@@somethingsomething404GCAS = ground collision avoidance system. GPWS = Ground proximity warning system. They are both official terms for the same thing
@whatsthematter8767 to be fair, military warning systems often use the term gcas(ground caution alert system) so it's not incorrect. It's all audible alert warnings so they all work
@@kalebmarkone9572 okay…..?? Good for you my grandfather immigrated from Ukraine & fought in WW2 against the nazis, when his leg got blown off & he met a women from Germany who was fighting for the us as a medic & saved his life, they then got married & had my father who had me. So what’s your point? You think you’re special & more educated because your grandfather fought in the war like mine, except mine had to genuinely fight for his right to even get to the us & still served. I promise you’re not special.
Not even that xD This is the pre-threshold, so planes landing in the opposite direction are also not allowed to touch down there. This segment is to be used solely for the takeoff run...
Pilots have stable approaches, touchdown on or just after the touchdown markers and abort in stuations where they don't ascertain either of those things at minimum. 😂
@@analtubegut66 they kinda do: you lose an engine, what do you do? Nosedive or overshoot the only airport close to you? You guessed correctly, nosedive. Second problem, you depressurize at 35,000 feet, what do you do? Nosedive or descend slowly so the passengers are comfortable. You guessed correctly, nosedive.
@@alexg700f - if you lose an engine at low altitude, no, you do not nosedive to slow down, that's not only insane but it also increases air speed. If you depressurize at high altitude, again, no, you do not nosedive. You do however initiate a rapid descent, which isn't a nosedive either, it's roughly half way in between a nosedive or less Are you new to aviation? I'm not here to make you feel bad, insult you, or anything like that. This is a learning opportunity
1/10. To improve, instead of diving at the houses, set up a stabilized approach even if the descent rate is high. You had a good amount of distance to lose that altitude. You could have brought the power to idle with full flaps and spoilers if needed. You could have even forward slipped instead of nosediving. As far as the landing portion went, having a smooth landing is great and all, but not if you need to float down the entire runway to do so. In a fuel emergency like this one, you cannot afford to go around so if you need to, you slam it down. Power idle once runway is assured. Still floating? Spoilers. Okay… so that was my rating… bye! 👋
bro took so long to land, just use the air brakes to slow down and push the plane down, even if it’s a hard landing better than risking running into the houses. and yes ik its a game but in a sim it’s meant to be realistic so yh.
Yeah, he likes to fly over as much as the runaway as possible and always land at the very end, and never uses air brakes for some reason, it’s his style, don’t challenge it lol
He could have also raised his flaps 1 notch to reduce the lift from the ground effect it would have been a rougher landing but would have still been better than landing damn near 1000 feet past the decision point
Tip for landing the 737. Don’t use auto throttle for the landing (like you did) because when you flare, the engines will ramp up. The point of flaring is to soften the landing, but to make aerodynamic drag to basically fall with style
Like the Ryanair one, you came in quite steep, but still made it nonetheless. You literally just stopped before the runway ended. That was pretty lucky. Still, that landing was still something. Keep up with the good work.
With that high g-force maneuver you've just injured 1/3 of your passengers, the second third vomited and the remaining third fainted... 😐 plus the now panicking viewers watching from their homes down there 😂
ryan air always land on touchdown zone marker even during crosswind because they do not give a f#ck about butter landing anyways. Man literally just missed a touchdown zone on the other end of the runway.
0/10. This is literally the dumbest thing I've ever seen in my entire life. A B737/73W's approach speed is about 145kts. You're already at 153 before you inexplicably initiate a dive. You had absolutely 0 need to trade altitude for airspeed at that point. All you need to do is lose altitude, so power to idle, flaps/slats down, speed brakes out if necessary to maintain about 145kts. If that isn't enough, consider a 360, S-turns, or a forward slip. First and foremost set up a stabilized approach. Then slow to 130kts over the numbers, and touch down in the appropriate landing zone. Why did you think 200kts on short final and 180 over the numbers was a good idea? It's no wonder you floated for literally thousands of feet.
I can only hope you’re continuing to play along with the joke this was intended to be, good sir. If you aren’t though, piloting from the comment section on RU-vid doesn’t pay very well. I checked. Exactly $0.00 annual salary.
@@jaredpyles5546I don't mind. They pay me well enough to do it for real. Education is a passion of mine, so I do it for free. Consider it a charity if you must.
Just watched a documentary about an airliner that took off without enough fuel and lost both engines and dude pulled that same maneuver to slow the plane down. Cocked her sideways like that to create drag. Pretty cool to see it done here.
This would be a 10/10 if: (a) plane was being flown by a passenger; (b) plane was working on fuel's last fumes; (c) there was a physical fight in cockpit with terrorists; (d) pilot was having a baby.
You ever watch the mayday disaster’s series really cool if your interested in aviation, anyways if you do I recommend checking out the GIMLI GLIDER incident episode. Very skilled pilot successfully lands a commercial Air Canada boing with no engines due to error in the fueling process. He perfectly executed the side slip maneuver which is that side slip, or drift you were referring to to actually slow down the plane enough and eliminate access speed to be able to land on a drag strip.
The reason being was because he couldn’t make it to Winnipeg the best nearest option and was a little close to GIMLI where they ended up but had no choice. Not enough fuel to make a go round for a new approach to GIMLI but was falling to quickly to make the airport in Winnipeg
Duas coisas aconteceram nesse vídeo: 1° Todos os passageiros ficaram inconscientes devido a queda brusca no pré pouso, e dependendo do treinamento ate os pilotos eram pra ter ficado inconscientes. 2° Perda total da aeronave ao se chocar com os edifícios no final da pista. Ou seja avisao explodido e passageiros duplamente mortos, mas foi um vídeo legal 😃👍
This is what happens when you dive for the runway is angle of attack decreases airspeed increases. Now you're going too fast and you're coming to the edge of the runway because your approach was all wrong.
I agree with you but he pretty much has managed to correct it which has allowed them to land.. but then he decided to do a flare and overcorrect it which was made the situation a lot worse
Zero. Landed dangerously long. The approach was horrible. You had enough energy to establish yourself at proper distance and altitude then ease it in on parameters. You need to study actual approach geometry and parameters. Using the length of the runway to disipats energy is unacceptable.
mate.... YOu dont have to be einstein and study geometry to see its not even possible to stop from that point if i saw how his deceleration went.... just spawned back on the rwy. ANd with the Energy disipating, im not sure what you mean. You would have to delay take-off probably as they are a tad HOT indeed. This is al clickbit and way overdone. Weird outside view isntead of inside the cockpit is the first of 1000 things gone wrong but who cares (i do yes haha but just ignore it..) IAS was way to high after that dive-bomb and way to low on touchdown, he Balloons that Plen so long i could have done .... idk lots of things 🤣. Altimere still on standard atmosphere (i.e 29.92)... not to the incorrect flap settings as well as landing rwy9 should have been coming in from the other side due to winds.... but then i remembered all of a sudden.... ITS MSFS! lovely!
Bro, the guy was in a big emergency on the plane How would he care about calculating his landing when he wants to save the passengers' lives and his own at the same time your idiot? 💀💀💀
@love_everything_aviation_r2834 I was an instructor pilot in the navy. Geometry applies to establishing yourself a head of glide slope. It's the way landings are handled professionally. We typically used a 3 degree glide path with a rate of descent around 600 fpm..all very stable. Knowing the basic sight picture based on the geometry of a triangle helps. I'm actually trying to help the guy posting.
0 your over stressed the aircraft. Stop playing on easy settings and lose the controller. You embarrass yourself with anyone who knows anything about aviation.
This dude is able to maneuver an aircraft extremely well for someone on controller, if anything I'm quite impressed and I don't see him as an embarrassment at all
There's heavy crosswind, 1% fuel, and a PS controller, what do you expect? -1 FPM with perfect touchdown zone and perfect centerline with the gears barely making a sound or what?
You broke 200 knots on final approach with that unstabilized dive and never met more than 1 of the criteria for a stable approach at any given time. A+ for stunt pilot, I am hereby revoking your ATP certificate and your commercial license XD
