Тёмный

Quantum Chromodynamics (QCD) 

Professor Dave Explains
Подписаться 3,3 млн
Просмотров 102 тыс.
50% 1

Electromagnetic force down, three more forces to go! Which one is next? Why it's the strong nuclear force, famous for keeping atomic nuclei together. What kind of particles will be involved in this quantum field theory, which is called quantum chromodynamics? Let's find out.
Watch the whole Modern Physics playlist: bit.ly/ProfDave...
Classical Physics Tutorials: bit.ly/ProfDave...
Mathematics Tutorials: bit.ly/ProfDave...
General Chemistry Tutorials: bit.ly/ProfDave...
Organic Chemistry Tutorials: bit.ly/ProfDave...
Biochemistry Tutorials: bit.ly/ProfDave...
Biology Tutorials: bit.ly/ProfDaveBio
EMAIL► ProfessorDaveExplains@gmail.com
PATREON► / professordaveexplains
Check out "Is This Wi-Fi Organic?", my book on disarming pseudoscience!
Amazon: amzn.to/2HtNpVH
Bookshop: bit.ly/39cKADM
Barnes and Noble: bit.ly/3pUjmrn
Book Depository: bit.ly/3aOVDlT

Опубликовано:

 

9 сен 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 121   
@davidlanham99
@davidlanham99 4 года назад
Oh, great, so now we have two periodic tables. That's nice.
@daffavirwandy7694
@daffavirwandy7694 4 года назад
Nice! You boron.
@aratof18
@aratof18 3 месяца назад
Splendid! You boson.
@mrdraco3758
@mrdraco3758 3 дня назад
What a strangely unique, yet charmingly accurate observation! You're a quarky one, aren't you?
4 года назад
I never learned before that for the strong nuclear force to exert force on/between quarks, a total of eight(!) gluons is required. Thank you professor Dave!
@elnuraliyev6603
@elnuraliyev6603 7 лет назад
Mr Dave, you are going more and more sophisticated! Lovely!
@chancelorhardy9893
@chancelorhardy9893 7 лет назад
It's so good to hear a vocal explanation of this. Keep doing what you do Dave!
@kjlee3577
@kjlee3577 4 года назад
Great ! I'm Korean and so impressed that I would like to introduce and share this link with my community members for Physics.
@vedekX
@vedekX 3 года назад
Been looking for a good description of this for like, a week, and this is the first time I've gotten it. Thanks for being so concise, I appreciate it!!
@tyruskarmesin5418
@tyruskarmesin5418 Год назад
I always picture red green and blue color charges as three 2D vectors at 120 degree angles to each other with a length of one. Negative charges just point in the opposite directions. With that, it makes sense that r + g + b = 0, r = - g - b, etc. Gluons (eg r - b) are vectors of length sqrt 2. It all just works out.
@salunkhesaurabh201
@salunkhesaurabh201 7 лет назад
After up and down quark. Everything went over my head (bouncer) Well greeat explaintion.. Its just my brain that didnt compete with what you were saying... Thank you professor... I wanted to learn quarks and got an Idea of it..
@engineeringconcepts138
@engineeringconcepts138 5 лет назад
Wonderful presentation. Super concise and definitely worth the small amount of time.
@JoyceGem
@JoyceGem 6 лет назад
wait, so the smallest particles are not atoms, but quarks?
@ProfessorDaveExplains
@ProfessorDaveExplains 6 лет назад
well atoms are made of quarks and electrons so those are definitely smaller, and there are other very teeny tiny particles like neutrinos, so no atoms are not the smallest particles by a longshot!
@jorgegaldos1400
@jorgegaldos1400 4 года назад
@Smit ShilpatulThe leptons are, as of rn, presumed to have no inner structure, so yeah they are considered to have no volume. For example, the electron is thought to be a point-like particle. Some experiments are gonna be going on rn at JLab to see if the electron has any inner structure at all. So it's still an ongoing question. However, I believe that the idea is, eventually when the true elementary set of particles is discovered, they should all be point-like with no volume.
@jorgegaldos1400
@jorgegaldos1400 4 года назад
@Smit Shilpatul I would say that mass is, in a sense, quantized. By the number of mass-contributing particles in an object(minus the energy binding them). And density is a macroscopic concept-- an object's mass is determined by the number of, and the types of particles, composing it. Density is a measure of how many of these particles are packed into a certain space. If we observe only 1 truly elementary particle, like a single electron, then(the consensus rn is) there's no volume, and *I'm* saying if there's no inner structure then it wouldn't have a density either. Density tells you something about the inner structure of something. Like how close together the molecules of a gas are. But, there is no inner structure to a point-like particle, so the idea of density wouldn't apply. If the electron was a black hole it would've decayed by hawking radiation very quickly and the universe wouldn't exist. So rest assured the electron is not a black hole and is not infinitely dense. Also the idea of tiny black holes isn't absurd, tiny black holes can be made here on earth, if u look into that it's some interesting stuff.
@PartialViewmusic
@PartialViewmusic 4 года назад
@@ProfessorDaveExplains Well, in the standard model neutrinos are not smaller than quarks and electrons. They are all point like particles and thus have the same size. In other theories this slightly change but in the standard model this is the way.
@ProfessorDaveExplains
@ProfessorDaveExplains 4 года назад
Fair enough, but atoms and nucleons are not point particles, so it is fair to call all point particles smaller than say, a proton.
@loicvalenti
@loicvalenti 7 лет назад
can't wait for the next one !! need to know
@ProfessorWaltherKotz
@ProfessorWaltherKotz 7 лет назад
This guy will have explained everything in about 2,14 years from now
@ProfessorDaveExplains
@ProfessorDaveExplains 7 лет назад
i think about ten years, but that's the goal!
@artsenor254
@artsenor254 4 года назад
Well, it's been something like two years now. How's stuff going ?
@user-pk9qo1gd6r
@user-pk9qo1gd6r 4 года назад
Turns out two years later he actually has to explain to people why the Earth is not flat.
@SpotterVideo
@SpotterVideo 2 года назад
@@ProfessorDaveExplains Quantum Entangled Twisted Tubules: When we draw a sine wave on a blackboard, we are representing spatial curvature. Does a photon transfer spatial curvature from one location to another? Wrap a piece of wire around a pencil and it can produce a 3D coil of wire, much like a spring. When viewed from the side it can look like a two-dimensional sine wave. You could coil the wire with either a right-hand twist, or with a left-hand twist. Could Planck's Constant be proportional to the twist cycles. A photon with a higher frequency has more energy. (More spatial curvature). What if gluons are actually made up of these twisted tubes which become entangled with other tubes to produce quarks. (In the same way twisted electrical extension cords can become entangled.) Therefore, the gluons are actually a part of the quarks. Mesons are made up of two entangled tubes (Quarks/Gluons), while protons and neutrons would be made up of three entangled tubes. (Quarks/Gluons) The "Color Force" would be related to the XYZ coordinates (orientation) of entanglement. "Asymptotic Freedom", and "flux tubes" make sense based on this concept. Neutrinos would be made up of a twisted torus (like a twisted donut) within this model. Gravity is a result of a very small curvature imbalance within atoms. (This is why the force of gravity is so small.) Instead of attempting to explain matter as "particles", this concept attempts to explain matter more in the manner of our current understanding of the space-time curvature of gravity.
@hinkles73
@hinkles73 4 года назад
I think it should be: u c t d s b with the mass increasing as you go right and the columns being particles that pair up nicely due to the weak force.
@tres-2b299
@tres-2b299 3 года назад
Actually in the regular standard model it is categorized: u s t d c b It is the same as your thing but with the strange and charm quark position switched, why? Because all the bottom row has that -⅓ charge, and the top row has the other charge
@bot0081
@bot0081 7 лет назад
I really love your videos professor Dave 💜
@loganfong8785
@loganfong8785 5 лет назад
this blew my mind
@jacquin8511
@jacquin8511 2 года назад
AND literary references... I'm in awe.
@sustainableslate
@sustainableslate Год назад
The fact this made sense when I'm in my first semester of physics is great
@aratof18
@aratof18 3 месяца назад
hey how's it going now
@aratof18
@aratof18 3 месяца назад
any tips for a high school senior?
@connorism69
@connorism69 4 года назад
Another very handy explanation. Will make sure to donate to your Patreon today.
@hinkles73
@hinkles73 4 года назад
You can increase the temperature enough to separate quarks into a quark-gluon plasma, by the way.
@carlrowlinson2833
@carlrowlinson2833 2 года назад
THANK YOU! I was struggling to understand why protons had positive electrical charge while neutrons didn't and the reason is so simply explained here
@NiloRiver
@NiloRiver 6 лет назад
I just think the colors are not only a choice for categorization... It's in fact the holy trinity behind everything in the universe R,G,B - X,Y,Z - W, H, D, positve, negative, neutral and so on.... The whole render of 3 Dimensional hologram just like in computer graphics.
@carultch
@carultch 2 года назад
The colors are completely arbitrary, and have nothing to do with actual color. The reason the color names are termed, is that it helps us visualize the way the property of color charge adds up. Red+green+blue adds up to white in actual colors of light. Any quark combination, be it a baryon (like protons and neutrons) or meson, will have a color charge that adds up to zero (analogous to adding up to white). We represent the color charges of anti-quarks with cyan/magenta/yellow, as they are used for the mesons where a quark and antiquark are combined. Think of the way ordinary numbers have a positive and negative sign. Now imagine a third sign that a number could have, that is "opposite" both of positive and negative. That is how the property of color charge works. It is a property that is principally located along three rays from the origin that you'd represent as 120 degrees apart.
@kiranvarma3070
@kiranvarma3070 3 года назад
Can gluons have momentum , just like photons, considering the fact that they haven't been observed freely?
@northernskies86
@northernskies86 3 года назад
yep. The strong interaction results from momentum exchange between quarks and gluons, similar to how the electromagnetic interaction is the momentum exchange of photons and charged particles.
@albertmendoza8330
@albertmendoza8330 2 года назад
Dave, you have been helping me since my general chemistry courses! Is there anything that you don't know!? Lol
@BlueCosmology
@BlueCosmology 3 года назад
The strong *nuclear* force does not bind quarks together, the strong force (or color force) binds quarks together. The strong nuclear force is a longer range force that is caused by the strong force. Similarly the strong nuclear force is not mediated by gluons (and hence particles in the nucleus are not held together by gluons). The strong nuclear force is mediated by pions.
@ProfessorDaveExplains
@ProfessorDaveExplains 3 года назад
The strong force and strong nuclear force are synonymous.
@BlueCosmology
@BlueCosmology 3 года назад
@@ProfessorDaveExplains They aren't (though they are very often confused), the strong nuclear force is the residual 'long range' effect of the strong force/color force (where long range is ~femtometres) , which as it's name implies is the force between nucleons, which is does via pion mediators not gluon mediators. The force between quarks is the strong force (or synonymously color force), not the strong nuclear force.
@rickfox4068
@rickfox4068 2 года назад
How does a Right Handed Top Quark decay? Weak Force only affects Left Handed Top's
@MoshkitaTheCat
@MoshkitaTheCat Год назад
Great video thank you!
@Trizzer89
@Trizzer89 2 года назад
Why would one quark have double the charge of another? Maybe the up quark can be split further
@donaldhenderson5039
@donaldhenderson5039 Год назад
Thanks Dave, Hopefully Cern won't form a black hole, love startrek original. Story - Orange mist in Bermuda as my ship passed, the 3 layers of pillow clouds, pillow space pillow, couldn't do the math Not Fractals, maby sub Log e
@narendranathkar5243
@narendranathkar5243 2 года назад
thanks sir for explaining it . thank u soooo much
@chaoshammbone2954
@chaoshammbone2954 4 года назад
Thank you for the information.
@leyharsiplayz2980
@leyharsiplayz2980 Год назад
Who else is here after watching young sheldon
@TheLastOne27
@TheLastOne27 4 месяца назад
Right here
@AnthonyNjenga-zb9tz
@AnthonyNjenga-zb9tz 4 месяца назад
Right here 😅
@MizumiGuzman
@MizumiGuzman 4 месяца назад
Finally gets to understand yk 😃
@S.A.M11
@S.A.M11 Месяц назад
🤣 me! Funny thing is now I want to learn everything about cqd
@leaxpickles
@leaxpickles Месяц назад
definitely not me
@shashankchandra1068
@shashankchandra1068 3 года назад
Can u send the 2D or 3D image of quantum field plz?(example:electron field,up-quark field)
@InterdimensionalWiz
@InterdimensionalWiz Год назад
like charged objects repel eachother, we can calculate the strength of the repelingness, however HOw does it work,what is the repelingness constructed of and how is the motive force communicated, how does it work? is this known by science?
@ProfessorDaveExplains
@ProfessorDaveExplains Год назад
Check the one on quantum electrodynamics
@InterdimensionalWiz
@InterdimensionalWiz Год назад
@@ProfessorDaveExplains so basically,it's not known by science HOW the repelingness functions.
@ProfessorDaveExplains
@ProfessorDaveExplains Год назад
@@InterdimensionalWiz It is. Momentum exchange by virtual photons. It's explained in the tutorial I mentioned.
@Ryanisthere
@Ryanisthere 3 года назад
richard Feynman called his fellow physicists idiots for coming up with such a confusing name
@mickshaw555
@mickshaw555 6 лет назад
Watching this thrice, getting clear.
@NovaWarrior77
@NovaWarrior77 4 года назад
Thanks!
@Eludinium
@Eludinium 2 года назад
Could it be that they are categorised as red green and blue because those are the primordial colours (think RBG cones in our eye) and these types of quarks are supposedly the primordium of an atom?
@carultch
@carultch 2 года назад
We choose to name the three signs of color charge after the three colors, because it helps us visualize how this property adds up. Just like red+green+blue adds up to white, a color charge of red + green + blue adds up to zero. It has nothing to do with actual color. Electrical charge can be positive or negative, while color charge can be a third sign, and the trinity of red/green/blue was the preferred convention for naming the signs of color charge. It either takes representation of all three directions of color charge to add up to zero (as happens with baryons like the proton and neutron), or it takes a color charge and an anti-quark of the opposite color charge, to add up to zero (as happens with mesons).
@pukulu
@pukulu 3 года назад
Obviously, the force between 2 quarks of different colors cannot strengthen forever as they are pulled apart. That makes no sense and will lead to infinities in the mathematics. Within a certain rather short distance though, it makes sense that it becomes increasingly difficult to pull quarks apart that are of different colors. Maybe this is just an ad hoc model that attempts to explain why individual quarks are never seen, but only mesons (quark - antiquark pairs) and baryons (particles made up of 3 quarks) are seen. Particles made up of 4 quarks or even 5 quarks apparently are possible too, although rarely, if ever, seen or detected. After all, particles with 4 or more quarks would have to include a couple of quarks of the same color, and maybe as a result they would not hold together for long.
@pukulu
@pukulu 3 года назад
8 varieties of gluons? That seems like too many but of course 8 equals 2 to the 3rd power. I suppose that if there were 4 different colors of quarks the model would include 16 (= 2 to the 4th power) varieties of gluons.
@gerakore8948
@gerakore8948 2 года назад
does this mean that there are 3 varieties of protons depending on which color the quarks are?
@MemeAnt
@MemeAnt 9 месяцев назад
Hello, if I may ask, is there a video on the 8 kinds of quarks? I haven’t been able to find a digestible source on it, and digging through Wikipedia rabbit holes is rather tricky, especially for someone who does not have every term memorized quite yet. Thanks!
@blacktoothgriner
@blacktoothgriner 3 года назад
Thirds; take that metric system!
@merukatukhbyet9400
@merukatukhbyet9400 5 лет назад
why chromodynamic is important?
@shrimpflea
@shrimpflea 4 года назад
seriously?
@Orion225
@Orion225 4 года назад
Why it got so less views? Anyway great video.
@ravinderbihali01
@ravinderbihali01 4 года назад
thnku so much sir
@atharvdeshpande6024
@atharvdeshpande6024 3 года назад
i did not understand how quarks keep the protons togeather
@trunghuong9797
@trunghuong9797 7 лет назад
giáo sư có thể nói cho em biết nhiều hơn về chấm lượng tử Cacbon không ạ? Carbon quantum dots?
@rakatmureshed5199
@rakatmureshed5199 6 лет назад
its just awesome professor. but can u tell me why quarks have charge????????
@ProfessorDaveExplains
@ProfessorDaveExplains 6 лет назад
hmm, i dunno! that would be a question for a particle physicist.
@NutBuddies
@NutBuddies Год назад
LET BRO COOK!!👨‍🍳👨‍🍳👨‍🍳👨‍🍳
@9fmradisapratama
@9fmradisapratama 2 года назад
I've looked up on google about quarks and it offered me strange and bizarre triangle plushies
@anwaraljnabi2143
@anwaraljnabi2143 5 лет назад
Hi I have question , now the quarks are the smallest particle and we know that protons has a charge of +1 and the neutrons has a charge of zero these all details are because of the quarks ; right ? But my question is how we know the electrons are negatively charged ? And the electrons do not have an internal structure , right ? Please can you help me ???
@ProfessorDaveExplains
@ProfessorDaveExplains 5 лет назад
well charge is easy to measure by demonstrating how a beam of electrons is deflected by a magnetic field. as to how we know that it's a fundamental particle, that's a little trickier to answer!
@anwaraljnabi2143
@anwaraljnabi2143 5 лет назад
@@ProfessorDaveExplains thanks a lot ☺ , really you are an amazing teacher .
@shashankchandra1068
@shashankchandra1068 3 года назад
Can u send the 2D or 3D image of quantum field plz?(example:electron field,up-quark field)
@projectmanagement2356
@projectmanagement2356 5 лет назад
Professor Dave. How much Americium-241 would it take to make an RI-TEG capable of powering the average American home?
@ProfessorDaveExplains
@ProfessorDaveExplains 5 лет назад
No idea what that is!
@projectmanagement2356
@projectmanagement2356 5 лет назад
@@ProfessorDaveExplains C'mon Dave you know what I'm talking about. I'm not asking about how to build a thermonuclear-turboramjet here. A "radio isotope thermo electric generator"
@projectmanagement2356
@projectmanagement2356 5 лет назад
Though any tips on the ceramic reactor core design would be helpful. I was thinking beryllium oxide and unranium oxide in a hexagaonal lattice, but I suppose lithium oxide may work as well.
@higgs_boson2231
@higgs_boson2231 2 года назад
Super late, but I assume it would take a lot more than the legal limit for Am-241, which is around 1mC. In order to possess more than that, you'd need to obtain an NRC general license, which is a pain in the ass to get. As to whether it would power your house (if you could obtain that much), its pretty unlikely it would power anything more than your bedroom since they aren't designed for large scale applications (as they are placed onto space probes).
@database2517
@database2517 3 года назад
I have 3000x more intelligence then my parents. And they always want to waste my time . Because they know it is the most valuable thing in this world.
@MisterTutor2010
@MisterTutor2010 5 лет назад
I thought the Force was mediated by Midicholorians :)
@carultch
@carultch 2 года назад
That is a force of nature that has yet to be discovered in our galaxy.
@9867935540
@9867935540 3 года назад
Yeah, yeah, ok , hmm, bouncer
@davidlanham99
@davidlanham99 4 года назад
I'm starting to hate physics. God is just fucking with us.
@firelow
@firelow 6 лет назад
What's up quark?
@TomHendricksMusea
@TomHendricksMusea 3 года назад
QUARKS DO NOT MAKE SENSE - or the 3rd quark is REALLY weird. Proton = 2 up , 1 down quarks. Neutron = 2 down, 1 up quarks. So the difference between the two is the 3rd quark. Both the proton and neutron, have one up and one down quark. That leaves the difference between the proton and neutron as the 3rd quark. So difference between a proton and neutron is due to whether the 3rd quark is up as in a proton, or down as in a neutron. So, if that's true then: The third quark determines these things: If it has an up quark - proton, then the particle is immortal. If it has a down quark - neutron, then the particle decays in 10 minutes. EXPLAIN If it has an up quark - a proton, then the particle has less mass then the neutron. If it has a down quark - a neutron, then the particle has .1% more mass than the proton. So the down quark weighs .1% more than the up quark. EXPLAIN Quarks have no measurable physical extension, and seem to exist at points. Yet that single point does all this and more. EXPLAIN The proton has an up quark, and that magic third quark also determines half of the electromagnetic force in the universe. And it in no way is like the electron, the other half, except in being an opposite charge. EXPLAIN The electron is one full charge. That magic third quark is 2/3+ charge, yet it determines half the charge of the universe. EXPLAIN. The up and down quarks combined for a proton or neutron, account for 1% of the mass - the rest is binding energy. That means that that third quark is by itself less than 1% of mass, yet still determines half the charge of the universe? EXPLAIN When three quarks team up only a small part of the proton's mass comes from the masses of the quarks. Most is binding energy. So that third quark has virtually no mass but can do all these magic things. EXPLAIN. Quarks interact strongly and link in twos or threes to make particles such as pions, protons, and neutrons. Yet the other half of the charge world, electrons, does none of these things. EXPLAIN Physics is a science of pairs. For every particle there is an anti-particle. Virtual particles come in pairs. Spin, waves destructive and constructive interference, etc. In these cases the pairs are virtually identical and or mirror images of each other. So why would electromagnetic charge have electrons and protons so different from each other, and in no way seem built on exact opposites, or mirror image opposites. EXPLAIN! There is the proton spin crisis where the 3 quarks and their spin doesn't work. "Physicists expected that the quarks carry all the proton spin. However, not only was the total proton spin carried by quarks far smaller than 100%, these results were consistent with almost zero (4-24%) proton spin being carried by quarks." Wiki. EXPLAIN. PARTICLE / WAVE duality includes atoms, electrons, protons, neutrons, quarks and gluons. Now imagine a nucleus of deuterium that has no particles only waves: that includes a proton wave, neutron wave, 6 quark waves, plus gluon waves. EXPLAIN Quarks exist in pairs, so why do protons and neutrons have three? Where did the third quark come from? Protons and neutrons are waves, so how can a wave have three quarks? Two quark meson are bosons not fermions. EXPLAIN Mesons, with 2 quarks are 1.2 times the size of a proton r neutron. EXPLAIN. NEITHER electrons or protons can decay, so both should be elementary particles, but protons are not considered elementary. EXPLAIN How can such a small electron match the charge of a massive proton? Explain. There is the proton radius puzzle. Explain. Quarks exist in pairs; so why does the proton and neutron have 3 quarks? Neutrons are made up of quarks which do have charges. So physicists expect neutrons to interact with the electric field - but they don't! Explain. Anti neutron and anti proton have anti quarks. Explain For a quark to be both a wave (and a particle), then it too must have at least a wave and a trough. So three quarks must have 3 waves. Explain Fact Neutron has no electric charge. Neutron has magnetic movement (So charge inside neutron acts like a small magnet) Explain. Fact Electric charge is not uniformly distributed inside neutron Close to the center you find positive charge. While outer regions are negatively charged. Explain Neutrons are radioactive if they are free of atoms If extra neutrons are added to shell it becomes extremely radioactive. Explain Strong force needed to keep protons from flying apart, but strong force is also applied to the neutron that has no charge. Explain "The proton is intermittently full of these virtual particles and, in fact when we try to estimate how much they might contribute to the mass of the proton, we find that the quarks themselves provide very little of the total mass and that the fields created by these particles contribute most of the energy that goes into the proton's rest energy and hence it's rest mass. The same is true for the neutron...." A universe from Nothing Krauss. Quote in Probable Universe p 48. EXPLAIN 'No one has been able to do with a quark what Thomson and Millikan did with an electron, measuring it's charges, or mass, or even it's charge to mass ratio. For this reason, we cannot yet include quarks among the ranks of the observed particles. "From neutrinos to the top quark there are 14 orders of magnitude of mass that the standard model needs to explain. This is hard to do even with the HIgg's Boson which is the missing ingredient. - Joanna Baler
@pasijutaulietuviuesas9174
@pasijutaulietuviuesas9174 4 года назад
The old triangle gluon-quark connection bugs me. It should be a Y connection of gluons between quarks.
@davidwatson7604
@davidwatson7604 5 месяцев назад
Algo boost! Lana Del Rey Lana Del Rey
@rummanmuhammad927
@rummanmuhammad927 6 лет назад
SOMEBODY UNLOCK HIS HANDCUFFS..
@zohrehrajaei5943
@zohrehrajaei5943 Год назад
😵‍💫🤔
@neotiwari3772
@neotiwari3772 2 года назад
Anyone here after watching Young Sheldon?
@manavaggarwal5424
@manavaggarwal5424 5 лет назад
saale explain the title.
@ranjitprasad2155
@ranjitprasad2155 4 года назад
Anyone here from Young Sheldon
Далее
The Standard Model of Particle Physics
7:33
Просмотров 118 тыс.
What Makes The Strong Force Strong?
21:37
Просмотров 1,1 млн
Новый уровень твоей сосиски
00:33
The Big Misconception About Electricity
14:48
Просмотров 22 млн
What is Spin? A Geometric explanation
20:28
Просмотров 312 тыс.
Quantum Mechanics and the Schrödinger Equation
6:28
Quantum Electrodynamics and Feynman Diagrams
15:33
Просмотров 543 тыс.
The Map of Quantum Physics
21:18
Просмотров 1,1 млн
What Happens Inside a Proton?
20:16
Просмотров 1,3 млн
I did the double slit experiment at home
15:26
Просмотров 1,9 млн