@@cbz5283I think most women prefer to appear as a kind, compassionate, progressive person over pushing back against trans ideology because: a) It’s the path of least resistance. Actually it’s the path of zero resistance, so it’s easy. b) Vanity. Like holding up two dresses and saying “Which one do I wear? How do I want to be seen? Which one benefits me more? Ideology or reality? c) Fear. We’ve already seen women are targeted more than us men when they don’t go along because they’re often seen as easier targets by predatory men [in dresses]
Has any other Scot thought about reporting the English PM Boris Johnson for his poem published in the Spectator 2004. Calling for the “extermination”/ GENOCIDE of the Scottish people?
@@user-Katie019 Good, they should keep rolling in, because the restriction on free speech is getting ridiculous in this country. Free speech is a fundamental human right, it literally allows for discussion of ideas and societal improvement and development. I'll be honest with you, I'm a migrant (a legal one), but even I can see that your own government is shafting you massively. What they're doing is wrong, and it's important to refuse to accept it. Literally the main reason they likely implemented that is in order to not allow islam to be criticized. If your government has turned against you, the only sensible thing to do is revolt, because the alternative to that is that eventually, you will be dehumanized and either literally slaughtered or outbred to the point where you will become a minority in your own nation. I won't stand for that one bit.
@@MargaretWilson-o7f well, the whole "trans" narrative when it comes to hate speech is literally just bait to distract you from the likely real reason they implemented the hate speech laws. So that you couldn't say that certain ethnicities or cultures are behaving in a less-than-civilized way. It's crucially important to point that out and criticize it, unless you want to see UK becoming increasingly like the 3rd world. Realistically, if it continues at this rate, I would not be surprised if it resulted in a literal civil war.
Humza's anti white speech was not taken out of context. Every position he mentions that exists in Pakistan is held by a brown person, because it's their country. Humza has a problem with white people holding positions of power in their own country.
The thing is white countries are flooded with immigrants, everyone wants to move to white countries because they are more prosperous than other countries. So white countries aren't really white anymore. And also there's a growing antiwhite sentiment in the people of historically colonised nations that still carry the legacy of colonialism. That's where the issue of representation comes from. But let's not forget that arabs also at one point where colonizing Europe politically and/or culturally. Im not defending the law btw I think its hideous.
It should be exposed for what it actually is. If you do not agree with the Muslim as they call for the death of Infidels aka Christians and Jews you can be sent to prison...
I complained to Police Scotland today because they took the age protection of their website. No, one will stop complaining until they repeal the act. Humza has now labelled the 96% of the population as far right. He's so obtuse he can't even see he's digging his own grave
@@stuartorr8192 He really doesn't understand us what with him being a Catholic Muslim lol I am referring to an old Robby Coltrane skit from a long time ago. He was talking to someone in a shop about footy and they said I hope Celtic get gubbed or something. So, Robbie said I thought you were a Muslim and the guy replied I'm a Protestant Muslim lol
@@bluecheesey701I did, but not anymore. It’s like our country is a hobbled prisoner that can’t run away and be free 😂. Maybe that’s a little dramatic, but if we were granted independence I don’t see how we could make it work without it taking several generations, even more foreign investment and takeover, all while the native Scottish people are being lectured about how privileged we are because our ancestors had white skin. American political tactics of shaming the masses with outright racism just harbours resentment and causes backlash. There’s just nobody competent enough to lead. Scotland is barely even a nation anymore. Most of our land and resources are owned by other nations. Furthermore, we’d only be trading Westminster for Brussels. Don’t get me wrong: a smaller government does sound appealing, but the price of imported goods would have to skyrocket, a little bit like Iceland (which I’m told is actually a lovely country). Scotland has serious problems with a high rate of drug addiction and resulting deaths because there are just no prospects and no downright hope for much of the working class. Working class boys are being left behind in education, but the government is more concerned with lecturing them about white privilege.
If the Scottish government are going to make ridiculous laws then people are going to use that law to show how ridiculous that government really is and they shouldn’t be in a position of power.
This man is 100% correct the Tories were the only ones who stood up against these laws gender and hate speech, the rest of the parties in Holyrood sat and voted this through I’m not a lover of Tories lack of action on this subject of the boats but the truth is they were the only ones who objected to this during the five hour debate I sat through the whole debate and took note who were helping this law go through. Nicola Sturgeon also halted the debate to remove two suffragettes from the public gallery knowing this was taking away women’s rights and putting children in danger but they didn’t care. The amount of women who never gave it another thought sat there in favour of ripping away women’s rights that took 100 years to achieve sickened me to my stomach. Jackie’s Bailey stands out most to me that night laughing and joking bringing up little insignificant points ignoring the bigger picture of what this meant for all women in Scotland. Not only the women of Scotland but all women in the uk the suffragettes fought and died fighting for women to have the right to vote now Muslims are fighting to take them away. The women in Afghanistan are being stoned to death and we have idiots running around with flags supporting Hamas who also don’t respect women’s rights chanting like fools to support people who will torture or behead anyone who does not hold their views. Shame on you all.
70 percent of the demenstrators are young with no life experiance some seem like profesional agitators if i was in goverment i would ignore all the agitators as they are a loud abussive minority 30 th in uk is peanuts listen to the silent majority
Dr Gad Saad has some ideas as to the cause of this madness in his book The Parasitic Mind. Don't have to agree with all of it, but it should give some pause for thought. He does articulate what many think but have nowhere to express it
A Ronald Reagan quote reminds us that losing our freedom is always just one generation away. It's not guaranteed or magically passed down to the next generation in our DNA. We have to fight for it.
Reagan also said "If Fascism is to come to America, it will do so in the guise of liberalism". That was 40 years ago.....and it's happening across the West - we are told that we have never been more free (i.e liberty)....but the reverse is true.
I disagree. The complaints regarding the 'white, white, white' speech were not made out of context. What does it matter about the colour of a person's skin if they have been selected for a role based on merit or in the case of a politician _elected_ by the electorate? Humza's delivery of the speech, emphasising each 'white' exudes hatred and loathing of anyone who is white. The man is seething with rage but does not grasp the fact that he is in a majority white country but that fact does not _exclude_ non-whites from excelling in the country to _by merit_ . If there were to be a speech along the lines of: 'Brown, brown, brown. Why are all the heads of the nations' governments in the UK all brown and unelected? There seems to be an insidious policy to _install_ non-white leaders rather than elect on merit. This _is_ a threat to democracy and one has to wonder why this nasty and anti-white movement exists.' Would that be seen as hateful despite raising legitimate concerns about how leaders of a particular skin colour are being _installed_ ?
Absolutely hilarious 🤣 Keep reporting every little slight people of Scotland - overwhelm Police Scotland with this utter nonsense and stupidity that the pathetic SNP have unleashed.
I tried to report a break in at the back of my house (not my property) and the police on the phone said "you are not a victim so go away". It's no wonder they can't catch murderers.
The only way to get this changed is to continue to complain to the police about absolutely anything you find offensive to make it completely unworkable and untenable.
Try voting out the clowns that gave them that power. If you don't then you are voting for this nonsense and agreeing to it. So just ask those you elected... what they are doing about this. If they tell you they can't do anything... then vote them out... or follow whatever rules your government has provided to oust them. They are clearly on the side of this clown making these rules... which is why they "installed them".
@@maccagrabme You are getting the picture. Bosses are responsible for their underlings for a reason. Far too many people have been allowing evil people off the hook because it was only their "henchmen" doing the deeds.
I know I know. It was passed in 2021. Scottish people didn’t care then either. They care more about football (despite being shite at the game) and drinking than the real world. Obviously not all of them. Just enough to have an impact. I’m Scottish too btw. Just venting some frustration re. some of my fellow Scot’s. I’ve brought this up at work the past week and most people don’t know anything about it 😂
Not only in Scotland.. we have the 'non-crime' crimes in the whole of the UK: write or say the wrong thing, wave the national flag, etc, etc, and expect a visit from the Thought Police !
Aye though, I'm hoping with Scotland taking it to it's obvious conclusion, our police forces and law makers have the sense to put a halt to it before it goes any further. Or, at least that the public have taken note of the fact that Labour, Lib Dems and Greens all supported the bill so, need to keep them out down here.
Scotlands first minister brown! Prime minister brown! Wales first minister brown! London mayor brown! Every home office hotel at you're expense full of browns!
@codswallop164, Well the police have stated his white rant didn’t break this new law so your comment gets the same response, but I feel something similar will be said and that person could have a different outcome.
If he does not like white people he should not be first minister of Scotland. He forgets there are k less coloured people in Scotland to fill these roles.
This is the level of intelligence that Hamas Yuseless is gifted with. Anybody with an ounce of common sense would know that this law could never work. This is purely an attempt by those controlling Yuseless to implement Islamic law in Scotland under the guise of protecting groups that the law already protected.
The SNP are a misnomer, as they do not want independence, as all they want to do is join the EU and be ruled by Brussels. Swap Westminster for Brussels, because they cannot balance the books, not surprised when they come out with this thought crime law.
@@gwensteddy2038 You must be a bit special if you vote for them. If they get in they will repeal your human rights and then when you complain they are ripping you off and that they don't stop illegal immigrants you will discover the real reason they removed your human rights.
Would any of the Whyte race with plain common sense that were to perhaps be elected in the Nigerian Parliament, have the audacity to stand up and rant that all the high positions in Govt are taken by the Blacks indigenous? The height of this arrogance and ignorance is beyond gobsmacking!
These are the leaders of a country. How could such a brainless idea be put forward. How did it pass through into legislation. Where were the brains of governance??. Shamefully stupid.
well why would they complain... look at all the OT they are getting ... do I hear "bring it on" from police Scotland... reminds me of the police and the miners strike back when Maggie was in Power. (PBUH 😁).. they wore T shirts which basically said " Miners pay our Mortgages".... they loved it and they will be loving it now ... lining their pockets off "Humza the Hateful's" hateful laws ....
You can see that many people are making a mockery of it. This Bill is disgusting and attack on our Freedom, the Scots are trying to show how ridiculous it is, in the first instance. 🏴🏴🏴🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧
This law is so vague it is literally a "ways and means" act that will be trotted out occasionally, to silence whoever they want for whatever reason they like. It's a law that will be used to stitch you up, when they cant find any other obvious crime to hang on you.
Same issue our Irish government are desperate to push on to us. A hate speech bill where they just want it there so as they can silence anyone who speaks out against them. Like with Scotland, the people are dead-set against it but our inept Government keep insisting that "the people are in favour of it" Even when our Government did a survey amongst a small number of people as to whether they wanted the hate speech bill, over 70% said they didn't want it and Leo the Liar brushed it off as "well we don't feel that's reflective of the wider community, all of whom definitely want this bill to be passed" and insisted they were carrying on with it anyway.
@@lifeisyours8250 So then you did vote SNP/Greens. The SNP/Greens are the platform Humza stands on. You've eaten your own nationalist vomit and now you complain about the taste.😅
@@xyxwtz-p5k Never make assumptions. The whole voting system is a scam, I mean that is blatantly obvious hence why Scotland and England have 2 unelected officials. With the whole rotten to the core system do you actually think the general public has any say in anything?
When Yousless first published the Bill years ago I wrote to my MSP and to the chair of the committee in Holyrood overseeing the draft legislation, politely pointing out the incompatibility of the legislation with the principle of freedom of expression. No reply. If a numpty like me can spot a glaring problem, why couldn’t a small army of MSPs and their officials do likewise? My guess is that they were too busy falling over each other to display their woke credentials. As for the motives of the Bill’s author, who can say? Does all this not bring into question whether the ludicrously expensive institution that is Holyrood is actually fit for purpose?
I did the same. I sent many, many emails complaining about this ridiculous anti Freedom Act. Only one MSP replied to me the rest ignored me. Is this Democracy? I think that there were many people who complained about this Hate Crime Bill and we were totally ignored. 🏴🏴🏴🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧
We now have an Indian hindu pm, a pakistani muslim london mayor a pakistani muslim leader of the scottish parrish council, an African in wales and an Islamic blasphemy law. What has happened to the UK
Hate is a perfectly legitimate emotion that we should all be able to express. Call from crimes is another matter and already illegal. We either have freedom or speech or we do not... this cannot end well and shame on all those complicit in its' implementation.
An islamic one. The woke stuff is incompatible with his cult ideology, but they are permitted to be deceptive little snakes who side with their enemies in order to push the ideology onto others. Taqqiya in action.
You say this in jest, but this law could make this a reality, maybe not over beans or peas as yet, but the law does not limit the offence to the public sphere, so your dining room and kitchen are included...
Polis Scotland have only one objective - protect the SNP. A relative of an SNP minister has avoided a hate crime investigation despite an anti-Semitic Facebook post showing a Nazi swastika within a Star of David and the caption 'Nazism = Zionism'. Incredibly, the woman who reported the "vile" post to Police Scotland ended up being questioned about her own ethnicity and was then told the complaint was being discarded because she was not Jewish - So it's all BS.
Big Time,Guess where The Gestahpo/SD came from ? The Prussian Civvy Police, Who controled that ? - Hermann Goreing. After the war a Staats Politzei Officer, stated under intterogation by The Brits, 'Most of the people we lifted in Germany were handed in on information received, - from friends or neighbours. HO HO !
These people are wimps! I'm 46 and over the years I've been called far, far, far worse! Yet I'm still standing. I wouldn't want a law like that because even if I win and have them arrested, imprisoned and sued, I still lose as it means they got to me. Harden up!!!
of course, labour would vote for it they have the same leader complaining about Scottish people and the police should be paying OT in the case of the 600K of missing money
Labour in both Scotland and the rest of the U.K. supports this law …. And also would support a Stasi style “report on your neighbour, your friends, family and colleagues” … pretty chilling, isn’t it ? Vote strategically and rout these bad actors once and for all.
I retired from Edinburgh City in 2011 after 32 years service and still have contacts. The numbers are now reaching the 10,000 mark and are still rising. The small team on the detail are overwhelmed. The Act is clumsy buffoonery at best. Scottish Labour have gone eerily silent on the matter.
It was the police who said, We Will Investigate Every Single Complaint, so they can’t complain that they are being overwhelmed by calls, they agreed with this absolutely ridiculous law.
I was in attendance at a forum where this law was the main topic. There is deep concern over how it's going to change the way many * normal* situations will be affected. There is major concern about the fact that it differs bbetween how Islam and Christianity will be treated. An example was put forward with the recent Easter Sunday celebration taking place Someone asked about the fact that in their area the Christian church are gathered to hold a sunrise service with them being led by the good old Sally Ann. In a local park car enough from blindingly to bother anyone at all. The churches were advised that police had received several complainants about the fact that some Muslim families didn't want the event to proceed as they do not celebrate Easter so it's an offence against Islam that this be allowed to happen. The actual law wasn't in force then but came into force on Easter Monday. Police investigation showed that those who made the complaint lived 8 miles away from the location so could not have been bothered by noise, prayers or praise of those participating. When informed no action was to be taken and the service was to go ahead as planned they went ballistic yelling how it was an offence against Islam that this be allowed to take place in public . During the discussions that followed it was repeatedly stated by Muslims present that they ought not to be forced into listening to Christian invitations to come share worship. An elderly man then quietly asked why need he have to listen to the daily calls to prayer which take place throughout the day he pointed out that while those complaining about how the Sally army band could have disturbed local ( remember the complaint was made by people who lived 8miles away from the place the band would be playing and nearest family homes just under half a mile from the park in question flagpole). He pointed out that the mosque was situated in a heavily populated area with both private and social housing estates literally all around it what if Christian locals decided that they don't want to be forced to listen to Muslims being called to worship and everyone of them chose to make complaints under the new system. Muslims present erupted the meeting became chaotic as they yelled, squealed, screamed and threatened of possible outcomes because " they have the right to worship according to their beliefs and practices " When it was quietly pointed out by the same elderly man that so did he, that people have been gathering for centuries here in Scotland to hold religious services and marches to demonstrate their Christian faith so why in a Christian country should Christians be forbidden to continue to do so. Many responses from the hall but there frighteningly was one often yelled response. Britain will not be Christian country for much longer or British people have to adapt to those coming here and as majority of those are Muslims then the British people must now to the will of Allah!!!!! I left the hall deeply concerned as I am employed I. Emergency services to ten one those homeless people and asylum seekers I know how many men come in to country with dubious stories of paperwork. I've lost count of the number of persecuted teenagers who arrive for interviews only to discover that they appear middle aged men On one example out of liberty hundreds while interviewing a 19!!! Year old as to it he had any family members here or indication of possible areas we could begin perusing housing in and did he have any special requirements. He informed me that he was going to be needing at least a five bedrooms house no flats because one of his wife's needed a garden and his children are too old now to be sharing bedrooms. I told him that at this point in the all be would be getting offered was single homeless accommodation and that meant most likely in high rise flats. He went crazy called me everything under the sun and screamed at top of his voice that I was being racist and denying him his legal right. He had fully expected that he would after interview be to directly from the centre to a fully furnished house in the area of his choice ( one of the most exclusive areas of the city no less) and when via the interpretation service in use he was made to calm down and listen I began to explain how things work how he was currently being interviewed for accommodation for a single person in a one bedroom flat within the centre and how in days to come application for social housing would be made on his behalf. How all applications must only be made for him alone and future needs would have to be dealt with in the future when it family members came to UK he could reapply for alternative housing again he lost the plot and I reminded both hi m and interpreter that as the basic interview had not yet taken place that unless he calmed down and treated me with respect the interview would be cancelled and he would have to return to the refugee centre. Then he requested ( demanded) to see the accommodation I took them to view the flat in question a one bedroom living room kitchen shower/ bath room and hallway all fully furnished and supplied with everything from two sets of bedding towels curtains right down to kitchen fully stocked from lots kettle dishes cups teapot cutlery down to teaspoons. He wasn't happy we returned to interview room and he spoke to interpreter who appeared to be arguing with him. He interpreted tells me it's not big enough where will his friends sleep. He was then informed no overnight guests yes another argument. I ignored that and informed him of what he would be expected to do while living in the flat. When I mentioned that he was responsible for the payment of his personal rent from benefits which was at that time 2years ago £7.46 p per week which includes electricity he blows up again and suddenly in virtually perfect English called me an undesirable slur and informed that he was now ever going to be paying rent that he would be having his friends sleep if he so chose and in fact two were waiting for the interview to finish so they could move their own as well as his belongings in that night. I cancelled the interview called in my manager and both myself and interpreter informed her of the events during the pre interview of his threats of violence facial and sexual slurs refusal to accept the terms and conditions of accommodation and the fact his documentation appears to be false as he has documentation stating he is 19years old but claimed he required accommodation for two wife's and several children two of whom he said were 21 years old twins. Interview was cancelled he had to return to the refugee centre and I forwarded the details of his comments and paperwork on to the border agency explaining why interview was cancelled and no accommodations offered as protocol demanded I also informed all the other homeless support centres in area of his application details and I'd info. Within one hour three other centres contacted me advising they had received referrals from refugee centre for accommodation for him when two informed they had no vacancies they approached the third who informed that they only had one vacancy and an elderly man had already been offered the interview they actually had the ball to ask they cancelled the interview and took in the one I had refused. When informed no they tried to bully receptionist by saying they were going to make an official complaint about her. Her senior project manager took the call read out the referral they forwarded and informed them to complain all they wanted because first thing in morning she would be making her own co.playing regarding the changes in information on several form between the various centres they had referred him too. They forget that we all used same site and systems so we could see referrals information. Worrying yes and I'd be a liar if I said it was a rare occurrence it happens with disgustingly regularity.
The Police should have said remove that legislation immediately or you will be arrested for malfeacance in public office. This would only be of course if it was 'our' police which it is not. They have been bought and paid for by corrupt politics.
NO! Gesture politics has NO place in education anywhere! Woke and cancel culture are in full swing in those places already, and they are manipulating and poisoning the minds of our uneducated young, warping the way they think and behave, and it needs to stop.
I'm not Scottish, but I did work in Dunfermline for 18 months. I mean, when the morons who proposed this idiocy were holding their discussions, did nobody ever bring up: 'Umm.. what about Rangers vs. Celtic?'
The speech from Humza useless was not taken out of context. how many non Muslims are in parliament in Pakistan ? haw many Whites are in all those positions in Pakistan ? the same as how many Christians are in power in Pakistan and many other countries ie Iran, China, India the list goes on and on so yes his speech was a hate speech.
You can say that Hamza's 'Hwyte' speech was taken out of context; however the Mark Meechan (Count Dankula/N*** Pug) trial set the ludicrous precedent in Scotland that context isn't important. You can't have it both ways.
New 'Miranda warning' for elected representatives, to be read out before voting : 'You have the right to vote down proposed legislation that is unenforceable. You have the duty to consider how, and to what degree, new laws can be misused and so cause more serious problems than they might alleviate. Anything you vote in can, and may, be used against you in a general election'. Make them all sign a declaration that they have read and understood the warning. Make the declarations public.
Really? the trans thing is fundamental in forcing people to deny reality, facts, what they see... Its to destroy truth and silence. And it has worked! and now is supported by the threat of up to 7 years incarceration.
Good 👍 hopefully it will get much worse. I urge everyone in Scotland that hears a word they don’t like to flood the police with complaints courtesy of the snp