Тёмный

Political Economy of Climate Disruption - [ECO]NOMICS Part 2 

New Economic Thinking
Подписаться 261 тыс.
Просмотров 10 тыс.
50% 1

Mainstream economists like to talk about choosing between climate protection and consumption. They often produce studies showing that policy action is too expensive, while climate change itself is not too costly. But a well-functioning climate is the basis for producing goods and services, not an alternative to them.
In part 2 of [ECO]NOMICS, Professor Juliet Shor introduces the political economy approach to climate change, as an alternative to the usual economics. This direction links action and inaction to economic and political interests. Who has interests in continuing to emit greenhouse gases, who is benefiting, and who is bearing the costs? Political economy turns the focus on the companies, countries and people who are disproportionately responsible and have a strong interest in the status quo. Prof. Schor shows how fossil fuel companies have spent vast amounts of money and effort in influencing public opinion and capturing politicians, to forestall government action on climate change. Solving the political economy problem requires new ways of thinking about transcending the interest-based politics that has led to climate inaction.
Part 3 will be available May 11, 2022
Learn more at www.ineteconomics.org/perspec...
Credits: Juliet Schor, Matthew Kulvicki, Nick Alpha, Gonçalo Fonseca, Kurt Semm

Опубликовано:

 

23 июл 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 39   
@pallavshrivastava6769
@pallavshrivastava6769 2 года назад
I live and breathe economics. I never thought I would be able to learn so much about econ from RU-vid. thankyou INET. you are doing quality work.
@mrose4132
@mrose4132 Год назад
😂😂😂😂
@tymanung768
@tymanung768 2 года назад
Who is this highly intelligent, accurate, honest, zero in soeaker? Great!!
@Alanoru
@Alanoru 2 года назад
As someone who graduated with a major in Economics and has been living with the climate crisis as one of the greatest threats to humanity. These are some of the best lectures I have seen on the topic. Thank you!
@commiehunter733
@commiehunter733 Год назад
Reported spam
@mrose4132
@mrose4132 Год назад
😂😂😂😂
@Rnankn
@Rnankn 2 года назад
She missed one of the most important disproportionalities in carbon emissions. Generational imbalance. The bulk of cumulative atmospheric carbon was from a single generation: the baby boomers in North America and Europe. They not only burned the most carbon, even after being undeniably aware of its impacts, they used their large majorities to build out a culture of dependence on it. As a generation, they enriched themselves through widespread home ownership, car culture and stock ownership. They financialized the economy, and strengthened limited liability. After extracting the benefits of its use, exhausting the accessible supply, denying the effects, and enjoying the profits, baby boomers have disavowed regulation, public programs and international agreements for a sustainable future. Instead, they have levered and commodified everything well into the future, and persist in hoarding all of the wealthy and power refusing to fund mitigation or adaptation. As a generation, they will die without bearing responsibility or sharing cost and their only legacy will be death and destruction.
@chrisk1944
@chrisk1944 2 года назад
Excellent talk, thank you :-)
@Userkzb20253
@Userkzb20253 2 года назад
So the economics departments in academia largely ignore such an important topics - the climate change. Economy. Scary. Irresponsible.
@Skylark_Jones
@Skylark_Jones 2 года назад
For decades the wrong people in the wrong place at the wrong time have led us towards the climate abyss: they know who they are.
@progyandas9650
@progyandas9650 2 года назад
You guys didn’t mention India as one the countries where massive disproportionality in household incomes have contributed to unequal climate emissions.
@tuckerbugeater
@tuckerbugeater 2 года назад
Great presentation!
@PesteNegro
@PesteNegro 4 месяца назад
10:52 I think that this graph, if it was not made this way (it isn't clear on the video) could've be done considering the emissions per capita because the gross emission might be misleading.
@pacoshuman7642
@pacoshuman7642 2 года назад
Such a great presentation...just simple truth.
@evanokeroa4877
@evanokeroa4877 2 года назад
Not really she does her math homework
@timothythompson9563
@timothythompson9563 2 года назад
Accumulation of nefarious economic environment influence. Successful influence yes, sustainable unfortunately yes. Mitigable with good planning perhaps.
@eugaleksandr
@eugaleksandr 2 года назад
For the first time in history, all of humanity is facing a common external enemy. This enemy is the climate. In the face of planetary danger, it is necessary to unite all people for the future of humanity. Because we are people, and we want to live. I invite all caring people to a unique event on May 7. International online forum "Global Crisis. We are People. We Want to Live" is a large-scale and unprecedented event, organized thanks to the independent unification of millions of people from 180 countries on the Creative Society platform.
@Pinstripe0451
@Pinstripe0451 2 года назад
Wrong. For the first time in history, all of humanity has become aware of a common enemy. This enemy are the rich.
@emiliaerle6030
@emiliaerle6030 Год назад
"out of a box ideas" - i have one, it's called socialism
@mrose4132
@mrose4132 Год назад
This comment section is laughable
@nxgrs74
@nxgrs74 2 года назад
The Earth is cooler w the atmos/GHGs/albedo not warmer. To perform as advertised the GHGs require "extra" energy upwelling from the surface radiating as a black body. The kinetic heat transfer processes of the contiguous atmos molecules render that scenario impossible. No greenhouse effect, no GHG heating, no man/CO2 driven climate change or Gorebal warming.
@blindstagehand
@blindstagehand 2 года назад
As an Engineer I have no idea what you're talking about ~ smells like horse, no, dog, no, bull shit!
@nxgrs74
@nxgrs74 2 года назад
@@blindstagehand I was awarded a BSME from CU Boulder in 1978 which I applied for three lucrative decades pumping up my retirement portfolio. You? Discipline and school? When? Here's some more that's over your head. Fact 1: Remove the Earth’s atmosphere or even just the GreenHouse Gases and the Earth becomes much like the Moon, no water vapor or clouds, no ice or snow, no oceans, no vegetation, no 30% albedo becoming a barren rock ball, hot^3 (400 K) on the lit side, cold^3 (100 K) on the dark. At our distance from the Sun space is hot (394 K) not cold (5 K). That’s NOT what the Radiative GreenHouse Effect theory says. EVIDENCE: RGHE theory “288 K w - 255 K w/o = a 33 C colder ice ball Earth” 255 K assumes w/o keeps 30% albedo, an assumption akin to criminal fraud. Nikolov “Airless Celestial Bodies” Kramm “Moon as test bed for Earth” UCLA Diviner lunar mission data Int’l Space Station HVAC design for lit side of 250 F. (ISS web site) Astronaut MMU w/ AC and cool water tubing underwear. (Space Discovery Center) Fact 2: The GHGs require “extra” energy upwelling from a surface radiating as a black body. EVIDENCE: According to the K-T atmospheric power flux balance, numerous clones and SURFRAD the GHGs must absorb an “extra” 396/333/63 W/m^2 LWIR energy upwelling from the surface allegedly radiating as a black body. These graphics contain egregious arithmetic and thermodynamic errors. See ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-0Jijw7-YG-U.html Fact 3: Because of the significant non-radiative, i.e. kinetic, heat transfer processes of the contiguous participating atmospheric molecules the surface cannot upwell “extra” energy as a black body. EVIDENCE: As demonstrated by experiment, the gold standard of classical science. For the experimental write up see: principia-scientific.org/debunking-the-greenhouse-gas-theory-with-a-boiling-water-pot/ CONCLUSION: No RGHE, no GHG warming, no CAGW or mankind/CO2 driven climate change.
@tuckerbugeater
@tuckerbugeater 2 года назад
@@blindstagehand Fascist.
Далее
Planetary Boundaries - [ECO]NOMICS Part 3
18:54
Просмотров 6 тыс.
Crossing the Most Dangerous Crosswalk
00:24
Просмотров 8 млн
Dr. Patrick Moore-- Carbon and Climate Catastrophe
1:20:53
Economist explains why Britain is poor
32:23
Просмотров 1,3 млн
Why politicians have failed to tackle climate change
9:04
How to Unf★ck Intellectual Property
21:02
Просмотров 13 тыс.
The Demographic Drought
34:29
Просмотров 341 тыс.
Which U.S. Cities Are Safest From Climate Change?
13:02
New Economic Thinking's Channel
Просмотров
Why nations fail | James Robinson | TEDxAcademy
18:34
Просмотров 463 тыс.