I'd love to learn more about this - why it's possible, some ways to achieve it, where the upper limits are and how you might know you've reached them, and just more related to strength in general.
Dr. Galpin I know you are a busy guy and I have followed quite a bit of your work and used it to further my self study on the subjects you cover so it would really mean a lot to hear your opinion on this. I have a question and this video hits the subject of the question but its a little off topic'ish. My Question: Has the work of the CNS (or total volume of the CNS load) in regards to resistance training ever been linked to fat loss in any way directly (either more or less) I know you can have an increased load on the CNS with the same volume by simply increasing intensity which can be increased in several ways. But aside from "burn out" or over training, are there any positive effects of loading up your CNS with a "Colorado Experiment" type style training for shorter periods of time in your opinion?
At first glance the study of human anatomy seems to bo complex and overwhelming. It's true that it's complex and your studies wont change that. As for being overwhelming, this can be solved if you take it one step at a time. I found an article on Sebs Study Crammer very helpful for this.
Great job Andy. Are you able to make a video or reference a resource that covers the best methods for strengthening connective tissue for athletic performance? Broad question and topic I'm sure.
Thanks Doc, you have the art of making complicated stuff seem so easy. I thought there was an impact on bone density from what I read. Is that legit science or BS? Thanks.
@@kellyboskey4866 I was thinking the adaptation was the multiplication and differentiation of the satellite cells onto the muscle tissue itself creating more myofibrils equaling thicker muscle tissue. BUT, I don't know how the connective tissue would adapt. Hmm, maybe more connective tissue just knows to grow to actually cover all of the adaptation of the muscle tissue?