Hello, i dont know if you still check your comments but i really wanted to say this. I first watched you when i was in first year of my college and i was having problems with learning the classical and operant conditioning. Now im in my final year and we came back to this topic again, which is wonderful not because im still having problems with remembering which is which but because your ABC method helped me sooooo much in my first year, that i know where to go when i get stuck again. You are a wonderful teacher, with great ideas of shortcuts and i love your teaching style. Thank you so much for these videos!
I watch the comments all the time - if a student has a question (does not matter if your my student or not) I try to answer - thank you for the comment about the ABC - it came to me when I was student - I tend to like to chunk material and it was worked for me so I use it with my own students - Also, Congrats on last year - oh man I remember my last exam on my last day and going home to watch TV with no guilty that I should be studying - only suggestion is have a pint of Ice Cream for that first non-guilty TV viewing - you put a real smile on my face
YOU ARE AMAZING! YOU'RE Humble you don't try to talk to show how smart or intellectul you are, but with direction and support to the learner. YOUR PITCH, STYLE, INTELLECT and INFORMATION IS SO EFFECTIVE AN ENGAGING. I understand your method of lecturing more so than anyone. I like most lectures but love yours, thank you 🤗.
You are truly a great lecturer. If you did not say evil as for the twins, then we would not known that the sisters were total polar opposites. I like the presentation and the process and choices you chose. Please keep placing videos for our viewing. I wish you would teach more, such as coefficiencies and other psychometrics. LOL
@@carlajackson-morris3590 Oh really psychometrics - UGGG - so your really hate me is what you are says - LOL. My grad school only offered that class at 8am on Mon/Wed morning. This is the class blame for my now complete addition to caffeine.
Loved this. Though I have one question, why is the soccer girl an "evil" twin? Was she evil because she didn't ask? Or just less than ideal. Did she define herself as "evil"? Or did the adults? What child defines themselves as "evil"? Perhaps there is a different word or phrasing. Plus it is putting the kid as a definer instead of the adults. I get what you are meaning to teach, but that starting point & assumption is flawed & changes the understanding of the concepts explained by it.
First of all, I would love to have you in my class. Most student’s do not catch the “good” and “evil” aspect. Second, I made these as a way for student’s who missed class to catch, so you will not get the full effect of the twin narrative. These twins appear several times through my class, but this is their first appearance. Later in the course we do cover perception and how that affects personality. This where my building of these twins comes back as a lesson. I ask the class the same questions you ask to show them how a sense of self is developed not only by our own actions but also by the actions of other. This shows the student that my defining of the twins as “good” and “evil” would not only have shaped the child concept of self, but I have also shaped their own concept of the twins and how they might react to each. I posted these on RU-vid a long time ago when this was the only way to share video files with my student. I never took them down because I found that there were many other students who have found them helpful over the years (that was not expected). I was thinking that I might make a collection of videos directed toward on-line viewers (not just my students) for Intro to Psy now that there is a greater demand with so many courses going on-line and I would be able to take out things like the twins that work in the classroom but not in a standalone lecture. Just have to finish up my own course videos first (just posted ones for several other courses I teach).
8:30 Does a puppy salivate the first time it sees food? If not, then seeing the food is a conditioned stimulus for salivating, isn't it? I would guess that the unconditioned stimulus for salivating is tasting the food.
First I am not a dog expect, so I am basing this basic animals with keen smell. A puppy may salivate the first time it see food, because smell it it primary sense organ. It will smell food far ahead of seeing it. The smell will stilimute the production of saliva.
You are welcome - trying to add more video now that so many student's are in on-line classes due to virus - I can share what I make for my own students
she is saying something that sounds way foreign and nothing like autonomic...it's like a new word LOL auto-tomic ??? UGH, I was distracted by that. And yes, otherwise, it was a good lecture.
Interesting overview but not very technically accurate. A number of the descriptions are not scientifically correct. The presenter doesn’t seem to understand the learning science very thoroughly. This is the problem with learning of RU-vid. For a much more accurate and scientifically valid education see Michael Domjans RU-vid channel
This is not a lecture about the technically of science or the scientific process. That is for a totally differnt class and time. This is lecture to help student get though an Introduction to Psy course. I encourage, with in my classroom, taking a deeper dive into and debating the scientifc process. Even Michael Domjans channel can be debated as to its content. I would also not recommend watching it if preparing for the Conditioning and Learning section for an Introduction to Psy course.
@@rjbirmingham I see your point and in general I agree however there is a lot of folk psychology and fundamentally inaccurate descriptions in the more technical areas of psychology and learning theory generally. Two quick points: firstly I look for good accurate tutorials so I can recommend my students to watch them to further understand thhe principles, but they need to be accurate, not folk psychology approximations that send people down the wrong path. Secondly, it appears that the majority of the online presentations are technically inaccurate and therefore giving people the wrong information and setting them up for failure down the track. Even if it is an introduction to psychology it needs to be correct and accurate otherwise we are setting them up to fail down the track. Certainly not meaning to offend, but some of these subjects are technical and unless we as educators fully understand the concepts we should be trying to educate others on them.
