Тёмный

Problem of Other Minds 

Philosophy Overdose
Подписаться 182 тыс.
Просмотров 7 тыс.
50% 1

Do we know what others are thinking or feeling? Indeed, do we even know that others have thoughts or feelings at all? If so, how? Jack Reynolds gives an introductory talk on this topic and considers two main types of response to the “problem of other minds”: those that are inferential in nature and argue that perception of others alone is an insufficient justification, requiring either an argument by analogy, or an inference to the best explanation; those that are non-inferential in nature, advocating either direct perception of others in some core emotions, or the view that certain experiences that we do have (e.g. shame) presuppose the existence of others.
This was from a talk given by Jack Reynolds back in 2013 at La Trobe University as part of a series on philosophical problems.
#Philosophy #Epistemology #Skepticism

Опубликовано:

 

15 июн 2022

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 14   
@scoon2117
@scoon2117 2 года назад
DAVID FOSTER WALLACE: Here is just one example of the total wrongness of something I tend to be automatically sure of: everything in my own immediate experience supports my deep belief that I am the absolute centre of the universe; the realest, most vivid and important person in existence. We rarely think about this sort of natural, basic self-centredness because it’s so socially repulsive. But it’s pretty much the same for all of us. It is our default setting, hard-wired into our boards at birth. Think about it: there is no experience you have had that you are not the absolute centre of. The world as you experience it is there in front of YOU or behind YOU, to the left or right of YOU, on YOUR TV or YOUR monitor. And so on. Other people’s thoughts and feelings have to be communicated to you somehow, but your own are so immediate, urgent, real.
@0ptimal
@0ptimal Год назад
I don't always know how I get to a solution, but I often do, and I've concluded that somehow perception is the answer to "the riddle".
@yddub111
@yddub111 2 года назад
Reading all your comments is amusing....especially since none of you are real...
@jakubsawinski6510
@jakubsawinski6510 3 месяца назад
Lol the sudden cut off at the end, did I really listen to it or was it just a hallucination feeling :D
@sea-bass-
@sea-bass- 10 месяцев назад
I think therefore I am. How do I know you think? I can measure signals in your brain but I cannot interact with your thoughts, I cannot experience them because they are metaphysical.
@mxultra8995
@mxultra8995 11 месяцев назад
The last bit makes no sense. The initial person has to assume the sentients of "other" otherwise shame isn't felt. You can feel shame in a dream but once you realize its a dream and that everyone is just you there is no way to feel shame except via a lingering moral compass.
@sea-bass-
@sea-bass- 10 месяцев назад
where can I get the full lecture?
@Milton..
@Milton.. Год назад
I know nothing.
@rafaelvelazquez460
@rafaelvelazquez460 Год назад
This is a dangerous philosophy to some. Should not be spread.
Далее
The Problem of the Criterion
36:09
Просмотров 6 тыс.
The Problem of Other Minds
52:42
Просмотров 8 тыс.
Paradoxes of Irrationality - Donald Davidson (1981)
1:10:48
Philosophy of Mathematics & Frege (Dummett 1994)
1:32:32
Hilary Putnam on Meaning & Externalism (2011)
35:43
Просмотров 8 тыс.
The Power of Lies to Transform Your Love Life
2:57
Просмотров 251 тыс.