Prey (Spoilers) 

not sticking the landing is kind of an 0451 staple too

one thing that I've noticed about this game is that it's much better on subsequent plays. My first play felt too overwhelming and all over the place, there were just too many things to do, texts to read and gorgeous places to visit, but on my second run I could focus on the mechanics and the secondary plot quests, which not only made the game shorter but also much easier in general. this game is awesome and thoroughly enjoyable. 9/10.

You really summed up what I've been thinking about Prey across multiple play throughs. I absolutely LOVE the opening (Even on it's own, the idea of the apartment simulation and smashing through into the real world is a super cool idea) and the early game of picking what path you want to go down first with powers and approaching each fight with a plan or spending valuable resources without one is an incredible feeling. It's not quite stealth (Unless you stick hard to stealth) and not quite horror, but feels like a nice mix of each. But in the middle of the game, it feels like that just kind of... falls apart. Even if you get into Fabrication and start fabricating neuromods as soon as you can, it still felt like I was always working towards some new power no matter how many I made. But towards the middle of the game, you have a ton of every resource except for one bottle neck (Either minerals if you're making ammo or exotic materials if you're making neuromods) and even playing on nightmare with immersion mods for minimal HUD... it stopped feeling challenging. It lost the feel of the first part of the game of planning for every fight. I found that unless I deliberately set rules for myself (Only picking up light and/or valuable items, no inventory upgrades, only using found ammo instead of fabricating), I was breezing through it. Not to mention that trying for a wrench and/or powers only playthrough is frustrating because of the lack of wrench upgrades/bonuses (Especially if you get screwed by RNG) and the fact that scope chips (Also RNG) are the only way to reduce power cooldown, so if you favor one, you're running around until it recharges or fall back on another. I certainly enjoyed sections of the game, despite the fall off in the main plot and game play. I think in 0451 style, the stories about the side characters and showing the game's world is executed very well. The little stories in both the arboretum and the Crew Quarters make them both my favorite areas, game play aside, and that those stories in general really make Talos 1 feel real. And I do think the themes of identity and what's real or "true" comes across very well; Even when the main plot loses its way a bit the side stories and environment drive those points home just as well. Maybe the patched it by the time I picked it up, but I was able to skip the credits. I wish the ending was a bit more fleshed out but still think it's wonderful, given that it isn't an "It's all a dream" cliche but has been hinted at since the beginning of the game, and I think it does a good job of wrapping up the game even when the final hours falter. I've been a huge fan of yours and your videos for awhile but just never quite found the right time to comment, but even with it's issues, Prey's a game that really resonated with me (And watching your video just makes me want to play it again), and you've put into words quite a few things that have been running through my head about it as well as bringing up some interesting points I never considered. Awesome video as always and I can't wait to see what comes next :)

This video could not have come at a better time, love Errant Signal and just completed Prey not two days ago!

I've missed your videos! Stoked to watch :)

I feel you on the ending being behind credits, but at least on PC they are completely skippable.

I think this is the first time after Bioshock 1 that a big budget game questioned the "player control" by question the "character control".

I am still playing this game and loving every second of it, might even be my GOTY...

Surprised you didn't mention how the "looking glass" tech connects with the main gimmick of the previous Prey game: portal technology.

Great video! Just wondering, before putting an end to your "Summer of 0451" proyect, could you do a video on "System Shock 2"? I know you´ve talked about that game before, but it would be nice to get your full insight on it.

Huh, never heard the term 0451 before.

I've been waiting for this!

Neat I can watch this video now 2 years on

I'm pretty late here, but I'm pretty sure that one of the guys in the game being called "Calvino" is a not so subtle nod to Italian author Italo Calvino. Not having played the game, I can't say if it's just a passing nod or if the game has a thematic connection to his works, but just know that there could be a way of interpreting the game through another literary lens

dam! now I have to play just prey! and Wooo minimal spoilers this time before I can watch this video

Interesting but would you rather want this instead of Prey 2?

This game should have been called NEURO SHOCK...that is all. So sad!!!

The credits are totally skippable what

These ghost-in-the-machine takes on personality and transhumanism always overlook how important brain chemistry is in the storage and manipulation of information. You can't just scan a brain's machine-state and throw it on a harddrive and expect that collection of nonsense to resemble a human personality unless you have an incredibly complex computer simulating a whole nervous system, circulatory system, digestive system etc. - and inserting it into an alien species is probably not going to end well for either party.

AIDS of March? I think I need to watch the 0451 video lol

Thanks so much for this video! I loved the game and gameplay, but its theme didn't come through clear enough throughout the game. The questions you ask, if playing a character says something about you or about the player, could be made very interesting and confronting in the game. But this video made me question it and not the game, which sadly says all about 'sticking the landing'. Still, having not played SS2 and only the bioshocks and modern Deus Ex, I had a blast playing my favourite genre

I had not heard of this game before. After the first 5 minutes I thought it sounds great, I might want to turn this video off and play the game first. I decided against it because you specifically warned against *minor* spoilers only. Now I'm at 14.12 and I feel you've spoilt everything. You're talking about the ending, it being a simulation. I really hope there's much more to discover in this game, but Im really worried you've spoilt it all.

That feeling when a RU-vidr you love does a video about a subject that another RU-vidr covered with so much more depth that it ruins it. Sorry Errant, but Joseph Anderson nailed this game a lot better than you did.

Too disappointing in multiple places. I'll buy it at maybe $15. Bioshock Infinite is the only one of this kind of game that I would call "good".

Great analysis of a game I loved. But I'm surprised you didn't mention one aspect I felt was key, and thoroughly compelling in this game; or perhaps you don't share my view. I felt this game featured some of the very best world building of any 0451/Immersive Sim game. In fact, better than most games outside of full RPGs. I felt it built a fabulous rich, deep and believable world. Talos-1 felt true to me in a way that no other -Shock/Immersive Sim game world has come close to. The realistically proportioned environment with its close detailing felt like a real place that real people could and did occupy (falling down only at the end by not having nearly enough beds - unless they intended to imply that the rest were lost in space.) As important if not more so, the characters and their stories, mostly told through copious and intersecting emails and audio logs, felt believable and human. I felt true pathos hearing of the D&D games and the tussles of blossoming love affairs, amongst the wreck, ruins and corpses of the subsequent catastrophe. As a result Prey's world stood out for me as few others have as a real place, where real people lived and worked and played, like normal people would. A clear difference from, for example, the BioShock games, whose worlds were beautiful but ultimately shallow and easily shown to be no more than pretty facade, and where characters were mostly painted in broad, generic strokes, with little focus beyond the central cast. That for me was one of the major wins of Prey. I felt it has come the closest of any such game to really immerse me in a simulated world, albeit with the usual caveat of doing so after it all went to hell. (Playing on max difficulty I also loved the tricky combat and the necessarily resulting gathering/crafting loop - so all those extra twists at the end were mostly welcome, even if it did get rather easy towards the end.)

One thing to note (as I am sure others will): the unskippable credits was a bug, fixed in a later patch. When I played I could skip the credits instantly (though I waited a couple of minutes until the replay of the pre-crisis events finished.)

another excellent piece chris. I'm very interested in the Calvino character, especially after seeing so many Italian surnames in the credits. the reference here is to the late Italian writer (and subject of my doctoral dissertation) and I wonder how prey's themes overlap with his later works.

I love the fact the games "choices" were hidden behind normal gameplay mechanics.

Neuroshock?

Funny how no one seems to notice that in-game's RPG "Fatal Fortress" is a reference to Arx Fatalis

Joseph Anderson also proposed another interpretation on Alex's character. In the story, everyone seems to hate Alex making him out to be a tyrant. According to the characters you talk to and the information you find lying around, he's the only one that wanted to enslave the Typhon. However, this contradicts every single appearance of him in the game. He is calm and incredibly reasonable. In the audio logs, he even seems very sympathetic towards the Typhon. Anderson's reading says that Alex wants to shoulder all the blame for what happened to the Typhon. He wants to give you a reason to save humanity by making all of them appear innocent; according to the simulation (the entire game), humanity was oblivious to what was really happening to the Tyhpon. However, if the crew members were really oblivious, which you are told they were, it is itself either a huuuge plot hole, or, much more likely, a narrative that is being force fed to the player character through the simulation, by Alex. In other words, this video never considers that the game itself might have been an altered simulation that tries to manipulate you, an expanded version of that tutorial section. The video does bring up something that only strengthens Anderson's interpretation: looking glass technologies are themselves a metaphor for the player's own 2d screens 'presenting a pretend 3d reality that is, in some superficial level, believable to you in the moment'. Since the game itself draws a parallel to deceptive realities found in looking glass tech., wouldn't that imply that you can't trust the illusion before your very eyes?

My take is that the entire game is basically preparation for the ending. There's just enough poking and prodding at the idea of (subjective) reality that you're aware that there is definitely SOMETHING going on, even if you don't predict the twist, and I really like that it's basically an empathy test. I think that's a great way to look at and design games, although you're right of course that 90% of the game being shooty sneaky doesn't have an awful lot to do with that. But there are more choices throughout the game, even if a lot of them are morally pretty one-sided, as you say. The balance was a bit off, but I enjoyed playing it so much, and the ending really worked for me. Too bad it bombed and the genre is probably dead for a while again =\

I honestly thought this was the best game i've played in the past 5 years. Some parts of the game were kind of ruined by glitches or faulty blends of story/game interaction, but i still loved the game. 10/10/10/10

I absolutely loved this game. I enjoyed it far more than anything else I played this year...and yes that includes Breath of the Wild and Horizon Zero Dawn...I guess I'm just really into immersive sims. The environmental storytelling, the atmosphere, the ambience, the "lived-in" feeling that the entire space station has...it's all done so well. I especially loved some of the unexpectedly good segments like your first time through G.U.T.S., discovering the new Typhon powers for the first time in Psychotronics, min-maxing your build around Neuromod crafting, some fun enemies like the Poltergeist, etc. I agree that the beginning 1/3rd is the strongest part of the game. You feel so weak and you're terrified of everything, you think you're the only one left alive and one blow from a Phantom can kill you. I was sneaking around with explosive canisters in hand for so long until I finally found the Shotgun. It has all the makings of an excellent immersive sim and I easily got my $60 worth out of it.

The majority of the 'action' might be combat with the faceless Typhon, however a big aspect you've overlooked for the majority of the game is world-building. The game went to incredible lengths to make Talos1 feel like its own place, every room has a story of what it was before and after the outbreak, each and every crewman is accounted for with a great amount of work put into emails, audio logs and so forth that tell us a story, even all the dimensions of the entire station fit together whether that be inside or out the station. I would also say that you are missing out on the angle of empathy that the game is going for. How much you empathize with the lives of the people of this station, how much length you go to pick up the pieces to understand what is going on. 'Looking through the looking glass' is something the devs very much wanted to combine with how you as a player empathised with the situation of Talos1. The player like a Typhon might just feel that it's just a game, a series of foes to punch your way through and on some level Prey does try to peel back the curtain and poke you to think about how you played the game at the end. I do agree though that the majority of the game falls a bit flat because of its reliance on a linear series locked door quests. Exploring new areas of the station is fun and interesting but the main storyline is mostly disconnected from that. On some level you even acknowledge this, saying that the end of the game feels long in the tooth because you are now going back through old areas that have already been explored. Once the locations are known, there's less fun in backtracking even if the same rooms are now filled with combative robots, or the boss Typhon. To me in the end, I like the premise of the game. Alex has tied up a Typhon to basically say to it 'let me tell you the story of my people'. He then watches to see how you think and act, how you handle the situation, how you think if literally put in his brother's shoes, how much you *empathise*. In this case, it seems that Campster spent his time focusing on looking through the looking glass to almost the exclusion of everything else, breezily dismissing most of Alex's story as a long boring combat sequence. I think we failed. This isn't the one. Start over.

January talking about the purpose of existence is the best part of the game imo. Glad you included most of it, although you left out the great line about deciding your purpose if you weren't made for one.

Have you checked out Joseph Anderson's video on Prey? It's stupidly long like all his critiques, but I think he provides a pretty swell alternate take on the ending that I hadn't considered. That's not to say that alternative contrarian interpretations are inherently superior, but it casts Alex and the player character in a bit of a different light that feels worth considering.

Another point I want to make: Alex and Morgan are the rare example of asian characters given the leading roles and portrayed in non-stereotypical ways. Super refreshing for me

The credits are skippable, on PC as of Aug 2017 (at least).

Strongly disagree about the momentum being killed towards the end. I spent a lot of the game covering each area with a fine comb and then as everything began kicking off towards the end I felt more compelled to pick up the pace. Because I was so familiar with the layout I was able to leap and dash my way across the terrain when the game called for urgency (which it definitely did with the crew being at risk or Dahl riding the elevator up to the Arboretum. This is one of the few games I've played where it really felt climactic. The fake ending felt a little deflated but then the true ending after the credit made the whole thing feel complete. This is my game of 2017 so perhaps I'm willing to gloss over some of its flaws but the run up to the end wasn't one of them in my opinion.

Dang. I can't believe you were so harsh on prey in this video. Been watching your video for years so I expected you would love it. I'll sum up my response by just saying that prey is one of the few video games I've played that feels intrinsically rewarding to play. It's not about the destination but how you got there.

I sincerely hope that in-game choices aren't a reflection of our true selves. Because the crimes i committed in paradox grand strategy games i'm going to hell.

Okay I'm on board with most of this except the "do they live or do they die" thing being a video-gamey thing. So, in the beginning of the game and as it's shown many times throughout, Typhon are not supposed to empathize in any way. Which is why when you make the choice to save any human, you are rejecting your typhon side and embracing your human side. Of course that's only put into context after the end reveal (also why this game needs multiple playthroughs to experience everything) but regardless, it's still you choosing whether or not you want to be empathetic or not and that's basically the whole theme of the game (and why there's multiple achievements for it). Who are you? Are you human, are you typhon? Are you both? Or are you neither? That's the main theme of the game and it resonates with what January asks you when you go to scan the nodes: what is your purpose, Morgan? What were you made for? And part of choosing which identify you want to be is based on who you choose to be throughout the campaign. Every side quest, every mission, basically everything in the game feeds back into who Morgan is as a person. Are they even a person at all? So yeah, its definitely not filler but more so there to reinforce your choices at the end. Of course it's not hammered into you constantly so it can feel looser than other story elements that you're forced to witness but otherwise, the middle of the game is actually the most important part of the game BECAUSE of how it all loops back into its main themes.

I'm surprised you didn't appreciate the false Cook more. It wasn't a question on whether you kill him or not, it's just that Arkane's recent games try to give you as much freedom to kill NPCs as they can. The Cook provides a lot of good suspense to the Apex typhon's arrival at the end of the game, and otherwise has some good dialogue about morality.

Best game in years, and best System Shock 2-like to date. it's a shame a much worse Dishonored got a lot more attention.

Gretchen, stop trying to make 0451 happen! It's not going to happen

Engaging Meta-textually is the new Ludonarrative dissonance

Goddamnit, you long-form video game critics and your videos about games I haven't played yet. (Adds to Watch Later list) That makes you, Noah Caldwell and Joseph Anderson with Prey videos on there.

I think the reason they hid the big twist at the end of the credits was largely because they were implying the credits were part of the simulation. I think it's actually really clever, but I can understand the frustration. Also, I don't know how the game is on PC, but the credits were totally skippable for me.

>.> I actually really liked the third segment because...honestly, I really liked exploring the station, and the changes to the station made scrambling through it again with first murderbots and then with a uber typhon.

Neuroshock sounds better let's be real

I despise the fact that immersive sims sell so poorly. In my perfect world, this would have sold tens of millions of copies and encouraged other devs/publishers to dabble in the genre. Arkane are one of the last beacons of hope for the genre and even then I'm worried Bethesda won't really let them experiment and do their thing because immersive sims are so niche. We'll see how Deathloop turns out, you can see Arkane are trying to squeeze that 0451 DNA in there, but Prey might just remain their magnum opus in my mind. I adore this game.

For people interested in this game and having trouble committing after hearing ES talk about the third major part after scanning the coral, using your research notes found in a sub category under the data tab will assist you with fighting the machines. You can also pull up weaknesses and immunities as a quick reference when you pull down your psychoscope and target an enemy, however the notes give you more details into their patterns and gives you recommendations on how to combat them. I do not believe Prey is a hard game even with all the survival modifiers and on Nightmare difficulty, but I don’t see any reason to not make Research it’s own dedicated section in your menu so all players can see it clear as day.

2:27 I’m not sure if this is the first time you played it, but it looked like you were thinking “whaaat the fuuuuckkk?!?”

Just a quick note -- the 7 minute closing credits *are* skippable. Just press ESC and go right to the ending. Not obvious, but still.

I wish you emphasized the connection between the themes of this game and classical Gnosticism more. The rejection of physicality as an artificial lie, created in ignorance and serving as a trap and a prison seems to resonate very strongly

i always prceived this ending like the kid that faceplants the floor during atheltism class but then gets up and does a flourish.. XD

The flaw in the idea of using an extended simulation (or, a video game) to judge a person's character is that the average player *dies* about a hundred times before reaching the end. It conditions your behavior. Your genuine responses get you sent back to try again until you fall in line. In other words, they're giving you nothing but a hammer and judging you for treating all your problems like nails. It's a limitation of the medium. Anyway, there's a lot of cool stuff going on here. Someone told me about the D&D sheets, and I assumed it was just a cute pop culture reference, but it's actually there to reinforce the narrative themes? That's awesome.

But what happened after Tommy stepped into that portal Elhuit created in his bar?

Prey... One of the most fascinating and competent games I've played that I didn't like. Way too much respawning crap for me. By midway through the game I had just started sprinting through everything rather than exploring.

Just finished the game so I could watch this. What an unexpectedly fleshed out game, loved so many aspects of it.

I think it's also worth mentioning how, because you don't know about other options until towards the end of the game, the decisions you make over who lives and dies on Talos I are made with the apparent knowledge that you're going to destroy the station in the end. In that light, the decisions are less game-y, at least in my opinion - saving Mikhaila or Igwe, for example, becomes somewhat of a question about mercy killing. It's also implied that the neuromods that have been produced on Talos I are going to result in the spread of Typhon regardless of if the station is cleared of them, because that exotic material is in the brains of about 8000 people, if that announcement in The Yellow Tulip is to be believed. Thus, in my opinion, the decisions are more complicated than "do you save people or leave them to die". That's my take, anyway. I think the themes are broader than just identity and truth, but those are also prominent.

Okk but return of the king absolutely makes its 6 endings work

PREY has some really creative weapons, but damnit if the starting pistol isn't the worst, most boring looking handgun mode ever to be put in a game.

Holy shit! PsychoShock would be a dope name!

The credits aren't unskippable, unless that got patched in later

Those first two acts were some of the most enjoyable time I've spent playing a game this year, but when the kill bots showed up, I checked out. The last few hours I spent with Prey were running between loading screens to fulfill the end state, which is sad. Could they not have thrown some human combatants at us at that point? The implications of wholesale slaughter probably would have raised a more loaded debate for the ending scene, deconstructing Typhon Yu's reaction to human aggression. For a game I so thoroughly enjoyed going in, it's frustrating to see it fall apart so spectacularly in the end.

Not sure if I missed it, but Calvino may also be a reference to Italo Calvino, who would tie in pretty well with the themes of artificial spaces, mind, and imagination

Also is Lorenzo Calvino an nod to Italo Calvino.

Do you think calling the guy ‘Calvino’ is a reference to Italo Calvino?

Enjoyed most of this analysis! One notable omission tho - when discussing themes, how did you miss the Trolley problem at the beginning of the game, and how that theme came through in so many of the missions throughout the game? The resolution of most missions is not just “do the video game thing of kill the bad guy or spare them”. It’s an interesting exploration of humanity to choose to save the people right in front of you, even if they’re doomed by the inevitable death of the station’s destruction. And the ending mission ties in perfectly to this - should you destroy the space station and everyone on it, or should you load everyone onto a spaceship to escape, even if that risks Earth’s safety? Many of the game’s missions also tie into this idea. Anyway, glad you could somewhat enjoy the game, despite it feeling inconsistent in your opinion. I loved the gameplay, the atmosphere, and the weight of the choices in this game, and can’t wait to see what Arkane Austin does next!

now I want to play it but it'll never run on my computer. ha, I think 2012 was the last year I could play new releases. I should save some money and upgrade.

Boy...prey was no System shock/Deus ex/Ultima underworld (probably because i always saw Arkane studios as "that studio that is inspired by Looking Glass studios...but isn't quite as good) that said: if for a few years we could have less generic multiplayer shooters/mobas/sandboxy third person stealthy things in exchange for more Crpgs/immersive sims even at the "not optimal" level that prey offered...i would suddenly be happy with modern triple A otherwise i will sill keep playinga mostly old Wrpgs,indies and middle market games

So I haven't finished this game, so keep that in mind when I talk about your take on the final twist. That being said, I think I can see the thought process of the developers making the twist a post-credits scene. It could be an attempt to make the players think that what happened on Talos I was real, and that there's no further mysteries to uncover. And then, when you get to the end of the simulation (the credits), you realize that you've also ended the in-universe simulation. That being said, I haven't played the game, so I'm not sure if that will be my reaction if/when I finally DO finish it.

"minimal spoilers," you say?

As far as the Genocide/Pacifism Choices go i think their not as plump as Chris potrays them. I saw them as choice between choosing between Typhoon and Human. If you dig deeper we learn that due to their Neural Structure the Typhoon as Species are literally biologically incapable of Empathy. Relatively early in the game you enter Talos-I´s Pychotronics section, the Part were they create they Neuromods, who are manufactured from Exotic Material harvested from Typhoon Tissue. It is here were we first encounter the first moral choice in the Game: Release a innocent Prisoner or release a Mimic on him. if you chose Option A the Prisoner will give you the Code to the Armory. If you chose Option B the Typhoon will eat the Prisoner, Multiply and then recycled into Exotic Material ready to build into Neuromods. the Game asks you to assume an identity. Empathy or Genocide Shotgun Ammo or Neuromods Weapons or PSI-Powers Human or Alien

Good Thoughtful analysis. I certainly enjoyed the game, but don't love like i do other 0451 games. I agree it has some pacing flaws, especially in the third act. I hated those military drones. Kinda wish they had pulled a Black Mesa and had proper human enemies for a while. Never really though about the looking glass theme as much as you did, but is cool the work has some meta-texuality.

It being called Prey was a big miss for me. I don't read much about upcoming games or watch any trailers or anything so I had no idea this was a Shock game. If I knew maybe I would have looked into it. Or maybe not, after Bioshock Infinite. It sounds like an interesting premise with a bit of a flawed execution, though I guess that's kind of the norm for them

Good video. I just beat the game for the first time, and I don't know if you missed it on your playthrough or it was patched in later (likely the latter), but the credits are skippable.

Saying gameplay comes second to philosophical themes? I guess I'm giving this channel the skip. I personally hated the final cut scene because it made everything you did, all the people you got to know, all the small choices you made entirely pointless.

I didn't mind the ending half, infact I liked it. The sense of constant urgency and the sense that "I might not be able to do all of these". I thought it was great. It made me feel very tense, however, the one part that did feel a bit forced was the whole military guy and his murder bots. They did set that up earlier, but I kept thinking "do I really have a reason to go after this guy? why? yeah he's an asshole, but so is everyone else on the damn ship"

"Do he die or do he live?" Despite listening in the background, I lowkey had to open up the video again. Forgot whose video this was for a second. XD

Clearly the after-credits sting is just a reference to Human Revolution. I didn't know about that for years even after I replayed the game several times.

FPS games are fundamentally incapable of dealing with issues that do not revolve around killing things or people on a thematic/game-mechanical level

To me it had some great ideas and the presentation was fantastic, but it was *tiresome* in ways it shouldn't have been. The endless retreads of Talos to do this quest or that just with added monsters got to be a chore. I don't think its message was that cohesive either. Cool game though, and a fitting farewell to the summer of 0451.

Please talk about a Halo game, or the series as a whole. Those are so important to modern gaming and I've found very little writerly content produced about those games.

I don't think any game is worth it just for it's opening anything. All that is is a gimmick, and gimmicks cannot be reused easily and still retain any punch.

you say reasons for them not using the shock formula, but it still probably would have been a better name than prey

How does this video have such low engagement? How is prey not more well known? It is such a genius game for those who like divergent gameplay.

This game is cool and all... but I just want a bounty hunter prey game...

Good review, pretty much how I felt about the game too. There's a lot to like, but it just didn't come together for me in the end.

I mean, some of the game's concepts are neat but... they shouldn't have rebooted an existing IP to _do_ that. It still bugs me that they did.

I was aghast at how terrible those ending credits were. Really enjoyed the game overall, though, and it strikes me as terribly underrated.

Overblown, psuedo intellectual nonsense. Prey is terrific but its a sci fi horror in space. End of. Its best bits are the setting, the station design and the need to see how things flush out in the end.

On a sidenote, is there any reason this shares the name of Prey 2006 instead of being an original IP? I mean, they may as well have called it Ghostbusters or The Thing.

I like the game, wish it was by another name. Would have liked to see the previous idea come to fruition

While I am disappointed this was not a review of the original Prey this was a lovely video.

I swear why does every shock game have to have a terrible or just really lackluster 3rd act?

Still the end cut scene / credit scene in Deus Ex Mankind Divided shames is even worse.

Lol. I get the feeling Chris is really done with 0451 titles for a little while.