Even if it is a true story Richard said he is hiding her identity and as long Richard or Netflix doesn't say that yes it is her then THEY NEVER accused her of this. The Internet made an assumption and she fed into it and she said she was the real Martha. But Richard and Netflix need to not give into this assumption. Fiona taddled on herself
@@ulyaka4781Then she’s Obviously Guilty of Sending everything that she did!! Also at the end of each episode, It says That some parts may be Dramatised So it kinda Contradicts the ‘This is a true story’ at the beginning!
Gadd has said that IRL Martha was no put on trial and convicted that was his closure through fiction. SHe is grasping onto that as its the only really untrue thing there.
That is the only thing she can definitely prove that he lied. How can she prove that she did not do the things that nobody was a witness to and he never reported. If she did not assault him sexually it is awful to be accused of it. Specifically.
Hilarity is that: 1. People see the drama as facts 2. People don’t realise what creative license is 3. She personally has inserted herself into this, if she hadn’t watched/had no involvement in the situation why has she inserted herself into all this? “That’s not me…” yet she has come forward… 4. Does she look like the actress Martha though???? I wouldn’t have put 2+2 together if I spoke to her, only comparison is weight and Scottish accent… 5. Baby Reindeer is a stunning piece of television. The balanced view of stalking and Gadd displaying his own flaws through Donny is amazing. 6. Fuck piers Morgan, however sometimes he bosses it (during Covid he was a beast!) 7…IT DOES SAY BASED ON A TRUE STORY! The intro is from the perspective of the main character! If people don’t realise this ffs 🤦 8. NO ACCUSATIONS HAVE BEEN MADE, ITS A DRAMA FFS! Gadd hasn’t come out to confirm, nor will he. The characters name is Martha, not Fiona, and even if it was Fiona, it is STILL a DRAMA. Does no one realise the difference between a DRAMA and a DOCUMENTARY!?! People are way overthinking this. In the end of the day Gadd and Netflix have done nothing wrong. If it was a documentary lol that would be a different story, and they would be monsters for doing so, but it isn’t. It is a wonderfully vulnerable play adapted to television. End of. I mean…her coming out like this and showing her colours, it is safe to assume that Martha is based her, but that was her own doing, not Gadds. Also she is a desperately unlikable person, does that mean she isn’t in her right to be angry, no, but I’m good with detecting bad people, she is definitely one of them. The interview was hilarious, you just had to listen to her contradictions to know she has dug herself into this hole. Absolutely no sympathy, she’s done this to herself, and the popcorn is delicious!
The difference is Fargo wasn’t basing any of its characters on an easily identifiable person and accusing them of having been in prison… I dislike Fiona and think she’s awful. But I think Netflix dropped the ball on this one
So her story is she only met him three times and didnt know him well. But if you watch she goes on to say she was in love with him and they were friends oh but wait she isnt interested in "little boys".. Ummm miss your story makes no sense. Me thinks your not telling the truth.
I thought she said yes when he asked her that question but she said “pierce… is that a serious question?” When she says pierce, because of her Scottish accent, it sounds like she says yes but she didn’t.
I think Piers is milking the “even if I sent those messages…” point a bit too much. This is normal lawyer talk, where they put their case first and then the second possibility if the legal test for the first count is not met. That does not mean the first possibility wasn’t true.
@@tamerfilly I was referring to a phrase Fiona said herself in her interview with Piers. She said “even if I sent those messages that doesn’t meant that…”. Piers thought it was a weird thing to say, but it’s not. It’s pretty standard, I’d say. But I agree with you that Netflix should have made the claim that not all of it is fictional more obvious and not in the fine print.
I get what you mean now. The credits at the end was a disclaimer. However, having to go to court, claiming its a true story, and it's part not, will be such an interesting case if it goes further.
I made a mistake, I said Martha ( as actress) when her real name is Fiona Muir. It's all over RU-vid and Facebook. I said tweets, opps, so sorry, yet irrelevant. She uses two names, Harvey and Muir. Scottish newspaper in 2013 claims she stalked two politicians. Donald Dewar first minister and the late MP Jimmy Wray and his wife Laura when she was a former Labour party member.
Piers was extemely manipulative, and repeated several times 'even if you had sent all those emails, it doesnt mean you attacked or abused him'' words to that effect, getting her to agree, but she never admitted to sending all that, he just twisted it like he wasnt the one saying it!! Im not saying she was innocent, but Piers was putting words in her mouth.
She getting any kind of reward for that behavior will be horrible for all her victims because she definitely stock those peoples and disturbed their life’s.
IT DOES SAY IN THE END CREDITS THAT NO-ONE WATCHED INCLUDING PIERS OBVIOUSLY THAT PARTS ARE FICTIONALISED. FUNNILY ENOUGH I HAVE BEEN UNABLE TO CATCH A SCREEN SHOT OF IT. DELIBERATE?????
I personally feel very sad for her. She is constantly being mocked on her Facebook, and attacks negative comments about her. Even down to the actress who played Martha, as being grossly over weight, and nothing like her.
![Piers Morgan (Baby Reindeer Discussion) On Lorraine [14.05.2024]](/img/logo.svg){kind=logo}
