Will be interesting on the micro. I have the compact and have shot 600 rds thru it with no issues. Now 550 of those rounds are my 124 gr reloads. The rest are my preferred carry ammo. Has a dot also, so far the gun has surprised me and on mine no Glock knuckle which is a win for me
My compact I removed the finger grove and did a double undercut on, much improved grip like that. The micro frame is basically perfect out of the box. I got a second frame that was sold as blem for 59 bucks a few months back too, and have LFA slide on it. Also has a built in comp but I can’t get any optic to hold zero on it, so I just shoot it irons for now
What an interesting in depth. Covering topics from Glock mag construction to Sig's expansion port design, weights effects on timing. And I agree with your outlook on the bag. In the hobby for a while, not needed or cared about. If you're new, it's a nice value add
I like that they did not put the rear sight on the removable plate like so many manufacturers so you have the possibility of putting co-witness sights on it and still being able to run a red dot
I got the RAVEN optic also. The mounting screws that PSA sent were for the Holosun and were way too short for the RAVEN. You'll need two M4 12mm screws and have to grind/cut the right screw down to about 11.5mm or so. Dry fit and tighten the optic down without Loctite and make sure the extractor rod inserts, removes and moves freely in the channel. If not, grind off a little more until it does. Then go ahead and apply the Loctite as usual and torque to spec. PSA sent me the wrong screws multiple times (including the warranty department), so apparently they don't even know which screws their own optic takes.
Shoot my C1 in uspsa every month, get reps in with my carry gun. I absolutely love it. Only issue is capacity, but I’m planning on getting some excess arms extensions, and maybe a grit grips mag well. I think my c1 shoots flatter than any of my full size or compact glocks or my compact dagger. The comp works wonders. Factory baseplates are also a little worrisome but I’ve had no issues yet
You asked about kits/cases like that. I think they are great , here it comes...But it would be better if it was full of extra mags. Being PSA I was (upon release) and still am surprised they're only shipping it with 1 stinking mag. 1 mag is a slap in the face from any company, more so from psa. As for the firearm I'm completely undecided about it all around. If that makes any sense
I had a problem with both mags in that the bottom plate was warped when being filled to capacity. I also put an optic on an aim surplus slide and my trigger failed. This was before PSA stated to use a shorter screw that they did not provide in packaging. Now I have a dagger micro lower they won't fix because I refuse to pay to send it back to them.
In Poland, this manufacturer's guns have a bad reputation, among other things, because of this film. Video in the linkru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-GEG9PG2WhbM.html
What are your thoughts, if any, on putting a complete MC1 slide on a 43x frame? I was given the same slide as the one in your video (complete), and im thinking should i switch out the internals of the MC1 and replace them with Glock OEM internals. Thanks in advance for any advice
Unfortunately I cna't advise in this situation. I left Glock behind years ago and haven't even held a 43x. I do recall PSA having some warnings about what is and isn't compatible.
If PSAs quality control was so horrible, i would be interested in their products. But their firearms definitely can't be trusted in a life or death situation.
Do you mean: "wasn't so horrible"? Don't you think that by now PSA has addressed the QC issue? Have you even held or fired a PSA product? How else would you know that they are as terrible as you say they are? What models did you own/test? Are you a gunsmith? Or are you just blowing out your arse?
