Deciphering which two cards each hand uses feels way too slow for me especially when all-in and cards are coming quick. Even when the cards are face-up I don't quickly recognize which cards to root for haha.
@@GTOWizard I feel PLO needs more geometric thinking, NLHD doesn’t coz I feel I can break down to different format and the results of river winning combo after the whole logical line doesn’t have that much. I don’t know if my thinking is right or wrong. I just feel Chart of PLO can by 3 Axis
For mathematically inclined people, plo is a much better game to play imo. The uncertainties are bigger but more 'manageable', if that makes sense. Also i has not been 'solved', giving maths people an edge.
Hey, just wanted to say AWESOME video in terms of the graphics (graphs, numbers, data is the star of the show - no more giant AI art every slide!). Thank you for listening to the community feedback and I hope this continues with your future videos.
Thanks, I'm a huge PLO fan, used to play a lot but bugger all games around Canberra AU lol. RFI charts are 3d - ie more a database than a spreadsheet. Joey's points on hands that can withstand a changing board texture & thinking ahead like chess makes a lot of sense.
28:00 - what about we develop a tesseract program to study PLO instead? A one you can move and be on the center of it - could even be using a 3D glass lol kkkkkkkk
