Тёмный

Podcast | Justice Gorsuch and Native American Law 

National Constitution Center
Подписаться 49 тыс.
Просмотров 1,8 тыс.
50% 1

This past term, the Supreme Court handed down two major decisions about Native American law. In Arizona v. Navajo Nation, the Court ruled 5-4 that a treaty did not require the U.S. Government to take affirmative steps to secure water for the Navajo Nation; and in Haaland v. Brackeen, the Court upheld the Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA).
In this episode, Native American law experts Professor Marcia Zug of the University of South Carolina Law School and Timothy Sandefur of the Goldwater Institute join to help unpack these key Native American law cases. They also dive more deeply into one specific member of the Court-Justice Neil Gorsuch-and his unique stance toward how the Constitution applies to issues relating to Native American tribes-from his dissent in Haaland, to his majority opinion in the McGirt v. Oklahoma case from 2020, and more. Host Jeffrey Rosen moderates.
Listen to the podcast on Apple Podcasts and Spotify, and explore all our resources on constitutioncenter.org/.
Today’s episode was produced by Lana Ulrich, Bill Pollock, Samson Mostashari. It was engineered by Bill Pollock. Research was provided by Lana Ulrich, Samson Mostashari, Tomas Vallejo, Connor Rust, Rosemary Li, and Yara Daraiseh.
Show Notes: constitutioncenter.org/news-d...
Follow Us: / constitutionctr

Опубликовано:

 

20 июл 2023

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 3   
@starbase51shiptestingfacil97
@starbase51shiptestingfacil97 10 месяцев назад
"Treat didn't require U.S. government to secure water for the Navajo Nation." They are literally called "Native Americans" as in the ingenious people of the Americas. They are U.S. citizens by birth (there is a law that says that). It has do with the fact that white or European-Americans originate from Europe, and they would only have European citizenship if they did not make a law making anyone born in the U.S. a U.S. citizen. It's more their land than anyone else. I mean really, refusing them their water on their land and Arizona of all places. That could be used as proof of attempted genocide in a court of law. And not just circumstantial if you include all the evidence of attempted genocide.
@tribalmember3425
@tribalmember3425 9 месяцев назад
This is where the United nations rights and laws protecting aboriginals and native Americans applies before u.s.a law especially if you got a citizenship the naturalized way all while being aboriginals or natives. That's why state law doesn't apply to tribes or members because enemies are usually the state or cities trying to take those rights away. Undrip applies to natives and aboriginals before u.s. law.
@JWPeace_4MyBoys
@JWPeace_4MyBoys 10 месяцев назад
LET ME TELL YOU SOMETHING I AM PISSED NOW THINGS WILL CHANGE FAST!!
Далее
Full Sen. Franken questioning of Judge Gorsuch
29:25
Просмотров 537 тыс.
Podcast | Lincoln, Democracy, and the American Experiment
1:00:44
Podcast | Lincoln’s Lessons: Then and Now
1:01:13
What is the Major Crimes Act?
2:37
Просмотров 1,2 тыс.
Noah Feldman: The Three Lives of James Madison (HD)
1:01:42