Sean is really one of the most entertaining lecturers on science for laypersons. He’s a great personality and excellent at simplifying complex ideas for us average enthusiasts. Thanks Sean!
It's been over 30 years since I got my M.S. in Physics, and during that time I have been teaching high school Physics, which can become mind numbingly mundane, even the A.P. classes. The upshot is that I have gotten rusty on advanced topics like Einstein's equation. His book, "The Biggest ideas in the Universe, Space, Time, and Motion" was a great review, and I can honestly say I learned some very useful Physics. In fact, it has inspired me to pull my intimidating 1,280-page book, "Gravitation" by Misner, Thorne, and Wheeler off the bookshelf and dive into it. However, even if you do not plan to go into the subject this deeply, you will benefit greatly from his approach. Having taught Physics for 33 years, let me give you some advice on how to approach this book to get the most benefit. 1) While the book is available as an Audible book from Amazon, you really need to buy the hardcover or Kindle versions. If you are an auditory learner, you can benefit from both, but do not rely solely on the audible version. I also recommend you have pencil and paper handy, and actually write down equations and study them until you feel you truly understand what they are saying (yes, I said "saying" because they tell a story). Doing this gives you two modes of learning, and if you also get the Audible version, you will have three modes of learning (auditory, visual, tactile). 2) Do not move on to the next concept until you are sure you understand the concept you are reading. This is not like reading a novel, missing something early on will affect your ability to learn and understand later concepts. 3) Take your time. It has been widely accepted that you will forget more than 50% of what you learn in the first hour after learning it. In fact, it is worse than that, you will forget 40% within the first twenty minutes. The way to combat this is to read and study a section on some concept, stop and come back to it an hour or two, a few hours, or even a day later and reread it. you will be surprised at how much you forgot. Don't believe this is true? Try answering this, how much do you remember from his talk? I mean truly remember to the point where you can explain it to another person, or even yourself. See what I mean? If you approach his book using these techniques, you will end up with a firm understanding that will stay with you for a lifetime. This is a great book so you should do your best to get as much out of it as he put into it. Wayne Y. Adams B.S. Chemistry M.S. Physics R&D Chemist (9 yrs.) Physics Teacher (33 yrs.)
I have so many interests that viewing your channel today was like going back in time. Thanks to all involved and a special thanks to Sean for his tireless work in bringing Physic to the masses..
I think I must have listened to every single Sean Carroll lecture,Interview, podcast he's ever appeared on. I'm just about to watch him at the Royal institute,, probably a similar lecture to this one. My memory is soooo bad ,,I need to keep at it . I promise myself one day I'll go back to school & learn all this for real.
Love the picture of the original Fiat 500 at 17:00. The "500" was the battle cry of a resurging Italy in the early '60s. It is admirable how the picture is showing the car in its most likely status through its lifetime, i.e. in need of some external energy input...
Sean's humor makes me laugh more than most comedians do. Like most humor, it is a connection between things that you had never imagined, but suddenly realize are completely obvious. In his case, though, the realizations are usefully educational, where he often reduces a complex idea down to a simple giggle. Then there are the statements about his "obvious" observations of life. _"You don't become a famous physicist by proving your predecessors right."_ Who discovered the Higgs boson? Who knows. But we know that Higgs was right. He's an amazing physicist, and a pretty good philosopher.
Why couldn’t my high school math teachers explain the fundamentals like Dr Carroll does? It would have put my brain in the right place conceptually and made trig a whole lot easier and calculus attemptable.
Very great lacture , I have watched many lactures on GR but today I had what I wanted. You are very knowledgeable professor, I look forward to watch your every lacture however if I find them.
Still waiting for WLC to answer Carroll's question from the Heard debate, on which logic exactly Craig uses, and how he knows that logic applies to the gods. LMAO. Carroll you remain amazing.
When I wrote the Miguel Alcubierre papers (I never imagined someone would give a child the name before sending him to school to claim false credit for the papers) E=MC2 is the missing equation that has be prodominate in the scientific communtity for years and wasn't missing. The Alcubierre equations explain warping space infront of the ship and my Einstein equation eE=MC2 has to do with expanding matter behind the spaceship
E=MC2 Energy=Mass Converted two times. It has to do with Warp Drive technology. One part Hydrogen exhaust and two parts oxygen exhaust converts matter behind a spaceship from gases to water, that then converts a second time into ice and expands. To make matter expand behind a spaceship while warping space infront of the space ship is as easy as using hydrogen and oxygen.
Just found the channel. I saw to all the videos from Sean on the Biggest Ideas in the Universe. This lecture is a great summary of those lectures. Always enjoy listening to Sean, he has a knack for taking complex ideas and making them understandable to most folks.
My equation for gravity was Newton's equation, I wrote E=MC2 as well, that is why Einstein said talk to Nikola Tesla if you want to talk to the smartest man on the planet.
Loved it all. I am an enthusiastic novice, and this was pitched perfectly for me. Brilliant. I especially like the Q&A - he really knows his stuff, even if he does try to keep it simple for guys like me
26:44 Not in Newtonian mechanics (its equations do not presume a preferred system at rest) but in Maxwell's electrodynamics (Maxwell's equations are true only in a certain system "at rest" (unless one changes the concepts of space and time which is what Einstein did), this was a huge conceptual problem before 1905). What Newtonian mechanics does presume is the idea of absolute simultaneity, so I think Sean misspoke here. 1:04:16 Schwarzschild was even better than that: he solved Einstein's equation already in 1915! His letter to Einstein informing him of his solution is dated 22 December 1915 and contains in it the formula shown on the slide. 1:07:00 In all fairness, this is not what they said. What Schwarzschild and Einstein thought (and many others until the early 1920s) was that the locus r=2GM merely corresponded to _the location of the central point mass._ This was an easy mistake to make in those days because Schwarzschild actually used a different coordinate system in his solution than Sean is showing on his slide, so for Schwarzschild this locus corresponded to r=0, and it seemed perfectly sensible to have an infinity there, given the fact that a spherical coordinate system is not even well-defined at the origin, as everyone remembers from high school. But this was a mistake, a particularly nasty mental trap to fall into, due to the fact that tensor calculus was still in its infancy in 1915 and nobody at the time had yet figured out that line element singularities need _not_ correspond to the _actual_ singularities of the _geometry._ They can be simply artefacts of the coordinate choice. Which is what happened here, and sometime in the 1920s (IIRC) people have finally figured out that r=2GM was not the locus of any geometry singularity, it was just one of those fake artefacts. Today we recognise r=2GM (Schwarzschild's r=0) as the location of the event horizon. 1:27:00 I believe the question was whether light _itself_ can be a source of gravity. The answer is yes because light also has its own energy-momentum tensor T which couples to spacetime curvature per Einstein's equation. 1:27:32 Strictly speaking Einstein's theory does not say that matter curves spacetime, it only says that the two are always correlated in that certain way. But correlation does not imply causation. So it may be that both are a result of something _else,_ yet undiscovered, which is the actual cause of both. So for now the answer is: we don't know. 1:29:59 I think Sean misunderstood the (clumsily formed) question: what would happen to the theory if we let the speed of light parameter go to infinity. The questioner had the right idea: the Schwarzschild spacetime would become flat. Similarly, if in _special_ relativity one allowed c go to infinity, one would obtain Newtonian mechanics with the Galilean transformation instead of the Lorentz one. An _excellent_ lecture, BTW.
Matter going into a blackhole and the blackhole shinking is compression theory. Kinda like putting a pillow into a plastic bag and vacuum sucking the air out to cause compression.
When I did "science" in school, Newton was correct and Einstein wasn't mentioned. That was obviously "old school" science. Perhaps, in the future, Einstein will suffer the same fate as Newton.
x2 is the positive x axis and negative x axis same for y2 and z2, they do a much better job explaining that in school than this guy does.... Generally y has an upside counterpart for the negative axis. It is important to be aware of the x2 y2 z2 axis's when flying a plane or a spaceship, not so important for driving a car x0 y0 z0 would be the neuatral axis. G is gravitally pull. Round objects in space is spacetime curving into itelf. The Earth, moon sun and so on and so forth. If there is a sphere or ball in space, it has a gravity well in its center pulling mass around.
Einstein's equations assume continuous variables. Quantum mechanics assumes discontinuous variables. We know the latter is correct, therefore the former is incorrect !
