Producer Grind's TB Digital Tries MPC ONE and.... 

I wouldn’t write off the possibilities of using both Ableton and MPC hardware. I use both and it’s a great time.

@@pushermode I agree, use both if you can. each have their own differences

You can do both hardware and software. My workflow is to make everything on hardware and finish in Ableton or your DAW of choice.

Facts! And you can touch light or push down hard on the pad while holding the note repeat creating some dope dynamics on the fly

my pleasure

That second sample had me hooked, without any drum pieces honestly.

@@robertprince2651 those drums were extra hard too

@@AveMcree Hittin it on the 4 had me stank-facing.

🙌

he definitely killed it

I think the MPC ONE is the perfect entry level groove box with some huge advantages over modern production tools. Less is more frfr

@@AveMcree Yes Sir; Mannie Fresh made bundles of hit with very few items.

What do you use instead of MPC now? I'm just snoopy.

@@towerrunner4675 I hope it’s FL!

@@towerrunner4675 doin' plenty in the DAW--reason 12 & bitwig. (still gotta learn bitwig, though. really cool, really powerful work environment, just really different from what I'm used to.) but I have the synthstrom deluge, the polyend tracker & the digitakt--among bunches of other hardware bits. so, those two cover what I was getting from the MPC ONE. if I could get the new school MPC with just the sampling & sequencing capabilities--same I/O & everything--just without all the internal synths & stuff, I'd be all about it. but all that stuff in there... it's just bloat for me. (I know it's pretty good quality, but... I won't use it.) & then they're constantly trying to sell you more of it. it's just really offputting & distracting for me.

@@fallprecauxionsmusic Thanks. I also wait for that type of MPC. Something like an "MPC Mini" (rumors) with just a touchscreen and 16 pads. A bigger Pocket Operator, if you will 😄.

@@towerrunner4675 I've heard of that buzz about some sort of mini MPC type thing... & polyend has released the mini tracker to much acclaim, so... hopefully akai will follow suit.... I'd be into it. sounds like you would too.

I have the mpk mini plus and MPC software. The sound is unbelievable

@@boomboombaby9140 how do you like the feel of it? is it functional with fl studio or do you use a different daw?

@@DonovanJamesOfficial I use it with the mpc2 software . Because it gives you a hardware sound .

@boomboombaby9140 that's dope. I'm gonna have to get an mpc soon.

frfr

Bro wtf are you talking about?

​@@jmorrisey79😂😂😂 he's young so don't be to hard on him lol

The MPC limiter or the Maximizer is GOAT bro... I just don't use it because I have LANDR.

use AIR transient designer.. it has a limiter in it

yeah he murdered those beats

yeah it j reads wav files like any other software . like your phone does

Scarlett gets the job done. But the Apollo puts your sound at another level of quality. Sounds louder and cleaner than the 2i2 or any interface at the Scarlett price range

It's a good budget interface but you'll notice a whole difference once you step into the UA world. Trust, I've own every audio interface on the market.

even with the fl key it's even simpler but yea too each his own

@@Kyoju252 huh?

@@Kyoju252 longtime fl user and own multiple MPC's myself, including the X. I just don't see it. I've used the MPK with FL, which was great and now the flkeys, even better and you don't even have to touch a mouse if you don't want to, other than deep edit in the piano roll, which is much less tedious than MPC's piano roll. Both the controllers I mentioned have just about any function imaginable that can be linked to user banks. There's just really no valid argument that can be made. Either ppl don't know about their options, too lazy or don't care.

@@Kyoju252 I don't understand ppls reluctance to make ignorant statements. I understand the advantages and disadvantages of both MPC and FL just fine. I'm not sure about other controllers, but all of the MPK and Arturia controllers are plug and play right out of the box. Writing python script not necessary. I will agree with the registry key BS with the key though.

@@badboy69cancer Yeah... the arguments are very subjective. It's like proclaiming a certain type of woman is better than others. I come from a background of using hardware sequencers, drum machines, sound modules, samplers, keyboards, analog mixers, tape recorders, FX units, etc. I still have some of these devices and I can say I don't miss using any of it! No more days of tracking bad cords, patching sh*t together, having numerous adapters to fumble with or needing to trade up equipment. Compared to that workflow, a computer is standalone! The day I decided to switch to a computer workflow was a change for the better and made more sense financially. Why is the MPC always in the conversation with FL Studio and never Abelton Live or other programs?

You getting a result bro.. just not a good one apparently 😂... it's called PRACTICE. The shit works believe it or not.

Why not?

he's still learning but he's off to a better start than me lol

@@AveMcree I feel it.. I think manual hi hats gon creep back into the game.

@@freshestinclass763 arp mode. Saves time

@@soulbeatzmajor Id agree, however you can still make the Hi hats more dynamic using 16 levels. Each velocity level enables for pitch, cutoff, envelop, amp attack, pan, sample start, and filter envelope attack... Meaning that with arp mode set at "accented" it takes more work to create dynamic hi hats or drum patters that arent 'random' .. Its WAAAy more expressive, especially when you Round robbin your shakers or hi hats.. then you have 4 velocity layers AND all of the above modulation,

lol then we'll know if they actually watched the video