Man that would get on my nerves too, I mean the credits ON THE RECORD. That’s how everybody was learning who made the beat, and that’s one of the best beats on the record you could make a case for it being the best
To Paul's credit, I hand off samples I find that I think "sound like them (the producer)" very liberally. That's just my style maybe, so I do understand the point. Introducing someone to something doesn't necessarily preemptively garner you any credit for the final product's end result.
He might have done the court session stuff, but the beat is all RZA. The "Wu-Tang Demo Tape" bootleg has RZA over the beat dating from before the Wu-Tang Clan even existed, much less Gravediggaz.
The first Gravediggaz demo "The House that Hatred Built" is from 1992. They existed for years before the album and actually almost gave up finding a deal until Gee Street offered to put the record out.
That was shady of Rza. All these producers do the same thing. Taking credit for something they didn't actually credit. Tomorrow they'll get a lead on more production work, based on something they didn't actually do. #ShadySh*t
It's RZA's beat. Check out the bootleg called "Wu-Tang Demo Tape". The beat is on there, minus the court session stuff. That was from before Wu-Tang even came together.
@@robertg9184 It could still be Prince Paul's beat. Gravediggaz made their demo in 1992, so Prince Paul could make the beat at that time and first gave it to RZA then used it in 6 Feet Deep later, I don't know, it's just my hypothesis.
@@robertg9184 LMAO shit isn't dificult to understand, the same sample from RNS used in Wu-Tang Demo Tape is the one he talking about here on this video used in Diary of a madman, not the beat that is there like you said, the sample is there! The same sample! you listen to both beats it does they really sound the same to you? wow
He's upset about the dude who was credited because he found the sample, but has no interest in giving credit to Johnny Mathis, without this song wouldn't have been possible. He don't even mentioned him.
Johnny Mathis didn't write the song (Billy Mays/Sony) and the label (Columbia) got the loot from the Mathis recording because they own the particular recording samples of the song. Paul ain't upset about name dropping, it wasn't his anyhow. He just wanted recog.
