[PoE] Recombobulating int stacker amulet - Stream Highlights  

Yo couldn't you use Orb of Dominance to get 50/50 t1 dmg per int? I mean craft Suffixes cannot be changed and slam it to get higher tier for dmg per int. its 50/50 but you get higher dmg and a prefix to aug on.

@@przemekwyszynski8642 yo couldn't he have crafted 4 annointed double corrupted rare strangle gasp with %int implicit ?

@@przemekwyszynski8642 read the orb of dominance again!

There's a really good post on the subreddit that explains about doubling mods on items in order to have a better chance at hitting the proper mods on a recombinator, think you could have improved your odds by crafting int onto the bases with % attributes before recombinating. From 20% up to 35% if his math is to be believed. For next time!

@@DerpyEdits drop it to a 17.5% chance because there is then a 50% chance you hit the crafted int which if we wanted to hit we could just craft it instead of recombing.

To be fair this league if you can't get 3-4 ex per hour by just chilling you're playing the game wrong

If you consider endgame crafting it really is low, spent 210ex just to craft helmet so rip

Felt the same, but at the same time he was using 5 at a time, so he could really Lost all his currency and get a worse result.

The guy is wearing like 700 ex dude lmao.

@@restless8638 Yeah, we all know that but you're telling people that haven't eaten for 10 days that your foie grass is a bit too rich.

@@TwoLeftSh0es I could argue with you about that, but given your tone I'll just say GIT GUD

@FlaxOFF ????

Why do i have the apple and pineapple song in my head ? 🤣

@@xHunterBCx What have you done? D:

It wont add a mod until after the recomb, so if it hits a 3 mod suffix which is indeed a 20% chance, then it cant add a mod. Basically we accounted for this into the reusable base part, as there is a 25% static chance to add a mod, not into the final success chances. Theres also a small chance to down tier the mods, but this is like a 1 in 6 ontop of its like 10% chance of occurring, so its not worth calculating, just acknowledging it can happen.

EZ

Correct

Innocence theme I think

it doesnt do anything

How many do you think I made so far?

@@Empyriangaming probably 29

4ex trade I stop for obviously.

sounds more expencive for only a 15%increase

@@FrozeNxXxDragoN bruh you really think he cares about price?

Even better to go for a dmg per int on the essence amulet prefix and hope to hit the mod aswell on the recombine, its 66% to then not have to do all the reforge influence and stuff

After the brick on the recombulator, you say? Because he need to make the base first, otherwise the recombulator pick one or the other and do not keep mods from the unchosen influence. Before woke orb is not worth either, as the flat int does not garantee to be a keep, only one influence mod each.

@@dairiskuznecovs7233 i mean... his argument is to save money? or why care otherwise keyword"costs 65 essence"

i would have craft suffix cannot be change and annuled that gained extra ligntning. you just have to believe daddy

Did it today!

@@Empyriangaming MorbPog

I fixed it since then

Correct, it does nothing.

Flat int on the suffix could be replaced

107int gain over previous amulet. add to it decent ES, add 1% dmg per 15 int and astramentis is looking at it through a telescope

the amulet is literally 300+ int and damage per int....

the cost of essence spaming for % int or attributs is not worth the extra % chance to hit the item in the end we did the math on that

You just described having 4 total mods, which is 35% to hit 3 mods, not 50% You also just described spending 5 ex per recomb (1 for each amulet and 3 ex in essences), my version costs 2 ex per try plus the like 6 essences TOTAL you have to use. (40c) Your 3 bases is 15ex and 4 recombs factoring in reusable bases, for 35% meaning you expect 81% of people running 4 recombs at this chance to hit the amulet My 5 bases is 10ex and 8 recombs factoring in reusable bases, for 20%, meaning you expect 83% of people running 8 recombs to hit this amulet. Please actually do the math before deciding if one is better.

@@m01t4123 I was wrong on that then, next I'll comment after spending more time waking up