You can't "Accept for Deposit and Value". Those are opposing terms. Acceptance for value means you've performed and are operating in honor of the reorganization of the Emergency Banking Act. You have to understand what you're doing by acceptance and why it's being sent back to the corporation. Making it an instrument to be deposited makes it a non-negotiable instrument. What you want is to convey a negotiable instrument back to them, one which they can in turn convey/transfer right title and interest to the Treasury, thereby completing a valuable exchange. It's a good attempt, but you're missing some very key elements here. I recommend keeping up your bill payments until you get remedy going this route.
@@willtuanaki1854 🤦♂️ love it. Thankfully I was keeping up on em. Thank you for your clarification here as well. Your words are helpful for everyone who wants to pay attention! I see the difference now.
My other question: Can there be any bad consequence for writing this on your Statement Billing portion, with the codes, if the bank or whatever, winds up stating, they DO NOT accept it ??? Has anyone suffered a bad consequence for TRYING this on their billing statement when they mailed it in? Please respond.
Man! I’m excited for you! I haven’t actually done anything yet. There are definitely many creators talking about this. I’ve listened to a lot. I’d like to see the outcome of this BOE. Thank you for sharing. I’ll never forget the statement: If you want to hide something put it in a book.
Honest and truthful answers are hard to come by, and honestly, I have no idea. I havent done any research on the way of Medicare Part B Premiums, but if a paper statement comes in the mail with the coupon attached, there should be a way! Check out the coupon clipping service through the DTCC.
Whats up Cam, So how did it turn out? Ive had success with the a4v / r4d (restricted endorsement "for deposit only") i wnt and ordered rubber stamps in order to make it more professional and only then did it start to work its magic.
@@CameronPrickett unless a demand is made ie; "demand for lawful money per 12USC411'', check out lawful money clause, critical [recognized by congress/irs] yet seldom mentioned, would be a loose end that many 'instructing' on these matters online leads one to skepticism on if the multitudes watching are being set up to fail
I've sent some others as well, but I've only faced roadblocks from the institutions. I'm learning that it's more about informing the governing body of your state/country that you're no longer a minor and wish to gain guardianship over your person and estate.
@@CameronPricketti just recently learned this as well, in that its more effective to go thru the necessary processes/paperwork to have your Age of Majority placed on the record before sending in restrictive indorsements, even though not doing so could work as well (but likely with some form of arbitrarion or litigation). Does that sound accurate to you too?
@@Overth_inc Very true. I've been continually studying since I made this video, and that part is very important. It's important that you do that through the county in which you were born/your ens legis was registered.
The company didn't mark my account as paid. They have a third party accept the payments by mail. So if I were to obtain remedy on this particular case, I'd have to go through the court, and use the administrative process and contract law to my advantage.
you are missing the endorsement language, u need to use the stamp on 328.5, but switch fed reserve for the language in 328.6, and the number has to be a negative. your pay to order info goes on back. put registered mail bar code on the security.
Are you, yourself, a _Bank_ ? (The specific instructions you read from Cornell Law clearly states in the title of the section, and in the summary, that this section and endorsement is For Banks.) Wouldn't you rather convert it from a _Bearer Security_ (check) to a _Book Entry Security_ (credit) to your account?
@@j.pocket you bring up a great point. If the ens legis is not a bank, then there may be problems here. How do you go about converting such security in that way?
We're currently suing Synchrony Bank in federal district court for breach of contract over non-acceptance of negotiable instruments tendered for payment on a PayPal credit card. I don't think it really matters that much beyond what's spelled out in the Bill of exchange Act how to indorse a bill. There's nothing else available to pay with.
Only thing I don't agree with that code as it's not what it means nor does it apply to what people think it does. Reading titles matters followed by section and in this case of section it's irrelevant. I'd say people should be more focused on understanding whether or not why we're in a debt wealth society when you read the Federal Reserve Act, Modern Money Mechenics, the entirety of HJR-192 and not the sexy sound bytes you hear on the internet with a paragraph only, and last but not least reading UCC 3, the UNICITRAL Model Law, and understanding GAAP because it's all accounting. Oh and a big thing, 7/10 times they will reject this because they either don't read, refuse to read, or a highly incompetent meaning you have to take them to court by way of administrative process. If that's something you're not ready for doing, stop what you're doing and study more to understand than to bum rush into a situation where you're not ready to stand on what you know.
@@Preston1997 paying this bill as normal now. The lender never directly accepted the payment, as they have a 3rd party company that deals with mail in payments. It will be written off as a business expense as it stands now. I’m getting ready to start the administrative process on the company ‘servicing’ my mortgage because they are unable to verify the debt. I will be documenting that process as well.
@@CameronPrickett I figured as much. Seems like the enforcement is where “they” win. Is there a way to get in touch privately? I don’t think you’re too far from me.
@CameronPrickett did you send it disfiguring to the address that states remittance payments an instruments labeled paid in full? I saw you got the address off the billing fine print but couldn't tell if Taya the line you got it from
Whatever happened to Winston Shrout? You might want to look into that. He knew the ins and outs of this stuff, and they put him in jail for 10 years, i think.
It IS technically legal. Most Law is commercial jurisdiction, US is a corporation which sets up corpses for each "Citizen" born in it's jurisdiction. Ur social security card is insurance on your 'Trust' issued by a bank. Usury is technically illegal 😂 but over the years they finagled work arounds so much that it has become commonplace to just accept what we are told about how money, currency, & promissory notes ACTUALLY work. They have not had to deal with this in decades and will not know what to do. The way I know this is true is because we all learned as children that if u don't have a check IT IS LEGAL to write on a napkin if you write the right things. 🤑
Great information of course but it does state the word in it Bank, you are not a bank! but however! all banks they have trustees! so he will have to get that over to the bank trustees to do it on behalf of the bank
Well this video confirms this guy's completely Goshen us. All the terms he has attempted to use have either countered themselves or gave wrong explanation with wrong remittence performing outline. Ok if settling an account u will credit the same to , transfer principle to xyz company deposit same to minor acct listed within terms expressed in cover page. Must tender to treasury when looking recive lawfull payment whichbis tran a fering of credits to tda registered through living estate or forign grantor trust.. stop playing buddy.. some if us are savvyy in this form of bennifets accommodated through new deal and emgemcy banking act as well as endorsement procedures of a new deal or new kind. Restrictive is when u stated whom thus payable to such as bearer etc.. signing without listing payee via payable to is blank endorsement . Those must tender to to u.s. treasury or fiscal services dept. Xyz still cresit same to .. must direct what the intrest instructed as to. Btw this is not administering estate in completion this is merrily billing statement instruction from acting agent yeah . Get u some folks.
And lockdowns based on fraud have serious consequences. Fraud committed by governments and CEOs of most organisations. Look into it. Your SIGNATURE creates the money. The trust was put in place for this reason
You can’t be a sovereign and a citizen. That’s oxymoron. A citizen is a slave. A sovereign is not. We are sovereign at birth but the certificate turned us into bonded ‘stock’
“PROOF OF CONCEPT” ??? I’d like to know how the company responded when they received that! I’d also like to know, in today’s world, even if this is entirely legitimate and indeed a way we could take back our personal sovereignty, just like our money, it is only valuable because others believe it’s valuable too,… so when others believe that you’re committing fraud, and like most people today, refuse to even consider the legitimacy of your claim. So, my point is… how can I pay my electric bill with the document itself without being taken to court by some closed-minded idiot suffering from Trump Derangement Syndrome who’s very religion is based on ‘their version’ of the truth. And all other truths are inherently false and blasphemous.
@@corrosioncrawler5706 in this particular case, the company has contracted a third party company that accepts their mail-in payments, so they can’t be held responsible for fraud related to the negotiable instrument that was mailed to them. Upon the mailing of the negotiable instrument, they still let addressed me to ‘pay’ in the way we’re used to.
@@CameronPrickett thanks for your response! The 3rd party you mentioned, I’m assuming this is just outsourcing their billing, correct, not a collection agency? Also, over time your principal balance should decrease with each ‘payment stub’ sent in?
@@corrosioncrawler5706 Yes, just to outsource their billing, not a collection agency. In theory, thats right, if you can enforce the accountability to each negotiable instrument.
the government system is a fraud. it states in their own regulation from 1933 that there is no money and thats the remdy instead themselves commiting treason
