Not really, he's making valid points on Nolan's style. I love his movies but I can't feel sometimes his editing with action sequences (especially BB & TDK) are just not good & exciting. His direction style is obviously a highlight but his expositions, editing & repeating at times can get frustrating.
Good Discussion, I think everyone feels the same regarding DUNKIRK, but I had changed my opinion recently after a rewatch, it gave me a great experience.
Yeah.. Exactly. For me the ending monologue and the music and how every timeline comes together just gave me wholesome Satisfaction about the the movie.🙌
I've found Nolan's biggest flaws to be dialogue and action scenes. Tenet literally had multiple scenes of people just walking and talking about the plot. And as far as action scenes are concerned, while he gets the big setpieces right ( like TDK's truck flip or Inception's hallway fight ), the more grounded gunfights/hand-to-hand combat in his films just end up feeling very badly choreographed and executed. Scenes from Tenet, Batman Begins and The Dark Knight Rises comes to mind here.
Exposition for a high concept film is important. and nolan makes these high concept movies. and without exposition these films would be hard to follow. I love Nolan's films the way they are.
Barathwaj be like Nolan overdid the "love transcends the space and time" but pats Maniratnam as a masterclass filmmaker for making movies like Roja which had Aravind samy yell like someone snipped his balls after seeing the terrorists burn indian flag, and we have Bombay which again has Aravind samy crying and advising terrorists in the streets about hatred, kaatru veliyidai which had the characters converse like as if they were in folklore period... I don't understand his lust for Maniratnam film making style while criticizing other film making for melodrama
29:16 that's a bloody fact. Great conversation btw. I love interstellar so deeply I don't look it as a story or something, it is particularly designed for an experience most of the Nolan films are for experience and interstellar is one such and tenet yeah definitely not upto mark.
@@vishnuadithya People said that the first half of Inception was filled with exposition, And now see what nolan did to tenet, he would have thought, ''Lemme show this so called geniuses a no exposition movie...''
Baradwaj Rangan sir talking about how chaotic the editing is in The Dark Knight 😆, finally somebody telling the truth. The dark knight despite its reputation honestly imo didn't have good action at all. The opening scene, the chase before the interval was very average & not that engaging. The dark knight rises actually had the most decent scenes in the trilogy action wise. The opening plane sequence, Bane vs Batman before interval, the football field & the climax bat chase scene were the most thrilling scenes he did.
For Master movie, the same BR said 'you can't expect Emotional connect in a movie which is a new try'. Now for Dunkirk he says he couldn't connect to the film emotionally. So Master is a new try but Dunkirk isn't? And Suddenly emotional connect is a concern to him🤣🤣
well, because the kind of fanbase vijay has in tamil, nolan has in hollywood. just like vijay fans expect their star to do certain things(fights,dance,political dialogues), nolan fans too expect him to do certain things and emotional connect is certainly one of them.
According to me, Emotional connect is mandatory for any genre/language of the movie. Because that's how you make your audience feel for any character. If you look Brangan Sir's reviews for Vijay Sir's movies, he always tries hard to find some positives and the same applies to Mani Sir's movies as well. Isn't that what we all try to do, finding some positives on something we like even though everyone else hates it, so that we can defend our taste ?
Baradwaj Rangan doesn't know how to watch movies he mention Leo is average but I would say above average 7/10 and jailer a good entertainment seriously 2nd half with blast mohan comedy is cringe Max
