck in repeating patterns. Perhaps novelty would be an active state and repetition would be passive?
Aether The answer is Aether, and this has been known for well over a century. But now we have the conceptual tools to actually begin to understand what the Aether actually is.
I applaud both your intellectual aspirations, tho I'm sure you're concurrently aware of the improbability of mathematically or conceptually modeling "the cosmos" (or at least the collective human experience thereof) within the confines of human cognition :) Which is perhaps why so much of the sciences, like the esoteric traditions before them, focused on "what can we ourselves effect in the world repeatably?" i.e. what causal levers can we reach, vs "how do we accurately and completely map this bizarre, often unpredictable territory?"
It is a way of wishing for god but scorning his presentation, this quest for the ability to recognize the ultimate pattern. This consciousness structure we are set deep within. The Age of Enlightenment; the era of convergence amidst abstraction. Two forces in developmental tonos with one another, pullstringing the embryo of the new age of a consciousness structure, and fearwishing its tether to snap into something integral only such a massive collision of opposites could enact. Thought organismic scale enantiodromia.
